Search for games

Type three or more characters to search...

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III cover image

Links

Steam

Twitch

MONSTER

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III
Item: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III
Author: Critik Editorial Team

2023

GenresAdventure, Action, Shooter, Single Player, Multiplayer, First Person Perspective

AvailableNov 10, 2023

PlatformXbox Series X, PlayStation 4, PlayStation 5, Xbox One, PC

DeveloperInfinity Ward

Overview

The game brings "open combat, " offering players more choices in approaching the single-player missions. Makarov returns as the chief villain of the new campaign. The newly introduced Carry Forward system will let players keep their progression and inventory from Modern Warfare II. Multiplayer fans can expect 16 maps at the launch and at least 12 coming later. Zombies mode will also return and should offer the largest zombie map to date.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics have mixed opinions on Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III's story. Some like the fast-paced action and familiar characters, but many criticize the weak dialogue, lack of depth, and disjointed narrative. The campaign is often seen as disappointing, rushed, and lacking in memorable moments, falling short of expectations for the series.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive (80-100)

Mixed (50-79)

43%

Negative (0-49)

57%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The opinions of the critics regarding the story of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III are varied. Some critics, such as GAMES.CH and Gamereactor Finland, appreciate the continuation of the story from the previous game and the focus on hunting down the antagonist, Vladimir Makarov. They find the fast-paced nature of the story engaging and enjoy the presence of familiar characters like Captain Price and Ghost. However, the lack of exploration into Makarov's motivations and the weak dialogue are seen as drawbacks, diminishing the impact of the antagonist. The campaign is also criticized for being short and lacking in depth, with generic and forgettable characters, as mentioned by Game Rant, Digital Trends, and Finger Guns. On the negative side, several critics express disappointment in the campaign's overall execution. Critics like Multiplayer.it, Eurogamer Germany, and Guardian highlight the lack of Hollywood spectacle and bombastic action that the series is known for, as well as the campaign feeling rushed and unfinished. The narrative is criticized for being disjointed, lacking in pacing and resolution, and failing to smoothly connect with the story of the previous game. The lack of realism and credibility in the missions, flawed stealth system, and recycled levels from Warzone are also mentioned as negative aspects. Additionally, some critics, like Destructoid and Hobby Consolas, find the story to be underdeveloped, short, and lacking in coherence. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the story of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III falls short of expectations. The campaign is often described as disappointing, lackluster, and the weakest in the series. It is criticized for its short duration, weak storytelling, lack of memorable characters, and unsatisfying ending. The rushed development, disjointed narrative, and lack of depth are common criticisms. While some appreciate the continuation of the story and the presence of familiar characters, the overall sentiment is that the campaign fails to deliver a compelling and engaging narrative experience.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics have mixed opinions on Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III gameplay. It received praise for smooth gunplay and multiplayer mode, but was criticized for lack of innovation, repetitive missions, and shallow gameplay. Some found the level design enjoyable, while others felt it lacked depth. Overall, the game's strengths and weaknesses divided critics' opinions.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive (80-100)

27%

Mixed (50-79)

56%

Negative (0-49)

17%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The opinions of the critics regarding the gameplay of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III are mixed, with some positive and negative aspects highlighted. Several critics praised the smooth and responsive gunplay, describing it as excellent (Gamereactor UK, Vandal, Destructoid). They also appreciated the movement mechanics, with some critics mentioning the introduction of new features like slide cancel and Tac-Stance (Multiplayer.it). The multiplayer mode received positive feedback, with critics mentioning its fast-paced and well-balanced nature (Pure Xbox, PlaySense). The cooperative Zombies mode was also praised for providing a fun and thrilling experience (Noisy Pixel). However, there were several criticisms regarding the gameplay of Modern Warfare III. Some critics felt that the game lacked innovation and failed to deliver a fresh experience (Gameblog.fr, Atomix). The open combat missions, while introducing a new approach to level design, were criticized for lacking variety and depth (Finger Guns, SpazioGames). The repetitive nature of the missions, which often devolved into massive firefights, was also mentioned as a drawback (But Why Tho?, NME). The enemy AI was criticized for being mediocre and lacking tactical nuance (Movies Games and Tech, Hobby Consolas). Additionally, some critics felt that the gameplay lacked memorable moments and set pieces (BaziCenter, Finger Guns). Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the gameplay of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III has its strengths and weaknesses. The smooth gunplay and movement mechanics were widely appreciated, as well as the improvements made in the multiplayer mode. However, there were concerns about the lack of innovation, repetitive missions, and shallow open combat gameplay. The game received mixed feedback regarding its level design, with some critics finding it enjoyable and others criticizing it for lacking variety and depth. While some critics praised specific features and mechanics, the overall sentiment suggests that the gameplay of Modern Warfare III did not meet the expectations of all reviewers.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics mostly praise Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III for its impressive graphics, realistic lighting effects, and detailed environments, with some calling it among the best in the series. However, some critics criticize the reuse of assets from previous titles, noting a lack of creativity and new experiences. Overall, while there are some negative opinions, the majority of critics acknowledge the game's visually appealing design and attention to detail.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive (80-100)

57%

Mixed (50-79)

37%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The opinions of the critics regarding the graphics and visual design of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III are generally positive. Many critics praise the game for its impressive graphics, detailed environments, and realistic lighting effects. Game Rant, Gamereactor Finland, and Vandal all highlight the incredible graphics and visually appealing environments. They mention the highly-detailed environments and realistic lighting effects that enhance the overall visual experience. Critics like Multiplayer.it and BaziCenter also commend the visual rendering and graphics engine of the game, stating that it is beautiful and among the best in the series. Additionally, Digital Trends and Guardian appreciate the high fidelity and attention to detail in the graphics, including grass and facial expressions. However, there are some negative aspects mentioned by a few critics regarding the graphics and visual design of Modern Warfare III. Critics like But Why Tho?, IGN Adria, and Gamer.no express disappointment with the reuse of assets from previous titles, including maps and buildings, which they feel negatively impacts the overall visual design. They mention that this lack of creativity and reliance on nostalgia can make the locations feel recycled and lacking in new experiences. IGN Italia also notes that some CGI cutscenes have lower quality compared to Modern Warfare 2. Additionally, Gamer.no states that many of the maps in the game are rehashed versions from previous Call of Duty games and do not feel as fresh or visually unique as those in Modern Warfare 2019. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III has impressive graphics and visual design, with attention to detail and realistic lighting effects. The majority of critics appreciate the highly-detailed environments and visually appealing visuals. Critics like Movies Games and Tech, Atomix, and PlayStation Universe praise the game for its stunning visuals and improved textures. They mention the seamless action and impressive cinematic experience. However, there are criticisms regarding the reuse of assets and lack of new content in terms of visuals and design. Critics like Gamer.no and IGN Adria express disappointment with the lackluster graphics and visual design, particularly in comparison to Modern Warfare 2019. Despite these negative opinions, the overall sentiment leans towards positive, with the majority of critics acknowledging the impressive graphics and visual design of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics mostly praise the sound design in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III, highlighting the immersive gun sounds and attention to detail in maps. Some criticisms include poor voice acting and audio issues, but overall, the consensus is that the sound design is impressive and enhances the gameplay experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive (80-100)

59%

Mixed (50-79)

36%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The opinions of the critics regarding the sound design and music of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III are generally positive. Many critics praise the sound design, specifically highlighting the gun sounds and attention to detail in the maps. Game Rant, Atomix, and BaziCenter all commend the game's sound design, with BaziCenter specifically mentioning the gun sounds as a standout feature. Gamereactor Finland and Multiplayer.it also appreciate the immersive and powerful weapon and explosion sounds. The addictive sound effects in the multiplayer mode are mentioned by Hobby Consolas and INVEN. Noisy Pixel praises the top-notch voice acting from iconic characters like Price and Soap, adding to the overall positive sentiment towards the sound design. However, there are some criticisms regarding the sound design and music of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III. Movies Games and Tech mentions poor voice acting, while Digital Trends points out audio issues with distant footsteps and annoying prompts. PlaySense highlights flaws in the sound design, such as randomly and often late footsteps and sounds coming from the wrong direction. Pocket-lint expresses disappointment in the absence of true spatial audio. Despite these criticisms, they do not seem to outweigh the overall positive sentiment towards the sound design. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the sound design of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III is impressive and immersive. The attention to detail in the gun sounds and explosion effects is highly praised. The voice acting, although criticized by Movies Games and Tech, is commended by Noisy Pixel for iconic character performances. The addictive sound effects in the multiplayer mode are also mentioned positively. While there are some criticisms regarding audio issues and the absence of certain features like true spatial audio, the overall sentiment leans towards the positive side. The sound design and music of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III are considered to be of high quality and enhance the gameplay experience.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics have mixed opinions on the voice acting in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III. Some praise the immersive sound design and performances of certain characters like Price and Soap, while others criticize the weak dialogue and lack of character development, with some even calling it poor overall. Overall, the consensus is that the voice acting has both positive and negative aspects, leading to a varied reception among critics.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive (80-100)

50%

Mixed (50-79)

38%

Negative (0-49)

13%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The opinions of the critics regarding the voice acting in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III are quite varied. Gamereactor Finland praises the sound design and natural voice acting, stating that it adds to the immersive experience of the game. Noisy Pixel also commends the voice acting, specifically mentioning the performances of iconic characters like Price and Soap as top-notch. This indicates that there are positive aspects to the voice acting in the game, with some critics appreciating the immersion and the performances of certain characters. However, there are also negative opinions regarding the voice acting in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III. GAMES.CH criticizes the antagonist's voice acting, stating that it is overshadowed by weak dialogue and a lack of character development. Digital Trends also mentions that talented actors are stifled by a script lacking gravity. Movies Games and Tech simply states that the voice acting is poor, without providing further details. These negative opinions suggest that there are shortcomings in the voice acting, particularly in terms of dialogue and character development. Overall, the consensus among the critics is mixed regarding the voice acting in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III. While some critics appreciate the immersive sound design and the performances of certain characters, others criticize the weak dialogue and lack of character development. The Daily Star mentions that the single-player storyline is okay, featuring the beloved character Capt Price and his motley crew, but does not specifically comment on the voice acting. TheSixthAxis praises the campaign for its excellent voice performances but does not provide any further information. Therefore, it can be concluded that the voice acting in the game has both positive and negative aspects, resulting in a mixed overall sentiment among the critics.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics had mixed opinions on the Technical Performance of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III across different platforms. Xbox Series X received praise for smooth gameplay but criticized for poor servers and UI/UX issues. PlayStation 5 had varying feedback, with some praising stability and others noting bugs. PC faced multiplayer problems like matchmaking issues. Players should consider platform-specific factors before choosing a version to play.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive (80-100)

33%

Mixed (50-79)

33%

Negative (0-49)

33%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

In terms of the Technical Performance on Xbox Series X, the majority of critics had positive experiences. Gamereactor Finland praised the smooth gameplay, while Movies Games and Tech commended the intuitive controls. However, Gamereactor UK mentioned poor servers and described the game as a UI/UX nightmare. This indicates that there may be some issues with the online experience and user interface on this platform. On the PlayStation 5, the opinions regarding the Technical Performance were more mixed. IGN Italia highlighted the stable frame rate and lack of major bugs, while Noisy Pixel had a similar positive experience with no bugs or crashes. However, Atomix criticized the game for numerous bugs and glitches, and PlaySense mentioned various bugs, including issues with airstrikes and animation glitches. These conflicting opinions suggest that the Technical Performance on PS5 may vary for different players. For PC, the critics' opinions focused on multiplayer issues. GamingBolt mentioned matchmaking and latency issues affecting the overall experience, while SECTOR.sk criticized occasional glitches and the launcher/game startup process. Windows Central, on the other hand, noted generally good performance and stability, with some issues in multiplayer. These opinions indicate that the Technical Performance on PC may be impacted by multiplayer-related problems. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the Technical Performance of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III varies across different gaming platforms. While Xbox Series X received positive feedback for smooth gameplay and intuitive controls, there were concerns about poor servers and UI/UX issues. On the PlayStation 5, some critics praised the stable frame rate and lack of major bugs, while others mentioned numerous bugs and glitches. PC had a mix of positive comments regarding performance and stability, but also criticisms related to multiplayer issues. It is important for players to consider these platform-specific factors when deciding which version of the game to play.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics are divided on the replay value of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III. The multiplayer mode receives praise for its thrilling experience and nostalgic maps, while the Zombies mode disappoints some with its lack of depth. Mixed opinions also exist on the short campaign length and recycled content. Overall, the multiplayer mode is seen as the main draw for replayability, offering diverse gameplay experiences.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive (80-100)

18%

Mixed (50-79)

58%

Negative (0-49)

24%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions of the critics regarding the replay value of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III are mixed. Several critics highlight the multiplayer mode as a major positive aspect of the game. Game Rant praises the multiplayer for offering a thrilling experience that keeps fans engaged for hours, while Multiplayer.it mentions the largest arsenal in Call of Duty history and the integration of content from Modern Warfare II. NME also commends the multiplayer as one of the best in Call of Duty history, with well-paced matches and on-point weapon balance. The inclusion of nostalgic maps from previous games, particularly Modern Warfare 2, is seen as a positive by Gamereactor Finland, IGN Spain, and NME. The cooperative Zombies mode is also appreciated by critics like Noisy Pixel, PlaySense, and Gamer.nl. These aspects contribute to the replay value of the game, providing depth, longevity, and enjoyable experiences for players. However, there are also negative opinions regarding the replay value of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III. Critics like Pure Xbox, Daily Star, and Eurogamer Germany express disappointment in the Zombies mode, considering it a weak link. Digital Trends mentions the lack of motivation to replay missions due to the gimmicky nature of the Open Combat Missions. Some critics, such as IGN Adria and IGN Italia, mention the short campaign length and recycled content as factors that reduce the replay value. Game Informer criticizes the lack of meaningful rewards in the Open Combat missions and the grindy unlock system in the multiplayer mode. The slow and tedious progression system in the Zombies mode is also criticized by Game Informer. These criticisms highlight certain aspects of the game that may not provide enough incentive for players to replay it. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the multiplayer mode of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III offers the most replay value. The multiplayer is praised for its thrilling experience, diverse offerings, revamped zombie battles, and the inclusion of nostalgic maps. The cooperative Zombies mode is also seen as an enjoyable aspect of the game. However, there are concerns about the lack of originality, recycled content, and short campaign length, which may affect the overall replay value. While some critics appreciate the depth and longevity of the multiplayer, others express disappointment in the Zombies mode. Ultimately, the opinions are mixed, with some critics finding enough replay value in the game while others feel it falls short in certain aspects.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive (80-100)

Mixed (50-79)

71%

Negative (0-49)

22%

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

In analyzing the opinions of multiple reviewers regarding the overall verdict of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III, it is evident that there are both positive and negative aspects to consider. Several critics praised the game for its enjoyable multiplayer experience and entertaining Zombies mode. Gamereactor Finland commended the polished mechanics and intense gameplay, while Movies Games and Tech highlighted the nostalgia-infused elements and amazing multiplayer. Additionally, CGMagazine found the single-player campaign and story to be enjoyable, and Pure Xbox considered Modern Warfare 3 a solid entry for multiplayer enthusiasts. These positive aspects of the game demonstrate that it has certain strengths that appeal to fans of the franchise. However, there are several criticisms raised by the reviewers that cannot be ignored. Many critics expressed disappointment in the single-player campaign, citing issues such as rushed and short gameplay, lack of innovation, and a forgettable story. Game Rant and Eurogamer Germany specifically mentioned that the campaign was the worst in the series. Furthermore, there were concerns about recycled content, high price tags, and a lack of overall innovation. Critics such as But Why Tho? and Digital Trends considered the game to be stale and lacking in originality. These negative aspects indicate that Modern Warfare 3 falls short in delivering a compelling and fresh gaming experience. Overall, the consensus among the critics leans towards a mixed reception for Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III. While some reviewers found enjoyment in the multiplayer and Zombies modes, others expressed disappointment in the lack of innovation, recycled content, and underwhelming single-player campaign. The game's shortcomings, such as the rushed development, weak story, and high price, were frequently mentioned. Critics like Game Informer and Push Square even suggested that the series needed a reboot or a pause to reassess its direction. Despite the mixed opinions, it is clear that the multiplayer aspect of the game garnered more positive feedback than the single-player campaign. Ultimately, players interested in the multiplayer experience and nostalgic elements may find enjoyment in Modern Warfare 3, but those seeking a more complete and innovative gaming experience may be left wanting.

TL;DR

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III received mixed reviews. Critics praised its multiplayer and Zombies mode but criticized the lack of innovation and underwhelming single-player campaign. While some found enjoyment in certain aspects, others felt the game fell short in delivering a fresh gaming experience. Overall, the consensus leans towards a mixed reception, with the multiplayer aspect receiving more positive feedback than the single-player campaign.

MONSTER

Reviews

184 reviews found

Windows Central

Nov 15, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Enjoyable experience with flaws, worthwhile AAA experience with multiplayer and Zombies modes

Read full review

MGG

PlayStation 5

Nov 15, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The campaign may be underwhelming, but the multiplayer and Zombies modes make up for it.

Read full review

Multiplayer.it

Xbox Series X

Nov 14, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III is a paradoxical game that lacks innovation but delivers enjoyable gameplay and a nostalgic multiplayer experience.

Read full review

GamingTrend

Nov 14, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Mixed reviews, with enjoyable multiplayer and entertaining Zombies mode, but criticized for lackluster campaign and reused content.

Read full review

IGN Italia

PlayStation 5

Nov 13, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The new Call of Duty iteration may feel repetitive to some, despite the abundance of content, and the forgettable campaign leaves a less significant impact compared to the multiplayer and derivative Zombie mode.

Read full review

CGMagazine

PlayStation 5

Nov 15, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The reviewer enjoyed playing Modern Warfare III and found the campaign and its story enjoyable. The game offers a solid single-player campaign, well-rounded multiplayer mode, and a fresh Zombies mode. The short campaign length and full AAA price may be a concern for some, but the reviewer expects to play the game a lot over the next few months.

Read full review

Jeuxvideo.com

PlayStation 5

Nov 14, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The game is seen as lacking innovation but still enjoyable for fans of the series.

Read full review

Gamereactor Finland

Xbox Series X

Nov 13, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The game has polished mechanics and offers intense and diverse gameplay at its best, but the AI enemies can be overly aggressive, and the single-player campaign feels rushed and short. The review concludes with a rating of 7 out of 10, highlighting the game's strengths and weaknesses.

Movies Games and Tech

Xbox Series X

Nov 13, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Despite its shortcomings, the nostalgia-infused elements and amazing multiplayer make Call of Duty: MW3 worth buying.

Read full review

Everyeye.it

PlayStation 5

Nov 14, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 falls short compared to its predecessors and offers less thrilling action. The review suggests waiting for a comprehensive assessment of the game before giving a final verdict.

Read full review