Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

Amazon

Steam

Twitch

MONSTER

Back 4 Blood

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Back 4 Blood
Item: Back 4 Blood
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2021

GenresAdventure, Action, Shooter, Horror, Single Player, Multiplayer, First Person Perspective

AvailableOct 7, 2021

PlatformXbox Series X, PC, PlayStation 5

DeveloperTurtle Rock Studios

Overview

Back 4 Blood is a thrilling cooperative first-person shooter from the creators of the critically acclaimed Left 4 Dead franchise. You are at the center of a war against the Ridden. These once-human hosts of a deadly parasite have turned into terrifying creatures bent on devouring what remains of civilization. With humanity’s extinction on the line, it’s up to you and your friends to take the fight to the enemy, eradicate the Ridden, and reclaim the world.

Elsewhere

6.1

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Back 4 Blood tries to weave a structured narrative about immune survivors called "Cleaners" battling zombie-like Ridden, aiming to enhance cooperative gameplay with acts and chapters. Critics appreciate its world-building and cinematics but largely deem the story thin, clichéd, and forgettable, marred by poor character development and pacing issues. Ultimately, it prioritizes action over a compelling narrative, leaving many players wanting more depth.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

10%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

72%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

18%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The story of Back 4 Blood has garnered some praise from critics, particularly for its attempt to create a structured narrative experience through its campaign divided into acts and chapters. Critics like Digital Chumps and Malditos Nerds highlight the basic premise of a group of immune survivors known as "Cleaners" battling against the zombie-like Ridden, suggesting that this setup provides a framework for engaging cooperative gameplay. Additionally, Destructoid notes that the narrative connects maps and missions, focusing on reclaiming territory rather than mere survival, which adds a layer of world-building that some players may find appealing. The game also includes well-crafted cinematics that, according to Areajugones, contribute to the overall presentation, even if the story itself is not deeply engaging. However, the overwhelming sentiment among critics leans towards the negative when it comes to the story's execution. Many reviewers, including GamingTrend and Press Start Australia, describe the narrative as "useless" and "forgettable," with minimal character development and an over-reliance on clichés. Critics like Vandal and Wccftech point out that the story suffers from a lack of depth and originality, often feeling derivative of the zombie genre without successfully parodying it. Furthermore, GameSkinny and Hardcore Gamer emphasize pacing issues and repetitive mission structures that detract from the overall coherence of the campaign, making it difficult for players to remain engaged with the narrative. In summary, while Back 4 Blood attempts to establish a cohesive story within its cooperative gameplay framework, the consensus among critics is that it ultimately falls short. The narrative is often described as thin, predictable, and serving merely as a backdrop for gameplay rather than a compelling story in its own right. Critics such as Invers and PlayStation Universe highlight that, despite the potential for interesting character dynamics, the story lacks significant exploration and development, leaving players with a sense of missed opportunities. Overall, the game appears to prioritize cooperative action over narrative depth, which may appeal to some players but leaves others desiring a more engaging storyline.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Back 4 Blood impresses with its cooperative mechanics and innovative card system, modernizing the Left 4 Dead formula and enhancing replayability. Critics praise its teamwork focus and strategic depth, making it best enjoyed with friends. However, it suffers from repetitiveness, AI shortcomings, and balance issues, leading to frustrating solo play. While the game offers thrilling cooperative experiences, it may alienate players seeking a more varied and straightforward solo adventure.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

80%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

19%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Back 4 Blood has received a mix of praise from critics, particularly for its cooperative mechanics and the innovative card system that enhances replayability. Many reviewers, such as IGN Italia and Eurogamer Italy, highlight the game’s ability to modernize the Left 4 Dead formula by introducing strategic depth through character abilities and deck customization. Critics like Pure Xbox and Xbox Achievements commend the gameplay for being satisfying and challenging, emphasizing the importance of teamwork in surviving against hordes of zombies. The game’s focus on cooperative play is a recurring theme, with several reviewers noting that the experience is most enjoyable when played with friends, as it fosters camaraderie and strategic collaboration. However, the gameplay also faces significant criticism, particularly regarding its repetitiveness and issues with AI performance. AusGamers points out a lack of meaningful variation in gameplay, which can diminish the fun and replay value. GameSpew and IGN Portugal echo these sentiments, noting that while the card system adds variability, the ineffective AI can lead to frustrating solo experiences. Additionally, several critics, including GameMAG and Games.cz, mention that excessive enemy spawns and difficulty balancing detract from the overall enjoyment, leading to a sense of monotony in gameplay. The complexity of the card system has also been described as unintuitive by CGMagazine, which can alienate players seeking a more straightforward experience. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Back 4 Blood successfully builds upon the foundation laid by its predecessor while introducing new mechanics that can enhance the gameplay experience. However, the enjoyment of the game is heavily contingent on cooperative play and the effectiveness of AI teammates. While many reviewers, such as M3 and Meristation, appreciate the depth and strategic elements the card system brings, others like GameSpew and AusGamers express concerns about repetitiveness and balance issues. This dichotomy suggests that while Back 4 Blood has the potential for thrilling cooperative gameplay, it may not fully satisfy all players, particularly those who prefer a more balanced and varied solo experience.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Back 4 Blood impresses with smooth 60 FPS and up to 4K visuals on next-gen consoles, earning praise for its detailed environments and dynamic gore effects. However, critics also highlight its lack of vibrancy and generic aesthetics, labeling the overall design as uninspired and outdated. While technically solid, it fails to stand out in a saturated genre, leaning too heavily on Left 4 Dead nostalgia without delivering true innovation.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

37%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

61%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of Back 4 Blood have garnered a range of positive remarks from critics, particularly regarding the game's performance on next-gen consoles. Many reviewers, such as Meristation and Gaming Nexus, highlight the game's impressive visuals, noting that it runs smoothly at 60 FPS and can reach up to 4K resolution, which enhances the overall gaming experience. Critics like PlayStation LifeStyle and GameCritics appreciate the detailed environments and character designs that contribute to a tense and immersive atmosphere. The variety of settings, as pointed out by NME and New Game Network, adds to the visual appeal, while the gore effects and animations, praised by IGN and Game Over Online, create an engaging and dynamic combat experience. However, despite these positive aspects, several critics have pointed out significant shortcomings in the game's graphics and visual design. For instance, WellPlayed and PlaySense express disappointment with the overall aesthetic, describing it as underwhelming and lacking vibrancy, particularly in darker environments. The environments have been criticized for being generic and uninspired, with EGM and Guardian noting that they fall into a bland post-apocalyptic aesthetic that fails to create memorable settings. Additionally, Atomix and PC Invasion mention issues with level design, highlighting inconsistencies in quality and a monotonous color palette that detracts from the visual experience. Overall, the consensus among critics suggests that while Back 4 Blood boasts solid technical performance and some visually appealing moments, it ultimately lacks the distinctiveness and creativity expected from a modern title. Many reviewers, including Games.cz and GamingBolt, find the graphics competent but not groundbreaking, with a tendency to feel outdated compared to other contemporary games. The game's reliance on familiar tropes from its predecessor, Left 4 Dead, is both a point of nostalgia and a limitation, as noted by PC Gamer and Hobby Consolas. Thus, while Back 4 Blood offers a visually engaging experience in some respects, it struggles to fully stand out in a crowded genre.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Back 4 Blood impresses with immersive sound effects and impactful audio feedback during combat, praised by critics for enhancing the gameplay experience. However, the soundtrack is criticized for being generic and lacking tension, detracting from the game's atmosphere. While the sound design is strong, many reviewers see a need for improvement in the music to create a more cohesive and engaging audio experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

54%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

40%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of Back 4 Blood have garnered a mix of praise from various critics, particularly for the immersive and impactful sound effects that enhance gameplay. Many reviewers, including Finger Guns and Hardcore Gamer, highlight the strength of the sound design, noting the satisfying audio feedback during combat, such as the impactful weapon sounds and the distinct noises of the Ridden. GameSpot and PlaySense also commend the energetic music that complements the gameplay, with specific tracks like "Black Betty" and "Ace of Spades" enhancing the game's atmosphere during intense moments. Critics like PlayStation LifeStyle and The Loadout emphasize how the sound design contributes to the overall tension and excitement, creating an immersive experience that draws players into the chaotic world of the game. However, there are notable criticisms regarding the music and sound design. BaziCenter and EGM point out that the music often feels generic and fails to create the tension necessary for an engaging experience. Some reviewers, like Checkpoint Gaming and Shacknews, express disappointment in the sound design, citing issues such as poor directional audio and inconsistent volume levels that detract from the immersive experience. Additionally, while some critics appreciate the humor in character dialogues, others like WellPlayed argue that the humor often falls flat, undermining the intended atmosphere of the game. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while Back 4 Blood delivers strong sound design with effective audio effects that enhance gameplay, the music does not consistently elevate the experience. Many reviewers acknowledge the potential of the soundtrack and sound effects to create tension and excitement, but there are significant concerns about the lack of memorable musical moments and the overall effectiveness of the audio design. Critics like Dexerto and Game Informer highlight the immersive qualities of the sound design, yet the mixed opinions on the music suggest that there is room for improvement in creating a more cohesive audio experience that fully engages players.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

"Back 4 Blood" features commendable voice acting that enriches character depth and player immersion, earning praise for standout performances, particularly Mario García's humorous flair. However, critics note issues with repetitive dialogue, simplistic writing, and predictable stereotypes that undermine the overall experience. While many celebrate its strengths, others feel the potential is not fully realized, leading to a mixed reception.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

35%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

51%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

14%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in "Back 4 Blood" has received a generally positive reception from critics, highlighting the contribution it makes to character development and immersion. Reviewers like Dexerto and Gamepressure commend the voice performances for adding personality and depth to the game, enhancing the player's connection to the characters. IGN Spain also praises the enjoyable voice acting, noting the standout performance of Mario García, which adds humor to the experience. Critics from Gaming Nexus and Checkpoint Gaming echo this sentiment, emphasizing the distinct personalities that shine through the characters’ dialogue, which helps create a lively atmosphere during gameplay. However, there are notable criticisms regarding the voice acting that suggest it may not be as effective as it could be. Finger Guns points out that while the voice acting features notable talent, it is hampered by a simplistic narrative, leading to repetitive dialogue that can detract from the experience. Hardcore Gamer and EGM express concerns about predictable stereotypes and unremarkable dialogue, which can make characters feel less engaging. Additionally, AusGamers and We Got This Covered highlight issues with repetitive lines and bland quips, suggesting that the writing may not fully capitalize on the potential of the voice performances. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed, with many acknowledging the strengths of the voice acting while also pointing out its limitations. While several reviewers, such as Worth Playing and New Game Network, celebrate the humor and engaging interactions that the voice acting brings to the game, others like IGN Italia and Shacknews note that the dialogue can become repetitive and lacks the charm found in similar titles like "Left 4 Dead." Ultimately, "Back 4 Blood" showcases a commendable effort in voice acting that enhances the game, but it is somewhat undermined by repetitive writing and character stereotypes, leading to a varied reception among critics.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Back 4 Blood shines on PS5 and PC with smooth performance, but suffers from severe bugs and connectivity issues, especially on Xbox Series X. While gameplay is enjoyable, frequent crashes and matchmaking problems plague the experience, indicating that the game needs significant refinement to realize its potential.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

25%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

65%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

10%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of Back 4 Blood has received a mixed response across various gaming platforms, with notable strengths particularly on the PlayStation 5 and PC. Reviewers such as Atomix and GameOver.gr praised the PS5 version for its stable performance, noting a smooth gameplay experience with no significant issues reported. Similarly, PC reviews from outlets like PC Gamer and Wccftech highlighted the game’s strong optimization, running smoothly even at high settings and frame rates. On Xbox Series X, many critics acknowledged the game’s solid performance, with MondoXbox and Gaming Age noting that it maintained a steady 60 frames per second, contributing to a generally enjoyable multiplayer experience. However, the negatives are pronounced, particularly on Xbox Series X and PC. A significant number of reviewers, including GameSpew and CGMagazine, reported frequent crashes and matchmaking issues that detracted from the overall experience. Critics like Game Over Online and PC Invasion echoed these sentiments for the PC version, pointing out bugs that hinder gameplay, such as connection problems and long loading times when cross-playing with console players. On the PS5, while the performance was generally praised, critics like Metro GameCentral noted issues with co-op play and matchmaking that could frustrate players, especially in solo scenarios. Overall, the consensus among critics indicates that while Back 4 Blood showcases solid technical performance on all platforms, it is marred by a range of bugs and connectivity issues that affect gameplay. Reviewers like Malditos Nerds and GamingBolt acknowledged that despite the presence of technical problems, the game remains enjoyable. However, the consistent reports of crashes, AI glitches, and matchmaking difficulties suggest that the game requires further refinement to reach its full potential. Critics across the board seem to agree that while the foundation is there, the experience is hindered by technical shortcomings that need to be addressed for a smoother overall experience.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Back 4 Blood shines in multiplayer with its innovative card system and varied challenges, boosting replay value. However, critics warn that solo players face significant drawbacks, including gated progression and repetitive missions, limiting enjoyment. While teamwork enhances the experience, the game's solo appeal is notably weaker, leaving a mixed reception overall.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

57%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

39%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions of various critics on the replay value of Back 4 Blood highlight several positive aspects that contribute to its appeal. Many reviewers, such as AusGamers and GameSpew, acknowledge the innovative card system that allows players to customize their gameplay experience through different deck builds and character choices. Critics like Digital Chumps and Game Informer emphasize that this system, combined with varying difficulty levels and mission types, encourages players to explore different strategies and playstyles, enhancing the overall replayability. Additionally, the inclusion of multiplayer modes, as noted by PlaySense and GamingTrend, provides a more engaging experience, making the game more enjoyable when played with friends. However, several reviewers express concerns regarding the game's replay value, particularly for solo players. Press Start Australia points out that progression is significantly gated behind online play, which can be a major drawback for those who prefer to play alone. Critics like CGMagazine and GameStar criticize the execution of the card system, suggesting that it may not be as enjoyable as intended, while others, such as Games.cz and Hobby Consolas, mention the repetitive nature of the mission design, which could lead to player fatigue over time. Furthermore, some reviewers, including TheXboxHub and PCMag, highlight that solo play lacks the same progression incentives found in multiplayer modes, limiting the overall enjoyment for those who prefer a single-player experience. Overall, the consensus among critics reveals a mixed sentiment regarding the replay value of Back 4 Blood. While many praise the card system and multiplayer options for enhancing replayability, significant concerns about solo play and repetitive gameplay persist. Critics like God is a Geek and New York Daily News point out that the game does offer a variety of content and challenges, but the enjoyment may diminish for players who primarily engage in solo play. Ultimately, the game seems to thrive in a multiplayer context, where its replay value is maximized, but it struggles to maintain the same appeal for those who prefer to venture through its challenges alone.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

61%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

39%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

Back 4 Blood has garnered a mixed reception from critics, with many praising its engaging cooperative gameplay and innovative mechanics. Reviewers like Easy Allies and Inverse highlight the intense moment-to-moment action and teamwork dynamics that shine when playing with friends. The card system introduced in the game has been noted as a fresh addition that adds depth to the gameplay, with critics such as Jeuxvideo.com and PC Gamer recognizing it as a significant improvement over its predecessor, Left 4 Dead. Additionally, several reviewers, including Metro GameCentral and TheGamer, commend the game for capturing the essence of cooperative zombie-slaying fun, making it a compelling experience for fans of the genre. However, the game is not without its flaws, which have been pointed out by numerous critics. Issues such as repetitive gameplay, lackluster AI bots, and matchmaking problems have been frequently mentioned, with AusGamers and GameSkinny expressing concerns that these elements could diminish the overall experience. Critics like GameSpot and Trusted Reviews also note that the game struggles with solo play, making it less appealing for players who prefer to venture alone. Furthermore, technical issues and bugs have been cited by several reviewers, including M3 and TheXboxHub, which detract from the otherwise solid gameplay experience. Overall, the consensus among critics suggests that while Back 4 Blood offers a fun and engaging cooperative experience, it ultimately falls short of the high expectations set by its predecessor. Many reviewers, including We Got This Covered and Press Start Australia, feel that the game does not fully capture the magic of Left 4 Dead, with some even describing it as a decent but flawed title. Despite its shortcomings, the game has its share of supporters who appreciate its potential and enjoyable moments, particularly when played with friends, as noted by critics like Atomix and Vgames. Ultimately, Back 4 Blood is seen as a worthy attempt to revive the cooperative zombie shooter genre, but it requires further refinement to reach its full potential.

TL;DR

Back 4 Blood strikes a chord with critics for its thrilling cooperative gameplay and innovative card system, offering intense zombie-slaying fun when played with friends. However, it suffers from repetitive gameplay, poor AI, matchmaking woes, and technical glitches. While it aims to recapture the magic of Left 4 Dead, many feel it falls short of expectations, making it a decent yet flawed entry in the genre that needs refinement to truly shine.

MONSTER

Reviews

175 reviews found

100

New York Daily News

Xbox Series X

Oct 16, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Back 4 Blood is described as a good-looking game that builds on the formula of Left 4 Dead. It is praised for its cooperative gameplay and ease of jumping into. It is compared to other cooperative games with deeper story and progression.

Read full review

TheGamer

Xbox Series X

Oct 10, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review praises Back 4 Blood as an elevated and enhanced version of Left 4 Dead, with a more mature and rewarding gameplay experience.

Read full review

God is a Geek

Oct 13, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Despite some glitches and issues with the solo mode, the reviewer considers Back 4 Blood to be the most fun they've had with a shooter this year and an absolute blast to play with friends. The game is praised for its atmosphere, gameplay, and card system.

Read full review

Inverse

Xbox Series X

Oct 11, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Back 4 Blood is praised for its intense moment-to-moment gameplay, clever level design, variety from run to run, and memorable characters in a campy story. It is considered a near-perfect cooperative experience with a focus on creating unique cooperative moments rather than a deep narrative. The botched PvP multiplayer mode is criticized for lacking creativity and being less enjoyable compared to the main campaign experience.

Read full review

PC Gamer

Oct 16, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Back 4 Blood is praised as one of the best co-op experiences, especially when played with friends. Despite some flaws in the PvP mode, the overall fun and gameplay depth make it a standout title.

Read full review

Stevivor

Oct 13, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Despite some criticisms, Back 4 Blood is seen as a worthy successor to Left 4 Dead, offering engaging gameplay and a fun experience overall.

Read full review

GameCritics

Nov 10, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Back 4 Blood is a solid, well-polished co-op shooter with minor flaws that could be improved with some tweaking. With more content updates and the engaging card system, it has the potential to become a great game with lasting appeal.

Read full review

Softpedia

PlayStation 5

Nov 1, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Back 4 Blood is a challenging co-op release and worth a chance, especially for fans of post-apocalyptic first-person shooters.

Read full review

PlayStation LifeStyle

PlayStation 5

Nov 2, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Back 4 Blood is a great co-op experience that captures the spirit of Left 4 Dead for a new generation of gamers. The card system adds depth to gameplay, but solo play lacks progression incentives at the moment.

Read full review

But Why Tho?

PlayStation 5

Oct 16, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Back 4 Blood is praised as a satisfying modern FPS that successfully calls back to its predecessors while introducing new features, despite some minor gameplay impediments.

Read full review