Search for games

Type three or more characters to search...

Links

Amazon

Steam

Twitch

MONSTER

Back 4 Blood

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Back 4 Blood
Item: Back 4 Blood
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2021

GenresAdventure, Action, Shooter, Horror, Single Player, Multiplayer, First Person Perspective

AvailableOct 7, 2021

PlatformPlayStation 5, PlayStation 4, Xbox Series X, Xbox One, PC

DeveloperTurtle Rock Studios

Overview

Back 4 Blood is a thrilling cooperative first-person shooter from the creators of the critically acclaimed Left 4 Dead franchise. You are at the center of a war against the Ridden. These once-human hosts of a deadly parasite have turned into terrifying creatures bent on devouring what remains of civilization. With humanity’s extinction on the line, it’s up to you and your friends to take the fight to the enemy, eradicate the Ridden, and reclaim the world.

Elsewhere

6.1

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics acknowledge Back 4 Blood’s framework for cooperative gameplay and engaging characters, but largely agree that its story is simplistic, predictable, and lacks depth. While the narrative serves as a backdrop for action, it ultimately feels unnecessary and forgettable, prioritizing gameplay over storytelling. The consensus: thrilling cooperative action overshadows a weak narrative.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

72%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

19%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The opinions of critics regarding the story of Back 4 Blood reveal a few positive aspects, primarily centered around the game's attempt to create a framework for cooperative gameplay. Some reviewers, such as Game Over Online and Digital Chumps, noted that the narrative serves as a cohesive backdrop for the action, connecting various missions and maps in a post-apocalyptic setting. Critics like Hobby Consolas and PlayStation LifeStyle appreciated the unique characters known as "Cleaners," who each bring distinct personalities to the gameplay experience, adding a layer of engagement, albeit minimal. Additionally, TierraGamer mentioned that while the story isn't groundbreaking, it is engaging enough to keep players interested, suggesting that it fulfills its purpose in the context of a cooperative shooter. However, the overwhelming sentiment among critics is that the story of Back 4 Blood falls short of expectations. Many reviewers, including GamingTrend and Wccftech, criticized the narrative as being overly simplistic, predictable, and lacking depth. Critics like WellPlayed and Vandal pointed out that despite attempts at character development and humor, the overall narrative feels unnecessary and poorly executed, filled with clichés. The consensus among several reviewers, such as GamingBolt and GameStar, is that the story is merely a vehicle to facilitate gameplay rather than a compelling narrative experience, leaving players with little to invest in emotionally. Overall, the critics agree that while Back 4 Blood has a framework for storytelling, it ultimately prioritizes gameplay over narrative depth. The story is often described as minimal, serving mainly to connect gameplay segments rather than provide a rich, engaging experience. Reviewers like IGN Portugal and Metro GameCentral highlighted that the narrative is incidental and forgettable, emphasizing the cooperative gameplay aspect instead. This sentiment is echoed by many, indicating a clear consensus that while the game succeeds in delivering thrilling cooperative action, its story lacks the substance and engagement that could elevate the overall experience.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Back 4 Blood shines with its cooperative gameplay and innovative card system for character customization, earning praise for satisfying gunplay and unpredictable AI. However, it falters with repetitiveness and pacing issues, making it less appealing for solo players. While it captures the spirit of Left 4 Dead, critics warn that the lack of variety may dampen long-term enjoyment. Ideal for team players, but solo gamers might find it lacking.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

80%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

19%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Back 4 Blood has garnered a mix of praise from critics, particularly for its cooperative mechanics and the introduction of a card system that adds depth to character customization and strategy. Many reviewers, such as MGG Spain and Xbox Achievements, highlight the cooperative gameplay that allows up to four players to work together against hordes of zombies, emphasizing teamwork and strategy. Critics like IGN and Windows Central commend the gunplay, describing it as satisfying and immersive, with varied weapons and attachments enhancing the experience. The Game Director AI, noted by Guardian, adds unpredictability to encounters, which some reviewers, including Easy Allies and Checkpoint Gaming, found to enhance the overall thrill of gameplay. However, despite the positive aspects, several critics point out significant drawbacks, primarily revolving around repetitiveness and pacing issues. AusGamers and Games.cz express concerns about the gameplay lacking meaningful variation, leading to a repetitive experience that diminishes replay value. CGMagazine and Shacknews echo these sentiments, criticizing the card system for being unintuitive and detracting from the game's pace. Additionally, issues with AI performance, particularly in solo play, have been highlighted by critics like IGN Portugal and Atomix, suggesting that the game is best experienced in cooperative mode rather than alone. Overall, the consensus among critics indicates that while Back 4 Blood successfully retains the core elements of its predecessor, Left 4 Dead, and introduces innovative mechanics, it struggles with pacing and variety. Critics such as Game Revolution and Digital Chumps recognize the enjoyable cooperative experience and strategic depth provided by the card system, but many also caution that the repetitive nature of gameplay can detract from the overall enjoyment. Ultimately, Back 4 Blood appears to be a solid yet flawed homage to cooperative zombie shooters, appealing primarily to those who prioritize teamwork and strategic gameplay over solo experiences.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Back 4 Blood impresses with smooth animations and solid performance at 60 FPS, earning praise for its immersive lighting and varied environments. Critics appreciate the vibrant color palette but slam its lack of originality compared to Left 4 Dead, citing repetitive designs and low-resolution textures. While it delivers a competent visual experience, many agree it falls short of standing out in the gaming landscape, lacking the ambition to truly innovate.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

37%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

62%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The opinions on the graphics and visual design of Back 4 Blood reveal a range of positive sentiments, particularly regarding the game's performance and visual effects. Many critics, such as PC Gamer and Hardcore Gamer, commend the game for its smooth animations and impressive lighting, which contribute to an immersive experience. The game is noted for running at 60 frames per second, even in chaotic scenes with many zombies on screen, as highlighted by TheXboxHub and Meristation. Additionally, some reviewers, like App Trigger and Gaming Age, appreciate the varied environments and detailed character designs, which enhance the overall gameplay experience. The vibrant color palette and the mix of dark and lively elements, as mentioned by Digital Chumps, also add to the game's visual appeal, creating a compelling atmosphere. However, despite these positives, there are notable criticisms regarding the graphics and visual design. Many reviewers, including WellPlayed and Eurogamer Italy, express disappointment over the game's lack of originality and distinct visual appeal, often comparing it unfavorably to its predecessor, Left 4 Dead. Critics like AusGamers and PC Invasion point out issues such as a monotonous color palette and repetitive environments, which detract from the overall immersion. Additionally, some reviewers, such as Gameblog.fr and PCGamesN, mention that while the graphics are decent, they are not groundbreaking, with certain textures appearing low-resolution or outdated. This sentiment is echoed by Vgames and IGN Spain, who note that the enemy designs lack creativity and originality. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while Back 4 Blood offers a visually appealing experience with solid performance, it falls short of being a graphical standout in the current gaming landscape. Many reviewers appreciate the game's ability to maintain a stable frame rate and deliver smooth animations, which are crucial for fast-paced gameplay. However, the lack of innovation in visual design and repetitive environments dampen the overall impression. Critics like GamingBolt and Push Square acknowledge the game's nostalgic elements but emphasize the need for more originality and diversity in design to elevate it beyond a mere update of Left 4 Dead. In summary, Back 4 Blood is seen as a competent visual experience that successfully supports its gameplay but ultimately lacks the ambition to impress on a higher artistic level.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Back 4 Blood's sound design is widely praised for its immersive weapon sounds and effective audio cues that enhance gameplay. Critics laud tracks like "Black Betty" for elevating intense moments, but the music faces criticism for feeling generic and lacking memorability compared to Left 4 Dead. While the overall audio experience is strong, issues like directional audio and inconsistent volumes point to areas needing improvement.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

54%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

40%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The opinions regarding the sound design and music of Back 4 Blood reveal a generally positive sentiment towards the game's audio experience, particularly in its sound design. Critics like Finger Guns and Hardcore Gamer highlight the impactful weapon sounds and satisfying audio feedback during combat, contributing to a sense of immersion and excitement. GamePro Germany and IGN Spain also commend the music for enhancing gameplay, with specific tracks like "Black Betty" and "Ace of Spades" noted for their ability to elevate intense moments. The sound design is frequently described as strong, with effective audio cues that enhance the atmosphere and gameplay, as mentioned by Dexerto and PlaySense. Overall, many reviewers agree that the sound design plays a crucial role in creating an engaging and immersive experience. However, there are notable criticisms regarding the music and overall sound design. BaziCenter and EGM express disappointment, stating that the music does not significantly enhance the gameplay experience and feels generic at times. Some critics, like Checkpoint Gaming and Shacknews, point out issues with directional audio and inconsistent volume levels, which detract from the overall experience. Additionally, WellPlayed mentions that some humorous dialogue falls flat, failing to contribute positively to the intended atmosphere. These criticisms suggest that while the sound design has its strengths, there are areas that could benefit from improvement, particularly in the music's ability to create tension and memorable moments. The overall consensus among critics indicates that while the sound design of Back 4 Blood is largely praised for its immersive qualities and effective audio cues, the music is more divisive. Critics like Game Informer and TrueAchievements appreciate the soundtrack's contribution to the chaotic atmosphere, yet others, such as Checkpoint Gaming and BaziCenter, feel it lacks the memorable impact found in its predecessor, Left 4 Dead. Ultimately, the sound design is viewed as a highlight, with many reviewers acknowledging its role in enhancing gameplay, while the music remains a point of contention, leaving some players wanting more in terms of its impact and memorability.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Back 4 Blood’s voice acting shines with distinct characters and engaging performances, praised for immersion and humor, particularly from standout characters like Karlee. However, critics lament the repetitiveness and cliché-ridden dialogue that limit character depth, detracting from the experience. The consensus is mixed: while some appreciate the lively interactions, others find the writing and predictability lacking, making it a double-edged sword in the game's overall appeal.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

35%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

51%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

14%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in Back 4 Blood has received a range of positive feedback from various critics, particularly highlighting the distinct personalities and engaging performances of the characters. Reviewers such as Dexerto and Gamepressure noted that the voice acting significantly contributes to the immersion and enjoyment of the game, with characters having unique backstories that enhance player connection. Critics like IGN and Gaming Nexus praised the lively banter and humor infused into the dialogue, with standout performances from specific characters, such as Karlee, noted for her memorable quips. Additionally, the Italian localization has been commended by several reviewers, including MondoXbox and The Games Machine, for adding value to the overall presentation. However, several critics pointed out significant drawbacks in the voice acting, particularly regarding the repetitiveness of dialogue and the reliance on clichés. Finger Guns mentioned that while the voice acting features notable talent, it is constrained by a simplistic narrative, leading to engaging dialogue that can become tiresome during gameplay. Hardcore Gamer and EGM echoed this sentiment, with the former highlighting that predictable stereotypes limit character depth, making them feel less like fully realized individuals. Critics like WellPlayed and AusGamers criticized the excessive chatter and the repetitive lines from NPCs, suggesting that these elements detracted from the overall experience. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed, with many acknowledging the strengths of the voice acting while also recognizing its limitations. While some reviewers, such as Checkpoint Gaming and Everyeye.it, praised the distinct personalities and immersive qualities of the characters, others, like We Got This Covered and Shacknews, expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of the writing and the charm of the dialogue. Ultimately, Back 4 Blood's voice acting appears to be a double-edged sword—while it enhances character engagement and humor for some, it also suffers from repetitiveness and a lack of depth that leaves others wanting more.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

"Back 4 Blood" shows mixed technical performance across platforms. Xbox Series X is critiqued for crashes and AI issues, while PS5 and PC generally deliver smoother gameplay with high frame rates, though still facing bugs and matchmaking problems. Overall, while the game offers solid experiences, significant technical flaws persist, necessitating improvements.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

24%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

67%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of "Back 4 Blood" has garnered a mixed response across various gaming platforms, with some positive aspects highlighted by critics. On the Xbox Series X, several reviewers, including Gaming Age and MondoXbox, noted that the game runs smoothly at 60 frames per second, contributing to a solid multiplayer experience. Critics like SpazioGames and Xbox Achievements also echoed this sentiment, indicating good overall stability with only minor glitches reported. On the PlayStation 5, the game has been praised for its stable performance and smooth gameplay, with reviewers such as Finger Guns and GameSpace emphasizing the high frame rates and minimal connection issues. For PC, many critics, including Vandal and PC Gamer, lauded the game's optimization, noting that it runs well on various setups with stable frame rates and good performance, even in crowded scenarios. However, the negatives surrounding "Back 4 Blood" cannot be overlooked, as several critics pointed out significant technical issues. On the Xbox Series X, reviewers like CGMagazine and TrueAchievements reported frequent crashes, matchmaking problems, and issues with AI companions that detract from the overall experience. Similarly, on the PlayStation 4, Attack of the Fanboy highlighted the game's requirement for an always-online connection, which can hinder solo play and accessibility. The PC version also faced criticism, with critics like PC Invasion and Game Over Online mentioning crashes, long loading times, and bugs that disrupt gameplay, particularly during cross-play with console players. Overall, the consensus among critics suggests that while "Back 4 Blood" offers a solid gaming experience with good performance on all platforms, it is marred by notable technical issues that affect gameplay. The Xbox Series X appears to be the most criticized platform, with multiple reviewers pointing out crashes and AI problems. In contrast, the PlayStation 5 and PC versions received more favorable reviews regarding stability and performance, although they are not without their flaws. Critics like New Game Network and IGN Spain noted that while the game performs well technically, ongoing issues with matchmaking and bugs remain a concern across all platforms, indicating that further improvements are necessary to enhance the overall player experience.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Back 4 Blood offers mixed replay value: the praised card system and cooperative gameplay add diversity and excitement, but solo players face major hurdles. Critics highlight heavy online progression gating and repetitive level design that dulls replay incentives. While it's a hit for multiplayer fans, solo gamers may find the experience lacking, leading to a divided reception overall.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

56%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

40%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The overall sentiment regarding the replay value of Back 4 Blood is mixed, with many critics highlighting several positive aspects that contribute to its replayability. The game's card system is frequently praised for its potential to enhance gameplay diversity, allowing players to customize their experience through different builds and strategies. Critics like Inverse and Digital Chumps emphasize how the card system, combined with varying difficulty levels and randomized elements, keeps the game feeling fresh and engaging across multiple playthroughs. Additionally, the inclusion of cooperative gameplay and unique mission objectives, as noted by critics such as New Game Network and Gaming Age, further enhances the replay value, making it an appealing option for players who enjoy multiplayer experiences. However, there are notable criticisms that suggest significant limitations in replayability, particularly for solo players. Many reviewers, including Press Start Australia and Atomix, point out that progression is heavily gated behind online play, which can be a major drawback for those who prefer to play alone. Furthermore, the predictability of level design and pacing, as mentioned by AusGamers and VGC, detracts from the incentive to replay levels at higher difficulties. Critics like GameSpew and EGM also express concerns about player fatigue due to long acts and repetitive mission structures, which could diminish the game's appeal over time. The overall consensus among critics indicates that while Back 4 Blood offers various features that could enhance replayability, such as its card system and cooperative gameplay, these elements are often undermined by significant drawbacks, particularly for solo players. Critics like Xbox Achievements and GameCritics recognize the potential for replay value, yet many also caution that the lack of meaningful progression and the repetitive nature of some content may limit long-term engagement. Ultimately, the game seems to shine in a multiplayer context, but its replay value is less compelling for those who prefer solo experiences, leading to a divided opinion among reviewers.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

61%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

39%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall sentiment regarding Back 4 Blood reflects a generally positive reception, particularly in the context of cooperative gameplay. Many critics, such as Malditos Nerds and Destructoid, highlight the game's engaging co-op experience, praising its thrilling and chaotic nature that captures the essence of its predecessor, Left 4 Dead. Reviewers like SpazioGames and The Loadout commend the game for successfully modernizing the co-op shooter genre, with innovative mechanics and a satisfying gunplay experience. Additionally, the card system introduced in the game has been noted for adding replayability and strategic depth, as mentioned by IGN and GameMAG, contributing to an enjoyable multiplayer experience that many found to be a blast when played with friends. However, the game is not without its criticisms. A significant number of reviewers pointed out the shortcomings in solo play, with many describing it as lacking depth and feeling incomplete. For instance, VGC and GameSpot echoed concerns about the AI's performance and the repetitive mission structure, which detracted from the overall experience for solo players. Technical issues, such as bugs and matchmaking problems, were also frequently mentioned, with critics like Game Over Online and The XboxHub highlighting these as significant hurdles that hinder the game's full potential. Furthermore, some reviewers like Shacknews and We Got This Covered expressed disappointment in the game's inability to match the charm and impact of Left 4 Dead 2, suggesting that it may not leave a lasting mark in the gaming landscape. In summary, while Back 4 Blood is generally celebrated for its engaging cooperative gameplay and innovative mechanics, it faces notable criticism regarding its solo experience and technical issues. The consensus among critics suggests that the game is a solid successor to Left 4 Dead, particularly for players who prioritize multiplayer experiences, as highlighted by Game Revolution and Windows Central. However, the game’s limitations in single-player content and various technical shortcomings indicate that it may require further updates and improvements to fully realize its potential and satisfy a broader audience.

TL;DR

Back 4 Blood earns praise for its exhilarating co-op gameplay, modernized mechanics, and innovative card system, making it a solid successor to Left 4 Dead. Critics celebrate its thrilling multiplayer experience, especially when played with friends. However, solo play suffers from AI issues and repetitive missions, alongside technical glitches that hinder overall enjoyment. While it excels in co-op, it falls short in solo content, leaving room for improvements to meet wider player expectations.

MONSTER

Reviews

176 reviews found

100

New York Daily News

Xbox Series X

Oct 16, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Back 4 Blood is described as a good-looking game that builds on the formula of Left 4 Dead. It is praised for its cooperative gameplay and ease of jumping into. It is compared to other cooperative games with deeper story and progression.

Read full review

TheGamer

Xbox Series X

Oct 10, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review praises Back 4 Blood as an elevated and enhanced version of Left 4 Dead, with a more mature and rewarding gameplay experience.

Read full review

God is a Geek

Oct 13, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Despite some glitches and issues with the solo mode, the reviewer considers Back 4 Blood to be the most fun they've had with a shooter this year and an absolute blast to play with friends. The game is praised for its atmosphere, gameplay, and card system.

Read full review

Inverse

Xbox Series X

Oct 11, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Back 4 Blood is praised for its intense moment-to-moment gameplay, clever level design, variety from run to run, and memorable characters in a campy story. It is considered a near-perfect cooperative experience with a focus on creating unique cooperative moments rather than a deep narrative. The botched PvP multiplayer mode is criticized for lacking creativity and being less enjoyable compared to the main campaign experience.

Read full review

PC Gamer

Oct 16, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Back 4 Blood is praised as one of the best co-op experiences, especially when played with friends. Despite some flaws in the PvP mode, the overall fun and gameplay depth make it a standout title.

Read full review

Stevivor

Oct 13, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Despite some criticisms, Back 4 Blood is seen as a worthy successor to Left 4 Dead, offering engaging gameplay and a fun experience overall.

Read full review

Gamers' Temple

Xbox Series X

Nov 18, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Back 4 Blood is praised for its replay value, card system, and finely tuned gun controls. The lack of a true single player mode and the requirement for an online connection are noted as drawbacks. The game is recommended for shooter fans looking for a game with longevity and fun multiplayer experiences.

Malditos Nerds

Xbox Series X

Nov 9, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Back 4 Blood is a thrilling and engaging cooperative shooter that retains the essence of Left 4 Dead while introducing new mechanics that elevate the experience. Despite some technical issues, it offers hours of fun and is highly recommended for players.

Read full review

Softpedia

PlayStation 5

Nov 1, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Back 4 Blood is a challenging co-op release and worth a chance, especially for fans of post-apocalyptic first-person shooters.

Read full review

GameCritics

Nov 10, 2021

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Back 4 Blood is a solid, well-polished co-op shooter with minor flaws that could be improved with some tweaking. With more content updates and the engaging card system, it has the potential to become a great game with lasting appeal.

Read full review