Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

Amazon

Steam

Twitch

MONSTER

MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries
Item: MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2019

GenresAdventure, Action, Science Fiction and Futuristic, Shooter, Simulation, Fighting, Military and Warfare, Single Player, Multiplayer, First Person Perspective

AvailableDec 10, 2019

PlatformPlayStation 5, Xbox One, Xbox Series X, PC, PlayStation 4

DeveloperPiranha Games

Overview

In MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries you will adopt the role of a rookie MechWarrior pilot thrust into combat as the Third Succession War continues to fracture the Inner Sphere. Take contracts from the factions of your choosing and engage in tactical, first-person, PvE ‘Mech combat through an immersive, career-based Mercenary campaign driven by player choice. Victory, prestige, and profit will not only require skill on the battlefield, but in the acquisition, maintenance, and enhancement of your BattleMechs. Set for release in 2018, MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries is under development by a dedicated development team at Piranha Games. MechWarrior Online, Piranha’s existing F2P multiplayer-focused tactical ‘Mech combat game, will continue its ongoing live development by the MWO team at Piranha.

Elsewhere

6.5

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

A lore-rich BattleTech experience praised for its faction depth and mission variety, but criticized for shallow characters, repetitive missions, and a generic narrative that prioritizes gameplay over emotional engagement, leaving fans divided between appreciation for its universe and frustration with its underdeveloped story.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

62%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

36%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The story of MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries receives praise for its strong foundation in the BattleTech universe, catering to longtime fans with intricate lore and faction dynamics. Critics like God is a Geek highlight its focus on mercenary themes and interstellar conflicts, while PlayStation LifeStyle notes the humorous elements and references that add charm. TheXboxHub and CGMagazine commend its balance of depth for veterans and accessibility for newcomers, with Gaming Nexus emphasizing the expansive universe and mission variety across planets. The narrative’s emphasis on faction politics and moral choices, as mentioned by TheSixthAxis, and its role in shaping player-driven progression, as noted by IGN, are seen as strengths that align with BattleTech’s legacy. These elements collectively create a story that feels immersive for fans of the franchise. However, many critics find the narrative lacking in emotional engagement and originality. TheSixthAxis and PC Gamer criticize repetitive mission structures and shallow character development, while COGconnected and Metro GameCentral describe the plot as underdeveloped and unengaging. The story’s reliance on revenge tropes and formulaic storytelling, highlighted by Attack of the Fanboy (PC) and GameSpew, is seen as a missed opportunity for deeper character arcs or thematic exploration. Destructoid points to poor dialogue and a rushed opening, while Worth Playing argues the campaign storyline is virtually nonexistent, overshadowed by gameplay mechanics. Even Gaming Nexus acknowledges that the narrative feels secondary to managing a mercenary company, with PC Games noting a lack of player impact on the world. These critiques underscore a disconnect between the game’s ambitious setting and its execution. Overall, the consensus leans toward mixed reactions, with fans of BattleTech appreciating the lore-rich framework while others find it generic and repetitive. Critics like God is a Geek and TheXboxHub emphasize its value for series enthusiasts, but a majority, including PC Gamer, Destructoid, and Worth Playing, view the story as a functional yet unremarkable backdrop for gameplay. The narrative’s strengths lie in its world-building and faction interactions, but its weaknesses—such as underdeveloped characters, clichéd plots, and repetitive missions—limit its appeal to broader audiences. While some see it as a solid entry in the BattleTech canon, many agree it falls short of delivering a compelling or emotionally resonant story.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries delivers deep, tactical mech combat and innovative business management but is weighed down by repetitive missions, clunky controls, and flawed AI, creating a polarizing mix of ambition and execution issues.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

45%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

55%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries is widely praised for its depth, tactical complexity, and immersive mech customization. Critics like IGN and PC Gamer highlight the game’s robust combat mechanics, including heat management, location-based damage, and varied mission structures that cater to both action and simulation enthusiasts. The blend of mech piloting with business management—such as hiring pilots, customizing mechs, and balancing resources—is seen as a standout feature by ZTGD and New Game Network, offering a unique "company-building" experience. GameCrate and Destructoid commend the attention to detail in controls, terrain navigation, and weapon systems, while TheXboxHub notes the satisfying learning curve for Xbox controllers. The co-op and multiplayer modes also receive praise for adding flexibility and replayability, with Worth Playing and GamingTrend emphasizing the strategic depth of squadron-based combat. However, several critics point to significant flaws that detract from the experience. Repetition in mission types—such as defense, demolition, and assassination tasks—is a recurring complaint, with Game Revolution, GameStar, and PC Invasion criticizing the grind-like nature of the gameplay. Issues like poor AI behavior, clunky controls, and a steep learning curve are frequently mentioned, with New Game Network and Hardcore Gamer noting that simplistic AI and flawed mission design can break immersion. Wccftech and Xbox Tavern highlight control awkwardness, while GameSpew and CGMagazine point to limited mech customization and tedious side quests. The game’s focus on simulation mechanics, though praised by some, is seen as a barrier for casual players, with PlayStation Universe and Windows Central noting accessibility challenges. Overall, the critics agree that MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries succeeds in delivering a richly detailed mech combat experience with strong tactical elements, but its repetitive systems and technical issues prevent it from being fully cohesive. While IGN, PC Gamer, and TheXboxHub celebrate its depth and innovation, many acknowledge that the game’s flaws—such as mission repetition, AI shortcomings, and control complexity—can frustrate players. The consensus leans toward a mixed reception: a mechanically impressive title with a dedicated fanbase, but one that struggles to balance simulation depth with engaging, varied gameplay. As ZTGD and New Game Network note, the game’s ambition is evident, but its execution leaves room for improvement in areas like AI behavior, mission variety, and accessibility.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries dazzles with destructible environments, detailed mechs, and atmospheric flair but falters with outdated textures, inconsistent visuals, and framerate issues, resulting in a technically flawed, uneven experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

89%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries received mixed praise, with several critics highlighting its strengths in destructible environments, mech detailing, and atmospheric effects. God is a Geek praised the "crisp battlefields" and "impressive explosions," while TheSixthAxis noted "laser-ignited fires" as standout environmental effects. PlayStation LifeStyle acknowledged the game’s focus on fast SSD loading times despite Unreal Engine 4’s struggles with maintaining 60 FPS, and GameStar celebrated diverse landscapes like ice planets and volcanoes, alongside detailed mech designs. Critics like TheXboxHub and New Game Network highlighted "impressive destruction" and procedural generation, with the latter praising "intergalactic biomes" and impactful weapon effects. Additionally, Finger Guns and CGMagazine commended the lifelike cockpits and customization options, though these were often contrasted with weaker environmental polish. However, the game faced significant criticism for its technical shortcomings and inconsistent visual quality. PlayStation Universe and XboxAddict described environments as "sparsely detailed" and "outdated," with recycled map layouts and generic textures. CGMagazine and Wccftech criticized the "dated textures," "subpar cutscenes," and "janky and jagged" visuals, while PC Gamer noted "flat plains" and "muddy" graphics. Framerate issues were a recurring concern across platforms: PlayStation LifeStyle mentioned struggles with 60 FPS during intense moments, and XboxAddict called the visuals "lacking detail" compared to modern standards. Critics like IGN and PC Invasion pointed to "blocky buildings," "textureless geometry," and "underwhelming weapon effects," while TheGamer noted that NPCs in the MechBay felt "static and unresponsive." These issues often overshadowed the game’s technical ambition, with many feeling it fell short of expectations for a 2019 release. Overall, critics generally agreed that MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries had ambitious visual elements but struggled with optimization and consistency. While the destructible environments, mech detailing, and atmospheric effects were frequently praised—especially by outlets like GameStar and TheXboxHub—the game’s technical flaws and repetitive design left many underwhelmed. Reviews from PC Gamer and IGN highlighted a "retro flair" that partially compensated for dated visuals, but others, such as XboxAddict and Wccftech, argued the graphics felt "outdated" and "unimpressive." Despite its strengths in specific areas, the consensus was that MechWarrior 5 failed to deliver a visually cohesive or polished experience, with many critics noting it as a missed opportunity for a more refined presentation.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries' sound design dazzles with immersive cockpit audio and a retro-rock soundtrack that fuels its mech-piloting vibe, but clunky voice acting, overdone guitar riffs, and generic clichés undermine its potential, leaving mixed reactions between nostalgic thrills and hollow execution.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

42%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

47%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

11%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries received generally positive acclaim, particularly for its immersive qualities and nostalgic aesthetic. Critics like TheSixthAxis highlighted the immersive cockpit audio experience, especially when using headphones, while CGMagazine praised the 90s-era electric-guitar-driven orchestral soundtrack that aligns with the game’s retro vibe. GameGrin and IGN emphasized the energetic and atmospheric music, noting how it enhances gameplay through clear sound effects and a nostalgic, aggressive tone. Hey Poor Player and GamingTrend also celebrated the “blaring rock music” and bombastic guitar riffs that contribute to the game’s immersive mech-piloting atmosphere. The soundtrack’s retro influences, such as references to Halo’s style and early 2000s metal, were frequently cited as strengths, creating a cohesive auditory identity for the game. However, several critics pointed out significant flaws in the audio design. XboxAddict criticized the voice acting as poor and the soundtrack as lacking dynamism and memorability, arguing it failed to enhance immersion during combat or exploration. Hardcore Gamer noted inconsistent sound effects and subpar voice acting, while Wccftech accused the guitar-heavy score of clashing with the game’s atmosphere, calling it overly stereotypical and lacking subtlety. Worth Playing echoed these concerns, stating that the music felt generic and overreliant on clichéd rock elements, diminishing immersion. Additionally, Gaming Nexus observed that while sound effects contributed to immersion, the score itself was forgettable, and PC Games acknowledged technical limitations in audio implementation despite praising its overall effectiveness. Overall, the critical reception of MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries’ sound design and music leans toward positive but uneven. While many reviewers, including CGMagazine, GameGrin, and IGN, praised the soundtrack’s energy, retro flair, and immersive qualities, others like XboxAddict and Wccftech found it lacking in subtlety and originality. The mixed feedback reflects a divide between those who appreciated the nostalgic, high-octane audio style and those who felt it overshadowed more nuanced elements. Despite these contradictions, the consensus is that the sound design effectively supports the game’s core mechanics and aesthetic, even if its musical composition occasionally falls short of excellence.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Voice acting in MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries is a mixed bag—some praise its adequacy and standout moments (like Elias Toufexis’ work), but most critics slam it as flat, repetitive, and emotionally hollow, with forced lines and a lack of depth that undermines immersion.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

11%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

53%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

37%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries receives a mixed reception, with several reviewers highlighting its adequacy and occasional standout moments. Critics like God is a Geek praise it as "pretty good," noting that it enhances the space marines-themed narrative, while Finger Guns describes it as "decent" with diverse accents and notable performances from actors such as Elias Toufexis (known for Deus Ex). TheSixthAxis emphasizes that the voice acting is "mostly solid," with one character’s performance evoking a strong resemblance to Adam Jensen from Deus Ex: Human Revolution. Additionally, IGN acknowledges it as "fairly good" and well-integrated into the game’s loose story. PC Games even commends the English voice acting as "stimmig" (consistent) and supportive of the narrative, despite lacking standout moments. These positives suggest that while not exceptional, the voice work is generally functional and contributes to the game’s atmosphere. However, several critics strongly criticize the voice acting for its lack of depth and emotional engagement. XboxAddict explicitly calls it "subpar," with no positive remarks about character dialogue or vocal performances, while CGMagazine and COGconnected describe it as "flat and lifeless" and "characterless," respectively. Games.cz uses the Czech term "prkenným" (wooden) to emphasize its static, unconvincing delivery, and Gaming Nexus notes that most performances are "wooden" except for Toufexis, whose work stands out. Hardcore Gamer compares the voice acting to the Ace Combat series, calling it "poorly executed" with "forced" lines, while PC Gamer criticizes actors struggling with poorly written dialogue, resulting in "shallow and forgettable characters." Repetition is another recurring issue, as highlighted by GamingTrend and Windows Central, who point to repetitive pilot lines that diminish immersion. These critiques collectively paint a picture of voice acting that often fails to elevate the narrative or emotional stakes. The overall consensus among critics is divided, with some acknowledging its functional quality while others find it lacking in impact. While titles like Finger Guns and IGN recognize the voice acting as "decent" or "fairly good," the majority of reviews—particularly from outlets like XboxAddict, CGMagazine, and PC Gamer—highlight its shortcomings, including monotony, poor delivery, and a failure to engage emotionally. The presence of notable performers like Elias Toufexis (mentioned by TheSixthAxis and Gaming Nexus) offers some relief, but these positives are often overshadowed by broader criticisms of repetition, flatness, and inadequate character development. Ultimately, the voice acting in MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries is seen as a mixed element that supports the game’s mechanics but falls short of delivering a compelling or immersive auditory experience.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries is a mixed bag of technical hiccups and incremental fixes, with PS5/Xbox Series X|S seeing smoother load times and minor stability wins, while PC battles buggy systems, clunky UIs, and inconsistent performance—overall, core mechanics shine but flaws overshadow its potential.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

89%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

11%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries varies across platforms, with some positives noted despite widespread issues. On PS5, reviewers like God is a Geek praised fast load times and controller optimization, while PlayStation LifeStyle highlighted cross-platform play and co-op features, though they acknowledged limitations like the absence of HDR support. For Xbox Series X|S, TheXboxHub noted improved load times compared to older consoles, and Attack of the Fanboy observed better stability post-patch, even if ray tracing performance was subpar. On PC, PC Gamer and GamingTrend acknowledged smooth performance on reviewed hardware, with some critics like Games.cz noting that engine optimizations were improving over time. Additionally, PSX Extreme pointed to incremental refinements in the PS4 version, suggesting technical improvements through updates. However, technical flaws are prevalent across all platforms. On PS5, PlayStation Universe criticized frame drops below 60fps and jarring pre-rendered cutscenes, while TheSixthAxis highlighted online matchmaking shortcomings despite cross-play support. For Xbox One, Finger Guns and TheXboxHub cited dated graphics and clunky systems like base management, with TheXboxHub noting the PC launch’s polish as a benchmark. On Xbox Series X, CGMagazine and XboxAddict criticized bugs, poor console port adaptations, and awkward controls, while Attack of the Fanboy pointed to frame drops near explosions. PC faced a barrage of issues: GameCrate and Games.cz detailed buggy repair systems, UI quirks, and inconsistent performance, while Screen Rant and Hardcore Gamer highlighted AI pathing flaws and stability problems. Even Destructoid noted minor but impactful UI glitches, underscoring a lack of polish across platforms. The overall consensus among critics is that MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries suffers from significant technical shortcomings, though some improvements exist on newer hardware. While PS5 and Xbox Series X|S benefit from faster load times and incremental fixes (e.g., TheXboxHub’s mention of post-patch stability), all platforms grapple with performance inconsistencies, AI issues, and UI flaws. PC received the harshest criticism for bugs, engine limitations, and a clunky interface (GameCrate, Games.cz), while PS4 and Xbox One versions were deemed less optimized but showed some progress over time (PSX Extreme). Despite these issues, many reviewers acknowledged that the game’s core mechanics remain functional, with PC Gamer noting smooth performance on capable hardware. The technical challenges, however, overshadowed its potential, leaving a mixed reception that highlights the need for further polish across all platforms.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

A deep, customizable mech combat experience with co-op and DLC-driven variety, but repetitive missions and simulation grind test patience, making it a polarizing pick for fans over casuals.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

13%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

81%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The overall sentiment toward MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries’ replay value is largely positive, with many critics highlighting its depth through features like mission variety, co-op play, and mech customization. Reviewers such as PlayStation LifeStyle and GamingTrend emphasize the game’s robust single-player campaigns, galactic maps, and dynamic mercenary economies, which offer substantial content for fans of the franchise. Finger Guns and TheXboxHub note that Career Mode, co-op multiplayer, and mech customization create a compelling loop for dedicated players, while Destructoid and IGN praise procedural mission generation and experimental free-play modes as key contributors to long-term engagement. The inclusion of DLCs, such as the Legend of the Kestrel Lancers, further expands replayability by introducing new missions and mechanics, as highlighted by Attack of the Fanboy and COGconnected. However, several critics point to significant drawbacks that may limit the game’s appeal over time. Repetition in mission structures and environments is a recurring issue, with TheSixthAxis, GameCritics, and PC Gamer noting that procedural missions and repetitive AI behavior can lead to monotony. Windows Central and Wccftech criticize the lack of innovation and tedium of grinding through tasks, while XboxAddict and Metro GameCentral argue that the simulation-heavy focus on management systems may alienate players who prioritize action over strategy. Additionally, New Game Network and Screen Rant mention that weak storytelling and limited progression in some systems (e.g., pilot development) reduce long-term incentive, despite the game’s technical depth. The consensus among critics is mixed but leans toward a balanced view: MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries offers strong replayability for fans of mech combat and simulation elements, particularly through its customization, co-op modes, and DLC expansions. However, its repetitive structures and niche appeal may deter broader audiences. PlayStation Universe and Xbox Tavern acknowledge that while the game’s complexity and depth can provide longevity for dedicated players, others find it overwhelming or tedious. Ultimately, the game’s replay value hinges on individual preferences—those who enjoy strategic management and mech customization will likely find it rewarding, but its flaws in variety and pacing may limit its appeal to casual or action-focused gamers. As GameSpew and Worth Playing note, the experience is a polarizing mix of satisfying mechanics and frustrating repetition.

TL;DR

replay value

A deep, customizable mech combat experience with co-op and DLC-driven variety, but repetitive missions and simulation grind test patience, making it a polarizing pick for fans over casuals.

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

37%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

63%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall reception of MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries highlights its strengths as a deep, mechanically rich experience tailored for fans of the BattleTech universe. Critics consistently praise its robust combat systems, intricate mech customization, and nostalgic homage to the series’ roots. PlayStation LifeStyle lauds it as “one of the best Mech games available on PS5,” while IGN commends its “robust mechanics” and retro aesthetic, noting that the game successfully recaptures the old-school charm of earlier MechWarrior titles. TheXboxHub emphasizes its “polished controls” and “immersive simulation elements,” calling it a standout console title despite its flaws. Additionally, Gaming Nexus and XboxAddict highlight the engaging single-player experience, with the latter noting that “its strengths outweigh its flaws” for mech enthusiasts. The game’s sprawling universe and tactical depth are frequently cited as major positives, appealing to players seeking a simulation-focused adventure. However, the game faces significant criticism for its accessibility issues, technical shortcomings, and repetitive design. Many reviewers point to its steep learning curve and complex systems as barriers for newcomers, with CGMagazine describing it as “divisive” due to its “steep learning curve and lack of accessibility.” TheSixthAxis and GameGrin note that repetition in missions and gameplay loops can become tiresome, while PC Gamer criticizes the “weak story and writing.” Technical issues like bugs, poor optimization, and clunky controls are also recurring complaints, with XboxAddict acknowledging “technical and design shortcomings” despite enjoying the single-player experience. Additionally, the game’s reliance on grinding and its underdeveloped economy management systems (as noted by Hooked Gamers and PC Games) further detract from its appeal. Critics like Screen Rant and Wccftech argue that the title feels “dated” and fails to innovate, limiting its broader appeal beyond hardcore fans. Despite these criticisms, the consensus among reviewers leans toward a balanced but polarizing assessment, with most agreeing that MechWarrior 5: Mercenaries is a worthwhile experience for dedicated fans of the franchise. While some, like Metro GameCentral (8/10) and TheXboxHub, praise its “highly successful return” and “ambitious scope,” others, such as Windows Central and Wccftech, find it “forgettable” or lacking in modern polish. The game’s strengths—deep combat, nostalgia, and simulation depth—are often overshadowed by its flaws, creating a divisive reception. However, the majority of critics acknowledge its value for veterans, with Gaming Nexus noting that it’s “a niche title that caters to long-time fans,” while IGN concludes that it “balances frustration with rewarding progression for fans of the series.” Ultimately, the game is seen as a mixed but ultimately positive entry in the mech genre, best suited for those willing to overlook its imperfections.

TL;DR

A deep, nostalgic MechWarrior experience marred by steep learning curves, technical glitches, and repetitive gameplay, yet praised for its combat depth, customization, and devotion to fans—worth it for veterans, frustrating for newcomers.

MONSTER

Reviews

74 reviews found

TheXboxHub

Xbox One

Jul 12, 2021