Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Pokemon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX cover image

Links

Amazon

Twitch

MONSTER

Pokemon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Pokemon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX
Item: Pokemon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2020

GenresFantasy, Adventure, Action, Third Person Perspective, RPG, Top-Down Perspective, Single Player

AvailableMar 6, 2020

PlatformNintendo Switch

DeveloperSpike Chunsoft

Overview

You can meet and recruit Pokémon in a dungeon-crawling adventure within their world! Build a rescue team to take on mysterious, changing dungeons and strategically plan your moves as you venture forth to make the Pokémon world a safer place…and uncover your true purpose along the way. As you recruit Pokémon, these trusty teammates will need somewhere to stay, so build camps to house, manage, and strengthen your Pokémon friends. Think hard about who is right for the job and how to approach each mysterious dungeon as you prepare a rescue team. You’ll move a single square at a time or use Auto mode to speed up movement until you engage other Pokémon in turn-based battles—but don’t forget about Pokémon strengths and weaknesses! This version adds gorgeous watercolor-inspired graphics, and more! Get comfortable in being a Pokémon, there’s a lot of work to do.

Elsewhere

7.2

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Praised for its heartfelt, nostalgic charm and unique take on friendship, but criticized for simplistic, formulaic storytelling that feels stuck in 2005—its emotional warmth can’t fully offset a lack of depth or innovation.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

24%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

71%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The story of Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX receives praise for its heartwarming premise, emotional depth, and unique perspective on the Pokémon universe. Critics like GameSpot highlight the anthropomorphized Pokémon with distinct personalities, ambitions, and quirks, offering a fresh take on the franchise. IGN Japan emphasizes the bond between the protagonist and their partner, noting twists that add dramatic depth, while RPG Site praises its surprising narrative depth and charming writing. The game’s focus on friendship, kindness, and mystery resonates with many reviewers, such as Digital Trends, who appreciate its sincere moments of empathy, and Pure Nintendo, which highlights themes of environmental responsibility and legendary Pokémon interactions. Additionally, Attack of the Fanboy and LevelUp commend the quirky characters and witty dialogue, framing the story as a refreshing departure from traditional Pokémon narratives. However, several critics criticize the story for its simplicity, repetition, and lack of depth. Gameplanet calls it "simplistic, tiresome, and lacking depth," while Metro GameCentral and Jeuxvideo.com note repetitive missions and a formulaic script. The narrative is often described as "babyish gobbledegook" (Gameplanet) or overly reliant on clichés, with Wccftech pointing out its "mild twists" and "lack of clever writing." Others, like CGMagazine and COGconnected, argue that the plot feels unremarkable compared to mainline Pokémon games, serving more as a functional framework than an engaging story. SpazioGames and M3 also mention its slow pacing and lack of originality, with some critics (e.g., My Nintendo News) noting that it fails to evolve from its 2005 origins, leaving the narrative feeling underwhelming for modern audiences. Overall, the consensus leans toward a mixed but generally favorable reception. While many critics acknowledge the story’s charm, emotional resonance, and nostalgic appeal—particularly in its focus on friendship and unique character dynamics—others find it lacking in complexity and innovation. Multiplayer.it and Hobby Consolas praise its heartfelt moments and retained originality, while Game Rant and Vooks note that it delivers satisfying nostalgia for fans without groundbreaking depth. The game is seen as a lightweight, accessible experience that prioritizes charm over ambition, with its narrative serving as a functional but unremarkable backdrop for gameplay. Despite polarizing opinions on its sophistication, the story’s ability to evoke empathy and maintain a playful tone ensures it remains a memorable entry in the Pokémon franchise.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Rescue Team DX balances accessible charm with repetitive tedium: while its strategic depth, party expansion, and quality-of-life upgrades please fans, outdated mechanics, monotonous dungeon loops, and simplified combat undermine its potential, leaving a divisive legacy between nostalgia-driven appeal and modern shortcomings.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

24%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

65%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

11%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX receives mixed praise, with several critics highlighting its accessibility, strategic depth, and quality-of-life improvements. GamesRadar+ acknowledges the tactical positioning and type advantages as core strengths, while MGG praises its complexity and features like auto-selecting moves and rare qualities. The expanded party size (up to 8 Pokémon) and recruitment systems are noted as enhancements that add variety, with Nintendo Enthusiast emphasizing teamwork and strategy. Additionally, improvements such as auto-mode, Mega Evolutions, and procedural dungeons offer fresh mechanics, making the game more approachable for newcomers while retaining the series’ roguelike essence. Critics like GameSpot and Digitally Downloaded commend the strategic depth of grid-based combat and resource management, suggesting that the core formula, despite its simplicity, remains engaging for fans of the genre. However, the gameplay is frequently criticized for its repetitive nature and outdated mechanics. Cubed3, Gameplanet, and CGMagazine all point to monotonous dungeon exploration and a lack of variation in procedurally generated levels, with the auto-explore feature reducing player engagement. Many reviewers, including My Nintendo News and Areajugones, argue that simplifications like auto-attacks and reduced difficulty undermine the challenge that defined earlier entries in the series. The repetitive loop of accepting jobs, exploring dungeons, and repeating the process is a common complaint, as noted by GameSkinny and Twinfinite, who describe the lack of progression systems and minimal strategic depth as major drawbacks. Controls and combat mechanics also face criticism, with Gameplanet and DualShockers highlighting frustrating aiming issues and a lack of visual feedback, while Vgames and XGN note that the turn-based system feels archaic compared to modern standards. The overall consensus among critics is that Rescue Team DX walks a fine line between accessibility and repetition. While it retains the charm of its 2006 predecessor with strategic depth and improved features—such as those praised by GamesRadar+ and Nintendo Life—the repetitive structure and simplified mechanics often overshadow these positives. Critics like Vgames and Noisy Pixel acknowledge the game’s addictive core loop, but most agree that the lack of innovation and overreliance on procedural generation lead to tedium. Despite this, the game’s blend of dungeon-crawling, team management, and tactical combat still appeals to fans of the genre, even if it falls short of delivering a truly groundbreaking experience. The mixed reception reflects a divide between those who appreciate its nostalgic charm and streamlined design versus those who find it unengaging due to its repetitive nature.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Charming storybook visuals charm critics with nostalgic watercolor flair, but outdated tech, repetitive dungeons, and blurred textures undermine polish, leaving a mixed legacy for fans of style over substance.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

67%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

29%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The visual design of Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX is widely praised for its charming, storybook-inspired aesthetic that evokes a whimsical, lighthearted atmosphere. Critics like Digital Trends and USgamer highlight its hand-drawn, watercolor-style visuals reminiscent of classic children’s books and Studio Ghibli, creating an inviting and nostalgic experience. The cel-shaded art style, described as "bright" and "vibrant" by Vgames, modernizes the original 2006 version while maintaining a retro feel, with Game Rant noting that the watercolor graphics enhance the game’s charm. Many reviewers, including Cubed3 and My Nintendo News, celebrate the cartoonish, crayon-like designs outside dungeons, which contrast with the more repetitive environments inside. The art direction is also lauded for its unique identity, with Critical Hit emphasizing its "endearing" and distinct visual language compared to other Pokémon titles. However, several critics point out technical limitations and a lack of innovation in the game’s visuals. Gameplanet and Twinfinite criticize the outdated presentation, comparing it to 3DS-era graphics and noting that dungeon designs feel generic and repetitive. Wccftech and Cubed3 highlight issues like low-poly models, stiff animations, and smeary textures, which detract from the overall polish. GameSkinny and Gamer.no mention that while the art style is initially appealing, it fails to maintain engagement in later stages due to bland dungeon environments and static visuals. Additionally, some reviewers, such as Jeuxvideo.com and Nintendo Insider, note that the watercolor aesthetic loses impact on larger screens, with character models appearing blurred or unpolished. These critiques suggest that while the art style is charming, it struggles to fully leverage the Nintendo Switch’s capabilities. Overall, the critics agree that Rescue Team DX’s visual design strikes a balance between nostalgia and charm, even if it falls short of cutting-edge technical standards. While MGG acknowledges the "light" but "successful" pastel aesthetic and SpazioGames praises its modernization of older titles, many recognize the trade-offs between artistic identity and technical execution. The consensus leans toward appreciation for the game’s unique storybook style, with Vandal and GamingTrend highlighting its ability to immerse players in a whimsical world despite its limitations. Though some critics, like DualShockers, argue that the core gameplay feels outdated, the visual redesign is broadly seen as a strengths that enhances the game’s appeal, particularly for fans of the series and those who value artistic expression over technical prowess.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX’s soundtrack blends nostalgic charm with infectious melodies that elevate its whimsical vibe, praised for remastered warmth and emotional highs. Yet, repetition, dated tracks, and a lack of modernization dulled long-term appeal, with critics calling it serviceable but stale—a mixed legacy balancing heartfelt homage against creative stagnation.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

55%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

45%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of Pokemon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX received generally positive reception, with many critics praising its nostalgic charm and ability to complement the game’s lighthearted, cutesy tone. Reviewers like Attack of the Fanboy highlighted the remastered soundtrack as a standout feature, noting that it retains the original tracks’ essence while evoking strong nostalgia for fans. CGMagazine and Hobby Consolas praised the “lovely” and “charming” musical score, emphasizing its role in enhancing the game’s aesthetic. The upbeat, catchy melodies were frequently noted as infectious and immersive, with Game Rant describing them as “addicting” and Multiplayer.it calling them “lively” and “remixed” to fit the game’s playful atmosphere. Additionally, TheGamer appreciated the blend of retro synths and chiptune elements, which offered a nostalgic yet refined auditory experience, while Nintenderos and Vandal highlighted how sound effects and battle music effectively intensified gameplay moments. However, several critics pointed out notable shortcomings, particularly regarding repetition and lack of modernization. Game Revolution and USgamer criticized the soundtrack for being “serviceable but repetitive,” with some tracks feeling outdated or overused during extended play sessions. Everyeye.it specifically called out the use of unchanged 2005-era tracks with limited loops, arguing that the music felt “outdated” and failed to engage players long-term. GamingTrend noted that while the soundtrack was updated, it retained “GBA-era instruments” that felt anachronistic, and Easy Allies observed that the audio improvements paled in comparison to the visual upgrades. Additionally, some reviewers, like USgamer, mentioned issues with shrill audio and a lack of variety, leading players to rely on external content like podcasts to avoid monotony. While RPG Fan praised the “memorable” melodies, they also criticized the absence of a published soundtrack, which limited accessibility for fans. Overall, the consensus among critics leans toward appreciation for the soundtrack’s nostalgic value and its ability to enhance the game’s charm, though it is not without flaws. Most reviewers acknowledged that while the music effectively complements the gameplay and visual style—GameSpot noted its “relentlessly upbeat” tone balancing tense moments, and Screen Rant called it “infectiously catchy”—there was a shared critique about repetition and a lack of innovation. The remastered tracks were generally seen as faithful to the original while offering slight modern touches, but some felt they fell short of pushing creative boundaries. Despite these criticisms, the soundtrack remained a highlight for many, with Meristation and Vooks emphasizing its role in making the game “stand out” through memorable themes and emotional resonance. The mixed feedback reflects a balance between celebrating its nostalgic appeal and acknowledging areas where it could have evolved further.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Analysis Unavailable

Summary unavailable

TL;DR

voice acting

Description unavailable

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX delivers stable, smooth performance on Switch with smart updates like autosaving and auto-mode, but clunky controls, AI hiccups, and visual compromises linger as persistent flaws, creating a polished yet imperfect experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

24%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

62%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

14%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX on the Nintendo Switch is largely praised for its stability and quality-of-life improvements. Critics like IGN highlighted features such as autosaving, auto-mode for exploration, and expanded team sizes, which enhance accessibility and convenience. Meristation noted the absence of major bugs and solid technical execution despite minor issues, while Vandal commended the game’s smooth performance in handheld mode with excellent image quality. SpazioGames emphasized consistent frame rates even in densely populated dungeons, and Gamer.nl acknowledged the game runs smoothly, though it suffers from lower resolution on TV compared to handheld. These positives underscore the Switch version’s technical reliability and thoughtful updates. However, several critics pointed out persistent technical flaws that detract from the experience. Gameplanet criticized the "terrible" controls, citing issues with aiming and automation, while Gamer.no and Games.cz highlighted problems like malfunctioning auto-mode, clunky inventory systems, and AI behavior forcing manual combat. Jeuxvideo.com noted frame rate drops during dungeon exploration, and Hardcore Gamer mentioned input delays in crowded scenarios. My Nintendo News and Screen Rant criticized unresponsive movement mechanics, unnatural animations, and the lack of enemy health bars, which hinder immersion. These issues, while not catastrophic, collectively create friction in gameplay, particularly for players seeking seamless interaction. Despite these criticisms, the overall consensus among critics is that Rescue Team DX delivers a technically sound experience on the Switch, with most acknowledging minor flaws as manageable drawbacks rather than deal-breakers. 3DJuegos and Atomix noted stability and immersion issues but emphasized they don’t ruin the game, while Trusted Reviews and Hobby Consolas highlighted smooth performance despite occasional glitches. The game’s core mechanics, though imperfect, are bolstered by updates like auto-mode and autosaving, as praised by IGN and Meristation. While technical shortcomings exist, they are overshadowed by the title’s charm and accessibility, reflecting a balanced reception that prioritizes fun over flawless execution.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX delivers a sprawling, grind-heavy experience with randomized dungeons, endless side quests, and post-game challenges that promise hundreds of hours for completionists—yet its repetitive mechanics, static environments, and lack of meaningful progression leave many frustrated. While roguelike depth and recruitment systems satisfy genre fans, the game’s formulaic structure and tedium polarize players, making it a love-it-or-hate-it affair for nostalgic enthusiasts versus those craving innovation.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

28%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

60%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

12%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The positives surrounding Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX’s replay value are centered on its structured variety and post-game incentives. Critics like Vandal highlight the game’s substantial content, noting over 100 hours of gameplay through completionist efforts, while TheGamer emphasizes its addictive team-building and exploration mechanics. Post-game features such as randomized dungeons (GamesRadar+), recruitment of all Pokémon (Nintenderos), and challenging endgame content like legendary battles (Gamer.nl) are frequently praised. Additionally, the game’s roguelike elements—such as dynamic dungeon generation (Games.cz) and mission repetition for optimal team builds (Multiplayer.it)—offer depth for fans of the genre. Critics like GamePro Germany and RPG Site also commend the endless side quests and varied missions that extend engagement beyond the main story, suggesting the game’s design encourages multiple playthroughs for completionist players. However, the negatives focus on repetitive mechanics and a lack of meaningful progression. Multiple critics, including Metro GameCentral and Gameplanet, describe the game as “repetitive,” “dull,” and “formulaic,” with generic dungeons and grinding that erode long-term appeal. DualShockers and GameSkinny point to outdated core mechanics and insufficient incentives for revisiting content, while Screen Rant criticizes the lack of engaging endgame material. Even features like auto-play (Nintendo Life) and recruitment systems (Jeuxvideo.com) are seen as insufficient to offset the tedium of repetitive quests and static environments. Critics like Digitally Downloaded and LevelUp note that the game’s charm and nostalgia may attract fans, but its grind-heavy design and limited depth deter broader replayability. The frustration of item loss (TheSixthAxis) and difficulty spikes (Shacknews) further compound these issues, creating a polarizing experience. Overall, the consensus is mixed but leans toward a split between dedicated fans and those seeking deeper engagement. While critics like Vandal, TheGamer, and Meristation argue that the game’s randomized dungeons, extensive Pokémon recruitment, and post-game challenges offer high replayability, others such as Metro GameCentral, Gameplanet, and DualShockers find its repetitive structure and lack of progression unappealing. The game’s appeal seems to hinge on player tolerance for grind-heavy mechanics and nostalgia-driven design. As noted by Vooks and Areajugones, it caters more to genre enthusiasts than casual players, with some critics (e.g., Nintendo Life) acknowledging “hundreds of hours” of gameplay but warning that repetition can diminish enjoyment over time. Ultimately, Rescue Team DX balances accessibility and depth, offering enough content for dedicated fans while struggling to retain broader appeal due to its repetitive core loops.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

31%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

63%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall reception of Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX highlights its nostalgic charm, visual upgrades, and accessible gameplay, which many critics praised as redeeming qualities. Reviewers like IGN noted that the game improves on presentation and story compared to the original, while Digital Trends acknowledged its "colorful visuals" and "endearing story." Noisy Pixel and Vgames emphasized its charm and nostalgic appeal, with the latter calling it a "heartfelt storytelling" experience. The remake’s modernized graphics, music, and quality-of-life features—such as auto-mode and redesigned interfaces—were frequently highlighted as positives by Nintendo Life, Meristation, and GameSpot, who saw it as a respectful update that balances accessibility with the original’s core appeal. For fans of the series, the game’s ability to evoke nostalgia while offering a simplified dungeon-crawling experience was a key draw. However, the consensus also points to significant flaws that detract from its overall impact. Critics like Gameplanet and Metro GameCentral criticized the game as "poorly designed" and "uninteresting," with repetitive gameplay and shallow mechanics that fail to engage beyond short sessions. IGN and Digital Trends noted that while the visuals and characters are appealing, the "repetitive dungeon crawling" and "unengaging combat" make it feel like a "monotonous chore." Twinfinite and GameSkinny pointed out that the remake lacks meaningful innovation, with Twinfinite calling it a "flawed remaster" and GameSkinny labeling it a "missed opportunity." Many reviewers, including Cubed3 and Easy Allies, argued that the game’s simplistic systems and lack of depth fail to satisfy hardcore RPG enthusiasts, while XGN criticized its high price and repetitive nature. These critiques underscore a general frustration with the game’s inability to evolve beyond its 2006 roots. Despite these criticisms, the overall consensus leans toward a balanced view, recognizing the game as a niche but enjoyable experience for fans and casual players. While Gameplanet and Metro GameCentral were highly negative, many critics like Nintendo Life, Meristation, and GameSpot saw it as a worthwhile title that successfully captures the essence of the original while offering modern refinements. IGN Japan and RPG Fan highlighted its accessibility and emotional storytelling, suggesting it appeals more to newcomers and longtime fans than to those seeking innovation. The game’s polarizing nature is evident in reviews like DualShockers’ "superficial update" and Shacknews’ "missed opportunities," but the majority of critics agreed that Rescue Team DX is a charming, if flawed, entry in the Pokémon series. Its value ultimately depends on one’s tolerance for repetitive mechanics and willingness to embrace its nostalgic appeal.

TL;DR

Nostalgic charm meets modernized polish in Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX, but repetitive gameplay and shallow mechanics undermine its potential, making it a divisive pick for fans craving familiarity over innovation.

MONSTER

Reviews

78 reviews found

TheGamer

Nintendo Switch

Mar 10, 2020

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A culmination of the series' strengths, blending accessibility with depth, charming aesthetics, and robust mechanics. It is recommended as an excellent entry point for newcomers and a satisfying experience for veterans.

Read full review

Game Rant

Nintendo Switch

Mar 19, 2020

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A charming, nostalgic spin-off that balances cutesy storytelling with dungeon-crawling mechanics. While not revolutionary, it delivers a satisfying experience for fans and newcomers, with strong visuals, music, and endgame content that keeps players engaged long after the main story concludes.

Read full review

Digitally Downloaded

Nintendo Switch

Mar 10, 2020

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The reviewer, as a fan of Pokémon and Mystery Dungeon games, highly praises the title for its charm, art style, and nostalgic appeal, despite acknowledging its niche nature and minor flaws. It is described as a love letter to longtime fans.

Read full review

Video Chums

Nintendo Switch

Mar 7, 2020

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A top-notch example of Mystery Dungeon games, praised for its accessibility, adorable presentation, and substantial improvements over originals, despite some flaws in challenge and repetition.

Read full review

RPG Fan

Nintendo Switch

Aug 8, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Despite issues with difficulty balance and post-game repetition, the game is deemed fun and accessible, particularly as a starting point for Mystery Dungeon fans. It balances challenge and storytelling effectively, though its target audience remains somewhat unclear.

Read full review

GameSpot

Nintendo Switch

Mar 5, 2020

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A worthwhile experience that improves upon the originals with refined mechanics, emotional storytelling, and stylish presentation. It offers a unique take on the Pokémon formula and is recommended for both newcomers and fans.

3DJuegos

Nintendo Switch

Mar 4, 2020

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The remake is praised as a respectful and improved version of the original, with notable enhancements in accessibility, visuals, and gameplay. While it doesn't revolutionize the formula, it successfully caters to fans and offers a rewarding experience.

Hardcore Gamer

Nintendo Switch

Mar 10, 2020

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A revitalizing remake that enhances the original's strengths with improved graphics, gameplay features, and accessibility, offering a satisfying adventure for newcomers and veterans alike.

Vooks

Nintendo Switch

Apr 15, 2020

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A faithful remake that balances nostalgia with minor improvements. While it excels in visuals and music, its outdated gameplay and limited changes make it a polarizing experience. The review acknowledges its strengths but questions its relevance for new players.

Read full review

USgamer

Nintendo Switch

Mar 4, 2020

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The game is deemed a good experience with charm and emotional depth, despite some flaws. It balances nostalgia with improvements but lacks the original's ambition, yet retains a warm heart that makes it worthwhile.

Read full review