Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction cover image

Links

Amazon

Twitch

MONSTER

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction
Item: Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2022

GenresAdventure, Action, Shooter, Crime, Horror, Strategy, Single Player, Multiplayer, First Person Perspective

AvailableJan 20, 2022

PlatformPlayStation 4, Xbox Series X, PC, Xbox One, PlayStation 5

DeveloperUbisoft Montreal

Overview

Assemble your elite team of Rainbow Six Operators to launch incursions in the unpredictable containment zones and face off against an evolving Alien threat. Band together and put everything on the line as you take on this unknown enemy.

Elsewhere

5.2

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Rainbow Six Extraction’s story is a bold alien invasion concept that flirts with creativity but collapses under shallow, generic storytelling. While some praise its atmospheric depth and lore, most critics dismiss it as a passive afterthought, prioritizing co-op mechanics over substance. The narrative’s fresh twist on the franchise falls flat, leaving players more invested in the action than the plot—a missed opportunity where ambition outpaced execution.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

22%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

56%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

22%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The story of Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Extraction receives mixed praise, with some critics acknowledging its intriguing premise and atmospheric elements. Several reviewers highlight the game’s unique alien invasion concept, noting its potential to differentiate it from previous entries in the franchise. For instance, VG247 praises the extensive lore and character backstories for operators like Ash, Mira, and Thermite, which add depth to the narrative. Similarly, GameStar commends the high-quality cutscenes and Codex entries that flesh out the parasitic alien threat, while CGMagazine appreciates the haunting imagery and desperate atmosphere of the story. The premise of the REACT team combating the Archaeans is also seen as a fresh twist by critics like Dexerto and IGN Spain, who note its ability to stand on its own with enough narrative elements to engage players, even if it diverges from traditional counter-terrorism themes. However, the majority of critics criticize the story for being shallow, generic, or poorly integrated into gameplay. We Got This Covered and Games.cz describe the narrative as hollow, lacking depth, and filled with uninteresting lore, while IGN Adria and BaziCenter argue that the plot feels unnecessary for the gameplay experience, reducing it to a passive backdrop. Atomix points out the absence of a traditional single-player campaign, relying instead on brief cinematic context and a VR tutorial. Many also highlight the repetitive nature of missions, with Multiplayer.it noting the lack of clear motivations for the alien invasion and IGN Italia criticizing the disjointed structure that fails to connect missions cohesively. Even GameGrin and TheGamer dismiss the story as a generic "alien invasion" template, lacking originality or memorable twists. Overall, while the narrative of Rainbow Six Extraction is seen as a creative departure from the series’ roots, its execution falls short for most critics. The game’s focus on cooperative gameplay over storytelling leads to a story that feels underdeveloped and peripheral, with many reviewers agreeing that it prioritizes mechanics over substance. VG247 and CGMagazine are among the few who find value in the lore and atmosphere, but their praise is overshadowed by widespread criticism of its lack of depth and engagement. The consensus leans toward the story being a missed opportunity, with only fragments of potential that fail to elevate the experience beyond its gameplay loop. As We Got This Covered and Games.cz succinctly put it, the narrative feels like an afterthought, leaving players more invested in the action than the plot.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Extraction nails tactical depth and co-op brilliance but drowns in repetition, tedious missions, and undercooked mechanics—a polarizing blend of siege-inspired strategy and frustrating execution.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

75%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

20%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Extraction receives praise for its tactical depth, cooperative mechanics, and strategic elements. Many critics highlight its evolution from Rainbow Six Siege, emphasizing squad-based tactics, varied mission objectives, and the importance of teamwork. For instance, GamesRadar+ and Gamer.nl commend the game’s layered mission structures and emphasis on stealth, while IGN France notes the retention of Siege’s solid mechanics in a PvE context. The unique abilities of operators are frequently praised for adding diversity to gameplay, as seen in Twinfinite’s acknowledgment of intelligent AI enemies requiring adaptive strategies. Additionally, GameGrin and Gfinity highlight the game’s engaging gunplay and risk-reward systems, with Wccftech noting the challenge of endgame content for hardcore players. These positives underscore a strong foundation in tactical shooter design. However, several critics point to significant drawbacks, particularly around repetition and lack of variety. Gamepressure and We Got This Covered criticize the game’s repetitive missions, underutilized gadgets, and simplistic enemy AI, while Inverse and IGN Adria describe the experience as tedious, especially in solo play. Games.cz and New Game Network argue that the frenetic pace and chaotic action undermine tactical depth, with Push Square noting unimpressive enemy AI and finicky mechanics like melee takedowns. The repetitive nature of randomized objectives and map repetition is a recurring issue, as highlighted by IGN Portugal’s observation of “slow and methodical gameplay” that can feel monotonous. Critics like Gamersky and SECTOR.sk also mention the MIA system and lengthy unlock processes contributing to tedium, suggesting that while the game has potential, its execution falls short in maintaining engagement. The overall consensus among critics is mixed but leans toward a balanced view: while Extraction successfully adapts Rainbow Six Siege’s tactical DNA into a cooperative PvE framework, it struggles with repetition and pacing. Positive reviews from Jeuxvideo.com (French edition) and Eurogamer Italy praise the game’s strategic teamwork and well-designed maps, but these are often offset by critiques of its predictability and lack of innovation. The game’s emphasis on stealth, operator abilities, and cooperative play is seen as a strength by many, yet the repetitive mission structures and underdeveloped mechanics (as noted by GameStar and Atomix) create a polarizing experience. Ultimately, while Extraction offers a compelling tactical shooter for fans of the series, its execution leaves room for improvement in sustaining long-term engagement.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Polished yet unoriginal: Rainbow Six Extraction delivers tense, atmospheric gameplay but stumbles on repetitive design, bland aesthetics, and missed creative potential.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

46%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

44%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

10%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The initial reception of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction’s graphics and visual design highlights several positive aspects, particularly its technical execution and atmospheric elements. Critics like CGMagazine and Shacknews praised the game’s "top-notch" visuals on Xbox Series X, noting smooth transitions, detailed environments, and a tense, immersive atmosphere. The game’s use of the Anvil engine, as highlighted by MondoXbox, allowed for polished character models, destructible environments, and dynamic lighting that enhanced the claustrophobic feel of its alien-infested locations. IGN France emphasized its consistent 4K performance on Xbox Series X, while GameGrin noted its similarity to Rainbow Six Siege but with improved textures and lighting. The design of the Archaeans, particularly their "creepy and tension-inducing" appearance (per Comicbook.com) and "unique organic elements like mucilage invasion" (as mentioned by Hobby Consolas), added a distinctive visual identity to the game’s horror elements. However, the negatives were more pronounced, with multiple critics criticizing the lack of originality and visual variety. We Got This Covered, Launcher, and Trusted Reviews all described the maps as "bland," "ugly," or "identical mazes of rooms," lacking distinctive features or set pieces to elevate the experience. Gamepressure and TheSixthAxis noted that the level design felt repetitive, with environments "similar and uninspired" due to the alien invasion theme. Character designs for the Operators were frequently criticized as "bland" and "lacking color" (per Comicbook.com, ComicBook, and AusGamers), making them blend together. Additionally, GameMAG and BaziCenter pointed out technical limitations from an aging engine, citing texture streaming issues and subpar visuals on older hardware. The Archaeans, while praised for their design in some cases, were also described as "boring" and "similar" (per Noisy Pixel and TheSixthAxis), highlighting a lack of creative diversity. Overall, the consensus among critics was mixed but leaned toward acknowledging Extraction’s technical polish and atmospheric strengths while criticizing its visual stagnation and lack of innovation. While IGN France and CGMagazine celebrated its "solid" and "polished" graphical presentation, many felt it failed to break away from the Rainbow Six Siege aesthetic, with GameRant and GRYOnline.pl noting that the game "falls short in originality." The balance between familiar mechanics and new elements was seen as a double-edged sword: while Hobby Consolas appreciated its evolution from Siege, others like We Got This Covered and Trusted Reviews felt it lacked the creative spark to justify its high price. Ultimately, Extraction’s visuals were deemed competent but unremarkable, with a strong foundation in technical execution that couldn’t fully compensate for its repetitive design choices.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Polished yet unoriginal: Rainbow Six Extraction delivers tense, atmospheric gameplay but stumbles on repetitive design, bland aesthetics, and missed creative potential.

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Extraction’s sound design excels in immersion and tension, with standout audio cues and a gripping score, but its derivative nature, forgettable music, and inconsistent execution prevent it from breaking new ground—a solid yet unremarkable auditory experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

46%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

46%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Extraction received generally positive feedback for their immersive qualities and atmospheric contributions. Critics like Digital Chumps praised the "squelching sounds of Archies" and "distinct audio cues" that enhance tension, while Gamer.no highlighted the unsettling infection sounds as a standout element. GamesRadar+ noted how sound design integrates with gameplay mechanics, creating a tense, immersive experience, and Press Start Australia commended the "fantastic musical score" that complements the game’s alien atmosphere. CGMagazine emphasized the importance of high-quality audio setups for maximum immersion, and Dexerto called the audio design "superb," with impactful sound effects and a fitting soundtrack. Ragequit.gr and Vgames also lauded the dynamic cues that heighten gameplay awareness, while XboxAddict praised the "menacing enemy sounds" and satisfying feedback for actions. These reviews collectively underscore the game’s ability to create an engaging auditory experience that supports its horror-driven narrative. However, several critics pointed out shortcomings, particularly in originality and consistency. BaziCenter criticized the sound design as derivative of Rainbow Six Siege, noting a lack of innovation despite new enemy sounds and music. IGN Adria called the music "forgettable," with no standout tracks, while IGN Italia described it as "on par with Siege" but unmemorable. GameMAG and COGconnected highlighted inconsistencies, with the former citing audio that detracted from horror elements and the latter noting muted weapon sounds. AusGamers criticized the clinical approach, calling the Archæans "generic enemies," and Worth Playing noted issues with creature sound distinctiveness. Additionally, Jeuxvideo.com (multiple instances) acknowledged immersive effects but pointed out that weapon sounds "lack impact." These critiques suggest that while the audio elements are functional, they fail to leave a lasting impression or innovate beyond established benchmarks. Overall, the critical reception of Extraction’s sound design and music leans positive, with most reviewers acknowledging its effectiveness in enhancing immersion and gameplay. The consensus is that it meets expectations for an Ubisoft title, offering solid, atmospheric audio that supports the game’s horror elements. However, there is a recurring sentiment that it lacks originality or standout moments, as noted by BaziCenter and IGN Adria, while some critics like GameMAG and AusGamers felt it fell short of its potential. Despite these criticisms, the majority of reviews—particularly from Digital Chumps, GamesRadar+, and XboxAddict—highlighted strengths in immersion, tension-building, and technical execution, suggesting that while not groundbreaking, the audio design is a strong, cohesive component of the game.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

The voice acting in Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Extraction is technically solid and occasionally impactful, with praised delivery and localization, but its underuse, repetitive lines, and lack of depth fail to elevate character engagement or narrative cohesion.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

11%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

78%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

11%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Extraction receives mixed but generally positive feedback, with several critics highlighting its technical quality and contextual relevance. Worth Playing praises the “convincing” delivery of lines, noting there are no “corny or out-of-place” moments, while Gamers’ Temple acknowledges that main characters are given radio dialogue, adding depth to their presence. MondoXbox commends the complete Italian localization for texts and audio, enhancing immersion, and VG247 appreciates how voice acting imbues operators with “personality,” even if these interactions are sparse. These positives suggest that when voice work is present, it effectively supports character identity and narrative cohesion, particularly in cutscenes and radio exchanges. However, several critics point to significant shortcomings in the voice acting’s execution and integration. IGN Adria criticizes the limited use of voice acting, relegating it to “mediocre sci-fi trailer”-style cutscenes that lack narrative weight. The Loadout notes a lack of meaningful character moments or interactions, despite the operators’ established lore from Rainbow Six Siege. Meanwhile, Games.cz and Multiplayer.it highlight repetitive communication from advisors and unclear quality of voice work, respectively, with the latter noting no further details on performance. These critiques underscore a broader issue: while the voice acting is technically competent, its frequency and depth fall short of expectations, particularly in a game that could benefit from more dynamic character engagement. Overall, the consensus leans toward cautious optimism, recognizing the voice acting’s technical merits but questioning its impact on the overall experience. While Worth Playing and VG247 acknowledge moments of quality, the majority of critics—such as IGN Adria, The Loadout, and Games.cz—argue that it feels underutilized or repetitive. The game’s reliance on pre-recorded cutscenes and radio dialogue, coupled with limited character development, creates a disconnect between the voice work’s potential and its execution. Despite some praise for localization and delivery, the voice acting remains a secondary element, failing to elevate the game beyond its procedural gameplay mechanics.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Rainbow Six Extraction delivers solid tech performance across PS5, Xbox Series X/S, and PC, with smooth 60fps, stable frame rates, and strong optimization—especially on newer hardware. Critics praise DualSense integration, DLSS support, and cross-platform polish, but persistent issues like PS5 crashes, texture streaming glitches, and PC network instability linger, hinting at areas for refinement despite a largely polished experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

73%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

25%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Extraction receives largely positive feedback across all platforms, with notable strengths in optimization and stability. On PS5, multiple reviewers highlight smooth gameplay, consistent frame rates (often 60fps), and minimal bugs. For instance, IGN Italia and Jeuxvideo.com praise the “solid technical performance” and “stable framerate,” while Screen Rant notes seamless DualSense integration. Xbox Series X also shines, with GameGrin and Meristation emphasizing smooth 4K@60FPS performance, and Eurogamer Italy commending improved graphics. On PC, critics like AusGamers and CD-Action highlight excellent optimization, supporting technologies like NVIDIA DLSS and Reflex, while TheGamer praises the engine’s stability even on mid-range hardware. Xbox Series S and Xbox One versions also perform well, with SomosXbox noting “smooth 4K and 60fps” on Series X and similar consistency on older hardware. However, technical issues persist across platforms. On PS5, Wccftech reports “multiple crashes,” while Noisy Pixel mentions a “connection issue” causing penalties, and Press Start Australia notes glitches during team revives. Xbox Series X faces texture streaming problems (GameMAG) and occasional frame drops (Generación Xbox), though these are minor. On PC, Gamersky raises concerns about network stability affecting the MIA system, and GamingTrend mentions “occasional disconnects.” Notably, SECTOR.sk points to “issues and disconnections on console versions,” though specifics remain unclear. While most platforms avoid major flaws, these inconsistencies highlight areas where Ubisoft may need further refinement. Overall, critics agree that Extraction is technically well-crafted, with strong optimization across PS5, Xbox Series X/S, and PC. The game’s stability and performance are frequently praised, particularly on newer hardware, though minor bugs and connectivity hiccups persist. While some reviewers like IGN Spain and GameMAG note concerns about “limited content” or “texture streaming,” the consensus leans toward a polished experience. The technical foundation is robust, but occasional issues—such as PS5 crashes or PC network instability—suggest room for improvement. Despite these flaws, the game’s cross-platform functionality and attention to detail (e.g., DualSense features) underscore its appeal, making it a technically solid entry in the Rainbow Six series.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Co-op focus, procedural variety, and operator progression keep Rainbow Six Extraction engaging short-term, but repetition, grind, and lackluster endgame content undermine long-term appeal, leaving its replayability in a tense balance between tactical fun and frustration.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

29%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

63%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The initial reception of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction highlights several positive aspects of its replay value, particularly its emphasis on cooperative gameplay, procedural generation, and operator progression. Critics like GamesRadar+ and IGN France praise the randomized mission objectives, enemy placements, and difficulty modifiers, which create a sense of variety and encourage players to revisit missions with different strategies. The game’s focus on co-op play is frequently highlighted as a strength, with CGMagazine noting that cooperative gameplay and diverse operator abilities enhance replayability. Additionally, modes like the Maelstrom Protocol (mentioned by XboxAddict) and weekly rotating missions (Meristation) offer structured challenges that keep players engaged beyond the initial campaign. The game’s progression system, which rewards players with new operators and gear through extractions (CGMagazine, TrueAchievements), also contributes to a sense of long-term investment. However, the negatives surrounding replay value are equally prominent, with many critics pointing to repetition, grind-heavy mechanics, and limited content as major drawbacks. Gamepressure and Inverse criticize the lack of meaningful incentives for returning to the game, noting that additional modes like Wall-To-Wall feel unbalanced and artificially inflate progression. Wccftech and MMORPG.com highlight mission repetition and a lack of variety in objectives, while GameGrin and GameMAG point to repetitive environments and maps that lose appeal after extended play. The game’s reliance on procedural generation (Shacknews) is praised for adding uniqueness to each session, but this is often offset by the frustration of solo play, where mechanics like operator resurrection are absent (Shacknews). Furthermore, IGN Portugal and TrueAchievements note that endgame content, while present, may not satisfy players seeking deeper or more varied challenges. Overall, the consensus among critics suggests a mixed but cautiously optimistic view of Rainbow Six Extraction’s replay value. While the game’s cooperative focus, randomized elements, and operator progression systems provide engaging short-term experiences (GamesRadar+, IGN France), long-term appeal is tempered by concerns about repetition, grind, and limited content (Inverse, GameGrin). Some critics, like COGconnected and Generación Xbox, express hope that future updates and community-driven improvements could address these issues, while others, such as NME and MMORPG.com, remain skeptical about the game’s longevity. The divide between those who appreciate the game’s tactical depth and those frustrated by its repetitive nature reflects a broader debate over whether Extraction’s strengths outweigh its flaws in the context of replayability.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

37%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

61%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall reception of Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Extraction highlights its strengths as a tactical co-op shooter with engaging mechanics and immersive gameplay. Critics like IGN Spain and TheXboxHub praised its balanced progression system and appeal to both newcomers and Siege veterans, while CGMagazine noted its "addicting gameplay" and "compelling storyline," positioning it as a unique entry in the franchise. The game’s emphasis on teamwork, strategic planning, and atmospheric environments was frequently lauded, with Jeuxvideo.com (twice) and Guardian highlighting its ability to blend tactical depth with rich world-building. SomosXbox emphasized its seamless integration of Rainbow Six Siege’s gunplay, calling it a "fantastic demonstration of innovation" in the co-op shooter genre. These positives underscore the game’s potential as a cooperative experience, particularly for fans of team-based strategy. However, the consensus also points to significant flaws that detract from its overall appeal. Many critics, including We Got This Covered and Gamepressure, criticized the game as "disappointing," "shallow," and "repetitive," with BaziCenter and GamesHub noting it feels more like an expansion than a standalone title. Issues such as grind-heavy progression systems (ZTGD, GamePro Germany), lack of variety in missions (GamesHub, Gamer.no), and underwhelming enemy design (TheSixthAxis) were recurring complaints. The game’s reliance on microtransactions and high price points (Gamepressure) further alienated players, while VG247 and GameGrin pointed to its struggle to retain long-term engagement due to repetitive objectives and a lack of meaningful story. These critiques paint a picture of a game that excels in short bursts but falters in sustaining player interest over time. Despite mixed reactions, the overall consensus leans toward acknowledging Extraction as a solid but flawed co-op experience. While IGN France and Press Start Australia praised its "robust foundation" and "strategic gameplay," others like Ragequit.gr and Gamer.no felt it needed more content to reach its potential. The game’s reliance on teamwork (Comicbook.com, XboxAddict) and tactical depth (Guardian) was seen as a strength, but its repetitive structure and lack of solo appeal (Daily Star, Hardcore Gamer) divided opinions. Ultimately, critics agree that Extraction is best suited for players who prioritize cooperative play and are willing to overlook its shortcomings, with some (like Twinfinite and TheLoadout) expressing hope for post-launch improvements to elevate it beyond a "missed opportunity."

TL;DR

A tactical co-op shooter lauded for immersive teamwork and strategic depth, but bogged down by repetitive missions, grind-heavy systems, and underwhelming solo appeal—its potential hampered by shallow progression and microtransactions.

MONSTER

Reviews

198 reviews found

100

Player 2

PlayStation 5

Jan 28, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review concludes that Rainbow Six: Extraction is a tactical experience that will be enjoyed by those who liked the tactical aspects of Rainbow Six: Siege but were put off by the PvP elements.

Read full review

Gamers Heroes

PlayStation 5

Jan 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction is praised as one of the most intense and exciting co-op experiences available today. It is seen as an incredible addition to the Siege universe and a fantastic demonstration of innovation in the genre.

The Loadout

PlayStation 5

Jan 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Rainbow Six Extraction is a refreshing and tactical co-op shooter that could set a new benchmark for the genre with enough support and new content.

Read full review

Generación Xbox

Xbox Series X

Jan 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Rainbow Six Extraction is a successful cooperative shooter that combines tactical gameplay with engaging content, making it enjoyable and rewarding.

Read full review

Worth Playing

PlayStation 5

Jan 20, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Rainbow Six: Extraction is a compelling PvE experience for Rainbow Six fans, offering a mix of tactical gameplay, challenging mechanics, and replay value. It provides a solid alternative for those seeking PvE content and single-player fans looking for Siege elements.

Read full review

MondoXbox

Xbox Series X

Jan 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Rainbow Six Extraction successfully combines cooperative gameplay with a compelling story and solid mechanics, making it a worthy addition to the franchise.

COGconnected

Jan 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Rainbow Six Extraction is a competent shooter that is best enjoyed with a three-player squad. It is functional as a single-player game but challenging and not super rewarding. The mechanics and missions are interesting, but the lack of originality in alien designs and the absence of a campaign or extra modes at launch are drawbacks.

Read full review

GameStar

Jan 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A cooperative shooter with a solid story and enjoyable gameplay.

Digital Chumps

PlayStation 5

Jan 20, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Rainbow Six Extraction is described as a thrilling, tense PvE game that implements the best shooting mechanics from Siege. It offers a challenge that only Rainbow Six can provide, despite lacking deep progression and evolving objectives. The game's success in the long term remains to be seen.

Read full review

Meristation

Xbox Series X

Jan 20, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Rainbow Six Extraction is a well-crafted cooperative shooter that offers a unique experience with its tactical gameplay and variety of challenges, making it a recommended purchase for genre enthusiasts.

Read full review