My Hero Academia: All's Justice

The story mode of My Hero Academia: All's Justice receives praise for its faithful adaptation of the anime’s final arcs, particularly the Final War arc, which is highlighted as a standout element by several critics. SpazioGames commends the game for capturing the essence of the series through cinematic sequences and key moments, while Hobby Consolas applauds its epic scale and emotional depth, noting the inclusion of villain perspectives and creative liberties. Digitale Anime emphasizes the structured narrative and large-scale battles as some of the game’s strongest aspects, and Just Play it highlights high-quality visuals, excellent music, and faithful voice acting that make battles feel like key anime episodes. Additionally, ReGame It appreciates the seven distinct paths, including a dedicated storyline for Shigaraki, which adds variety to the experience. These positives underscore the game’s appeal to long-time fans seeking a nostalgic tribute to the source material. However, the narrative faces significant criticism for its technical and structural shortcomings. Multiple reviewers, including SmashPad and Pizza Fria, lambaste the reliance on static screenshots and low-quality animations, calling the storytelling rushed and disjointed, akin to a "PowerPoint presentation." Cerealkillerz and COGconnected note inconsistent cutscenes and a lack of depth, with the Hero Diaries criticized as filler and the final battle deemed overly difficult and frustrating by Multiplayer.it and ElDesmarque. The game’s linear structure and reliance on anime footage over dynamic 3D sequences are also highlighted as drawbacks, with CGMagazine pointing out that some dialogue scenes use static JPEG images from the anime, undermining immersion. Additionally, the omission of earlier seasons (like 5 and 6) and a lack of recaps for newcomers, as noted by The Outerhaven and Play Watch Read, create gaps that alienate those unfamiliar with the source material. Overall, the critics agree that All’s Justice is a polarizing experience, best suited for dedicated fans of the franchise. While its faithful adaptation of key moments and emotional beats resonates with enthusiasts, technical limitations and a lack of innovation hinder its broader appeal. The game’s narrative structure, though praised for its depth and character exploration by some (like GamersRD and GamerFocus), is often criticized as repetitive or underdeveloped by others (e.g., Player 2 and But Why Tho?). Despite mixed reception, the consensus leans toward it being a nostalgic but flawed tribute to My Hero Academia, with its strengths in storytelling and visuals overshadowed by inconsistencies in presentation and accessibility. As IGN Italia notes, the game’s cinematic sequences and dual perspectives from heroes and villains offer a compelling experience, but its convoluted timeline and reliance on static imagery leave much to be desired for those seeking a more polished narrative.

The gameplay of My Hero Academia: All's Justice is generally praised for its accessibility, unique mechanics, and variety. Critics highlight the 3v3 combat system as a standout feature, with SmashPad noting its "easy-to-learn" nature and "Rising Meter counters," while Cerealkillerz calls it the "best in the series" due to its robust roster of over 60 characters and well-implemented Quirk-based mechanics. The tag team system, including character switching and strategic depth, is frequently lauded—SpazioGames and Multiplayer.it both commend its balance between simplicity and complexity. Modes like Team-Up Missions and Hero’s Diary add variety, with Loot Level Chill praising the "detailed" combo mechanics and GamersRD noting the game's ability to cater to both casual and technical players. The inclusion of unique abilities like Plus Ultra attacks and Rising Gauge systems also earns praise, as seen in Digitale Anime’s acknowledgment of "tactical depth" and "vertical combat." However, several critics point to significant flaws that detract from the experience. Technical issues like poor collision detection (Multiplayer.it), unreliable targeting (Multiplayer.it), and chaotic camera angles (SpazioGames) hinder strategic play, while others criticize repetitive mechanics and unbalanced fights. SmashPad mentions All For One’s "unfair projectile spam," and Game8 notes that combat becomes "repetitive over time." The lack of depth in controls and movesets is a recurring complaint: VideoGamer calls the gameplay "shallow" with "no complex combos," while Try Hard Guides criticizes characters for having only "3-4 abilities" and relying on button-mashing. Additionally, modes like Team-Up Missions are seen as underdeveloped (Omelete) or tedious (CGMagazine), and issues like floaty movement (Game8) and inconsistent mechanics (ElDesmarque) frustrate players. The game’s focus on spectacle over complexity also draws criticism, with IGN Italia noting that "mechanics prioritize spectacle over complexity." Overall, the critics agree that All's Justice succeeds as an accessible, character-driven fighting game with a strong emphasis on teamwork and Quirk-based variety, but it struggles to maintain depth and consistency. While many praise its approachability and creative mechanics—such as the tag system (SmashPad, GamersRD) and dynamic combat (Digitale Anime)—others argue that its repetitive nature, technical flaws, and lack of strategic nuance limit its appeal. The game walks a fine line between being a fun, flashy experience for fans and falling short of the complexity expected in competitive fighting games. As Combo Infinito notes, the tag system is "the most interesting aspect" but fails to sustain long-term engagement, while IGN Italia and Indigo GEEK highlight the tension between accessibility and depth. Despite these critiques, the game’s strengths in character variety and team-based strategies ensure it remains a notable entry in the series, even if its flaws prevent it from being a definitive success.

The graphics and visual design of My Hero Academia: All's Justice are largely praised for their faithful adaptation of the anime’s aesthetic, with many critics highlighting its ability to translate the source material into a cohesive gaming experience. SmashPad and ElDesmarque commend the game’s accurate character designs and Quirk animations, noting that the art style effectively mirrors the original series. SpazioGames and VideoGamer emphasize the high fidelity of character models and dynamic effects, with the latter praising "flashy spectacle" and immersive cutscenes that rival the anime’s energy. Additionally, Digitale Anime and IGN Italia laud the detailed character models, CGI sequences, and cel-shaded visuals that capture the series’ vibrant tone. The game’s use of onomatopoeic elements and expressive animations further enhances its comic-book-like presentation, as noted by GamersRD and Just Play it. These positives collectively underscore the developers’ success in maintaining the anime’s visual identity while adapting it for interactive gameplay. However, several critics point to significant shortcomings in technical execution and design consistency. The use of static screenshots instead of 3D recreations for key scenes is criticized as "cheap" by SmashPad, while Multiplayer.it and Game8 highlight underwhelming environments and repetitive stages. SpazioGames and Pizza Fria note issues like excessive visual effects causing chaos during combat, texture pop-ins, and frame rate drops that detract from immersion. Cerealkillerz and Hooked Gamers point to inconsistent cutscenes, with some sequences using washed-out visuals or low-resolution static images, creating a jarring experience. Additionally, COGconnected and Gameliner criticize the "empty" Musutafu City hub and lack of detail in Team Up Missions, while Try Hard Guides and Gameblog.fr describe stiff animations and minimalistic level design that fail to match the anime’s cinematic grandeur. These technical and artistic flaws reveal a game that prioritizes style over substance in several areas. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed but leans toward appreciation for the game’s dedication to the source material’s visual identity, tempered by frustrations over technical polish and design choices. While many praise its faithful adaptation and vibrant art style—echoed by reviewers like ElDesmarque, VideoGamer, and Digitale Anime—the recurring critiques of repetitive environments, inconsistent cutscenes, and performance issues (as noted by SpazioGames, Pizza Fria, and Game8) highlight a game that feels more like a passionate fan project than a polished AAA release. The balance between homage and innovation remains uneven, with some critics, such as IGN Italia and Everyeye.it, acknowledging its strengths while others, like GamersRD and COGconnected, find it lacking in ambition. Ultimately, All's Justice succeeds in capturing the spirit of My Hero Academia but struggles to translate that into a visually cohesive and technically refined experience.

The sound design and music of My Hero Academia: All's Justice received widespread praise for their energetic and immersive qualities. Critics like Hobby Consolas highlighted the "thrilling music that complements the action," while Pizza Fria and Just Play it emphasized how the soundtrack blends "energetic battle tracks" with emotional scenes, enhancing immersion. The original Japanese voice acting was consistently lauded for its faithfulness to the anime, with Pizza Fria noting it "enhances immersion" and Combo Infinito praising its "excellent" quality alongside surprisingly strong English dubbing. Additionally, Digitale Anime and Gameliner appreciated how the music drew from original anime tracks, amplifying emotional moments and reinforcing the game’s fanservice appeal. The sound effects were also commended for their impact, with Game8 highlighting "impactful sound effects" that added weight to combat, while Just Play it noted they "add weight to attacks." However, several critics pointed out notable shortcomings. Cerealkillerz and Combo Infinito criticized the soundtrack’s repetitive nature, with the former noting its quick repetition and the latter pointing out a lack of iconic anime themes. Hooked Gamers and MKAU Gaming raised concerns about reused audio/video elements and inconsistent vocal performances, respectively, with the latter mentioning "vocal lines from All Might and Todoroki sound off." Cloud Dosage and Game8 also noted that repetitive battle dialogue and voice lines became noticeable over time. Meanwhile, Atomix described the music as "heroic but generic," lacking the original anime’s signature soundscapes, while Everyeye.it acknowledged rearranged themes but highlighted their credibility through improved physics. These critiques underscored a tension between the game’s ambitious audio design and its execution. Overall, the consensus among critics was largely positive, with the game’s audio elements being a standout feature for fans of the franchise. While the soundtrack and voice acting were celebrated for their energy, faithfulness to the source material, and immersive qualities, recurring issues like repetition and generic compositions tempered the experience. Hobby Consolas, Pizza Fria, and Digitale Anime emphasized the audio’s role in enhancing the game’s epic tone, while Combo Infinito and Atomix acknowledged its limitations. Despite these critiques, the majority of reviewers agreed that the sound design and music effectively supported the game’s action and narrative, making it a strong point for both newcomers and longtime fans.

The voice acting in My Hero Academia: All's Justice is widely praised for its fidelity to the source material and immersive quality, with many critics highlighting its strengths across both Japanese and English tracks. Cerealkillerz and Hobby Consolas lauded the "top-tier performances" and "dramatic intensity," emphasizing that the Japanese voices particularly enhance the game’s authenticity, while Pizza Fria noted their "fidelity to the anime" for adding depth to combat and narrative moments. Combo Infinito and Game8 praised the English dub as "excellent" and "surprising in quality," respectively, with Play Watch Read and Digitale Anime appreciating how the original voice actors brought "authenticity" and "emotional depth" to key scenes. The inclusion of both language options was seen as a significant asset for fans, with many noting that it enriched the overall experience without overshadowing the game’s core mechanics. However, several critics pointed out notable flaws, particularly in the English dub and technical execution. SmashPad criticized the "excessive dialogue during fights" as distracting and highlighted issues with subtitle readability when switching to Japanese audio, while COGconnected called the English voice acting "terrible," citing inconsistent translations and unexpected language shifts. MKAU Gaming specifically called out "inconsistent or poorly executed" lines from All Might and Todoroki, and CGMagazine noted that static JPEG images in dialogue scenes undermined the voice work’s impact. Additionally, Cloud Dosage and Game8 mentioned repetition in victory lines and attack shouts, which diminished their emotional weight over extended playtime. These critiques suggest that while the voice acting itself was strong, its presentation and technical implementation had room for improvement. Overall, the consensus among critics leans toward a positive assessment of the game’s voice acting, with most acknowledging its contribution to immersion and authenticity. While Japanese voices were consistently praised for their quality and alignment with the anime, the English dub received mixed reactions, with some calling it "excellent" and others criticizing its inconsistencies. Technical issues like subtitle readability and repetition in dialogue were recurring concerns, but these did not overshadow the general appreciation for the voice work’s role in enhancing the game’s narrative and character dynamics. Critics like Cerealkillerz, Hobby Consolas, and Combo Infinito emphasized the strengths of both language tracks, while others, such as SmashPad and COGconnected, highlighted areas needing refinement. The result is a largely favorable reception, with voice acting serving as a key strength despite its imperfections.

The technical performance of My Hero Academia: All’s Justice varies across platforms, with some notable strengths. On the PS5, several reviewers highlighted stability and smooth gameplay despite minor issues. ElDesmarque praised its ability to handle chaotic combat sequences without significant hiccups, while Voxel noted only minor frame drops during intense battles, emphasizing overall stability. IGN Italia reported no technical issues, suggesting a polished experience, and Enternity.gr confirmed smooth 60fps performance on Xbox Series X, though this platform wasn’t explicitly mentioned by others. On PC, ReGame It acknowledged smooth performance without major glitches but criticized the lack of ultra-wide monitor support. Meanwhile, Combo Infinito and CGMagazine pointed to optimization issues, with the latter calling the PC version “barely exceeding the quality of a mobile game.” The Xbox Series X received praise for its consistent 60fps performance, as noted by Enternity.gr, though no other platforms were evaluated on this system. Negatives across platforms reveal persistent technical challenges. On the PS5, critics like SpazioGames and Multiplayer.it cited clunky camera systems, collision detection flaws, and online netcode issues that disrupted gameplay. Pizza Fria reported frame rate drops and crashes, while COGconnected highlighted motion blur and unpolished animations. GamersRD noted environmental limitations, and Indigo GEEK criticized rigid movement and awkward camera angles. On PC, Combo Infinito and But Why Tho? pointed to stuttering, poor optimization, and janky traversal mechanics, with CGMagazine calling the PC version “rushed” and lacking depth. The Outerhaven specifically called out uneven physics in hub areas, while Gameliner lamented a 60fps cap and awkward controls. Xbox Series X faced no major technical complaints, but this platform’s performance wasn’t extensively reviewed. Overall, the consensus leans toward mixed results, with PS5 receiving the most balanced feedback—some praise for stability but significant criticism of camera systems and collision mechanics. The PC version struggled with optimization and design flaws, as highlighted by Combo Infinito and CGMagazine, while Xbox Series X emerged as the most technically consistent platform. Despite these differences, many reviewers acknowledged the game’s ambition, with ElDesmarque and Voxel praising its technical execution amid minor issues. However, recurring complaints about camera behavior (SpazioGames, Multiplayer.it), performance inconsistencies (Pizza Fria, Combo Infinito), and lack of polish (COGconnected, Indigo GEEK) suggest that the game’s technical foundation, while functional, required further refinement to fully realize its potential.

The reviewers generally acknowledge that My Hero Academia: All’s Justice offers a commendable amount of replayability through its diverse modes and features. Critics like SmashPad highlight additional content such as Team Up Missions, Archives Battle, and Character Memory, which add variety despite some being labeled as filler. Cerealkillerz and SpazioGames praise the large character roster and customization options, while Hobby Consolas notes over 50 hours of content, including open-world exploration and cosmetic customization. MKAU Gaming emphasizes strong replay value for fans and newcomers alike, citing S-rank challenges and multiple modes like Story, Team-Up Missions, and Archive Battles. The game’s focus on fan service, collectibles, and side stories also encourages repeated playthroughs, as noted by ElDesmarque and Pizza Fria, who appreciate the creative use of characters’ abilities and expanded longevity. However, several critics point to significant drawbacks that limit long-term engagement. Multiplayer.it and COGconnected criticize repetitive secondary missions and underdeveloped modes like Team Up Missions, which feel unengaging or lack meaningful rewards. Omelete and CGMagazine highlight issues with repetitive combat mechanics, filler content, and a stale open-world structure, while But Why Tho? and Gameblog.fr argue that mission variety and stage repetition diminish the experience. Loot Level Chill and IGN Italia note that while there is substantial content, its scope feels limited, and some modes lack polish or innovation. The reliance on prior knowledge of the anime, as mentioned by Play Watch Read, also narrows the game’s appeal, making it less accessible to newcomers. These critiques suggest that the game’s replayability hinges heavily on fan enthusiasm rather than robust mechanics. Overall, the consensus among critics is that All’s Justice provides moderate to strong replay value for dedicated fans but falls short in sustaining long-term interest due to repetitive elements and underdeveloped content. While Hobby Consolas and MKAU Gaming celebrate its variety and depth, many reviewers like CGMagazine and But Why Tho? argue that the game’s flaws—such as filler missions and lack of innovation—diminish its appeal beyond initial playthroughs. The balance between fan service and gameplay mechanics remains a key factor, with SpazioGames and ElDesmarque acknowledging nostalgia-driven incentives but also recognizing limitations in scope. Ultimately, the game is seen as a worthwhile experience for enthusiasts but one that struggles to justify repeated play for broader audiences.