Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction cover image

Links

Amazon

Twitch

MONSTER

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction
Item: Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2022

GenresAdventure, Action, Shooter, Crime, Horror, Strategy, Single Player, Multiplayer, First Person Perspective

AvailableJan 20, 2022

PlatformPlayStation 4, Xbox Series X, PC, Xbox One, PlayStation 5

DeveloperUbisoft Montreal

Overview

Assemble your elite team of Rainbow Six Operators to launch incursions in the unpredictable containment zones and face off against an evolving Alien threat. Band together and put everything on the line as you take on this unknown enemy.

Elsewhere

5.2

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics praise Rainbow Six Extraction for its fresh premise of alien invasion but slam its shallow, disconnected narrative. While the lore and atmospheric cutscenes shine, the overall story is deemed superficial and lacking depth, missing an opportunity to engage players meaningfully. The game prioritizes gameplay over a compelling storyline, leading to a disappointing reception regarding its narrative.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

22%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

56%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

22%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The story of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction has garnered some praise from critics, particularly regarding its premise and the thematic shift from traditional counter-terrorism to an alien invasion narrative. Critics like Gamer.no and CGMagazine highlight that the game introduces a unique storyline involving parasitic aliens known as Archaeans, which adds a fresh twist to the franchise. The game is set in a world where players take on the role of the REACT team, tasked with combating this new threat, and several reviewers noted that the lore surrounding the alien invasion, including the backstory of a Russian Soyuz capsule crash, provides an interesting context for the gameplay (as mentioned by Daily Star and MondoXbox). Additionally, the high-quality cutscenes and atmospheric elements have been acknowledged for enhancing the overall experience, even if the narrative itself is not deeply engaging. However, the overwhelming sentiment among critics is that the story lacks depth and coherence. Many reviewers, including those from Gamer.nl and Launcher, criticize the narrative for being virtually non-existent, with bare-bones cutscenes and a lack of significant plot progression. IGN Italia and Jeuxvideo.com echo this sentiment, stating that the missions feel disconnected and devoid of a cohesive storyline. Critics like We Got This Covered and GamingTrend describe the story as hollow and uninteresting, pointing to a clichéd theme of alien destruction without meaningful character development or plot twists. The consensus is that while the game attempts to weave a narrative, it ultimately feels superficial and fails to engage players in a meaningful way. Overall, the critics reach a consensus that Rainbow Six Extraction's story is a missed opportunity. While the premise of fighting against an alien invasion has potential, the execution leaves much to be desired. Many reviewers, such as GameCritics and Wccftech, emphasize that the game prioritizes gameplay over narrative, resulting in a thin storyline that does not drive the experience. The lack of a compelling narrative structure, as noted by multiple critics, detracts from what could have been a more immersive and engaging experience. In summary, while the game introduces an intriguing concept, the execution of its story fails to resonate with players, leading to a largely negative reception regarding its narrative depth and engagement.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction impresses with its cooperative gameplay and tactical depth, earning praise for teamwork and realistic mechanics. However, it suffers from repetitiveness and a lack of variety, leading to a mixed reception. Critics note that while it can be engaging with friends, the simplistic level design and predictable enemy encounters undermine the excitement, leaving many players craving more dynamic experiences.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

75%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

20%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction has garnered a mix of praise, particularly for its cooperative elements and strategic depth. Many critics, such as Pure Xbox and Gamers Heroes, highlight the game's emphasis on teamwork and tactical gameplay, which requires players to utilize unique operator abilities effectively. The gameplay is described as engaging and satisfying, with a variety of mission types and objectives that encourage players to strategize and coordinate their actions. Critics like GRYOnline.pl and Digital Chumps commend the game for its realistic shooting mechanics and risk/reward systems, which add layers of tension and excitement to the experience. The cooperative nature of the game, as noted by players like Metro GameCentral and XboxAddict, allows for dynamic interactions and a sense of urgency, especially when managing resources and rescuing fallen operatives. However, the gameplay also faces significant criticism, with many reviewers pointing out its repetitiveness and lack of tactical depth. Critics from sources like We Got This Covered and Inverse express disappointment in the simplistic nature of the levels and the predictability of enemy encounters, which detract from the overall excitement. Additionally, some reviewers, such as Gamepressure and Screen Rant, mention that the game fails to capture the high-stakes tension that characterized Rainbow Six Siege, leading to a more mundane experience. The MIA system, while intended to add depth, has been described as frustrating, especially for solo players, as noted by PlayStation Universe and Trusted Reviews. This sentiment is echoed by several critics who feel that the game can become tedious over time, particularly when playing without a full team. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while Rainbow Six Extraction offers a solid foundation for cooperative gameplay with its tactical elements and engaging mechanics, it falls short in delivering a consistently thrilling experience. The repetitive nature of missions and the lack of variety in enemy encounters are recurring themes in the critiques, leading to a mixed reception. Critics like Games.cz and New Game Network highlight the need for more dynamic gameplay to maintain interest, while others, such as Gamer.nl and Gfinity, acknowledge the potential for fun when played with friends. In summary, Rainbow Six Extraction presents a blend of strengths and weaknesses, appealing primarily to those who enjoy cooperative tactical shooters but leaving some players wanting more in terms of depth and variety.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics are split on Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction's graphics. While some praise its solid performance on next-gen consoles and polished visuals, many others slam its bland, uninspired environments and outdated aesthetics, calling it a missed opportunity for innovation. Overall, the game impresses technically but disappoints visually, leaving a lukewarm reception overshadowed by critiques of repetitiveness and lack of originality.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

46%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

44%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

10%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction have garnered a mix of opinions from critics, with some highlighting positive aspects of the game. Several reviewers noted that the game maintains a solid technical performance, particularly on next-gen consoles like the Xbox Series X and PS5. For example, Generación Xbox praised the visual design as impressive, running at 4K and 60fps, while CGMagazine emphasized the polished visual and technical presentation, describing it as visually appealing. Critics such as Daily Star and Everyeye.it acknowledged the high-quality visuals inherited from Rainbow Six Siege, with options for resolution and high frame rate modes, suggesting that the game utilizes next-generation capabilities effectively. Additionally, some reviewers appreciated the destructible environments and atmospheric details that contribute to the overall gameplay experience, with GamePro Germany noting the atmospheric details like alien growths and lighting effects. On the other hand, a significant number of critics expressed disappointment with the game's graphics and visual design. Many pointed out that the environments and character designs often feel bland, generic, and uninspired. For instance, We Got This Covered and Launcher described the maps as "bland and ugly," while Gamepressure echoed this sentiment by calling the maps "identical mazes" with little variation. Critics like IGN Adria and Atomix noted that the game does not appear to be a next-gen title, with visuals that feel outdated even on newer hardware. This sentiment was further supported by GameMAG, which attributed the subpar visuals to limitations of an aging engine, leading to texture streaming issues. The overall impression from these reviews indicates a lack of originality and variety in design, with many environments failing to create a compelling atmosphere. The overall consensus among critics suggests a divide in opinion regarding the graphics and visual design of Rainbow Six Extraction. While some reviewers acknowledge the technical performance and smooth gameplay, many others criticize the game for its uninspired aesthetics and lack of visual innovation compared to its predecessor, Rainbow Six Siege. Critics like Games.cz and ComicBook highlighted the repetitive nature of character and environment designs, detracting from player investment. Overall, the game appears to have a solid foundation but struggles to elevate its visual presentation, resulting in a mixed reception that leans more towards disappointment than acclaim.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Rainbow Six Extraction's sound design and music receive mixed reviews: praised for immersive audio and effective cues enhancing gameplay, but criticized for being forgettable and lacking impact. Critics highlight a strong atmosphere and strategic audio elements, yet some feel it doesn't innovate beyond previous titles and fails to deliver a compelling horror experience. Overall, it’s an uneven aspect of the game, resonating with some while leaving others wanting more.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

46%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

46%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction have garnered a range of positive feedback from critics, particularly regarding their immersive qualities and ability to enhance gameplay. Several reviewers, including Digital Chumps and CGMagazine, praised the sound design for its effectiveness in creating tension and contributing to the overall atmosphere of the game. Critics like Press Start Australia highlighted the musical score as fantastic, complementing the alien environment and enhancing the player's experience. Many reviewers noted the effectiveness of audio cues, with Player 2 and Vgames emphasizing their importance in reconnaissance and gameplay mechanics, which added a strategic layer to the experience. Overall, the sound design was recognized for its ability to immerse players in the game's world, with many calling it a strong aspect of the title. However, there are notable criticisms regarding the sound design and music that detract from the overall experience. Some critics, such as IGN Adria and AusGamers, found the sound design to be forgettable or clinical, lacking the distinctiveness and impact needed to create a compelling horror atmosphere. BaziCenter echoed this sentiment, suggesting that while the sound design was competent, it did not innovate beyond what was established in Rainbow Six Siege. Additionally, several reviews pointed out that while the audio cues were effective, weapon sounds and the impact of gunfire felt muted or lacked punch, as noted by COGconnected and Worth Playing. This inconsistency in audio quality has led some reviewers to feel that the sound design does not fully meet the expectations set by previous Ubisoft titles. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed, with a split between those who appreciate the immersive and tension-filled audio experience and those who find it lacking in memorability and impact. While many reviewers commend the effective use of audio cues and the atmospheric soundtrack, others criticize the sound design for not innovating enough or failing to create a strong sense of horror. Critics like MondoXbox and Gfinity highlight the solid foundation of sound design, yet the feedback from IGN Adria and AusGamers suggests that there is room for improvement in terms of distinctiveness and emotional impact. Ultimately, Rainbow Six Extraction's sound design and music appear to be a strong but uneven aspect of the game, resonating well with some players while leaving others wanting more.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction features some commendable voice acting that adds personality to characters and supports localization efforts, enhancing immersion for non-English players. However, critics like IGN Adria and The Loadout highlight major flaws, including repetitive lines and a lack of engaging character interactions, which undermine the narrative depth. While there's potential, the execution falls short, resulting in a mixed reception overall.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

11%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

78%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

11%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction has received a mix of feedback from critics, with some positive notes highlighting the convincing delivery of the voice work. Worth Playing commends the voice acting for being convincingly performed, without any lines that feel corny or out of place. Additionally, VG247 points out that the voice acting adds personality to the operators, suggesting that there is a degree of character depth present. Furthermore, MondoXbox notes the complete localization in Italian, indicating that the game has made efforts to cater to a broader audience, which enhances the overall experience for non-English speakers. This attention to localization might also contribute positively to the immersion for players who engage with the game in their native language. On the flip side, several critics have pointed out significant shortcomings in the voice acting. IGN Adria describes the voice acting as limited to pre-recorded cutscenes that resemble mediocre sci-fi trailers, lacking the depth and significance that would enhance the narrative. The Loadout echoes this sentiment by noting a lack of worthwhile character moments and interactions, suggesting that while the operators have established lore from Rainbow Six Siege, the game fails to leverage this potential effectively. Furthermore, Games.cz criticizes the repetitive communication from advisors, which can become annoying over time, indicating that the voice acting may not contribute positively to the gameplay experience as it could have. Overall, the consensus among critics suggests that while there are some redeeming qualities in the voice acting of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction, such as convincing performances and added personality to characters, these strengths are overshadowed by limitations in character interactions and narrative depth. Critics like IGN Adria and The Loadout highlight that the lack of engaging dialogue and repetitive voice lines detracts from what could have been a more immersive experience. Thus, while the foundation of the voice acting is solid, its execution leaves much to be desired, leading to a mixed reception overall.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

"Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction" impresses with smooth performance and solid optimization across PS5, Xbox Series X, and PC, earning positive reviews for its polished experience. However, users report connection issues and crashes, particularly on PS5 and Xbox, hinting at potential stability concerns in multiplayer. While the game showcases strong technical capabilities, ongoing support from Ubisoft is crucial to address these issues.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

73%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

25%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction has generally received positive feedback across all platforms. On the PlayStation 5, critics like Atomix and IGN Italia noted that the game runs smoothly with stable frame rates, and Gamer.no appreciated the cross-platform functionality. The game is highlighted for its optimization, with many reviewers, including Screen Rant and Worth Playing, praising its polished experience and minimal bugs. On the Xbox Series X, critics such as CGMagazine and Game Informer echoed similar sentiments, noting smooth gameplay and solid technical performance. Reviews from GameGrin and Meristation emphasized the game's ability to run at 4K and 60 FPS without major issues, while Gamers' Temple reported a stable experience on the Xbox Series S. Meanwhile, on PC, the game has been lauded for its optimization, with critics like AusGamers and CD-Action reporting smooth performance even on high settings, and support for advanced technologies like NVIDIA DLSS. Despite the overall positive reception, there are notable concerns regarding technical performance across the platforms. On PS5, Noisy Pixel reported connection issues that could lead to penalties, while Wccftech highlighted multiple crashes during gameplay, indicating that stability might not be universal. For the Xbox Series X, GameMAG pointed out issues with texture streaming, which could detract from the visual experience. Additionally, while many reviews on PC were positive, Gamersky raised concerns about network stability affecting gameplay, particularly with the MIA system, suggesting that disconnects could impact the overall experience. In summary, the consensus among critics is that Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction performs well across all platforms, with solid optimization and minimal technical issues. However, some reviewers have pointed out specific problems that could affect gameplay, particularly on PS5 and Xbox Series X. Overall, while the game is praised for its technical capabilities and smooth operation, there are enough reported issues to warrant caution, especially regarding connectivity and stability in multiplayer modes. The game showcases a commendable effort in technical performance, but ongoing support and updates from Ubisoft may be necessary to address the concerns raised by critics.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics are divided on the replay value of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction. While some praise its varied missions, operator progression, and endgame content as engaging, many highlight its repetitive gameplay and lack of compelling post-launch content as major drawbacks. The game's long-term appeal hinges on the developer's ability to introduce fresh updates and address these concerns.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

29%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

63%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions on the replay value of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction reflect a mix of positive aspects that highlight the game's potential for engagement. Several critics, including Gamer.nl and COGconnected, emphasize the varied mission objectives and tactical gameplay that can enhance replayability. The game features a progression system that allows players to unlock new operators and gear, which can motivate continued play. Furthermore, the inclusion of endgame content like the Maelstrom Protocol, as noted by Metro GameCentral and XboxAddict, adds layers of challenge and variety, encouraging players to explore different strategies and team compositions. Critics such as Press Start Australia and Jeuxvideo.com also mention the procedural generation of missions and objectives, which can keep the gameplay experience fresh and engaging. Conversely, a significant number of critics express concerns about the game's replay value due to its repetitive nature. Inverse, BaziCenter, and Games.cz all point out that the lack of variety in objectives and environments can lead to a sense of monotony, diminishing long-term engagement. Many reviewers, including Game Rant and GameGrin, echo this sentiment, stating that the game quickly becomes repetitive and lacks sufficient incentives to keep players invested. The absence of compelling post-launch content and dynamic engagement, as highlighted by GameCritics and NME, further exacerbates these concerns, leaving players questioning the game's longevity. Overall, the consensus among critics suggests that while Rainbow Six Extraction has elements that can foster replay value—such as varied mission objectives, operator progression, and cooperative gameplay—the game's repetitive nature and limited content may hinder its appeal over time. Critics like Daily Star and Gamer.no emphasize the importance of future updates and additional content to maintain player interest. Ultimately, while the game offers a solid foundation for replayability, its long-term success will heavily depend on the developer's commitment to providing fresh content and addressing the concerns raised by reviewers.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

37%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

61%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

In analyzing the overall sentiment surrounding Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction, there are several positive aspects highlighted by critics. Many reviewers appreciate the tactical depth and cooperative gameplay that the game offers, with some noting that it provides an engaging experience when played with friends. For instance, PlayStation Universe emphasizes that the game is best enjoyed with others, while Gamers Heroes describes it as one of the most intense and exciting co-op experiences available today. Critics like Shacknews and XboxAddict praise the game for its immersive atmosphere, diverse character options, and solid gameplay mechanics, suggesting that it can be a rewarding experience for fans of the genre. However, a significant number of reviews express disappointment regarding various aspects of Rainbow Six Extraction. Critics such as We Got This Covered and IGN Adria describe the game as disappointing and lacking excitement, with the latter labeling it a "glorified zombie mode" of Siege. Many reviewers, including Gamepressure and Inverse, criticize the game for its repetitive gameplay and lack of innovation, suggesting that it feels more like an expansion than a standalone title. Concerns about the game's progression system and overall depth are also prevalent, with Power Unlimited noting a frustrating progression system and Atomix mentioning concerns about longevity. Overall, the consensus among critics appears to be mixed, with a notable divide between those who find value in the cooperative experience and those who feel let down by the execution. While some, like Generación Xbox and The Loadout, see potential for the game to grow with future content updates, others argue that it falls short of expectations set by previous titles in the franchise. The criticisms regarding repetitiveness and lack of depth are echoed across multiple reviews, leading to a general sentiment that, while Rainbow Six Extraction has its merits, it ultimately struggles to establish a unique identity and sustain long-term engagement.

TL;DR

Critics are split on Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction. Many praise its tactical co-op gameplay and immersive atmosphere, making it fun with friends. However, significant reviews slam it for being repetitive, lacking innovation, and feeling more like an expansion than a standalone game. While some see potential for future updates, many feel it fails to meet franchise expectations, struggling with depth and long-term engagement.

MONSTER

Reviews

198 reviews found

100

Player 2

PlayStation 5

Jan 28, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review concludes that Rainbow Six: Extraction is a tactical experience that will be enjoyed by those who liked the tactical aspects of Rainbow Six: Siege but were put off by the PvP elements.

Read full review

Gamers Heroes

PlayStation 5

Jan 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Extraction is praised as one of the most intense and exciting co-op experiences available today. It is seen as an incredible addition to the Siege universe and a fantastic demonstration of innovation in the genre.

The Loadout

PlayStation 5

Jan 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Rainbow Six Extraction is a refreshing and tactical co-op shooter that could set a new benchmark for the genre with enough support and new content.

Read full review

Generación Xbox

Xbox Series X

Jan 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Rainbow Six Extraction is a successful cooperative shooter that combines tactical gameplay with engaging content, making it enjoyable and rewarding.

Read full review

Worth Playing

PlayStation 5

Jan 20, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Rainbow Six: Extraction is a compelling PvE experience for Rainbow Six fans, offering a mix of tactical gameplay, challenging mechanics, and replay value. It provides a solid alternative for those seeking PvE content and single-player fans looking for Siege elements.

Read full review

MondoXbox

Xbox Series X

Jan 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Rainbow Six Extraction successfully combines cooperative gameplay with a compelling story and solid mechanics, making it a worthy addition to the franchise.

COGconnected

Jan 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Rainbow Six Extraction is a competent shooter that is best enjoyed with a three-player squad. It is functional as a single-player game but challenging and not super rewarding. The mechanics and missions are interesting, but the lack of originality in alien designs and the absence of a campaign or extra modes at launch are drawbacks.

Read full review

GameStar

Jan 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A cooperative shooter with a solid story and enjoyable gameplay.

Digital Chumps

PlayStation 5

Jan 20, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Rainbow Six Extraction is described as a thrilling, tense PvE game that implements the best shooting mechanics from Siege. It offers a challenge that only Rainbow Six can provide, despite lacking deep progression and evolving objectives. The game's success in the long term remains to be seen.

Read full review

Meristation

Xbox Series X

Jan 20, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Rainbow Six Extraction is a well-crafted cooperative shooter that offers a unique experience with its tactical gameplay and variety of challenges, making it a recommended purchase for genre enthusiasts.

Read full review