Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

MONSTER

Exoprimal

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Exoprimal
Item: Exoprimal
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2023

GenresAdventure, Action, Science Fiction and Futuristic, Third Person Perspective, Shooter, Multiplayer, First Person Perspective

AvailableJul 14, 2023

PlatformPC, PlayStation 5, Xbox One, Xbox Series X, PlayStation 4

DeveloperCapcom

Overview

Exoprimal is a co-op action game with a competitive edge. Two teams of five players in powered armor battle hordes of dinosaurs. Only one team will survive.

Elsewhere

6.1

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Mixed reviews: Exoprimal’s sci-fi narrative dazzled some with its quirky creativity and thematic depth, but most found it clunky, shallow, and overshadowed by gameplay mechanics, leaving fans divided between intrigue and frustration.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

16%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

63%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

21%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The story of Exoprimal received mixed but occasionally positive feedback, with several critics highlighting its unique premise and creative elements. IGN France praised its "quicky sci-fi narrative" and "lighthearted tone," while Twinfinite noted a "unique and satisfying narrative" with decent voice-acting. SECTOR.sk commended the game’s "creative and engaging narrative" that explores themes of technology and humanity, incorporating meta-commentary and humor. Cubed3 appreciated the story’s surprising depth for a multiplayer title, describing it as "engaging" despite its focus on data collection and matches. Additionally, MMORPG.com found the narrative "enjoyable and surprising," noting how it gradually revealed mysteries about the island and the AI antagonist Leviathan. These reviews suggest that while the story may not be groundbreaking, its approach to blending sci-fi elements with gameplay mechanics resonated with some critics. However, the majority of critiques focused on the story’s execution, pacing, and character development. Merlin’in Kazanı called it "disappointing and poorly presented," criticizing the need for repetitive matches to progress and a disconnect from the narrative. Eurogamer Germany and The Jimquisition both highlighted clichéd characters and convoluted plots, with the latter calling the story "overly complex and poorly executed." PCGamesN and GamingTrend described it as "thin," "unexciting," and filled with "cheap dialogue" and "uninteresting characters." The Loadout and Eurogamer Poland criticized the narrative’s lack of propulsion and aimlessness, while XboxEra and TheGamer found the storytelling disjointed and confusing. Many reviewers also noted that the story relied heavily on gameplay progression rather than a traditional campaign, with some (like Everyeye.it and TheXboxHub) feeling this weakened its impact. These criticisms underscore a recurring issue: the narrative often felt secondary to the game’s multiplayer mechanics. Overall, the consensus among critics was divided, reflecting the game’s polarizing storytelling approach. While some praised its creative concepts and occasional depth—such as IGN’s "absurd but entertaining" narrative or The Mako Reactor’s observation of evolving character development—others found it underwhelming or poorly structured. The story’s reliance on fragmented worldbuilding, audio logs, and unlockable content divided opinions: while MMORPG.com and Cubed3 appreciated the gradual reveals, critics like Eurogamer Germany and The Jimquisition felt it lacked coherence. Despite these contradictions, a clear trend emerged: Exoprimal’s narrative was seen as an ambitious but inconsistent attempt to blend sci-fi themes with multiplayer gameplay, leaving players either intrigued by its potential or frustrated by its execution.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Exoprimal delivers thrilling team-based combat with inventive exosuit variety and fast-paced action, but its repetitive wave mechanics, derivative design, and lackluster PvP drag down an otherwise promising formula.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

49%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

44%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Exoprimal receives praise for its engaging team-based mechanics, variety of exosuits, and dynamic combat scenarios. Critics like Everyeye.it highlight the fun factor of the game’s core mechanics, noting the “variety of exosuits and abilities” that add depth to matches, while We Got This Covered appreciates how the experience becomes more engaging as players unlock new missions and dinosaur species. The game’s blend of PvE and PvP elements, such as the “PvEvP gameplay” described by Wccftech, is seen as a strong foundation, with some reviewers like MMORPG.com praising its fast-paced, squad-based action and the flexibility of switching exosuits mid-match. Additionally, GameGrin and Digital Trends commend the game’s “fast-paced combat” and “diverse character classes,” emphasizing its potential for strategic teamwork and variety in playstyles. However, the consensus on Exoprimal’s gameplay is heavily shaped by criticisms of repetitiveness and lack of innovation. Multiple reviewers, including Gamereactor UK, Eurogamer Poland, and Merlin’in Kazanı, describe the core mechanics as “bland,” “repetitive,” and “lacking variety in maps and modes.” The game’s reliance on wave-based survival elements, akin to Left 4 Dead or Lost Planet, is seen as a double-edged sword—while Multiplayer.it notes the enjoyable action, others like GamingBolt and New Game Network argue that the repetitive objectives and pacing issues detract from long-term appeal. Additionally, IGN Adria and PCGamesN criticize the game for feeling like a “copy of Overwatch” with minimal originality, while GGRecon points to undercooked PvP mechanics and overly long ultimate ability charges as key flaws. Overall, the critics present a mixed but largely balanced view of Exoprimal’s gameplay. While many acknowledge its potential as a team-based shooter with unique exosuit customization and engaging combat (as noted by The Loadout and Press Start Australia), the repetitive nature of its core loops and limited content are recurring drawbacks. The game’s ability to evolve over time—such as in We Got This Covered’s “endgame sensory overload” or Digital Chumps’ evolving mission types—offers hope for sustained interest, but most agree that Exoprimal struggles to balance innovation with its reliance on familiar formulas. Despite this, the game’s strengths in cooperative play and strategic depth (as highlighted by COGconnected and Xbox Tavern) suggest it has a dedicated audience, even if its flaws prevent it from standing out as a groundbreaking title.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Exoprimal dazzles with sharp RE Engine performance and quirky Exosuit designs but flails with generic urban locales, bland textures, and clunky UI—functional yet creatively flat.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

46%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

53%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of Exoprimal receive a mix of praise for their technical execution and stylistic elements. Many critics highlight the game’s use of Capcom’s RE Engine, noting its ability to handle large-scale battles with smooth performance, such as rendering thousands of dinosaurs without frame rate drops (IGN Adria, Wccftech). The character and exosuit designs are frequently lauded for their distinctiveness and creativity, with Cubed3 praising the "cartoonish quality" and "well-rendered" Exosuits, while GamingBolt and MeuPlayStation commend their "unique silhouettes" and "beautiful environments." The game’s vibrant aesthetic, described as having a "bright and charming 90s-esque" look (Inverse) and "Transformers-like visuals," also stands out. Additionally, the dynamic action sequences and flashy effects are noted for their immersive appeal, with Gamereactor UK emphasizing "outstanding" mech and enemy designs. However, several critics point to significant shortcomings in environmental variety and artistic originality. Multiple reviewers, including Jeuxvideo.com and PC Gamer, criticize the repetitive urban environments and generic map design, which they argue lack creativity and fail to engage players over time. The game’s visuals are also described as "somewhat flat" (Vandal), "bland" (God is a Geek), and "derivative" (SpazioGames), with some noting that textures and effects fall into the "mid-tier" category (New Game Network). UI issues further detract from the experience, with TheGamer and New Game Network pointing out clunky navigation and outdated interfaces. While the RE Engine’s performance is stable, critics like Wccftech and Eurogamer Germany note that the visuals lack the polish or innovation to feel truly groundbreaking. Overall, the consensus leans toward Exoprimal being a technically competent but visually unremarkable title. While its character designs, Exosuit aesthetics, and dynamic action sequences are frequently praised (Cubed3, IGN Adria, GameSpew), the repetitive environments and lack of artistic risk-taking dominate the criticism. The game’s reliance on recycled assets and generic settings contrasts with its strong technical performance, leaving many critics divided between appreciating its polish and acknowledging its missed opportunities for originality. As Eurogamer Germany notes, the visuals are "functional rather than stunning," while others like IGN France and Wccftech acknowledge that Exoprimal "gets the job done" but fails to inspire. Despite these critiques, the game’s ability to deliver chaotic, high-octane gameplay with consistent performance ensures it remains visually engaging for fans of its core mechanics.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Exoprimal dazzles with sharp RE Engine performance and quirky Exosuit designs but flails with generic urban locales, bland textures, and clunky UI—functional yet creatively flat.

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Exoprimal’s audio is immersive but plagued by forgettable music, jarring localization, and uneven voice acting, balancing stellar sound design with glaring inconsistencies.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

23%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

73%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The initial reception of Exoprimal’s sound design and music highlights several strengths, particularly its immersive audio elements and genre-appropriate execution. Critics like Movies Games and Tech praised the game’s "excellent cutscenes and sound effects," noting that the audio aligns well with the action-packed gameplay. TheXboxHub highlighted the realism of dinosaur noises, gunfire, and explosions, while XboxEra appreciated the blend of low-fi synth beats and orchestral swells, calling it a fitting mix for the game’s tone. MMORPG.com and Worth Playing both emphasized that the sound design enhances the intensity of combat and cutscenes, with TechRadar Gaming and TRG specifically praising the music as "great" and "solid." Additionally, We Got This Covered noted the standout voice acting for the AI character Leviathan, which adds a unique, sinister flair to the experience. These positive remarks underscore the game’s ability to create an engaging auditory atmosphere despite its flaws. However, several critics pointed out significant issues that detract from the overall audio quality. The Jeuxvideo.com reviews (across platforms) consistently criticized the soundtrack as "mostly forgettable and underutilized," with the main theme overshadowed by gameplay pacing. XboxEra also noted that voice acting "sounded like a bad 2000s arcade game," while PC Gamer highlighted repetitive and annoying voice lines. PlaySense described the audio as "average" with forgettable voice acting, and Everyeye.it and MeuPlayStation raised concerns about inconsistent localization—such as Italian dialogues in a primarily English game or Brazilian Portuguese for one character—which disrupted immersion. Multiplayer.it and Vandal similarly criticized poor localization choices, including mixed languages in cutscenes, while The Jimquisition found the voice acting "lacking depth." These critiques reveal recurring problems with audio consistency, originality, and execution across different platforms. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Exoprimal’s sound design and music are competent but unremarkable, with notable strengths in atmosphere and genre alignment offset by significant flaws. While TheXboxHub, MMORPG.com, and TechRadar Gaming praised the technical quality of sounds and music, many reviewers—such as Jeuxvideo.com, PC Gamer, and Everyeye.it—highlighted issues with localization, repetitive voice lines, and a lack of memorable musical themes. The game’s audio succeeds in creating an immersive experience for action-oriented gameplay but falls short in delivering a cohesive or standout auditory identity. Despite mixed opinions on specific elements like voice acting and music, the general sentiment leans toward acknowledging its functional quality while recognizing room for improvement in consistency and originality.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Exoprimal’s audio is immersive but plagued by forgettable music, jarring localization, and uneven voice acting, balancing stellar sound design with glaring inconsistencies.

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Exoprimal's voice acting is a mixed bag—standouts like Leviathan’s performance and charismatic delivery shine, but AI monotony, jarring localization, repetitive accents, and a mute protagonist drown out its potential, leaving a fragmented, underwhelming experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

10%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

60%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

30%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in Exoprimal receives mixed but notable praise, with several critics highlighting its strengths. GameGrin and Gamersky commend the AI voice acting as a standout element, with the latter noting it enhances the game’s experience. Cubed3 acknowledges that while some characters’ performances are inconsistent, they generally support the narrative, and Digital Chumps praises well-voiced characters that add personality despite static storytelling. GamingBolt and The Mako Reactor emphasize charismatic delivery from certain voices, while We Got This Covered singles out Leviathan’s performance by Mark Whitten as a highlight. These positives suggest that when executed effectively, the voice acting contributes meaningfully to the game’s atmosphere and character dynamics. However, the criticisms of Exoprimal’s voice acting are more pronounced and widespread. Multiple reviewers, including Jeuxvideo.com (Xbox and PC) and IGN France, criticize the AI’s monotonous and grating delivery, while Generación Xbox points out the lack of full voice acting, relying only on Spanish AI for accessibility. Localization inconsistencies further detract from the experience: Everyeye.it and Multiplayer.it note awkward shifts between Italian and English dialogue, and Hobby Consolas highlights jarring Spanish AI lines. Others, like PC Gamer and PlaySense, describe repetitive accents and unmemorable performances, while Eurogamer Germany and Poland point to a mute protagonist that limits character depth. XboxEra’s critique of “bad 2000s arcade game” voice acting underscores broader concerns about the quality and immersion of the audio design. Overall, the consensus leans toward a mixed reception, with praise for specific elements like AI voice work and charismatic performances but significant frustration over inconsistencies and lack of polish. While critics like GameGrin and The Mako Reactor find the voice acting “stellar” or “very good,” others, including IGN France and PC Gamer, highlight its flaws as major detractors. The game’s localization issues, repetitive dialogue, and uneven character delivery create a fragmented experience, though some see potential in its audio design. Despite these contradictions, the majority of reviews suggest that Exoprimal’s voice acting is adequate at best but fails to fully elevate the narrative or player engagement.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Exoprimal excels on Xbox Series X and PS5 with stable 60fps, smooth multiplayer, and impressive engine power, but PC faces mixed optimization, clunky menus, and hardware-dependent lag, while all platforms grapple with UI quirks, server issues, and minor bugs—overall a polished core marred by inconsistent polish.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

66%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

30%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of Exoprimal across its platforms is largely praised for stability and optimization, with notable strengths on Xbox Series X, PS5, and PC. On Xbox Series X, reviewers like Game Informer, Jeuxvideo.com, and XboxEra highlight smooth gameplay with no significant frame rate drops, even during intense action sequences. The game’s ability to handle large numbers of enemies without lag is frequently cited, with IGN France noting "no significant lag" and Generación Xbox emphasizing its demand during chaotic moments. On PS5, critics such as MeuPlayStation and IGN Italia praise the game’s smooth 60fps performance, dynamic resolution scaling, and stable netcode, while Finger Guns and GamingBolt commend its ability to maintain frame rates during high-action scenes. For PC, Atomix, GameGrin, and Wccftech laud the game’s optimization, with Wccftech noting a consistent 90 FPS at 4K resolution and "no stuttering issues," while PC Gamer acknowledges its potential for further polish despite early access-like limitations. Despite these positives, several technical concerns emerge across platforms. On Xbox Series X, Gamer.no criticizes the clunky menu system designed for mouse/keyboard, which feels out of place on consoles, while New Game Network points to long matchmaking times and delays. For PC, MMORPG.com reports potential lag issues possibly tied to hardware configurations, and NME highlights "clunky menus" and pre-match cutscenes as detractors. On PS5, Checkpoint Gaming and Digital Chumps mention multiplayer connectivity problems and loading time frustrations, while SECTOR.sk notes server stability issues that disrupt gameplay. Additionally, some critics like PC Gamer and MMORPG.com suggest the game feels unfinished or under-optimized, with "early access" vibes and occasional graphical glitches, such as dinosaurs getting stuck in IGN Italia’s review. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Exoprimal delivers strong technical performance on next-gen consoles, particularly Xbox Series X and PS5, where it showcases the RE Engine’s capabilities with stable frame rates and smooth multiplayer. However, PC users face mixed experiences, with some praising optimization (e.g., Wccftech) while others note issues like long loading times or potential hardware dependency (MMORPG.com). While minor bugs, UI quirks, and matchmaking hiccups are mentioned across platforms, the game is generally seen as well-optimized for its core mechanics. Critics like MeuPlayStation and IGN Italia emphasize its technical prowess on next-gen systems, while PC-focused reviews highlight areas for improvement. Despite these flaws, the majority of reviewers agree that Exoprimal performs reliably, with only isolated issues affecting specific platforms or configurations.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Exoprimal’s replay value is a mixed bag: while evolving content, customization, and post-launch plans hint at long-term potential, repetitive gameplay, shallow mechanics, grind-heavy systems, and fragmented updates leave players frustrated, demanding stronger execution to justify its ambitious vision.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

13%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

66%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

22%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The initial reception of Exoprimal’s replay value highlights several positive aspects that suggest potential for long-term engagement. Critics like IGN and MMORPG.com note that the game’s evolving gameplay, with new maps, scenarios, and mission types introduced over time, keeps the experience fresh. TheXboxHub emphasizes the variety of exosuits, missions, and consistent player activity as key drivers of replayability, while Eurogamer Germany points to customizable Exosuits and promised content updates as encouraging factors. Additionally, IGN Adria acknowledges the game’s progression systems and post-launch plans, such as seasonal content, which could mitigate early criticisms. These positives suggest that Exoprimal has the foundation for a dynamic experience if its developers deliver on future promises. However, the majority of critics express significant concerns about the game’s current limitations, which undermine its replay value. Merlin’in Kazanı and PCGamesN describe the gameplay as repetitive and shallow, with limited modes that fail to sustain interest beyond a few hours. Vandal and Eurogamer Poland highlight fragmented content strategies and a lack of creativity, while GameGrin and GamingBolt criticize the grind for unlocks and sparse post-launch offerings. IGN Adria also raises issues with microtransactions and a “fragmented” approach to content, which could alienate players seeking depth. Even We Got This Covered and But Why Tho? note that while multiplayer modes offer some variety, the lack of map diversity and mission types creates a sense of monotony. These critiques collectively paint a picture of a game struggling to balance immediate appeal with long-term engagement. The overall consensus among critics is mixed but leans toward cautious optimism tempered by frustration. While IGN and MMORPG.com argue that Exoprimal has strong replay value due to its evolving narrative and progression systems, many others, like PC Gamer and Wccftech, warn that the current experience feels sparse and repetitive. The game’s reliance on live-service elements—such as battle passes, seasonal content, and post-launch updates—creates a divide between those who see potential in its roadmap and those who feel it lacks substance at launch. XboxEra and Push Square acknowledge the promise of future updates but stress that early-stage issues, such as limited modes and grinding mechanics, may deter players. Ultimately, Exoprimal appears to be a game with ambitious ideas but one that requires significant refinement and commitment from its developers to fully realize its replayability potential.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

17%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

81%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall verdict on Exoprimal highlights several positive aspects that many critics acknowledge despite its flaws. Several reviewers praise its unique concept, particularly the blend of cooperative gameplay with dinosaur-themed Exosuits and dynamic team-based combat. Shacknews notes that the game can be “fun with friends,” while Checkpoint Gaming appreciates its “promising concept” and enjoyable initial gameplay. The game’s visual design, including its Exosuit mechanics and dinosaur encounters, is frequently highlighted as a standout feature, with PC Invasion commending its “customization options” and Wccftech praising the “interesting story and excellent combat.” Additionally, some critics, like Eurogamer Germany, find it “unexpectedly enjoyable” in cooperative PvE scenarios, and Xbox Tavern suggests it’s a worthwhile pickup for Game Pass subscribers. These positives often center on the game’s potential and short-term entertainment value, even if they acknowledge its shortcomings. However, the negatives are equally prominent, with many critics criticizing Exoprimal for its repetitive gameplay, lack of content, and underdeveloped narrative. Merlin’in Kazanı calls it “one of Capcom's worst games,” while GamingTrend and BaziCenter highlight its “repetitive gameplay” and “weak narrative.” The game’s live-service model is frequently criticized for feeling incomplete, with Multiple critics like PCGamesN and Everyeye.it noting a lack of innovation and engaging content. Issues such as slow pacing (Shacknews), inconsistent audio localization (Multiplayer.it), and a “boring story” (Gaming Age) further detract from the experience. Additionally, concerns about pricing and value are raised by multiple outlets, including Merlin’in Kazanı and Wccftech, who argue that the game feels underwhelming for its cost. These criticisms often converge on the game’s failure to deliver sustained engagement or meaningful progression, leaving many feeling it falls short of Capcom’s usual standards. The overall consensus among critics is a mixed but cautiously optimistic view, with many acknowledging Exoprimal’s potential while emphasizing its current shortcomings. While some, like Press Start Australia and The Mako Reactor, see promise in its unique approach and future updates, others, such as IGN Italia and Eurogamer Poland, describe it as a “missed opportunity” or “content-poor” title. The game’s reception hinges on its ability to evolve through patches and additional content, with several critics (e.g., VG247, XboxEra) suggesting it’s worth trying via Game Pass for its short-term fun. Despite the criticisms, there is a shared belief that Exoprimal could improve significantly if Capcom addresses its flaws, making it a game of “potential” rather than a definitive success. This duality—between its enjoyable mechanics and persistent issues—defines the broader critical perspective, with many urging patience over immediate dismissal.

TL;DR

Exoprimal is a flawed but promising co-op shooter with flashy dino-exosuit action and creative customization, yet repetitive gameplay, a hollow story, and live-service shortcomings leave it feeling underwhelming—its survival hinges on Capcom fixing its issues through updates.

MONSTER

Reviews

147 reviews found

TheXboxHub

Xbox Series X

Jul 24, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Exoprimal is described as extremely enjoyable with a fresh and fun gameplay experience, especially when played with a coordinated team.

Read full review

Gaming Nexus

Xbox Series X

Jul 20, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Overall, Exoprimal is described as a fun and engaging game that successfully combines elements of hero-based shooters with a unique twist on gameplay. The reviewer highly recommends it for those looking for a fresh experience.

Read full review

Xbox Tavern

Xbox Series X

Jul 26, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Exoprimal is a worthwhile pickup, especially if you’ve got a Game Pass subscription.

Read full review

Press Start Australia

Xbox Series X

Jul 16, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Exoprimal is a pleasant surprise that successfully combines engaging single-player style encounters with a solid multiplayer experience. It has a unique approach to storytelling and offers a good variety of gameplay options. The opaque progression system and limited content visibility may be drawbacks, but the game has potential with future updates.

Digital Trends

PlayStation 5

Jul 20, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Exoprimal is a fun and innovative multiplayer shooter with a strong story campaign, though it faces challenges as a live-service game. It’s enjoyable for those willing to invest time into it.

Read full review

Gamer.no

Xbox Series X

Jul 25, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Exoprimal offers a unique and engaging gameplay experience with a quirky story, despite some technical issues on consoles. Worth exploring further for intense battles and teamwork-focused gameplay.

Read full review

But Why Tho?

PlayStation 5

Jul 19, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Exoprimal has a lot of heart and plenty of exciting moments, but it requires players to dig for them. The game receives an overall score of 8/10.

Read full review

Game Informer

Xbox Series X

Jul 28, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Exoprimal impresses with its absurd and entertaining story, smooth gameplay, and visually appealing design. It may not have long-term appeal for hardcore multiplayer fans, but offers a fun experience for casual players.

Read full review

The Jimquisition

PlayStation 5

Jul 21, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Exoprimal is a surprisingly fun and engaging game despite its flaws, with a unique blend of gameplay elements that make it enjoyable, though it suffers from poor storytelling and repetitive content.

Read full review

IGN

Jul 20, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Exoprimal is a fun and unique multiplayer experience that combines hero shooter mechanics with dinosaur hunting. While it has some repetitive elements initially, the evolving gameplay and story provide a rewarding experience for dedicated players.

Read full review