Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Life is Strange: Double Exposure cover image

Links

Steam

Twitch

MONSTER

Life is Strange: Double Exposure

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Life is Strange: Double Exposure
Item: Life is Strange: Double Exposure
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2024

GenresAdventure, Action, Drama, Single Player

AvailableOct 29, 2024

PlatformXbox Series X, PlayStation 5, PC

DeveloperDeck Nine Games

Overview

Max Caulfield, photographer-in-residence at the prestigious Caledon University, discovers her closest new friend Safi dead in the snow. Murdered. To save her, Max tries to Rewind time – a power she’s not used in years… Instead, Max opens the way to a parallel timeline where Safi is still alive and still in danger! Max realizes the killer will soon strike again – in both versions of reality. Only Max can Shift between the two parallel timelines to solve and prevent the same murder.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Life is Strange: Double Exposure evokes intrigue with its themes of grief and moral dilemmas, earning praise for character development and emotional depth. However, critics highlight significant flaws in coherence and character arcs, leading to a disjointed narrative experience. The dual-world mechanic feels underexplored and plot holes abound, disappointing many who expected a continuation of the franchise's high standards. Ultimately, while the game has potential, its pacing issues and unresolved plot threads leave it feeling like a mixed bag of brilliance overshadowed by shortcomings.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

55%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

31%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

14%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The overall sentiment surrounding the story of Life is Strange: Double Exposure reveals a mixture of intrigue and emotional depth, with several critics acknowledging its potential. Positive remarks highlight the engaging themes of grief, loss, and moral dilemmas that resonate throughout the narrative. For instance, Daily Star praises the story for being engaging and deep, emphasizing strong character development as Max Caulfield navigates the aftermath of her friend Safi's murder. Similarly, Movies Games and Tech commends the narrative as a powerful murder mystery that effectively explores themes of grief and guilt, showcasing a mature coming-of-age story. Critics like GamingBolt and Digital Chumps also appreciate the gripping tale and emotional depth, suggesting that the story has moments that resonate well with players. However, the negatives surrounding the story are pronounced and consistent among many reviewers. Critics frequently point out issues with character development and plot coherence, leading to a disjointed experience. For example, GameGrin criticizes the writing for its poor handling of character arcs and plot twists, while Worth Playing describes the narrative as disconnected and the weakest in the franchise. The introduction of a dual-world mechanic, while intriguing, is often seen as underexplored, with RPG Fan noting that it leaves many plot points unresolved. Additionally, several reviews, including those from Noisy Pixel and Guardian, mention plot holes and inconsistent character behaviors that detract from the overall narrative experience. The overall consensus among critics is that while Life is Strange: Double Exposure has intriguing elements and emotional themes, it ultimately fails to live up to the high standards set by its predecessor. Many reviewers, such as IGN Brasil and Try Hard Guides, express disappointment in the lack of emotional impact and depth compared to the original game. Despite some positive feedback regarding character development and the narrative's potential, the prevailing sentiment is that the story suffers from pacing issues, unresolved threads, and a lack of cohesive execution. As a result, Life is Strange: Double Exposure is viewed as a mixed bag, with moments of brilliance overshadowed by significant shortcomings.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Life is Strange: Double Exposure impresses with innovative mechanics and a captivating narrative, particularly its dual-timeline puzzle-solving and choice-and-consequence system. However, critics slam its execution, citing repetitive gameplay, fetch quests, and choices that feel weightless, making it more of an interactive film than a true adventure. While it retains the series' signature storytelling, it may disappoint those craving deeper interactivity.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

30%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

60%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

10%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Life is Strange: Double Exposure has garnered a mix of praise from critics, particularly for its innovative mechanics and narrative integration. Many reviewers, such as Eurogamer Germany and IGN, highlight the consistency of gameplay with previous entries while noting that Max's new powers are well integrated into the mechanics. Critics like GamingBolt and Shacknews appreciate the engaging choice-and-consequence system, which encourages players to think critically about their decisions. The new dual-timeline mechanic, as pointed out by IGN Brasil and COGconnected, adds a fresh layer to puzzle-solving and allows for a more dynamic exploration of the narrative, enhancing the overall experience for players. However, there are notable criticisms regarding the gameplay's execution. Some reviewers, including Noisy Pixel and SECTOR.sk, express frustration with the dual-timeline mechanic, describing it as poorly executed and leading to a more linear and straightforward experience than expected. Critics like RPG Fan and Daily Star mention that gameplay can feel repetitive, bogged down by fetch quests and dull moments that detract from the overall pacing. Additionally, several critics, such as Metro GameCentral and Xbox Tavern, point out that the choices often lack weight and impact, making the experience feel less engaging and more like an interactive film than a true adventure. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while Life is Strange: Double Exposure introduces intriguing mechanics that enhance the narrative, it suffers from execution issues that limit player engagement. Many reviewers appreciate the fresh elements brought by the dual-reality system, as noted by Impulsegamer and Vgames, but they also highlight the repetitive nature of gameplay and the lack of challenging puzzles, as echoed by critics like Worth Playing and GamesRadar+. The game successfully retains the series' signature storytelling style, but it may not fully meet the expectations of players seeking deeper interactivity and impactful choices.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Life is Strange: Double Exposure wows critics with stunning visuals powered by Unreal Engine 5, featuring realistic animations, vibrant colors, and emotional depth. While praised for its artistic style and storytelling, technical hiccups like texture pop-ins and frame rate drops, along with some generic environments, slightly mar the experience. Overall, it’s hailed as a major visual leap for the series, successfully marrying graphics with narrative despite its flaws.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

79%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

21%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of Life is Strange: Double Exposure have garnered widespread acclaim from critics, with many praising the impressive visuals enabled by Unreal Engine 5. Eurogamer Germany noted the realistic character animations, while IGN Brasil highlighted the stunning blend of realism with the franchise's signature art style, enhancing reflective moments throughout the game. Reviewers from GamingBolt and LevelUp echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the well-realized environments and character models that contribute to the overall storytelling experience. The vibrant color palettes and detailed character expressions were also frequently mentioned, with COGconnected and Daily Star commending the game for its emotional depth and engaging visual storytelling. Despite the overwhelmingly positive reception, several critics pointed out technical issues that detracted from the visual experience. Common complaints included texture pop-in, frame rate drops, and animation bugs, as noted by both Eurogamer Germany and GamingBolt. Additionally, some reviewers like Gameblog.fr and Vgames mentioned that the environments felt somewhat generic compared to previous entries, which may affect the overall immersion. The limited scope of locations was also highlighted by critics such as GamesHub and Oyungezer, suggesting that while the graphics are impressive, the variety and richness of environments could have been better. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Life is Strange: Double Exposure presents a significant visual upgrade over its predecessors, with many asserting that it features the best graphics in the series to date. Critics like Xbox Tavern and Movies Games and Tech praised the painterly aesthetic and detailed environments, while the contrasting aesthetics between the Living and Dead worlds were noted as enhancing emotional connections to the story, as highlighted by IGN Benelux. While technical issues were acknowledged, they did not overshadow the overall sentiment that the game successfully combines stunning visuals with a compelling narrative, making it a noteworthy addition to the franchise.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Life is Strange: Double Exposure impresses with its emotional soundtrack and immersive sound design, earning praise for Tessa Rose Jackson's original music that enhances the game’s narrative depth. Critics from various outlets highlight the strong combination of voice acting and indie music that elevates the experience. However, some note a lack of memorable tracks and technical audio issues, such as sound mixing problems, which can detract from immersion. Overall, while there are criticisms, the sound design and music are seen as essential to the game's impactful storytelling.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

56%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

44%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of Life is Strange: Double Exposure have garnered a predominantly positive reception from critics, with many praising the soundtrack's ability to enhance the emotional and narrative depth of the game. Reviewers like Eurogamer Germany and IGN highlight the exceptional original music by Tessa Rose Jackson, which is noted for capturing emotions and enhancing the tone of various realities within the game. Critics from XboxAddict and Daily Star emphasize the immersive experience created by the combination of well-executed voice acting and a rich selection of indie music. Furthermore, several reviewers, including Metro GameCentral and XGN, describe the soundtrack as a standout feature that significantly contributes to the overall atmosphere and emotional impact of the game. However, not all feedback is entirely positive. Some critics, such as Gameblog.fr and GameGrin, express disappointment with the soundtrack's memorability, suggesting it lacks standout tracks that would encourage repeated listening. Additionally, there are mentions of persistent audio issues, including sound mixing problems and inconsistencies in voice volume, as noted by Games.cz and Movies Games and Tech. These technical shortcomings detract from the otherwise well-received soundscape, leading to a mixed experience for some players. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Life is Strange: Double Exposure offers a compelling auditory experience, with a well-chosen soundtrack that complements the game's narrative and emotional stakes. While there are some criticisms regarding the memorability of the music and technical issues that affect immersion, the majority of reviewers, including those from IGN Adria and God is a Geek, agree that the sound design and music play a crucial role in enhancing the overall experience of the game. The combination of evocative tracks and effective sound design has left a positive impression, solidifying the game's place within the series' tradition of strong audio-visual storytelling.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

The voice acting in Life is Strange: Double Exposure is largely praised for its emotional depth and character development, with standout performances, especially from Hannah Telle as Max Caulfield. Critics commend it as a high point of the game, enhancing the narrative's impact. However, some reviewers noted issues with character chemistry and stilted dialogue that detracted from immersion, along with technical glitches disrupting the experience. Overall, it's a strong asset for the game, but improvements are needed in certain areas.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

78%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

19%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in Life is Strange: Double Exposure has garnered a predominantly positive reception from critics, with many praising the performances for their emotional depth and contribution to character development. Eurogamer Germany commended the strong voice acting that enhances the emotional weight of the narrative, while GamingBolt highlighted the wonderfully acted performances from a diverse cast that leaves a lasting impression. Critics like Xbox Tavern and Daily Star emphasized the emotional engagement and immersive quality of the voice acting, describing it as some of the best in the series. Notably, Hannah Telle's return as Max Caulfield has been a focal point of praise, with her performance being recognized for adding continuity and depth to the character, as noted by IGN Benelux and The New York Times. Despite the overall acclaim, some critics pointed out weaknesses in the voice acting that detracted from the experience. Noisy Pixel criticized the chemistry between characters and described the dialogue as forced, leading to a lack of connection with the new cast. Shacknews echoed this sentiment, mentioning instances of stilted dialogue that impacted immersion during conversations. Additionally, XGN raised concerns about technical issues, such as voice lines not playing at times, which could disrupt the flow of the narrative. These critiques indicate that while the majority of the voice performances were well-received, there are notable exceptions that some critics felt undermined the overall quality. In summary, the consensus among critics is that the voice acting in Life is Strange: Double Exposure is a strong asset to the game, with many lauding the performances for their emotional resonance and character depth. The majority of reviewers, including those from Adventure Gamers and GameGrin, highlighted the voice acting as a standout feature that enhances the narrative experience. However, the criticisms regarding character chemistry and dialogue quality suggest that there are areas for improvement. Overall, the game succeeds in delivering a compelling auditory experience, despite some noted shortcomings.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

"Life is Strange: Double Exposure" boasts improved technical performance on Xbox Series X and PS5, with smooth gameplay praised by some reviewers. However, significant issues lurk beneath the surface: Xbox faces frame rate instability and game-breaking bugs; PS5 users report audio glitches and crashes; and lower-end PCs struggle with performance. Overall, while the game shows promise, its technical flaws create a frustrating experience, underscoring the need for urgent patches and updates.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

71%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

23%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

In analyzing the technical performance of "Life is Strange: Double Exposure" across various platforms, there are notable positives that emerge from the reviews. For the Xbox Series X, several critics, including IGN Brasil and LevelUp, highlighted improvements in technical performance compared to earlier versions, with LevelUp noting a smooth experience and no bugs reported. On the PlayStation 5, most reviewers, such as Gameblog.fr and Hobby Consolas, found the game to run smoothly overall, with only minor technical flaws like texture pop-ins and audio inconsistencies. Similarly, on PC, Adventure Gamers and Merlin'in Kazanı reported stable performance and smooth user experiences, with minor graphical glitches being the only concern. However, the negatives for each platform reveal a more troubling picture. On Xbox Series X, Eurogamer Germany and Shacknews pointed out significant technical issues, including frame rate instability, texture pop-ins, and even game-breaking bugs that disrupt gameplay, as noted by Noisy Pixel. For the PlayStation 5, while some reviewers found the game stable, others, such as RPG Fan and MeuPlayStation, reported game-stopping bugs and various audio issues that detracted from the experience. On PC, while some critics acknowledged a generally stable performance, Vgames pointed out significant performance issues on lower-end hardware, and Gamer Escape mentioned jarring scene transitions that could disrupt immersion. Overall, the consensus among critics for all platforms is a mixed bag of experiences. While there are commendable aspects regarding the visual appeal and some improvements in performance, the presence of various technical issues—ranging from minor glitches to game-breaking bugs—creates a significant divide in player experience. Critics like Shacknews and RPG Fan emphasized that these issues can severely affect gameplay, leading to frustration. As a result, while "Life is Strange: Double Exposure" shows potential, the technical performance across platforms leaves much to be desired, suggesting that future patches and updates will be essential to enhance the overall experience.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

"Life is Strange: Double Exposure" sparks debate on replay value; critics praise its decision-making system and narrative complexity but lament the lack of emotional stakes and impactful choices. Some see potential for exploration, while others find the game's linearity and limited divergence dull, ultimately questioning the motivation for multiple playthroughs. A mixed consensus suggests it offers some replay incentives, but many agree it falls short in delivering compelling reasons to return.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

11%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

71%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

17%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions regarding the replay value of "Life is Strange: Double Exposure" reveal several positive aspects that critics have highlighted. Many reviewers, including Eurogamer Germany and IGN, emphasize the game's decision-making system, which encourages players to explore different outcomes and paths. Critics like COGconnected and Movies Games and Tech also note that the choices made throughout the game significantly impact relationships with supporting characters, enhancing the replayability factor. Additionally, some reviewers, such as GamesRadar+ and Adventure Gamers, mention that the narrative complexity and potential for sequels create intrigue for players to revisit the game, suggesting that there are layers to the story that can be uncovered through multiple playthroughs. However, a significant number of critics express concerns regarding the game's overall replay value. LevelUp and SECTOR.sk point out that the emotional stakes in player decisions are lacking, which diminishes the motivation to replay. Xbox Tavern and Games.cz echo this sentiment, stating that the choices do not feel impactful enough to warrant multiple playthroughs. Furthermore, critics like RPG Fan and GameGrin argue that the limited narrative divergence and the overall structure of the game may lead to a lack of engagement, making revisiting the game less appealing. The linearity of the storyline, as noted by Daily Star and Vandal, also contributes to the perception that replayability is not a strong selling point. The overall consensus among critics is mixed, with a divide between those who appreciate the game's potential for exploration and those who feel it falls short in delivering a compelling reason to replay. While some reviewers, such as IGN Brasil and Impulsegamer, highlight the value of exploring different character dynamics and outcomes, others like XboxAddict and Wccftech emphasize the limitations posed by the game's structure and emotional resonance. Ultimately, while "Life is Strange: Double Exposure" offers some replay value through its choices and narrative complexity, many critics agree that the lack of significant consequences and emotional stakes may hinder players' desire to engage in multiple playthroughs.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

48%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

48%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

In analyzing the overall sentiment surrounding "Life is Strange: Double Exposure," it's clear that many critics appreciate the game's strong elements, particularly its visuals, soundtrack, and character interactions. Reviewers such as God is a Geek and GamesHub commend the narrative's emotional depth and the engaging performances that resonate with fans of the series. Additionally, some critics, like Eurogamer Germany and COGconnected, highlight the continuation of Max Caulfield's story as a compelling aspect, praising the new gameplay mechanics and the nostalgic elements that appeal to long-time players. The game has been recognized for its potential to deliver a captivating experience, with several reviewers noting that it successfully captures the essence of the original while introducing new dynamics. However, the game is not without its significant drawbacks. Many critics express dissatisfaction with the narrative's coherence and depth, with GameGrin and RPG Fan pointing out a confusing plot and poor character development that detracts from the overall experience. Technical issues also plague the title, as noted by Shacknews and Xbox Tavern, which mention that these problems hinder the gameplay experience. Furthermore, several reviews indicate that the game lacks the impactful choices that were a hallmark of its predecessors, leading to a feeling of disappointment among fans who had high expectations for a sequel. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed, with a noticeable divide between those who find merit in the game's emotional storytelling and nostalgic elements and those who feel it falls short of the series' legacy. While some, like Hey Poor Player, regard it as a potential standout in the series, others, such as Metro GameCentral and Worth Playing, view it as an unnecessary sequel that fails to fully capitalize on its premise. Ultimately, "Life is Strange: Double Exposure" appears to be a solid yet flawed continuation of the franchise that may entertain fans but leaves many longing for the depth and innovation of earlier entries.

TL;DR

"Life is Strange: Double Exposure" impresses with stunning visuals, emotional storytelling, and nostalgic ties to the original, but suffers from a confusing plot, weak character development, and technical issues. Critics are divided; while some see it as a worthy sequel, others deem it a disappointing follow-up that fails to meet the franchise's legacy. Overall, it offers moments of enjoyment but leaves many fans wanting more depth and impactful choices.

MONSTER

Reviews

170 reviews found

100

Hey Poor Player

Xbox Series X

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The reviewer expresses high satisfaction with the game, considering it potentially the best in the series and a strong contender for the best games of 2024, giving it a perfect score.

100

Player 2

PlayStation 5

Oct 31, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Despite its flaws, the game resonates deeply with the reviewer, highlighting its character depth and exploration of complex themes. It is a personal and impactful experience, particularly for fans of the series.

Read full review

Movies Games and Tech

PlayStation 5

Nov 14, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure sets a new benchmark for the franchise with its thought-provoking story, engaging gameplay, stunning graphics, and exceptional soundtrack, despite minor sound issues.

Read full review

TierraGamer

PlayStation 5

Oct 29, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is a significant improvement for Deck Nine, showcasing a mature narrative and engaging gameplay that makes it a worthwhile experience.

Read full review

God is a Geek

PlayStation 5

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is a brilliant continuation of Max's story, offering a mix of nostalgia and fresh storytelling, supported by strong characters, visuals, and music, despite occasional gameplay clarity issues.

Read full review

IGN

Xbox Series X

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is praised for living up to the original, offering a fresh direction, and improving on nearly every aspect, making it a highly recommended experience.

Read full review

Adventure Gamers

Jan 24, 2025

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life Is Strange: Double Exposure meets the expectations of the series with compelling characters, strong writing, and an emotionally resonant story, making it a worthwhile experience for both newcomers and series fans.

GamingBolt

Xbox Series X

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is an excellent sophomore outing for beloved protagonist Max Caulfield, justifying its existence with a gripping story and engaging gameplay, despite some occasional writing issues and technical rough edges.

Read full review

Digital Chumps

PlayStation 5

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is praised for capturing the emotional essence of the series while introducing new elements and mysteries, leaving the reviewer excited for the future of the franchise.

Read full review

Gamer Escape

Oct 30, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure successfully captures the essence of the original while introducing new elements, making it a worthy addition to the series.