Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

Steam

Twitch

MONSTER

Dying Light: The Beast

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Dying Light: The Beast
Item: Dying Light: The Beast
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2025

GenresAdventure, Action, Horror, RPG, Multiplayer, First Person Perspective

AvailableSep 18, 2025

PlatformXbox Series X, PlayStation 5

DeveloperTechland

Overview

Dying Light: The Beast is a thrilling standalone zombie adventure set in a tightly-crafted rural region. Play as Kyle Crane, a legendary hero who breaks free after years of brutal experiments. Now, he must realize there’s more at stake than just revenge.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Dying Light: The Beast presents a compelling revenge story centered on Kyle Crane, praised for its emotional depth and connections to previous games. However, it suffers from clichéd writing and predictable plot twists, with critics noting the narrative feels secondary to gameplay. While some moments shine, the overall execution lacks depth and originality, appealing primarily to fans but likely disappointing newcomers seeking a richer experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

37%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

55%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The story of Dying Light: The Beast has garnered a mix of positive feedback from critics, particularly regarding its central character, Kyle Crane, and his quest for revenge. Many reviewers appreciate the narrative's focus on Crane's personal journey, with critics like MondoXbox highlighting the exploration of trauma and survival in a fresh setting, Castor Woods. The narrative's connection to the previous games is also noted as a strength, with critics such as Gamers' Temple and Gameliner praising the return of familiar characters and the emotional depth it adds to the gameplay experience. Additionally, some critics, like PlayStation Universe, commend the story for expanding the lore of the Dying Light universe, making it engaging without unnecessary fluff. However, the story has faced significant criticism for its execution and overall depth. Many reviewers describe the narrative as clichéd and predictable, with ComicBook and TrueGaming pointing out the lack of suspense and engaging character development. Critics like TheXboxHub and Gamer.no mention that the narrative feels secondary to the gameplay, serving primarily as a backdrop rather than a compelling focal point. Furthermore, several reviewers, including Game Informer and Games.cz, express disappointment in the overall quality of the writing, citing wooden dialogue and forgettable arcs that detract from the experience. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while Dying Light: The Beast offers a potentially engaging narrative centered on Kyle Crane's revenge, it ultimately falls short of expectations due to its predictable and clichéd elements. Critics like Gameliner and GamingBolt acknowledge that the story has its moments, but many agree that it lacks the depth and originality needed to elevate it beyond a standard revenge tale. The mixed reactions suggest that while the foundation of the story is solid, its execution leaves much to be desired, resulting in a narrative that is enjoyable for fans but may not resonate with newcomers or those seeking a more profound experience.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Dying Light: The Beast impresses with fluid parkour, visceral combat, and the strategic 'Beast Mode', earning positive reviews for its engaging gameplay and cooperative features. However, it faces criticism for clunky mechanics, repetitive combat, and a lack of innovation. While building on its predecessors, the game struggles with pacing and depth, resulting in a mixed reception. Fans may find satisfaction, but it doesn't quite hit the mark of a polished experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

66%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

32%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Dying Light: The Beast has garnered a generally positive reception from critics, highlighting its engaging mechanics and immersive elements. Many reviewers praised the refined parkour system, with critics like Eurogamer and MondoXbox noting the fluidity and agility of movement, which allows for dynamic exploration and combat. The introduction of the 'Beast Mode' has been particularly well-received, as it adds a new layer of strategy and excitement to encounters, with critics such as Gamers Heroes and Digital Chumps emphasizing its impact on gameplay dynamics. Additionally, the cooperative mode has been highlighted by Generación Xbox as a feature that enhances the overall experience, making it more enjoyable when played with others. The visceral combat, described as brutal and satisfying by critics like WellPlayed and Game Informer, further contributes to the game's appeal, providing a thrilling experience when battling zombies. However, the game is not without its criticisms. Several reviewers pointed out issues with the parkour mechanics, describing them as clunky or unresponsive in certain situations, particularly in dark areas, as noted by Saudi Gamer. Critics like ComicBook and Gamer.no highlighted a lack of focus and depth in some mechanics, leading to repetitive and frustrating combat experiences. Additionally, the RPG elements have been criticized for feeling unbalanced and slow to unlock, impacting the overall pacing of the game, as mentioned by MeuPlayStation. Some critics also noted that while the gameplay retains familiar elements from previous titles, it lacks significant innovation, with Invader and Combo Infinito expressing concerns about the introduction of unnecessary shooting mechanics that detract from the survival horror experience. Overall, the consensus among critics suggests that Dying Light: The Beast successfully builds upon its predecessors with a mix of engaging parkour, visceral combat, and the new Beast Mode, fostering a thrilling atmosphere. However, the game is hampered by some mechanical issues and a sense of repetitiveness in mission structure, as highlighted by Game8 and TrueGaming. While many reviewers appreciate the improvements and refinements made, the game still faces challenges in delivering a consistently polished experience, leading to a mixed but generally favorable reception. Critics like Worth Playing and IGN Spain encapsulate this sentiment by acknowledging the game's familiar yet improved mechanics, suggesting that while it may not reinvent the wheel, it still offers a satisfying experience for fans of the franchise.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Dying Light: The Beast impresses with stunning visuals and immersive environments, earning high praise from critics for its detailed landscapes and character designs. The alpine setting enhances exploration, and lighting effects are a standout feature. However, some reviewers point out technical issues, inconsistent texture quality, and a lack of vibrancy in certain areas. Overall, while there are shortcomings, the game is lauded for its strong visual experience, marking a significant improvement over prior entries in the series.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

77%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

23%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The overall sentiment regarding the graphics and visual design of Dying Light: The Beast is predominantly positive, with many critics praising the game's impressive visuals and immersive environments. Reviewers from various outlets, such as Eurogamer and Gamers' Temple, highlighted the game's visually appealing landscapes and detailed character models, particularly noting the variety of locations and the attention to detail in the environments. Critics like MondoXbox and TheXboxHub emphasized the game's striking alpine setting, which enhances the overall atmosphere and encourages exploration. The lighting effects were frequently mentioned as a highlight, contributing to the game's aesthetic appeal, with several reviewers, including COGconnected and Game Informer, commending the fidelity and detail of both character models and environments. Despite the overall acclaim, some critics pointed out a few shortcomings in the game's graphics. Generación Xbox noted that while the visuals are solid, they are not groundbreaking, with certain textures failing to meet high standards. Finger Guns and TrueGaming mentioned technical issues and visual bugs that detracted from the experience, while others, like IGN France and Metro GameCentral, observed a lack of vibrancy in some areas compared to previous titles. These critiques suggest that while the game excels in many aspects of visual design, there are moments where it falls short, particularly in texture quality and consistency across different environments. In summary, the consensus among critics is that Dying Light: The Beast offers a visually impressive experience, with many praising its detailed environments and character designs. The majority of reviewers, including those from GameBlast and GAMINGbible, found the graphics to be a significant improvement over previous entries in the series, contributing to an engaging and immersive atmosphere. While there are some noted issues regarding texture quality and technical performance, the overall sentiment remains highly favorable, indicating that the game successfully delivers a rich visual experience that enhances its gameplay.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Dying Light: The Beast nails sound design and music, earning high praise for its immersive atmosphere and tension-building audio elements. Critics laud its eerie soundscapes and impactful score, likening it to The Last of Us. However, some note minor flaws—overly pronounced effects and inconsistent voice acting—that slightly detract from the experience. Overall, the audio enhances gameplay, making it a standout title in its genre, despite a few areas needing improvement.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

75%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

25%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of Dying Light: The Beast have received widespread acclaim from critics, with many praising the immersive qualities and atmospheric depth they contribute to the gameplay experience. Eurogamer highlights the eerie noises and minimalistic musical themes that evoke tension, drawing comparisons to the acclaimed The Last of Us. Similarly, COGconnected emphasizes the top-notch sound design, noting the superb original score that enhances the overall atmosphere, while Game8 points out how chase music adds to the tension and the voice acting improves storytelling. Critics like Generación Xbox and IGN Spain also commend the effective use of music during tense moments, with well-executed voice acting further enriching the experience. The overall sentiment is that the audio elements significantly enhance immersion and engagement, making the game a standout in its genre. Despite the overwhelmingly positive reception, a few critics have pointed out areas for improvement. IGN Adria mentions that some sound effects can be overly pronounced and distracting, which detracts from the overall experience. Additionally, Games.cz notes that while the soundtrack is praised, certain sound effects could be improved. Combo Infinito also mentions inconsistencies in voice acting quality, with some performances being out of tone. These criticisms suggest that while the sound design is generally well-executed, there are minor flaws that could be addressed to elevate the experience further. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Dying Light: The Beast excels in sound design and music, creating an engaging and immersive atmosphere that enhances the gameplay. The majority of reviewers, including GameSpew and WellPlayed, agree that the soundtrack and audio effects complement the gameplay effectively, contributing to a visceral experience. The positive remarks from critics like Worth Playing, who praises the depth added by voice acting, further solidify the game's strong audio foundation. While there are some criticisms regarding specific sound effects and voice acting inconsistencies, they do not overshadow the general appreciation for the quality of sound design in the game.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Dying Light: The Beast boasts strong voice acting, especially from Roger Craig Smith as Kyle Crane, enhancing the narrative. Critics praise the immersive performances, including the Brazilian Portuguese version by Fábio Azevedo. However, many find the writing and character development lacking, leading to stilted performances and generic characters that undermine the experience. Overall, while the voice work shines, significant flaws in writing and depth leave a mixed impression.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

50%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

50%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in Dying Light: The Beast has received a largely positive reception from critics, with many highlighting the strong performances of key actors. Roger Craig Smith's return as Kyle Crane is frequently praised, with critics from Gamers' Temple and Game Informer noting that his performance adds significant depth to the character and enriches the narrative. The immersive quality of the voice acting is also emphasized, as seen in the reviews from Generación Xbox and Game8, which commend the overall contribution of the voice work to the gaming experience. Additionally, the Brazilian Portuguese version, featuring Fábio Azevedo, is recognized by Combo Infinito and GameBlast for its quality and ability to enhance character charm and immersion. However, not all feedback is favorable. Some critics express disappointment regarding the overall writing and character development, which leads to stilted performances. Finger Guns points out that while Smith's portrayal is commendable, the writing results in a wooden delivery. Similarly, IGN Adria mentions that while Smith's performance stands out, the rest of the cast feels generic and uninspired. Critics like PlayStation Universe and Saudi Gamer echo this sentiment, describing characters as lacking personality and emotional depth, which ultimately hampers player engagement with the story. Overall, the consensus among critics indicates that while the voice acting, particularly from Roger Craig Smith and Fábio Azevedo, is generally well-executed and enhances the narrative, there are notable shortcomings in character development and writing. Critics like WellPlayed and Gameliner affirm the positive impact of the voice acting on the game's narrative delivery, yet others highlight significant flaws that detract from the overall experience. This dichotomy suggests that while the voice performances are a strong aspect of Dying Light: The Beast, they are undermined by inconsistencies in character depth and writing quality, leaving a mixed impression on the game's overall voice acting.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

"Dying Light: The Beast" performs well on Xbox Series X and PS5, with smooth gameplay and solid mechanics, but both platforms face notable bugs and glitches. Critics praise the improvements over "Dying Light 2," yet persistent technical issues like graphical glitches and mission bugs could mar the experience. Overall, while promising, players should brace for potential frustrations.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

25%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

57%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

18%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

In analyzing the technical performance of "Dying Light: The Beast" across different gaming platforms, it is evident that both the Xbox Series X and PS5 versions have their strengths. For the Xbox Series X, critics like Gamers' Temple and TheXboxHub noted that the game runs smoothly with impressive mechanics and a well-designed world, highlighting a generally positive experience with minimal bugs compared to its predecessor, "Dying Light 2." Similarly, on the PS5, several reviewers, including Digital Chumps and IGN Spain, praised the game's overall stability and smooth gameplay, with many noting that the performance mode offers a solid experience even in chaotic moments, with no significant technical issues reported. However, despite these positives, both platforms also have their share of technical shortcomings. Eurogamer pointed out that the Xbox Series X suffers from bugs and glitches, including graphical malfunctions and problems with the day/night cycle. On the PS5, critics like COGconnected and Finger Guns echoed concerns about numerous technical issues, such as clipping, screen tearing, and quest bugs that detract from the overall experience. Additionally, GameOver.gr and Gamers Heroes highlighted game-breaking bugs and mission-related issues that could significantly impact gameplay, indicating that while the PS5 version performs well, it is not without its flaws. Overall, the consensus among critics reveals a mixed sentiment regarding the technical performance of "Dying Light: The Beast." While there are commendable aspects, such as the smoother performance on both Xbox Series X and PS5, the presence of bugs and glitches remains a significant concern. Critics like Worth Playing noted that the game feels more polished than "Dying Light 2" at launch, but many others, including Metro GameCentral and Invader, emphasized that persistent technical issues could hinder the overall experience. This duality suggests that while the game shows promise and improvement, players may still encounter frustrating technical challenges that could affect their enjoyment.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics largely praise Dying Light: The Beast for its replay value, citing extensive content, engaging gameplay, and strong cooperative play that keeps players invested. However, concerns about gameplay repetitiveness and shallow side activities could hinder long-term appeal. Despite these issues, the game is seen as a solid choice for fans of action and survival horror, offering a rewarding experience, though it may not win over everyone beyond its core audience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

48%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

48%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The overall sentiment regarding the replay value of Dying Light: The Beast is predominantly positive among critics, particularly those who appreciate the game's extensive content and engaging gameplay mechanics. Reviewers like Eurogamer and Gamers' Temple highlight the multiple difficulty modes and the inclusion of side missions that feel integral to the story, which significantly enhance replayability. Generación Xbox and MondoXbox echo this sentiment, noting that the cooperative play and abundance of collectibles contribute to an experience that can be enjoyed for hours. Critics such as LaPS4 also emphasize the game's solid cooperative mode and the substantial amount of content, suggesting that fans of the genre will find plenty to keep them engaged. However, several critics point out limitations that may hinder long-term replayability. Combo Infinito and Digital Chumps express concerns about the potential repetitiveness of gameplay mechanics and side activities, which could lead to a diminished desire to replay the game. Finger Guns and GameBlast mention that side activities may lack depth, and the limited number of impactful choices could deter some players from revisiting the game. Moreover, critics like TrueGaming and MeuPlayStation note that the absence of a fast travel system and slow progression in unlocking new abilities may make exploration feel tedious, ultimately affecting the game's replay value. Despite the mixed opinions on certain aspects of gameplay, the overall consensus among critics is that Dying Light: The Beast offers a solid replay value, especially for fans of action and survival horror games. While some reviewers, like The Jimquisition and Saudi Gamer, caution that repetitive tasks and a lack of unique features may limit appeal beyond its core audience, many others, including IGN Spain and WellPlayed, assert that the combination of side missions, exploration opportunities, and cooperative play creates an engaging experience. Ultimately, while there are areas for improvement, the game is generally regarded as a worthy investment for players seeking both challenge and exploration.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

74%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

25%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall sentiment towards "Dying Light: The Beast" is largely positive, with many critics praising its engaging gameplay, compelling storytelling, and immersive world-building. Reviewers like Gamers' Temple and Game Informer highlight the game as a standout entry in the franchise, emphasizing its thrilling parkour mechanics and impressive graphics. Critics such as MondoXbox and WellPlayed commend the game for refining the original formula and enhancing the overall experience, making it appealing to both newcomers and veterans alike. The game's ability to blend action and horror elements, as noted by Eurogamer, adds to its charm, with several reviewers describing it as an exhilarating and entertaining experience. However, the game is not without its flaws, which have been pointed out by numerous critics. Issues such as technical glitches, narrative depth, and some gameplay mechanics have been cited as drawbacks. For instance, ComicBook expresses disappointment in the game not fully capitalizing on its strengths, leading to a frustrating experience. Similarly, critics like The Jimquisition and TrueGaming mention that while the game shows improvement, it still suffers from significant issues that could frustrate players. The incorporation of shooting elements, as noted by Combo Infinito, also appears to detract from the survival horror experience that fans expect. In summary, the consensus among critics is that "Dying Light: The Beast" is a solid sequel that successfully combines the franchise's strengths with new innovations, despite its imperfections. While many reviewers, including IGN Spain and GameBlast, consider it the best entry in the series, there is a recognition that the game could have been even better with more polish and depth. Overall, it is seen as a must-play for fans of the genre, with the potential to captivate both loyal players and newcomers, provided they are willing to overlook some of its shortcomings.

TL;DR

"Dying Light: The Beast" earns praise for its thrilling parkour, compelling story, and immersive world, marking it as a standout sequel in the franchise. Critics commend its blend of action and horror but point out flaws like technical glitches and shallow narrative depth. It’s a solid, entertaining experience for both fans and newcomers, though some may find its imperfections frustrating. Overall, it’s a must-play but could have benefited from more polish.

MONSTER

Reviews

135 reviews found

Gamers' Temple

Xbox Series X

Oct 1, 2025