Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

Amazon

Twitch

MONSTER

For Honor

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of For Honor
Item: For Honor
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2017

GenresFantasy, Adventure, Action, Third Person Perspective, RPG, Fighting, Single Player, Multiplayer

AvailableFeb 13, 2017

PlatformPlayStation 4, PC, Xbox One, Xbox Series X

DeveloperUbisoft Montreal

Overview

Enter the chaos of war as a bold Knight, a brutal Viking, or a deadly Samurai. Play the thrilling story campaign or fight in brutal PvP modes, all on new dedicated servers. Enjoy an evolved experience with 18 Heroes, 18 maps, new PvP and ranked modes, thousands of gear items, and more.

Elsewhere

6.4

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

For Honor's story garners mixed reviews: some critics praise its role as a solid intro to gameplay mechanics and engaging narrative elements, while the majority condemn it for being shallow, rushed, and poorly written. Reviewers highlight forgettable characters and a disjointed plot that feels more like a tutorial for multiplayer than a compelling single-player experience. Ultimately, the campaign lacks depth and fails to deliver the immersive narrative players crave, making it a disappointing aspect of the game.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

72%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

19%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The opinions of various critics regarding the story of For Honor reveal a few positive aspects amidst a largely negative reception. Some reviewers, such as Xbox Achievements and Gamer.no, noted that the single-player campaign serves as a solid introduction to the game's mechanics and character classes, providing a decent narrative experience that helps players get acquainted with the gameplay. Critics like Digital Chumps and Shacknews acknowledged that while the campaign is primarily a tutorial, it does offer an engaging enough storyline to keep players interested, with some mentioning the cinematic storytelling and diverse gameplay elements as highlights. Additionally, certain reviewers appreciated the campaign's attempt to create a backdrop for the multiplayer experience and the inclusion of a villain like Apollyon, who drives the conflict between factions. However, the overwhelming sentiment among critics is that the story of For Honor is fundamentally flawed. Many reviews, including those from GameCrate, Metro GameCentral, and The Digital Fix, criticized the campaign for being shallow, rushed, and lacking depth. Critics highlighted issues such as forgettable characters, poor writing, and repetitive gameplay, with God is a Geek describing the campaign as "dull and lifeless." Furthermore, several reviewers pointed out that the narrative feels more like a series of disconnected missions rather than a cohesive story, with Game Informer and Everyeye.it noting that the plot is confusing and fails to provide meaningful context for the conflict between the factions. Critics like Wccftech and LaPS4 echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that the campaign serves primarily as an extended tutorial rather than a compelling narrative experience. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while For Honor offers some enjoyable gameplay elements and serves as an introductory experience for new players, its story is largely underwhelming and lacks the depth and engagement expected from a single-player campaign. Many reviewers agree that the narrative feels superficial and serves more as a means to facilitate multiplayer combat rather than a standalone experience worth investing in. As noted by critics like Atomix and PCWorld, the campaign's simplistic premise and lack of character development ultimately detract from the overall enjoyment of the game, leaving players craving a more substantial and immersive narrative.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

For Honor's innovative combat system is a hit with critics, praised for its depth, strategic gameplay, and diverse multiplayer modes. While the game excels in providing a rewarding melee experience, issues like overcrowding, matchmaking woes, and a lack of tutorials hinder new players. Overall, it’s a compelling entry in the fighting genre that balances skill and accessibility but has room for improvement.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

93%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of For Honor has garnered significant praise from a majority of critics, who highlight its unique and engaging combat system as the game's standout feature. Reviewers like TheXboxHub and Game Revolution emphasize the diverse multiplayer modes, including Dominion and Duel, which cater to various playstyles. Critics such as ICXM and PlayStation LifeStyle appreciate the depth of the melee combat, noting that it requires strategic thinking, patience, and skill rather than mere button-mashing. The "Art of Battle" combat system is frequently mentioned, with many reviewers, including Hardcore Gamer and Game Informer, praising its tactical approach that encourages players to read their opponents and master their character's abilities. The overall sentiment is that the combat mechanics are not only deep and rewarding but also accessible enough for newcomers to grasp, as noted by IGN Spain and XboxAddict. However, while the gameplay is largely celebrated, several critics point out notable drawbacks that can detract from the experience. Issues such as overcrowding in multiplayer modes and matchmaking problems were highlighted by PlayStation LifeStyle and Digitally Downloaded, which can lead to frustrating gameplay moments. Additionally, some reviewers like DarkStation and IGN Spain raised concerns about the chaotic nature of larger team modes, which may disrupt the balance and strategic depth that the game aims to provide. Critics also mentioned the lack of a comprehensive tutorial, as noted by Multiplayer.it, which could hinder new players from fully understanding the intricacies of the combat system. Overall, the consensus among critics is overwhelmingly positive, with a strong appreciation for the combat mechanics and multiplayer experience that For Honor offers. Many reviewers, including Stevivor and Metro GameCentral, agree that the game excels in providing a unique and engaging melee combat experience that rewards skill and strategy. Despite some criticisms regarding matchmaking and the potential for chaotic gameplay in larger modes, the majority of critics believe that For Honor successfully delivers a compelling and enjoyable gameplay experience that stands out in the fighting game genre.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

For Honor impresses with stunning graphics, detailed character models, and immersive environments, earning praise for its artistic design and solid performance. Critics applaud the animations and fluid motion capture, enhancing the medieval combat experience. However, some note issues with graphic inconsistencies, pixelation, and a sense of emptiness in certain areas. Overall, the game’s visuals are a high point, despite some critiques, contributing greatly to its immersive atmosphere.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

85%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

15%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of For Honor have garnered a largely positive reception among critics, with many praising the game's impressive character models and detailed environments. Reviewers from outlets like Vgames and Areajugones highlighted the game's robust performance and the high quality of character animations, which contribute to the immersive experience of medieval combat. Critics such as Eurogamer Italy and Xbox Addict noted the stable frame rates during intense battles, enhancing the overall visual experience. The artistic quality was also commended, with LaPS4 and Atomix emphasizing the beautiful and immersive environments that effectively represent the different factions within the game. Many reviewers, including IGN Spain and Hardcore Gamer, noted the game's top-notch graphics, fluid motion capture, and the effective portrayal of violence and impact in combat. However, not all opinions were entirely favorable. Some critics pointed out inconsistencies in the graphics, with PlaySense mentioning pixelated environments and a failure to deliver the grand scale promised in trailers. IBTimes UK echoed this sentiment by describing the world as feeling "empty and soulless," despite the visually incredible locations. Additionally, Post Arcade criticized the reuse of character models and assets from multiplayer modes in the story mode, which detracted from the overall visual cohesion. Other critiques included texture quality issues, as noted by Gameblog.fr and others, who pointed out that while some aspects were visually appealing, certain textures fell short of expectations. Overall, the consensus among critics is that For Honor offers a visually stunning experience, with many praising its artistic design and detailed graphics. Despite some criticisms regarding texture inconsistencies and the feeling of emptiness in certain environments, the majority of reviews reflect a strong appreciation for the game's visual achievements. Critics like DarkStation and Multiplayer.it encapsulated this sentiment, highlighting the game's impressive visuals and the way they enhance the overall experience of medieval warfare. In conclusion, while there are areas for improvement, the graphics and visual design of For Honor are generally regarded as a strong point, contributing significantly to the game's immersive atmosphere.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

For Honor shines with immersive sound design and impactful combat effects, praised by critics for enhancing gameplay. However, the voice acting is inconsistent—some find it cringe-worthy—and the soundtrack lacks variety, detracting from the overall experience. While the audio landscape is compelling, the uneven performances and forgettable music leave room for improvement.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

38%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

54%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of For Honor have garnered a generally positive reception among critics, with many praising the immersive qualities that enhance the gameplay experience. Reviewers like Atomix and Hardcore Gamer highlight the effective sound design, noting that the clash of weapons and ambient sounds contribute significantly to the feeling of being in the midst of battle. Additionally, the soundtrack has been commended for its ability to reflect the game's various factions, as mentioned by Hobby Consolas, which adds depth to the overall atmosphere. Critics from multiple platforms, including LaPS4 and Xbox Achievements, also emphasize the quality of sound effects, particularly during combat, which are described as impactful and satisfying. However, there are notable criticisms regarding the voice acting and the music's memorability. While some critics, such as Gameplanet and Hardcore Gamer, appreciate the quality of voice acting in certain roles, others like PlaySense and Gameblog.fr find it lacking, describing it as cringe-worthy or not fitting the medieval theme. The music, despite being well-crafted, has been pointed out by critics like Vandal and We Got This Covered as lacking variety and presence, which detracts from the overall experience. Furthermore, some reviewers noted issues with repetitive dialogue during special moves, as mentioned by Multiplayer.it, which can lead to a diminished engagement over time. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while For Honor excels in sound design and immersive audio effects, particularly during combat, it struggles with inconsistencies in voice acting and the memorability of its soundtrack. Critics like Eurogamer Italy and Twinfinite express appreciation for the game's audio landscape, yet the mixed feedback on voice acting and music suggests that there is room for improvement. Ultimately, the game's sound design creates a compelling atmosphere that enhances the gameplay, but it is somewhat undermined by the uneven quality of voice performances and a soundtrack that could have been more impactful.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

The voice acting in "For Honor" has drawn mixed reviews. Some praise it as high-quality, even Hollywood-level, with standout performances like Jennifer Hale as the Warden and strong Spanish localization. However, many critics slam it for being wooden, cliché-ridden, and poorly integrated, undermining immersion. This split feedback highlights the difficulties in delivering consistent voice acting in a multilingual game, leading to a disconnect for some players.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

42%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

42%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

17%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in "For Honor" has received a mixed reception from critics, with several reviewers highlighting its strengths. Notably, Atomix praised the voice acting as well done in both English and Latin Spanish, which adds to the overall presentation of the campaign. Similarly, Hardcore Gamer noted that the voice acting quality approaches a Hollywood blockbuster level, enhancing the immersive experience. Critics like GamesRadar+ and Gamer.no also acknowledged solid performances, with GamesRadar+ specifically mentioning Jennifer Hale's portrayal of the Warden as a positive contribution to the narrative. Additionally, LaPS4 emphasized the strong aspect of Spanish localization, showcasing Ubisoft's commitment to quality in voice acting. Conversely, a significant number of critics expressed dissatisfaction with the voice acting, pointing out various flaws. Areajugones described some performances as artificial and poorly integrated with the characters, while DarkStation criticized the dialogue as a mashup of clichés and implausible American dialogue, making it hard to take seriously. God is a Geek went so far as to label the voice acting as wooden and laughable at times. Other reviewers, such as PlaySense and IBTimes UK, echoed these sentiments, with PlaySense commenting on awkward and poorly executed voice acting that negatively impacted immersion, and IBTimes UK referring to forgettable cutscenes with terrible dialogue. Overall, the consensus among critics indicates a divide in opinions regarding the voice acting in "For Honor." While some reviewers, like Vandal and MondoXbox, noted the professionalism and quality of the voice acting, particularly in Spanish and Italian, others highlighted significant shortcomings that detracted from the game's overall experience. The mixed feedback suggests that while there are commendable performances and a commitment to localization, the inconsistency in quality and execution has left some players feeling disconnected from the narrative and characters. This duality reflects the challenges of achieving a cohesive voice acting experience in a game with diverse linguistic and cultural elements.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

For Honor delivers solid frame rates and performance across consoles and PC, but significant connectivity and server issues mar the experience. Critics across platforms report frustrating disconnects, lag, and matchmaking problems stemming from its flawed peer-to-peer system. While the game shows technical promise, pervasive online issues hinder enjoyment, with calls for Ubisoft to address these shortcomings in future updates.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

62%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

29%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of For Honor varies across different gaming platforms, with each showing a mix of strengths. On the PlayStation 4, several reviewers, including Eurogamer Italy and Atomix, noted that the game runs smoothly with stable frame rates, maintaining a solid 30 frames-per-second. Critics like GameSpot also echoed this sentiment, stating that the game runs well on PS4, Xbox One, and PC with minimal online stability issues. On Xbox One, Generación Xbox highlighted the technical performance, noting minimal frame drops and no texture loading issues, ensuring a smooth gameplay experience. For PC players, while there are some concerns, many reviewers like Vgames and PCWorld reported that the game runs smoothly on high settings, showcasing good optimization. However, the negatives associated with For Honor's technical performance are significant and prevalent across all platforms. On PS4, critics such as LaPS4 and Wccftech pointed out server instability and frequent disconnects that detract from the overall experience. Similarly, on Xbox One, critics like EGM and Gamers' Temple reported significant issues with connectivity, including lag and long load times, which negatively impact gameplay. The PC version also faced criticism, with multiple reviewers, including Shacknews and The Jimquisition, highlighting issues with the peer-to-peer networking system that led to matchmaking problems and unreliable online experiences. This reliance on a peer-to-peer system was a common theme among many critics, indicating a significant drawback in the game's online infrastructure. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while For Honor has moments of technical success, particularly in terms of frame rates and graphical performance, the pervasive issues with connectivity and server stability overshadow these positives. Reviewers across platforms expressed frustration with the peer-to-peer setup, with critics like Ragequit.gr and We Got This Covered emphasizing how these problems detract from the overall experience. The need for improvements was a recurring theme, with many critics expressing hope that Ubisoft would address these technical issues in future updates. Despite the game’s potential, the technical performance, particularly in online modes, remains a critical concern that needs to be resolved for a more enjoyable player experience.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

For Honor shines in multiplayer with diverse modes and engaging PvP combat, but suffers from a lackluster single-player campaign and limited game modes. Critics flag issues like microtransactions, matchmaking woes, and a steep learning curve as barriers to long-term play. While multiplayer is the game's heart, its longevity remains uncertain without significant updates. A mixed review landscape indicates potential, but concerns linger.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

39%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

59%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions regarding the replay value of For Honor reveal a generally favorable sentiment towards its multiplayer component. Many critics highlight the variety of multiplayer modes, such as Dominion, Duel, and Brawl, which offer players different gameplay experiences and the chance to engage in intense PvP combat. Critics like ZTGD and AusGamers emphasize that the game’s seasonal content and the War of the Factions system provide ongoing engagement and reasons for players to return. Additionally, the customization options available for characters are praised by several reviewers, including Shacknews and Eurogamer Italy, as they enhance the personalization of gameplay and encourage players to explore various strategies and styles. However, there are notable criticisms regarding the game's overall replayability, particularly concerning its single-player campaign and the limited number of game modes. Critics such as IGN Spain and Riot Pixels express that the campaign lacks compelling reasons to revisit, and the multiplayer experience can feel sparse at times. The presence of microtransactions and pay-to-win elements, as pointed out by DarkStation and Post Arcade, also raises concerns about fairness and accessibility, potentially discouraging new players from fully engaging with the competitive aspects of the game. Furthermore, issues with matchmaking and the steep learning curve, highlighted by Ragequit.gr and LevelUp, may hinder long-term player retention. Overall, the consensus among critics suggests that while the multiplayer modes of For Honor provide significant replay value and engaging gameplay, the game suffers from limitations in its single-player content and issues related to monetization and matchmaking. Critics like GamesRadar+ and The SixteenthAxis note that the multiplayer is the core of the experience, but the lack of depth in other areas may affect the game's longevity for some players. Despite these drawbacks, many reviewers acknowledge the potential for future updates and content expansions to enhance replayability, indicating a mixed but hopeful outlook on the game's long-term engagement.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

56%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

42%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall sentiment regarding For Honor from various critics highlights several key positives that resonate throughout the reviews. Many reviewers, such as Wccftech and PlayStation Universe, commend the game for its innovative combat system, which is described as deep, rewarding, and engaging. The multiplayer experience is frequently praised, with critics like GameSpot and Xbox Achievements noting its potential for creating a dedicated player base. The game’s visuals and sound design also receive accolades, with critics like Trusted Reviews emphasizing the stunning graphics that enhance the overall experience. Additionally, some reviewers, including Eurogamer Italy and Digital Chumps, express that the game is particularly appealing to those who enjoy competitive multiplayer experiences, showcasing its potential to stand out in a crowded market. However, despite the numerous strengths, For Honor is not without its flaws, which many critics highlight as significant drawbacks. Server stability issues are a recurring theme, as pointed out by Wccftech and EGM, which detracts from the overall enjoyment of the game. Matchmaking problems and aggressive microtransaction practices are also frequently mentioned, with LevelUp and DarkStation noting how these elements can undermine the gameplay experience. Furthermore, the single-player campaign is generally regarded as lackluster, with critics like Ragequit.gr and Merlin'in Kazanı expressing disappointment in its execution and depth. These technical shortcomings and design choices lead to a mixed assessment of the game’s overall quality. The overall consensus among critics is that For Honor is a title with significant potential that is somewhat hampered by its technical issues and design flaws. While many reviewers, including TheSixthAxis and Game Informer, recognize the game's unique combat mechanics and engaging multiplayer modes, they also caution potential players about the various shortcomings. Critics like PC PowerPlay and We Got This Covered note that the game rewards those willing to overlook its flaws, suggesting that it may appeal to a specific audience. Ultimately, while For Honor showcases a fresh take on multiplayer combat, its success may hinge on Ubisoft's ability to address the technical issues and enhance the single-player experience in future updates.

TL;DR

For Honor impresses with its innovative combat and engaging multiplayer, earning praise for stunning visuals and competitive potential. However, server stability, matchmaking issues, aggressive microtransactions, and a lackluster single-player campaign mar the experience. Critics see promise but warn that technical flaws could hinder its success, leaving players to weigh the game's strengths against its shortcomings.

MONSTER

Reviews

186 reviews found

GamingTrend

Feb 21, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor offers a compelling experience with stunning visuals, a strong story campaign, and diverse gameplay options, despite some technical issues like lack of dedicated servers and minor balance concerns.

Read full review

Game Rant

Xbox One

Feb 20, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is described as a must-play title for anyone looking for a fresh take on multiplayer. It is praised for its fun gameplay, depth, and unique experience.

Read full review

Areajugones

PlayStation 4

Feb 15, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is an impressive new IP from Ubisoft, featuring a balanced combat system and engaging multiplayer, though the campaign could use more depth. Overall, it is a standout title with potential for a strong online community.

Read full review

Stevivor

Xbox One

Feb 15, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is praised as a refreshing new take on combat that everyone should experience, despite its average story.

Read full review

TheXboxHub

Xbox One

Feb 24, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is a game with a decent single-player campaign and a strong focus on multiplayer gameplay. The story could have been better, but the game offers a unique experience in a saturated market.

Read full review

CGMagazine

PlayStation 4

Feb 17, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is a great example of Western developers taking a risk with a new IP and delivering a satisfying combat system.

Read full review

Arcade Sushi

PlayStation 4

Feb 22, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor lays down a great fighting foundation with reasons to keep playing, despite some issues. Sets a strong pace for Ubisoft in multiplayer experiences.

Read full review

Vgames

Mar 8, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is a great game with deep mechanics and rewarding gameplay, though it suffers from technical issues and a mediocre story.

PlayStation Universe

PlayStation 4

Feb 17, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is praised as an excellent combat title with compelling hooks, despite some issues like matchmaking and network connectivity. It is recommended for players looking for a deep and engaging multiplayer experience.

COGconnected

PlayStation 4

Feb 17, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

For Honor is a special game that offers intense, smart, and rewarding gameplay.

Read full review