Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

MONSTER

MindsEye

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of MindsEye
Item: MindsEye
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2025

GenresAdventure, Action, Science Fiction and Futuristic, Third Person Perspective, Shooter, Single Player

AvailableJun 10, 2025

PlatformPlayStation 5, PC, Xbox Series X

DeveloperBuild a Rocket Boy

Overview

Play as Jacob Diaz, a former soldier fitted with The MindsEye, a mysterious neural implant that haunts him with fragmented memories of a covert mission that changed his life forever. Fight to uncover the truth in a world where AI, high-tech experimentation, and unchecked military power shape every encounter. Jacob isn’t the only one searching for answers, forces working from the shadows may be more powerful and dangerous than he ever imagined. Get ready for intense combat - on foot, behind the wheel, and in the air - where every decision can mean the difference between survival and defeat.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

MindsEye boasts high production values and an intriguing cyberpunk premise, but critics universally slam its lack of originality, shallow character development, and poor execution. While it offers some entertaining moments, the story is largely forgettable and anticlimactic, failing to engage with its themes effectively. Overall, MindsEye squanders its potential, leaving viewers disappointed.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

45%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

55%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The opinions regarding the story of MindsEye reveal a few positives that some critics have highlighted. Notably, several reviewers appreciated the high production values and the intriguing premise that revolves around Jacob Diaz, a former soldier with a neural implant. Critics like GameStar noted the blend of cyberpunk aesthetics with Las Vegas glamour, which adds a unique visual appeal to the narrative. Additionally, Vandal pointed out that the story explores relevant themes such as AI and government corruption, presenting some clever moments amidst the storytelling. Critics like Digital Trends acknowledged the campy sci-fi elements and technosatire, suggesting that there are engaging aspects to the narrative, even if they are not fully realized. However, the negatives heavily overshadow the positives. Many critics, including But Why Tho? and Shacknews, criticized the story for its lack of originality and depth, with But Why Tho? labeling it as "predictable and message-less." Reviewers like Invader and Eurogamer echoed these sentiments, describing the character development as shallow and the narrative as poorly executed. The consensus among critics such as GameSpot and GamesRadar+ is that the story is forgettable, lacking emotional depth and engaging characters, which ultimately detracts from the overall experience. Even those who found some merit in the story, like GamingBolt, acknowledged its lack of groundbreaking elements and depth. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while MindsEye presents an interesting premise and high production values, it ultimately fails to deliver a compelling narrative. Many reviewers, including The Jimquisition and IGN, pointed out that the story feels thin and anticlimactic, leaving significant questions unanswered and failing to engage with its themes meaningfully. The combination of a generic plot, weak character development, and tonal inconsistencies has led to a largely negative reception, indicating that despite its potential, MindsEye does not fully capitalize on its intriguing setup.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

MindsEye may offer a few tactical elements and functional mechanics, but it's largely a letdown. Critics slammed its outdated gameplay for uninspired combat, poor enemy AI, and repetitive missions. Despite minor positives, the game’s lack of innovation and depth leaves players bored and disappointed. Overall, it’s a forgettable experience that fails to engage.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

18%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

82%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

In analyzing the gameplay of MindsEye, a few critics noted some positive aspects, albeit limited. For instance, PlaySense mentioned that the introduction of a drone adds a layer of tactical depth to the gameplay, providing a slight variation in an otherwise repetitive experience. Additionally, some reviewers, like Digital Trends, acknowledged that the shooting mechanics, while unremarkable, are functional enough to allow players to progress through the game. A few critics, such as Shacknews, pointed out that driving mechanics, despite being described as dull, still contribute to the overall gameplay experience. However, these positives are overshadowed by the overwhelming critique of the game's core mechanics. The majority of reviewers expressed significant dissatisfaction with MindsEye's gameplay, highlighting a plethora of issues. Critics like But Why Tho? and GameSpot emphasized the poorly designed combat mechanics, with many describing the shooting as lackluster and uninspired. The enemy AI was frequently criticized for being dumb and ineffective, leading to a frustrating combat experience. Furthermore, the linearity of missions and repetitive nature of tasks were common complaints, with critics like Invader and Eurogamer noting that the game feels restrictive and lacks depth. The driving mechanics, while occasionally noted as a highlight, were often described as tedious and unengaging, contributing to an overall sense of boredom. The overall consensus among critics is that MindsEye suffers from a lack of innovation and depth in its gameplay. Many reviews, including those from IGN and GamingBolt, pointed out that the game feels outdated, reminiscent of older titles without offering any fresh ideas or engaging mechanics. The repetitive mission structures and uninspired combat mechanics lead to a lack of player engagement, as highlighted by critics like Gameliner and Critical Hits. In summary, while there are minor elements that some players may appreciate, the overwhelming sentiment is that MindsEye fails to deliver a compelling gameplay experience, leaving critics and players alike feeling disappointed.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

MindsEye showcases stunning visuals and impressive character models, especially on PS5, earning some praise for its immersive design. However, severe technical flaws like poor optimization, choppy framerates, and inconsistent graphics overshadow these positives, leading critics to deem it more of an unfinished product than a polished experience. Overall, a promising aesthetic marred by performance issues leaves many disappointed.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

14%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

62%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

24%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The opinions regarding the graphics and visual design of MindsEye reveal a mixed bag of sentiments, with some critics acknowledging the game's potential and moments of visual appeal. Critics such as GameSpot and GamingTrend commend the impressive character models and the high-fidelity visuals, particularly in cutscenes, showcasing the capabilities of Unreal Engine 5. The futuristic city design, as noted by GameSpot, feels credible and immersive at first glance, while Gameliner highlights moments of visual appeal, especially on the PlayStation 5. Additionally, Critical Hits mentions an interesting aesthetic that blends modernity and cyberpunk elements, suggesting that there are aspects of the visual design that resonate with certain audiences. However, the negatives surrounding MindsEye are significant and often overshadow the positives. Multiple reviewers, including But Why Tho? and Digital Trends, point out severe technical issues such as poor optimization, asset pop-in, and choppy framerates, which detract from the overall experience. Critics like PlaySense and Metro GameCentral emphasize the inconsistency in graphics, with low and unstable framerates and blurry visuals that fail to impress. The sentiment is echoed by The Jimquisition, who criticizes the visual design as generic and uninspired, while Game8 describes the graphics as merely "okay," lacking creativity and detail. Overall, the consensus among critics suggests that while MindsEye has the foundation for impressive graphics and a visually appealing world, it is hampered by significant technical flaws and a lack of polish. The game’s visual design is characterized by moments of brilliance, as noted by critics like GamingBolt and IGN, but these are often undermined by performance issues and a lack of immersive detail, leading to a perception of the game as an unfinished product or a tech demo rather than a fully realized experience. This dichotomy leaves many reviewers feeling disappointed, as the game fails to capitalize on its visual potential.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

MindsEye's sound design is a letdown, with critics like But Why Tho? and The Jimquisition slamming the toy-like weapon sounds and weak voice acting. While the soundtrack receives praise from outlets like Digital Trends and GamingTrend for its immersive beats, the overall audio experience falls flat, failing to meet the expectations of a AAA title and leaving players seeking more from its ambitious scope.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

36%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

55%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The opinions regarding the sound design and music of MindsEye present a mixed bag of sentiments, with some positive notes emerging from the reviews. Critics like Digital Trends and GamingTrend highlight the soundtrack as a standout feature, with the former praising the thumping sci-fi score that enhances the cinematic cutscenes and overall atmosphere. GamingTrend goes further to award a perfect score for the soundtrack, emphasizing its driving beats that elevate the gaming experience. Additionally, Critical Hits mentions that while the music and dubbing are good, they do not stand out as the game's strongest elements, indicating a degree of appreciation for the audio aspects. However, the negative feedback regarding the sound design is prevalent and significant. Multiple reviewers, including But Why Tho? and The Jimquisition, criticize the weapon sounds for lacking impact and feeling toy-like, which detracts from the overall immersion and enjoyment of the gameplay. Game8 echoes this sentiment, pointing out poor voice acting and sound effects that do not meet the expectations typically associated with a AAA title. Moreover, GameSpot and Vandal describe the sound design as muted and underwhelming, contributing to a bland combat experience and an overall audio experience that feels lacking. In summary, the overall consensus among critics leans towards disappointment in the sound design of MindsEye, despite some appreciation for the soundtrack. While a few reviewers, such as GamingTrend and Digital Trends, find merit in the music, the majority highlight significant shortcomings in sound effects and voice acting. The critiques suggest that while the game may have potential in its auditory elements, it ultimately fails to deliver a cohesive and impactful audio experience, leaving many players wanting more from a title of its ambition.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Voice acting in MindsEye receives mixed reviews; some praise standout performances like Alex Hernandez as Jacob Diaz for emotional depth, while others criticize cringeworthy dialogue and poor delivery that disrupt immersion. The divide highlights commendable moments but also significant flaws, making it a polarizing aspect that affects the game's narrative experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

18%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

55%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

27%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in MindsEye has garnered a mix of positive feedback from several critics, highlighting moments where the performances shine. Critics like GamingBolt praised the solid voice acting, particularly noting Alex Hernandez's standout performance as Jacob Diaz, which effectively carries the emotional weight of the story. Additionally, Vandal mentioned that the original voice acting is well-cast and convincing, which contributes positively to the narrative experience. Some reviewers, such as Digital Trends, found the voice acting to be campy yet enjoyable, suggesting that the cast was aware of the game's tone and added a layer of charm, which can enhance the overall enjoyment for players seeking a lighter experience. However, the negative aspects of the voice acting are quite pronounced in the reviews. Critics like Game8 described the voice acting as hard to listen to, with cringeworthy dialogue and poor delivery, indicating a significant disconnect in the quality of performances. But Why Tho? echoed this sentiment by mentioning a lack of emotional weight in critical story moments, which could detract from the player's immersion. Furthermore, GameSpot pointed out awkward line deliveries that disrupt the flow of conversations, while Multiplayer.it described the voice acting as embarrassing due to poorly written dialogues, which ultimately detracts from the overall experience. Overall, the consensus among critics regarding the voice acting in MindsEye is mixed, with a notable divide between those who appreciate certain performances and those who find significant faults in the delivery and writing. While some, like GamingTrend, found the performances solid and contributing positively to the experience, others, like Game8 and Multiplayer.it, highlighted the shortcomings that hinder the game's narrative impact. This divergence suggests that while there are commendable elements in the voice acting, the inconsistencies in quality and delivery create a varied experience for players, making it a polarizing aspect of the game.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

MindsEye is a technical disaster across gaming platforms. Xbox Series X and PlayStation 5 reviews are overwhelmingly negative, highlighting severe crashes and performance issues with no redeeming qualities. PC is slightly better but still plagued by significant bugs and glitches. Critics equate its unfinished state to failures like Cyberpunk 2077. Overall, MindsEye fails to deliver a polished experience, disappointing players everywhere.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

10%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

90%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

In analyzing the technical performance of MindsEye across various gaming platforms, it is evident that there are few positives to highlight. On the Xbox Series X, while most critics like But Why Tho? and Xbox Tavern noted significant technical issues, there are no standout positive remarks regarding performance, suggesting a lack of redeeming qualities. Similarly, on the PlayStation 5, critics such as Gameliner and Invader expressed their disappointment, but there are no positive mentions that indicate any aspect of the game performed well. On PC, GameSpot provided a slightly more favorable perspective, noting that the game is "mostly stable," which hints at a better experience compared to consoles, although this is tempered by other reviews highlighting performance problems. The negatives for each platform overwhelmingly dominate the reviews. For Xbox Series X, critics like Shacknews and Xbox Tavern emphasized the presence of severe technical issues, including crashes, glitches, and poor optimization, which contributed to a negative reception. On the PlayStation 5, the sentiment is similarly grim, with multiple reviewers, including Metro GameCentral and PlaySense, pointing out significant performance issues like low frame rates, stuttering, and broken AI. The consensus on PC is mixed; while GameSpot noted some stability, many critics, including IGN and GamingTrend, reported serious performance issues such as frame rate drops, crashes, and glitches, indicating that even the PC version suffers from a lack of polish. Overall, the consensus among critics across all platforms is overwhelmingly negative regarding the technical performance of MindsEye. The game is widely viewed as unfinished, with severe bugs and optimization issues that detract from the overall experience. Critics from But Why Tho? to Invader have drawn parallels to notorious releases like Cyberpunk 2077, underscoring the frustration players might face. While there are minor exceptions, particularly on PC, the general sentiment is that MindsEye fails to deliver a polished experience, leading to a disappointing reception across the board.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics agree that MindsEye's replay value is severely lacking due to dull gameplay, linear design, and uninspired side missions. While features like user-generated content and a free roam mode hint at potential, they ultimately fall flat, offering little incentive for players to return after the main storyline. Many will likely play it once and move on.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

16%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

84%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions regarding the replay value of MindsEye reveal a few positive aspects that some critics have noted. Notably, several reviewers, including Game8 and Guardian, mentioned the presence of user-generated content tools and a free roam mode that could potentially enhance replayability. Game8 pointed out that the free-play mode allows for community-created missions, which could be a draw for dedicated players. Similarly, Guardian acknowledged the inclusion of a level editor, suggesting that it might appeal to a niche audience looking for creative engagement. However, these aspects are overshadowed by a general lack of compelling content that would encourage players to return to the game after completing the main storyline. The overwhelming sentiment among critics is that MindsEye suffers from significant shortcomings that severely limit its replay value. But Why Tho? and Shacknews emphasized the game's dullness and lack of engaging elements, while Digital Trends and Push Square highlighted the absence of meaningful side content and rewards. Many reviewers, such as The Jimquisition and Metro GameCentral, criticized the linear design and repetitive missions, which do not incentivize players to revisit the game. Furthermore, critics like GamesRadar+ and GamingTrend noted that even the user-generated content feels like filler rather than a meaningful addition to the experience. This consensus suggests that while there are features that could theoretically enhance replayability, they are not effectively executed or supported. Overall, the critics collectively agree that the replay value of MindsEye is low. The game is characterized by a lack of engaging gameplay, poorly designed side missions, and a linear structure that detracts from the overall experience. Despite some potential for user-generated content, as noted by critics like GamingBolt and Vandal, the absence of a strong community and the presence of technical issues hinder its appeal. The general consensus is clear: MindsEye fails to provide sufficient incentives for players to return, making it a title that many will likely complete once and then set aside.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

22%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

78%

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

In reviewing the opinions of various critics regarding "MindsEye," a few positive notes emerge amidst the overwhelming criticism. Some reviewers, such as Digital Trends and GamingTrend, acknowledge that the game possesses redeeming qualities, such as impressive visuals and a captivating soundtrack. Additionally, critics like PlaySense and GameStar recognize the potential within the game's concept and story, suggesting that there are moments of enjoyment to be found, even if they are overshadowed by the game's shortcomings. This hint of promise indicates that, while "MindsEye" may not have succeeded in its current form, there are elements that could be refined in future iterations or updates. However, the negatives surrounding "MindsEye" dominate the discourse, with a consensus among critics that the game is riddled with significant flaws. Critics such as But Why Tho? and Metro GameCentral describe it as a "buggy mess" and "one of the worst video games of the modern era," respectively. Many reviews highlight issues like unrefined mechanics, poor execution, and a lack of engaging gameplay, with terms like "soporific failure" and "unmitigated disaster" being used to characterize the overall experience. The game is often described as unfinished, with critics like IGN and Eurogamer emphasizing its overly ambitious nature that ultimately fails to deliver a satisfying experience. Overall, the consensus among critics is decidedly negative, painting "MindsEye" as a disappointing and flawed title that struggles to meet its potential. While some reviewers, including Critical Hits and Vandal, suggest that there is a kernel of an interesting idea buried beneath the technical issues and gameplay shortcomings, the overwhelming sentiment is that the game is not worth recommending in its current state. Critics agree that the execution is lacking, with many calling it a cautionary tale of game development failures. Thus, "MindsEye" stands as a cautionary example of how ambition must be matched with execution to create a compelling gaming experience.

TL;DR

"MindsEye" fails to impress critics, who largely label it a "buggy mess" and "unmitigated disaster" due to poor mechanics and execution. Despite some praise for its visuals and soundtrack, the overwhelming consensus is that it falls short of its potential, serving as a cautionary tale of ambition gone wrong in game development.

MONSTER

Reviews

50 reviews found

GameStar

Jun 12, 2025