Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

Amazon

Twitch

MONSTER

For Honor

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of For Honor
Item: For Honor
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2017

GenresFantasy, Adventure, Action, Third Person Perspective, RPG, Fighting, Single Player, Multiplayer

AvailableFeb 13, 2017

PlatformPC, Xbox One, PlayStation 4

DeveloperUbisoft Montreal

Overview

Enter the chaos of war as a bold Knight, a brutal Viking, or a deadly Samurai. Play the thrilling story campaign or fight in brutal PvP modes, all on new dedicated servers. Enjoy an evolved experience with 18 Heroes, 18 maps, new PvP and ranked modes, thousands of gear items, and more.

Elsewhere

6.4

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

For Honor's story mode garners mixed reviews, praised for introducing game mechanics but criticized for being shallow, lifeless, and lacking emotional depth. Critics see it as a brief, repetitive tutorial more than a compelling narrative, with forgettable characters and a confusing plot. Overall, the consensus is disappointment, urging a shift in focus to the multiplayer experience instead.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

72%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

19%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The story of For Honor has received a mix of opinions from critics, with some highlighting its potential strengths. A few reviewers, like Eurogamer Italy and Digital Chumps, noted that the campaign serves as a decent introduction to the game's mechanics and factions, providing context for the multiplayer experience. Critics such as Arcade Sushi appreciated the narrative's foundation, which revolves around the conflict driven by the warlord Apollyon, and some found the character dynamics engaging. Additionally, GamesRadar+ pointed out the well-produced cutscenes and solid voice acting, which contribute to a more immersive experience, despite the overall narrative being linear. However, the overwhelming sentiment among critics is that the story falls short in various aspects. Many reviewers, including PCWorld and God is a Geek, criticized the campaign for being shallow and lifeless, with forgettable characters and a lack of emotional depth. SomosXbox and The Digital Fix echoed these sentiments, describing the narrative as weak and intranscendent, with a simplistic premise that fails to engage players. The campaign is often viewed as an extended tutorial rather than a standalone experience, with critics like Ragequit.gr and Vandal highlighting its brevity and repetitive gameplay. The lack of cohesion and depth in the narrative has led to a consensus that the story mode is ultimately underwhelming. Overall, the critics agree that while For Honor has a framework for an interesting narrative, it largely misses the mark in execution. The campaign is seen as a necessary but flawed component of the game, primarily serving to introduce players to the mechanics rather than offering a compelling story. Critics such as Game Informer and The Jimquisition emphasized the confusion and blandness of the plot, with many noting that the campaign is more of a series of missions than a cohesive narrative. In summary, while there are elements of the story that some found enjoyable, the general consensus leans heavily towards disappointment, with many reviewers advocating that the focus should remain on the multiplayer experience rather than the single-player campaign.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

For Honor impresses with its strategic combat mechanics and thrilling multiplayer, earning accolades for its "Art of Battle" system that rewards skill and mastery. Critics highlight the brutal satisfaction of one-on-one duels and a variety of game modes that cater to different playstyles. However, the campaign's repetitiveness and chaotic larger team modes draw criticism, and the steep learning curve poses challenges for newcomers. Overall, while it has flaws, the game's intricate combat and engaging multiplayer experience make it a must-try for fans of tactical melee action.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

93%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of For Honor has garnered significant praise from critics, highlighting its intricate combat mechanics and engaging multiplayer experience. Reviewers like Game Revolution and PlayStation LifeStyle commend the game's unique combat system, which emphasizes strategy and skill over mere button mashing. The "Art of Battle" system, as noted by DualShockers and Hardcore Gamer, allows for a rich tactical depth that rewards players who invest time in mastering various character classes and their unique abilities. Critics such as God is a Geek and ZTGD emphasize the satisfaction derived from the combat, describing it as brutal and rewarding, particularly in one-on-one match-ups. Additionally, the variety of game modes, including Duel, Brawl, and Dominion, provides diverse gameplay experiences that cater to different playstyles, as highlighted by GamingTrend and TheXboxHub. However, despite the overwhelmingly positive feedback, there are notable criticisms regarding the gameplay experience. Several reviewers, including USgamer and PlayStation LifeStyle, point out issues with the campaign mode's repetitiveness and lack of depth, suggesting that it fails to match the excitement of the multiplayer experience. Additionally, some critics, such as IGN Spain and GameOver.gr, mention that larger team modes can become chaotic, disrupting the balance and strategic nature of combat. The steep learning curve associated with mastering the combat mechanics has also been flagged as a potential barrier to entry, with critics like Push Square and Worth Playing noting that while the game is easy to learn, it can be frustrating for newcomers due to its high skill floor. Overall, the consensus among critics is that For Honor delivers a compelling and engaging gameplay experience that stands out in the competitive gaming landscape. The depth and intricacy of the combat system have been widely praised, with many reviewers acknowledging its ability to foster strategic gameplay and rewarding mastery. While there are some concerns regarding the campaign's depth and the chaotic nature of certain multiplayer modes, the majority of critics agree that the game's strengths far outweigh its weaknesses. Critics like Generación Xbox and Digital Chumps encapsulate this sentiment, emphasizing that the gameplay is the core strength of For Honor, making it a worthwhile experience for players who appreciate tactical melee combat.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

For Honor boasts impressive graphics and visual design, praised by critics for detailed character models and immersive environments, making it one of Ubisoft's standout titles. While some inconsistencies, like pixelation and asset reuse, were noted, the overall sentiment remains highly positive, highlighting the game's artistic quality and its ability to capture the essence of medieval warfare.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

85%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

15%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The overall sentiment regarding the graphics and visual design of For Honor is predominantly positive, with many critics praising the game's impressive visuals. Reviewers such as Vgames and Areajugones highlight the detailed character models and well-designed environments, noting that the graphics are among the best produced by Ubisoft. Critics like LaPS4 and Eurogamer Italy commend the immersive environments that effectively represent the different factions, enhancing the overall gaming experience. Additionally, the fluid animations and intricate combat choreography received accolades from sources like Riot Pixels and GamesRadar+, emphasizing how these elements contribute to the game's brutal and engaging atmosphere. However, some critics pointed out inconsistencies and shortcomings in the visual design. PlaySense criticized the graphics as inconsistent, mentioning pixelated environments and characters that fail to deliver the grand scale shown in trailers. Post Arcade noted the reuse of character models and assets from multiplayer modes in the story mode, which detracted from the overall visual experience. Furthermore, IBTimes UK expressed that while some locations are visually stunning, the world can feel empty and lacking in depth. These critiques suggest that while the game excels in many areas, there are notable flaws that prevent it from achieving a consistently high standard. Despite these criticisms, the general consensus among critics leans towards a favorable view of For Honor's graphics and visual design. Many reviewers, including Hardcore Gamer and AusGamers, regard the game as one of Ubisoft's best-looking titles, praising its artistic quality and attention to detail. The majority of opinions reflect a strong appreciation for the immersive environments, character designs, and overall visual presentation, with critics acknowledging that the game successfully captures the essence of medieval warfare. While some inconsistencies and technical issues were noted, the overwhelming sentiment is that For Honor offers a visually stunning experience that enhances the gameplay.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

For Honor shines with immersive sound design and a powerful soundtrack that enhances gameplay, earning praise for its realistic battle sounds and faction-themed music. However, critics point out inconsistencies in voice acting quality and a lack of memorable music variety, which detracts from the overall experience. While combat sound effects excel, the game leaves room for improvement in voice performance and audio diversity, offering a captivating yet flawed auditory landscape.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

38%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

54%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of For Honor have generally received positive feedback from critics, highlighting the game's ability to create an immersive atmosphere that enhances the overall experience. Reviewers like Atomix and Eurogamer Italy praised the sound design, particularly the realistic clash of weapons and ambient sounds that contribute to the feeling of being in the midst of battle. Critics such as Hobby Consolas and Xbox Achievements noted that the original soundtrack effectively reflects the different factions, with music that complements the gameplay. In addition, LaPS4 emphasized the quality of sound effects and the positive impact of localized voice acting in Spanish, further enhancing immersion. Overall, the combination of impactful sound effects and a fitting soundtrack has been recognized as a strong aspect of the game. However, there are notable criticisms regarding the voice acting and the music's variety. Critics like Areajugones and PlaySense pointed out that the voice acting can be inconsistent, with some performances described as "cringe-worthy" or lacking quality. Gameplanet's observation about the bemusing choice of Californian accents for Japanese audio also reflects a disconnect in the localization efforts. Furthermore, while many reviewers acknowledged the quality of the music, there were concerns about its memorability and variety. Vandal and We Got This Covered specifically mentioned that the music, although well-produced, lacks presence and can feel subdued during gameplay. The overall consensus among critics is that while For Honor excels in sound design and immersive audio effects, it struggles with the consistency of voice acting and the memorability of its soundtrack. Many reviewers agree that the sound effects, particularly during combat, are impactful and enhance the gaming experience, as noted by critics like Twinfinite and Hardcore Gamer. However, the mixed reception of the voice acting and the repetitive nature of some audio elements detracts from what could have been a more cohesive auditory experience. Ultimately, For Honor presents a compelling audio landscape that captivates players, but it also leaves room for improvement, particularly in voice performance and musical variety.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

"For Honor" boasts a mix of strong and weak voice acting, praised for its immersive performances in multiple languages, especially standout roles like Jennifer Hale's as the Warden. However, critics also highlight issues with wooden deliveries and clichéd dialogue, which detract from the game's seriousness and authenticity. The consensus is a divided experience: while some performances shine, inconsistent quality leaves players yearning for a more cohesive storytelling experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

42%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

42%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

17%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in "For Honor" has garnered a mix of praise from several critics, highlighting its strengths across various languages. Critics such as Atomix and Hobby Consolas commend the performances in both English and Spanish, noting that the voice acting adds to the overall presentation and immersion of the game. GamesRadar+ specifically points out standout performances, like that of Jennifer Hale as the Warden, which enhances the narrative experience. Additionally, Hardcore Gamer likens the quality of voice acting to that of a Hollywood blockbuster, suggesting that it significantly contributes to the game's immersive qualities. Overall, many reviewers agree that the Spanish localization features reputable actors, further enhancing the game's atmosphere, as noted by LaPS4 and Vandal. However, the voice acting in "For Honor" is not without its criticisms. Some reviewers, like Areajugones and God is a Geek, describe the performances as wooden or laughable, indicating a lack of emotional depth and integration with the characters. DarkStation criticizes the dialogue as a mix of clichés and implausible American vernacular, which detracts from the seriousness of the game. PlaySense echoes this sentiment, stating that awkward delivery negatively impacts immersion. Furthermore, USgamer points out that contemporary dialogue can break immersion, as characters do not sound authentic in their roles. This inconsistency in quality leads to a fragmented experience for players. Overall, the consensus among critics reveals a divided sentiment regarding the voice acting in "For Honor." While there are notable performances and commendable localization efforts that enhance the game's narrative, significant criticisms about the quality and integration of the dialogue persist. Critics like Gamer.no and GamingTrend highlight that, despite some strong performances, the overall execution is inconsistent, with moments of strong engagement overshadowed by awkward or clichéd dialogue. This duality suggests that while "For Honor" has the potential for immersive storytelling through voice acting, it ultimately falls short of a uniformly high standard, leaving players with a mixed experience.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

For Honor's technical performance is a mixed bag across platforms. PC players enjoy smooth gameplay and good optimization, while PS4 users also report stable performance. However, all platforms face serious connectivity issues due to a flawed peer-to-peer system, with frequent disconnections and matchmaking problems ruining the experience. Critics agree that while there are positives, Ubisoft must resolve these server instabilities to improve overall player satisfaction.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

62%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

29%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of For Honor varies across different platforms, with each receiving a mix of praise and criticism. On PC, several critics, including Vgames and PC PowerPlay, noted that the game runs smoothly on high settings, with good optimization and a stable frame rate, particularly in single-player modes. Critics such as GameSpot and CGMagazine also highlighted that the game performs well overall on PC, with minimal online stability issues reported. For the PS4, reviewers like Eurogamer Italy and Areajugones praised the game's technical performance, citing stable frame rates and a generally smooth experience during online play. Xbox One players, as noted by Stevivor and Trusted Reviews, found the game to run at a consistent 30fps, with some improvements in stability compared to the beta version. However, the negatives surrounding technical performance are pronounced across all platforms. On PC, critics like Games.cz and Shacknews pointed out significant connectivity issues stemming from the peer-to-peer system, leading to matchmaking problems and frequent disconnections. Similarly, on PS4, reviewers such as Game Informer and Wccftech reported frequent disconnects and server instability, which detracted from the overall gameplay experience. Xbox One players echoed these sentiments, with BaziCenter and EGM highlighting server issues that disrupt gameplay, affecting the online-centric nature of the title. The always-online requirement was also criticized, particularly by Hardcore Gamer and IGN Italia, as it can lead to frustrating experiences even in single-player modes. Overall, the consensus among critics across all platforms indicates that while For Honor has made strides in technical performance, significant issues remain. The peer-to-peer networking model has been a common point of contention, with many reviewers, including Ragequit.gr and The Digital Fix, emphasizing the negative impact of connectivity problems on the multiplayer experience. Despite some positive remarks regarding optimization and frame rates, the recurring themes of matchmaking issues, disconnections, and server instability suggest that Ubisoft needs to address these technical shortcomings to enhance player satisfaction.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

For Honor boasts strong multiplayer replay value thanks to diverse modes and the engaging Faction War system, rewarding player investment. However, critics highlight limited single-player content, repetitiveness, and matchmaking issues as major drawbacks. While the game offers enjoyment for dedicated players, its longevity hinges on future updates to address these concerns.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

39%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

59%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions regarding the replay value of For Honor reflect a generally positive sentiment towards its multiplayer offerings. Many critics, including Trusted Reviews and Xbox Achievements, highlight the game's diverse multiplayer modes, which provide engaging and strategic gameplay experiences. The Faction War system is frequently mentioned as a significant factor that enhances replayability, encouraging players to contribute to their faction's success over time. Critics like Game Rant and Stevivor emphasize that the more time players invest in the game, the more rewarding the experience becomes, with a variety of characters and classes to explore. Additionally, customization options and ongoing post-launch support are seen as contributing factors to keeping players engaged in the long term. However, the critics also point out several drawbacks that hinder the overall replay value of For Honor. Many reviews express concerns about the limited variety in single-player content, with critics like GRYOnline.pl and Everyeye.it noting that the campaign feels more like a tutorial and lacks depth. There are also mentions of repetitiveness in the main game modes, particularly Dominion, which some reviewers, such as Riot Pixels and PCWorld, argue can diminish the excitement after extended play. Additionally, issues related to matchmaking, microtransactions, and technical problems are frequently cited as barriers to a fully satisfying experience, as noted by Ragequit.gr and Digitally Downloaded. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while For Honor offers a strong multiplayer experience with significant replay value, particularly through its competitive elements and Faction War system, it struggles with content limitations and repetitiveness in single-player modes. Critics like Everyeye.it and Gameblog.fr suggest that the game's longevity may depend on future content updates and improvements to address the concerns raised. As it stands, For Honor is seen as a title that can provide enjoyment for dedicated players, but its replay value may vary significantly based on individual preferences and play styles.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

56%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

42%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall sentiment towards For Honor among critics is mixed, with many praising its innovative combat system and engaging multiplayer experience. Reviewers like Ragequit.gr and GameSpot highlight the game's unique combat mechanics, which require skill and strategy, making it a rewarding experience for dedicated players. Critics such as XboxAddict and Digital Chumps commend the game for its immersive visuals and sound, which enhance the overall atmosphere. Additionally, several reviews, including those from MondoXbox and God is a Geek, point out that the multiplayer modes are particularly enjoyable, offering depth and variety that can captivate players looking for competitive gameplay. However, the game is not without its flaws, with numerous critics expressing disappointment in its single-player campaign, which is often described as lackluster or dreadful. Reviews from GameOver.gr and New York Daily News emphasize the shortcomings of the campaign, which many feel fails to deliver a compelling narrative or engaging content. Furthermore, technical issues, particularly concerning connectivity and microtransactions, are frequently mentioned as detractors from the overall experience. Critics like EGM and GameWatcher specifically note the problems with peer-to-peer connectivity and the implications of an always-online requirement, which can hinder gameplay and frustrate players. In summary, while For Honor is recognized for its innovative combat and potential for a dedicated player base, the consensus among critics suggests that it is marred by significant shortcomings in single-player content and technical stability. Reviewers such as Easy Allies and PCWorld encapsulate this sentiment, acknowledging the game's potential while also highlighting the areas in need of improvement. Ultimately, For Honor is recommended primarily for those who are interested in multiplayer experiences, but it may not appeal to players seeking a robust single-player narrative or a flawless technical experience.

TL;DR

For Honor offers an innovative combat system and engaging multiplayer, earning praise for its skill-based mechanics and immersive visuals. However, critics slam the lackluster single-player campaign and significant technical issues, particularly with connectivity and microtransactions. Recommended mainly for multiplayer fans, the game struggles to satisfy those seeking a solid single-player experience or flawless performance.

MONSTER

Reviews

186 reviews found

GamingTrend

Feb 21, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor offers a compelling experience with stunning visuals, a strong story campaign, and diverse gameplay options, despite some technical issues like lack of dedicated servers and minor balance concerns.

Read full review

Game Rant

Xbox One

Feb 20, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is described as a must-play title for anyone looking for a fresh take on multiplayer. It is praised for its fun gameplay, depth, and unique experience.

Read full review

Areajugones

PlayStation 4

Feb 15, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is an impressive new IP from Ubisoft, featuring a balanced combat system and engaging multiplayer, though the campaign could use more depth. Overall, it is a standout title with potential for a strong online community.

Read full review

Stevivor

Xbox One

Feb 15, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is praised as a refreshing new take on combat that everyone should experience, despite its average story.

Read full review

TheXboxHub

Xbox One

Feb 24, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is a game with a decent single-player campaign and a strong focus on multiplayer gameplay. The story could have been better, but the game offers a unique experience in a saturated market.

Read full review

CGMagazine

PlayStation 4

Feb 17, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is a great example of Western developers taking a risk with a new IP and delivering a satisfying combat system.

Read full review

Arcade Sushi

PlayStation 4

Feb 22, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor lays down a great fighting foundation with reasons to keep playing, despite some issues. Sets a strong pace for Ubisoft in multiplayer experiences.

Read full review

Vgames

Mar 8, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is a great game with deep mechanics and rewarding gameplay, though it suffers from technical issues and a mediocre story.

PlayStation Universe

PlayStation 4

Feb 17, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is praised as an excellent combat title with compelling hooks, despite some issues like matchmaking and network connectivity. It is recommended for players looking for a deep and engaging multiplayer experience.

COGconnected

PlayStation 4

Feb 17, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is a special game that offers intense, smart, and rewarding gameplay.

Read full review