ROUTINE

The story of ROUTINE is widely praised for its atmospheric tension, environmental storytelling, and immersive sci-fi horror elements. Critics like CGMagazine highlight its intriguing plot that avoids overwhelming themes while building dread through visual cues and text logs, such as fragmented communications and a lunar colony’s mysterious events. Critical Hits and Final Weapon commend the game’s well-paced narrative structure, with the latter noting its effective use of cosmic horror and unsettling revelations to create psychological tension. TheSixthAxis draws comparisons to Alien and Moon, praising the blend of mundane technician tasks with existential dread, while Gamekult emphasizes the eerie atmosphere and analog horror influences that evoke a sense of isolation. Many reviewers also appreciate the layered mystery, with GamingBolt and Voxel pointing out how scattered documents and recordings add depth, even if they leave some questions unanswered. However, several critics critique ROUTINE for its lack of narrative resolution, character development, and originality. Checkpoint Gaming and Game8 note that the story’s opacity and minimal character arcs leave players unsatisfied, with the latter criticizing the protagonist as an “empty vessel” that limits emotional investment. Critical Hits and PC Gamer point to reliance on familiar sci-fi tropes, such as corporate dystopia and malfunctioning AI, which feel unoriginal despite strong execution. Voxel and Wccftech highlight disjointed progression and a confusing narrative structure, while WellPlayed and PC Games criticize the predictable supernatural elements in the second half and the game’s failure to fully engage with its premise. IGN and GamesRadar+ acknowledge loose ends and logical inconsistencies, suggesting that the story’s ambition is undermined by its execution, even if it keeps players hooked. Overall, critics agree that ROUTINE excels as a atmospheric, mystery-driven experience but struggles with narrative depth and coherence. While CGMagazine, Final Weapon, and TheSixthAxis celebrate its immersive worldbuilding and thematic richness, others like PC Gamer and Voxel argue that its reliance on environmental storytelling comes at the cost of meaningful character development or a satisfying conclusion. The game’s divisive ending, noted by GRYOnline.pl and WellPlayed, reflects a broader split between those who appreciate its ambiguity and symbolic themes versus those who find it unsatisfying. Despite these flaws, ROUTINE is consistently praised for its ability to evoke tension and curiosity through its retro-futuristic setting and fragmented narrative, making it a standout example of atmospheric sci-fi horror even if it falls short of groundbreaking storytelling.

The gameplay of ROUTINE is widely praised for its immersive, mechanics-driven design that prioritizes environmental interaction and player intuition. Critics like CGMagazine highlight the game’s tense, engaging systems, which rely on spatial audio, environmental cues, and the C.A.T. tool to create a deeply immersive experience. Game Informer and Critical Hits commend the tactile, logic-based puzzles that resemble escape-room challenges, emphasizing their creativity and the satisfaction of solving them through precise interactions with the environment. The C.A.T. tool is frequently lauded as a standout mechanic, offering unique ways to engage with objects, such as hacking terminals or manipulating machinery, while PC Gamer and The A.V. Club note its role in balancing tension during chases and problem-solving. Many reviewers, including Game8 and Voxel, appreciate the minimalistic design and lack of HUDs, which enhance immersion by forcing players to rely on observation and environmental storytelling. However, several critics point to significant drawbacks that detract from the experience. Checkpoint Gaming and IGN criticize puzzles for being overly obscure or requiring excessive detail-oriented searching, while Game Rant and GamesRadar+ describe the gameplay as repetitive, with predictable enemy behavior and a lack of evolving mechanics. The absence of tutorials, maps, and pause functions is frequently cited as frustrating, particularly by IGN and Windows Central, who note that these design choices can alienate players unaccustomed to the game’s minimalist approach. Additionally, Gameliner and Voxel mention that some puzzles feel unnecessarily complex or confusing, while Game Rant outright calls the gameplay “boring” due to tedious backtracking and a lack of dynamic combat. The stealth mechanics, though praised for their tension by PC Gamer and Metro GameCentral, are criticized as simplistic or underdeveloped by Gamereactor UK and The A.V. Club. Overall, the critics present a mixed but largely balanced view of ROUTINE’s gameplay. While many celebrate its innovative mechanics, immersive design, and creative puzzle-solving (as noted by Critical Hits, Game Informer, and PC Gamer), others find it frustrating due to its steep learning curve, repetitive elements, and lack of guidance. The consensus leans toward the game’s ambition and uniqueness, with reviewers like Voxel and Wccftech acknowledging its strengths despite flaws. However, the polarizing nature of its design—prioritizing challenge over accessibility—means that players’ enjoyment will likely depend on their tolerance for ambiguity and patience with obscure mechanics. Despite these criticisms, ROUTINE is frequently recognized as a bold experiment in immersive gameplay, even if it occasionally falters under the weight of its own complexity.

The graphics and visual design of ROUTINE are widely praised for their immersive retro-futuristic aesthetic, which blends nostalgic 1970s and 1980s sci-fi elements with modern technical detail. Critics consistently highlight the game’s ability to evoke a decaying lunar base through meticulous environmental storytelling. CGMagazine notes the “retro-futuristic aesthetic [that] blends grungy, dreamlike visuals with Unreal Engine detailing,” while Critical Hits emphasizes the “striking 1980s sci-fi aesthetic” and “flickering CRT monitors, cluttered lunar bases, and retro interfaces.” Final Weapon applauds the “analog-inspired technology” and “grainy look that enhances the unsettling tone,” comparing it to Alien and Silent Running. The use of period-accurate tech like CRT displays, VHS-era designs, and industrial machinery—such as “worn environments” (PC Gamer) and “liminal spaces” (IGN Deutschland)—creates a cohesive, atmospheric setting. Many critics, including Gamekult and PC Games, praise the deliberate choice to prioritize thematic coherence over raw graphical fidelity, using subtle details like flickering lights and decaying infrastructure to amplify tension. Despite these strengths, some reviewers point to technical and stylistic limitations. Game8 criticizes “excessive darkness” and “noticeable frame rate drops on PC during intense sequences,” which detract from immersion despite “convincing environmental details.” IGN notes the visuals are “old-fashioned” and occasionally frustrating due to issues like “flickering screens,” while Wccftech observes that the game “looks best at lower resolutions, evoking a vintage feel reminiscent of older horror games.” Additionally, some critics argue that the retro aesthetic, though effective, may feel overly nostalgic or restrictive. For instance, Game Informer mentions the “gritty film grain” and “decaying lunar station,” which, while atmospheric, might not appeal to players seeking hyper-realistic graphics. These critiques suggest that while ROUTINE’s visual design excels in creating mood, its reliance on analog horror tropes and technical compromises could limit its broader appeal. Overall, the majority of critics celebrate ROUTINE’s graphics and visual design as a standout achievement, with praise for its ability to immerse players in a believable, eerie lunar base. The retro-futuristic approach—rooted in 1970s/80s aesthetics—is seen as both innovative and effective, with reviewers like Voxel comparing it to Dead Space for its “cohesive sense of isolation,” and Windows Central calling the art direction “immaculate.” Even critics who noted technical flaws, such as Game8’s frame rate issues or IGN’s “old-fashioned” remarks, acknowledge the visual design’s contribution to the game’s atmosphere. The consensus is that ROUTINE’s visuals are a critical component of its success, balancing nostalgic charm with modern engine capabilities to create a haunting, immersive experience. As Gamereactor UK puts it, the “meticulously detailed” moon base “creates a strong atmospheric presence,” reinforcing the game’s reputation as a visually compelling entry in the sci-fi horror genre.

The majority of critics overwhelmingly praise ROUTINE’s sound design as a cornerstone of its immersive and tense atmosphere. CGMagazine highlights the "eerie ambiance" and "bitcrushed audio effects," while Gamekult lauds its "spatial audio, ambient noises, and eerie soundscapes," comparing it to Mick Gordon’s work on DOOM for its suspense-building prowess. IGN emphasizes "unsettling ambient noises" and the absence of a traditional HUD, which heightens tension through auditory cues alone. PCGamesN applauds the "meticulous attention to audio details," such as the CAT’s mechanical sounds and dynamic musical cues, creating a claustrophobic experience. Voxel and WellPlayed both note how silence and subtle mechanical noises—like creaking tiles or distant echoes—amplify isolation and unease, reinforcing the game’s psychological horror. These elements collectively establish sound design as a defining strength, with many reviewers citing its ability to evoke fear through atmosphere rather than overt scares. While the sound design is universally praised, some critics note that the musical score receives less attention or feels underdeveloped. Checkpoint Gaming describes the music as "understated and not particularly memorable," while Game8 mentions that "no tracks are truly memorable" despite the sparse, purposeful use of music. Critical Hits and Hardcore Gamer also point out that the review lacks specific details about the musical score, leaving this aspect somewhat underexplored. Additionally, IGN and others note that the audio cues sometimes rely on players’ imagination for fear, which could be seen as a limitation. Though these critiques are minor, they suggest that while sound design excels in creating tension, the music itself does not leave a lasting impression compared to other elements of the game. The overall consensus among critics is overwhelmingly positive, with nearly all agreeing that ROUTINE’s sound design is a standout feature that significantly enhances its horror and immersion. Reviewers like Gamekult, IGN, and PCGamesN emphasize how environmental audio—such as flickering lights, malfunctioning terminals, or the CAT’s tactile feedback—creates an oppressive, believable lunar base. Even when music is mentioned as less impactful (e.g., Checkpoint Gaming or Game8), the broader auditory experience is celebrated for its ability to evoke dread and tension without relying on traditional horror tropes. The near-unanimous praise for sound design, paired with only minor critiques about the musical score, underscores its critical role in ROUTINE’s success. As Xbox Tavern notes, the "unsettling sounds" and "chilling atmosphere" are central to the game’s identity, making it a masterclass in audio-driven horror.

Summary unavailable

The technical performance of Routine across platforms shows a generally positive reception, with notable strengths on PC and Xbox Series X. On PC, multiple critics praise the game’s stability and smooth operation. Checkpoint Gaming highlights its "flawless" performance with no bugs, while PC Gamer notes "smooth running on specified hardware" and compatibility with Steam Deck, emphasizing solid technical execution. PCGamesN lauds the "butter-smooth" performance, avoiding common Unreal Engine 5 issues, and WellPlayed confirms no technical hiccups. On Xbox Series X, Game Rant states there is "nothing wrong from a technical standpoint," and Xbox Tavern acknowledges smoothness despite minor cursor control quirks. These reviews collectively suggest that Routine delivers reliable performance across both platforms, with PC receiving particular acclaim for its optimization. However, some technical drawbacks emerge, particularly on PC. Game8 criticizes frame rate drops during intense sequences like door closures, which disrupt immersion, while IGN points to design choices such as an inability to pause and manual saving, which they describe as frustrating despite being intentional. Hardcore Gamer notes gameplay frustrations tied to the C.A.T tool’s mechanics, though these are more about design than outright bugs. On Xbox Series X, Xbox Tavern highlights a minor issue with mouse cursor control, citing awkward small clickable areas and limited zoom. While these flaws are relatively minor, they underscore that Routine is not entirely free of technical imperfections, particularly in how certain systems interact with player expectations or hardware. Overall, the consensus among critics leans heavily toward positive technical performance, with most praising stability, smoothness, and optimization. PC reviewers like Checkpoint Gaming and PCGamesN emphasize the game’s reliability, while Xbox-focused critiques (e.g., Game Rant) affirm its polished execution. The negatives—such as frame rate inconsistencies on PC or minor UI quirks on Xbox—are largely seen as manageable or intentional design choices rather than critical flaws. While some critics like IGN and Hardcore Gamer point to specific frustrations, the broader sentiment is that Routine succeeds in delivering a technically sound experience, with its strengths outweighing its minor shortcomings across both platforms.

Summary unavailable