Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Life is Strange: Double Exposure cover image

Links

Steam

Twitch

MONSTER

Life is Strange: Double Exposure

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Life is Strange: Double Exposure
Item: Life is Strange: Double Exposure
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2024

GenresAdventure, Action, Drama, Single Player

AvailableOct 29, 2024

PlatformXbox Series X, PlayStation 5, PC

DeveloperDeck Nine Games

Overview

Max Caulfield, photographer-in-residence at the prestigious Caledon University, discovers her closest new friend Safi dead in the snow. Murdered. To save her, Max tries to Rewind time – a power she’s not used in years… Instead, Max opens the way to a parallel timeline where Safi is still alive and still in danger! Max realizes the killer will soon strike again – in both versions of reality. Only Max can Shift between the two parallel timelines to solve and prevent the same murder.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Life is Strange: Double Exposure offers a compelling mix of emotional depth and intriguing mystery, praised for its character growth and exploration of heavy themes. However, critics are divided, citing major flaws like shallow writing, a confusing dual-timeline mechanic, and a lack of coherence that detracts from the story's impact. While it has moments of brilliance, it ultimately fails to capture the magic of its predecessor, leaving many players disappointed.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

55%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

31%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

14%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

In analyzing the opinions of various critics on the story of Life is Strange: Double Exposure, it is evident that the game has its share of positives. Many reviewers, such as God is a Geek and Digital Chumps, highlight the emotional depth and character growth present in the narrative. The story, which follows Max Caulfield as she investigates the murder of her friend Safi, is praised for its exploration of themes like grief, trauma, and moral ambiguity. Critics like COGconnected and Impulsegamer commend the intriguing mystery and the clever twists that keep players engaged, while others, such as Vgames and Movies Games and Tech, appreciate the effective intertwining of past and present narratives that add complexity to Max's character journey. However, the consensus among critics also points to significant shortcomings in the story. Many reviewers, including GameGrin and Dexerto, criticize the writing for its lack of depth and coherence, particularly in character development and plot resolution. The dual-timeline mechanic, while ambitious, is often described as confusing and disjointed, as noted by Noisy Pixel and Xbox Tavern, leading to a narrative that feels scattered and unresolved. Critics like Worth Playing and RPG Fan further emphasize that the story fails to connect with the rich themes of the original game, leaving many feeling disappointed and disconnected from the characters and their journeys. Overall, the critics seem to agree that Life is Strange: Double Exposure presents a mixed bag in terms of narrative quality. While some reviewers, like Shacknews and Daily Star, find the story engaging and filled with potential, many others express dissatisfaction with its execution. The game appears to struggle with maintaining the emotional resonance and character-driven storytelling that defined its predecessor, leaving a divide among players and critics alike. The combination of intriguing elements and significant narrative flaws suggests that while the game has moments of brilliance, it ultimately falls short of fulfilling the expectations set by the original Life is Strange series.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Life is Strange: Double Exposure impresses with its captivating narrative and innovative time-shifting mechanics, earning praise for its chapter-based storytelling and engaging puzzles. However, criticisms highlight flaws in execution, with some finding the dual-timeline feature poorly implemented and the gameplay repetitive. While the game has potential and offers thought-provoking decisions, issues with pacing and meaningful choices hinder the overall experience. Critics agree it’s a mixed bag—offering great storytelling but struggling to fully deliver on its gameplay promises.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

30%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

60%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

10%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Life is Strange: Double Exposure has garnered a range of positive feedback from critics, particularly for its engaging narrative and innovative mechanics. Many reviewers, including Eurogamer Germany and GamingBolt, praised the integration of Max's new time-shifting powers, which add a fresh layer to the gameplay experience. The chapter-based storytelling format has been highlighted as a strong point, allowing for a natural flow of the narrative, as noted by Hey Poor Player and IGN. Critics like COGconnected and Impulsegamer appreciated the clever puzzles that arise from the dual-timeline mechanic, which not only enhances player engagement but also deepens the narrative experience. Additionally, the decision-making elements have been recognized for their ability to provoke thought and reflection, making the gameplay feel impactful. However, several criticisms have emerged regarding the gameplay's execution and overall depth. Some reviewers, such as Noisy Pixel and SECTOR.sk, expressed frustration with the dual-timeline mechanic, describing it as poorly executed and leading to a linear experience that lacks player engagement. The repetitive nature of exploration and puzzles has also been a common point of contention, with critics like RPG Fan and Daily Star pointing out that fetch quests and simplistic mechanics can bog down the pacing and diminish the overall excitement. Furthermore, many critics, including Metro GameCentral and Xbox Tavern, noted that while the new mechanics are intriguing, they often lack the weight and impact necessary to make choices feel meaningful, leading to moments of disengagement. The overall consensus among critics suggests that while Life is Strange: Double Exposure offers a compelling narrative and introduces innovative gameplay mechanics, it struggles with execution and pacing issues that detract from the player experience. Many reviewers, including GamesRadar+ and Vandal, recognized the potential of the new timeline-switching abilities but felt that they could have been better fleshed out to enhance the gameplay's depth. Ultimately, the game appears to be a mixed bag, delivering engaging storytelling and fresh ideas while also facing challenges that may leave some players wanting more from the experience.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Life is Strange: Double Exposure wows critics with its stunning visuals powered by Unreal Engine 5, showcasing realistic animations and vibrant color palettes that enhance emotional storytelling. While praised for its art direction and character designs, the game faces criticism for technical issues like texture pop-ins and frame rate drops, as well as limited environmental scope compared to earlier entries. Despite these drawbacks, the consensus is that it sets a new visual benchmark for the franchise.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

79%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

21%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of Life is Strange: Double Exposure have received overwhelmingly positive feedback from critics, highlighting the game's impressive use of Unreal Engine 5. Reviewers from Eurogamer Germany and GamingBolt praised the realistic character animations and well-realized environments, noting that the visuals significantly enhance the storytelling experience. IGN Brasil and LevelUp emphasized the stunning blend of realism with the franchise's signature art style, which effectively captures the emotional depth of the narrative. Critics like Dexerto and Movies Games and Tech noted the detailed character designs and expressive facial animations, which contribute to a more immersive experience. The vibrant color palettes used to differentiate between the 'living' and 'dead' worlds were also commended, with COGconnected and God is a Geek highlighting how these visual choices enhance the emotional storytelling. Despite the strong praise, several critics pointed out notable technical issues that detract from the overall visual experience. Issues such as texture pop-ins and frame rate drops were mentioned by Eurogamer Germany and GamingBolt, while Player 2 noted glitches in character models that could potentially disrupt immersion. Critics like Vgames highlighted performance problems on lower-end systems, which could hinder the experience for some players. Additionally, some reviewers, including Gameblog.fr and Games.cz, expressed concerns about the relatively limited scope of environments compared to previous entries, suggesting that while the graphics are impressive, they may lack the unique charm of earlier settings. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Life is Strange: Double Exposure features a visually stunning presentation that significantly elevates the franchise's standards. The majority of reviewers, including those from IGN and Shacknews, agree that the game's art direction and character animations are among the best seen in the series, contributing to a rich emotional landscape. While technical issues and some environmental limitations were noted, they did not overshadow the general sentiment that the game offers a compelling visual experience. As a result, Double Exposure is recognized for its aesthetic achievements, setting a high bar for future titles in the series.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Life is Strange: Double Exposure receives praise for its evocative soundtrack by Tessa Rose Jackson, enhancing the game's emotional depth and atmosphere. Critics commend its indie music selection, but some note it lacks the memorable moments of previous titles and suffers from technical issues like inconsistent volume. Overall, the sound design is a strong but flawed element, significantly contributing to the game's experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

56%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

44%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of Life is Strange: Double Exposure have garnered a largely positive reception from critics across various platforms. Many reviewers, including Eurogamer Germany and IGN, highlight the exceptional quality of the original music by Tessa Rose Jackson, praising its ability to capture emotions and enhance the narrative. The soundtrack is frequently described as well-chosen and evocative, with several critics like XboxAddict and God is a Geek noting how it complements the game's atmosphere and emotional depth. The indie music selection has been particularly appreciated, with critics from outlets like XGN and Vgames emphasizing how it enhances the overall experience and fits seamlessly within the game's artistic setting. However, not all feedback is entirely favorable. Some critics, such as Gameblog.fr and GameGrin, express disappointment, suggesting that the soundtrack lacks the memorable moments found in previous titles and fails to encourage repeated listening. There are also mentions of technical issues, such as inconsistent voice volume and sound mixing problems, which several reviewers, including RPG Fan and Vandal, note can disrupt immersion. These issues detract from an otherwise strong auditory experience, leading to a mixed sentiment regarding the overall execution of sound design. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while Life is Strange: Double Exposure features a strong and emotionally resonant soundtrack that enhances the narrative, it is marred by some technical shortcomings. The majority of reviews, such as those from IGN Adria and Daily Star, commend the music's role in creating atmosphere and pacing, reinforcing the game's emotional stakes. Despite the noted issues, the sound design and music are regarded as significant components of the game, contributing positively to the overall experience, with many critics still considering it a standout feature of the title.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

The voice acting in Life is Strange: Double Exposure is largely celebrated for its emotional depth, especially Hannah Telle's return as Max Caulfield, which enhances narrative continuity and character immersion. Critics praise the overall quality, noting a strong performance from the French voice cast, but some point out issues like stilted dialogue and character chemistry that can break immersion. Despite minor criticisms, the consensus is that the voice acting significantly elevates the game's emotional impact and narrative strength.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

78%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

19%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in Life is Strange: Double Exposure has garnered significant praise from a majority of critics, who highlight it as one of the game's strongest elements. Critics from Eurogamer Germany and XboxAddict commend the performances for their emotional depth and realism, contributing positively to character development and immersion. Hannah Telle's return as Max Caulfield is particularly celebrated, with reviewers like IGN Benelux and GamesRadar+ emphasizing how her performance enhances the narrative and provides continuity within the series. The French voice acting is also noted as a strong point, receiving accolades from Jeuxvideo.com, which highlights its contribution to the overall experience. Many reviewers, including Daily Star and Movies Games and Tech, describe the voice acting as superb, enhancing the emotional weight of the story and making the characters feel real and engaging. However, not all opinions are uniformly positive. Some critics, like Noisy Pixel and Shacknews, point out issues with character chemistry and stilted dialogue, which can detract from the immersion and connection with the new cast. While the majority of the voice acting is praised, there are mentions of inconsistencies, such as voice lines not playing at times, as noted by XGN. Additionally, Vandal mentions that while the returning cast delivers strong performances, one character's portrayal is criticized for being overly exaggerated, indicating that there are moments where the voice acting may not resonate as well with all players. Overall, the consensus among critics is largely favorable, with the majority recognizing the voice acting in Life is Strange: Double Exposure as a significant strength that enhances the game's emotional and narrative depth. The performances, particularly by Hannah Telle, are frequently highlighted as exceptional, contributing positively to character immersion and engagement. While there are some criticisms regarding dialogue and character chemistry, these do not overshadow the overall appreciation for the voice acting quality, as reflected in the reviews from sources like GamingBolt and Digital Chumps, which affirm that the voice performances are a key element in making the game a compelling experience.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Life is Strange: Double Exposure shows mixed technical performance across platforms. Xbox Series X has some improvements but suffers from significant bugs and frame rate drops. PS5 runs smoothly overall but has game-stopping issues and audio glitches. PC users also face performance problems, especially on lower-end hardware. While there are positives, persistent bugs and technical flaws detract from the experience, leaving critics urging for patches to fix these issues.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

71%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

23%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

In analyzing the technical performance of Life is Strange: Double Exposure across different gaming platforms, it is evident that there are some positives worth noting. For the Xbox Series X, several critics, including IGN Brasil and LevelUp, reported improvements in technical performance from preview versions, with LevelUp even highlighting a smooth experience and quick loading times. On the PlayStation 5, the game generally runs smoothly, with critics like Gameblog.fr and Hobby Consolas acknowledging minor technical flaws but overall stability. Similarly, on PC, Adventure Gamers and Merlin'in Kazanı noted a stable user experience, with smooth frame rates and only minor graphical glitches, suggesting that the game performs adequately on this platform. However, the negatives associated with each platform cannot be overlooked. On the Xbox Series X, critics like Shacknews and Noisy Pixel pointed out significant performance issues, including frame rate drops, texture pop-ins, and even game-breaking bugs that hinder progression. This sentiment is echoed by Xbox Tavern, which noted that various bugs disrupt the narrative flow. On the PlayStation 5, while some critics found the performance stable, others like RPG Fan and MeuPlayStation highlighted serious issues, including game-stopping bugs and audio problems that necessitate a restart. On PC, Vgames reported significant performance issues on lower-end hardware, while Gamer Escape noted jarring scene transitions that could disrupt immersion, indicating that the game may not be optimized for all configurations. Overall, the consensus among critics across all platforms suggests a mixed reception regarding technical performance. While there are commendable aspects, such as improved stability on the PS5 and Xbox Series X, the presence of bugs and performance issues remains a significant concern. Critics like Shacknews and RPG Fan emphasize that these technical flaws can detract from the overall experience, leading to frustration among players. Therefore, while Life is Strange: Double Exposure offers a visually appealing narrative experience, its technical performance appears to be hampered by various issues that need addressing through patches and updates.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Life is Strange: Double Exposure garners mixed reviews on replay value. Some critics praise its decision-making system and character connections, suggesting worthwhile replayability, while others argue the short experience and lack of impactful choices diminish motivation for multiple playthroughs. Overall, the game has potential but falls short in narrative depth, leading to a divided reception.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

11%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

71%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

17%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions on the replay value of Life is Strange: Double Exposure present a mixed but generally positive outlook from several reviewers. Critics like Eurogamer Germany and IGN highlight the game’s decision-making system, which encourages players to explore different outcomes and story paths, suggesting that replaying the game can be a worthwhile experience. Additionally, IGN Brasil emphasizes the appeal for franchise fans, noting that the game allows players to reconnect with familiar characters and environments, further enhancing its replayability. COGconnected and Movies Games and Tech also support this notion, pointing out that choices significantly impact relationships and character interactions, inviting players to dive deeper into the narrative. Conversely, a notable number of critics express skepticism regarding the game’s replay value. LevelUp and Xbox Tavern argue that the experience feels short and that the choices made throughout the game lack impact, which diminishes motivation for multiple playthroughs. SECTOR.sk and Games.cz echo these sentiments, stating that the absence of significant emotional stakes and consequences for player decisions detracts from the overall replayability. Furthermore, RPG Fan and GameGrin reinforce the idea that the story's shortcomings overshadow any potential enjoyment from revisiting the game, indicating a consensus that the narrative may not be compelling enough to warrant repeated exploration. Overall, the consensus among critics suggests a divided reception regarding the replay value of Life is Strange: Double Exposure. While some reviewers, such as GamesRadar+ and TheSixthAxis, acknowledge the potential for replayability through branching storylines and character dynamics, many others highlight the limitations imposed by a lack of impactful choices and narrative depth. Critics like Vandal and Wccftech emphasize that the game's structure may not encourage significant replayability, ultimately leading to a sentiment that, while there is some replay value, it is not as robust or enticing as it could be.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

48%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

48%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

In analyzing the overall sentiment surrounding "Life is Strange: Double Exposure," it is evident that several critics appreciate the game's visual enhancements, emotional depth, and character development. For instance, IGN praised the game for living up to the original while offering a fresh direction, highlighting improvements across various aspects. Critics like COGconnected and GamesHub echoed this sentiment, commending the strong writing, engaging characters, and emotionally resonant storytelling that effectively captures the essence of the series. Additionally, some reviewers, such as Digital Chumps and GamingBolt, noted the successful integration of supernatural mechanics and the gripping narrative, suggesting that the game has the potential to excite both longtime fans and newcomers alike. Conversely, a significant number of critics pointed out various shortcomings that detracted from the overall experience. Reviewers like RPG Fan and GameGrin criticized the game for its confusing plot choices, poor character development, and unresolved storylines, leading to a sense of disappointment for fans of the series. Technical issues were frequently mentioned, with Noisy Pixel and Xbox Tavern highlighting the game's struggles with performance and pacing, which undermined the initial promise showcased in the early episodes. Furthermore, some critics, including Worth Playing and Dexerto, described the game as feeling more like an unnecessary side story rather than a worthy sequel, suggesting that it fails to capture the impactful choices that defined its predecessors. Overall, the consensus among critics appears to be mixed, with a divide between those who found "Life is Strange: Double Exposure" to be a compelling continuation of Max Caulfield's journey and those who viewed it as a flawed entry in the franchise. While several reviewers, such as IGN Adria and The New York Times, acknowledged the nostalgic experience and emotional storytelling, others like My critic name and GameGrin expressed disappointment in the narrative depth and character development. Ultimately, while the game has its merits, the prevailing sentiment suggests that it may not fully satisfy all fans, leaving a sense of longing for the impactful storytelling that characterized the original titles in the series.

TL;DR

"Life is Strange: Double Exposure" garners mixed reviews; praised for visual upgrades and emotional depth by some critics, while others slam confusing plots, poor character development, and technical issues. Fans are split—some see it as a fresh continuation, others deem it a lackluster side story that fails to capture the series' essence. Overall, it may leave dedicated fans wanting more of the impactful storytelling that defined the originals.

MONSTER

Reviews

170 reviews found

100

Hey Poor Player

Xbox Series X

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The reviewer expresses high satisfaction with the game, considering it potentially the best in the series and a strong contender for the best games of 2024, giving it a perfect score.

100

Player 2

PlayStation 5

Oct 31, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Despite its flaws, the game resonates deeply with the reviewer, highlighting its character depth and exploration of complex themes. It is a personal and impactful experience, particularly for fans of the series.

Read full review

Movies Games and Tech

PlayStation 5

Nov 14, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure sets a new benchmark for the franchise with its thought-provoking story, engaging gameplay, stunning graphics, and exceptional soundtrack, despite minor sound issues.

Read full review

TierraGamer

PlayStation 5

Oct 29, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is a significant improvement for Deck Nine, showcasing a mature narrative and engaging gameplay that makes it a worthwhile experience.

Read full review

GamingBolt

Xbox Series X

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is an excellent sophomore outing for beloved protagonist Max Caulfield, justifying its existence with a gripping story and engaging gameplay, despite some occasional writing issues and technical rough edges.

Read full review

IGN

Xbox Series X

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is praised for living up to the original, offering a fresh direction, and improving on nearly every aspect, making it a highly recommended experience.

Read full review

Adventure Gamers

Jan 24, 2025

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life Is Strange: Double Exposure meets the expectations of the series with compelling characters, strong writing, and an emotionally resonant story, making it a worthwhile experience for both newcomers and series fans.

Digital Chumps

PlayStation 5

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is praised for capturing the emotional essence of the series while introducing new elements and mysteries, leaving the reviewer excited for the future of the franchise.

Read full review

God is a Geek

PlayStation 5

Oct 28, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is a brilliant continuation of Max's story, offering a mix of nostalgia and fresh storytelling, supported by strong characters, visuals, and music, despite occasional gameplay clarity issues.

Read full review

Gamer Escape

Oct 30, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Life is Strange: Double Exposure successfully captures the essence of the original while introducing new elements, making it a worthy addition to the series.