Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

About

Navigation

Home

Games

Links

Twitch

MONSTER

Agony

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Agony
Item: Agony
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2018

GenresFantasy, Adventure, Action, Horror, Top-Down Perspective, Single Player

AvailableMay 29, 2018

PlatformPC, Xbox One, PlayStation 4

DeveloperMadmind Studio

Overview

Agony is a traditional Yume Nikki fangame, where the objective is to collect effects in Aoi's and Yuuka's dream world. Aoi and Yuuka have different types of Media. Aoi has two different Media: usable effects and collectibles. Yuuka, on the other hand, only has usable effects. Additionally, both have Memories that are required to unlock endings.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics praise The Story of Agony's atmospheric horror and conceptual ambition, but its disjointed narrative, underdeveloped plot, and emotional hollow execution overshadow its strengths, resulting in a divisive yet largely panned experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

50%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

50%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The Story of Agony receives praise for its ambitious conceptual framework and atmospheric elements, which many critics acknowledge as unique or intriguing. For instance, Hooked Gamers highlights the game’s initial engagement through its cinematic introduction and hints at deeper mysteries, while Push Square commends its surreal, Bosch-inspired imagery and themes of torment and redemption. MondoXbox notes the narrative’s focus on mystery and character development through environmental storytelling, and Hobby Consolas draws comparisons to works like Damned and Outlast 2, praising its eerie thematic richness. Additionally, Wccftech acknowledges the game’s effective portrayal of a horrifying Hell, even if it falls short in originality. These positives suggest that while the story may lack cohesion, its visual and conceptual ambition resonates with some reviewers. However, the majority of critics condemn the narrative for being underdeveloped, confusing, and lacking emotional depth. IGN and GameSpot criticize the plot’s failure to motivate progress beyond curiosity about grotesque imagery, while PlayGround.ru and PLAY! Zine lambast the story for its clichéd use of letters, poor character development, and shallow execution. Generación Xbox and Twinfinite point to a loss of momentum in later stages, with predictable twists and unclear objectives. Game Informer and Worth Playing highlight weak writing and voice acting, while TrueAchievements and Jeuxvideo.com note technical issues and unfulfilled promises. The recurring complaints about fragmented storytelling, repetitive structure, and lack of clarity—such as the Red Goddess’s ambiguous role or the protagonist’s motivation—underscore a widespread dissatisfaction with the narrative’s execution. Overall, the consensus among critics is that The Story of Agony struggles to balance its ambitious themes with coherent storytelling. While some praise its atmospheric horror and unique conceptual ideas (as noted by Push Square and Hobby Consolas), the majority find the narrative disjointed, underdeveloped, and emotionally hollow. Critics like GameSpot, IGN, and Game Informer emphasize that the game’s premise—whether involving a descent into Hell or a quest for the Red Goddess—fails to deliver on its potential due to poor pacing, unclear direction, and superficial character arcs. Despite occasional praise for environmental storytelling or visual design, the narrative’s inability to engage players meaningfully leaves it as one of the game’s most significant shortcomings, resulting in a mixed but largely critical reception across platforms.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Agony’s ambitious concepts—like its innovative NPC possession mechanic—are undermined by unpolished systems, punishing checkpoints, and repetitive gameplay, resulting in a frustrating, disjointed experience that fails to deliver on its potential.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

26%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

71%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Agony receives mixed reactions, with several critics acknowledging its unique concepts despite significant flaws. Notably, the game’s NPC possession mechanic is frequently highlighted as a standout feature, offering a novel twist on survival horror by allowing players to switch between bodies to navigate Hell. Critics like IGN and CGMagazine praise this system as an intriguing idea, while MondoXbox and Impulsegamer note its potential for variety and strategic depth. Additionally, the stealth-based gameplay and environmental storytelling are seen as ambitious attempts to evoke tension, with GameGrin and Wccftech acknowledging the effort to create an immersive horror atmosphere. However, these positives are often overshadowed by execution issues, leaving the core mechanics feeling underdeveloped. The negatives dominate the critical reception, with flawed stealth mechanics and poorly implemented systems being the most consistent complaints. Multiple reviewers, including PlayGround.ru, GameGrin, and TrueAchievements, criticize the ineffectiveness of stealth, citing unresponsive controls, inconsistent enemy AI, and frustrating collision detection that leads to unfair deaths. The checkpoints and progression systems are repeatedly condemned for being punishingly placed or absent, with GameSpot and Worth Playing highlighting how this undermines player engagement. Repetitive tasks like item collection, maze-like level design, and overly complex puzzles—often requiring trial-and-error—further detract from the experience. Jeuxvideo.com and Trusted Reviews emphasize that these elements create a monotonous and tedious gameplay loop, while Eurogamer Italy notes that even later stages fail to alleviate the frustration. Overall, the consensus among critics is overwhelmingly negative, with Agony’s ambitious ideas failing to translate into a cohesive or enjoyable experience. While some praise its unique mechanics and atmospheric horror elements, the majority agree that poor implementation, unpolished systems, and repetitive design choices render the game frustrating and unsatisfying. GameInform and Worth Playing succinctly summarize this sentiment, stating that the gameplay feels “repetitive and unenjoyable” despite its conceptual merits. The lack of meaningful progression, unclear objectives, and technical issues—such as those highlighted by PlaySense and Eurogamer Italy—further erode player satisfaction. Ultimately, while Agony attempts to innovate within the survival horror genre, its execution falls short, leaving critics divided between its creative aspirations and its glaring flaws.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Agony’s bold artistic vision and grotesque, surreal horror aesthetic earned praise for its disturbing creativity and eerie atmosphere, but crippling technical flaws—poor lighting, low-quality textures, repetitive design, and performance issues—undermined its potential, leaving a frustrating gap between its ambitious concepts and flawed execution.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

15%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

59%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

26%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of Agony received praise for their ambitious artistic vision and unsettling aesthetic, with several critics highlighting its unique approach to horror. IGN celebrated the game’s "detailed, grotesque environments" and vivid depiction of hellscapes, while CGMagazine noted the "Cronenberg-inspired details" and "nightmare-like aesthetic." GameGrin acknowledged the "creatively gruesome" visuals, and Game Revolution praised the "grotesque and detailed hellish environment filled with blood, meat, bone, and other visceral elements." The game’s inspiration from artists like H.R. Giger and Hieronymus Bosch was frequently cited, with Push Square highlighting its "visceral, surreal environments" such as "viscera chambers and demonic babies." These elements collectively created a strong sense of dread and immersion, particularly in the early stages of the game. However, the visual design faced significant criticism for technical flaws and inconsistent execution. Multiple reviewers pointed to poor lighting, with TrueAchievements noting that "lighting is dysfunctional, leaving players nearly blind," while Worth Playing criticized the "excessive darkness" that made environments "nearly unplayable." Low-quality textures, outdated character models, and performance issues were recurring complaints: GameGrin described "muddy textures and outdated character models," while Generación Xbox highlighted "low-quality textures" and "poor fire animations." Repetitive enemy designs (GameSpot) and monotonous environments (Game Informer) further undermined the experience. Additionally, technical issues like screen tearing (Trusted Reviews) and unstable frame rates (Hobby Consolas) detracted from immersion, with some critics arguing that the game’s "visual polish" felt rushed or incomplete. Overall, the consensus among critics was mixed but leaned toward disappointment, as the game’s artistic ambitions were often overshadowed by technical shortcomings. While several reviewers acknowledged the unsettling atmosphere and creative concepts—such as Game Informer’s praise for its "disturbing, unique depiction of Hell"—these strengths were frequently undermined by poor optimization, inconsistent art direction, and repetitive design. Critics like PlayGround.ru and IGN noted that the game’s "strong elements" (e.g., winged demons, atmospheric settings) were "undermined by poor lighting" or "shock value that diminishes over time." Despite some praise for its grotesque aesthetic, the technical flaws and lack of cohesion prevented Agony from fully realizing its potential, leaving many reviewers frustrated by the gap between its artistic vision and execution.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Agony's sound design excels in creating an oppressive, immersive horror atmosphere with chilling ambient audio, but suffers from repetitive sounds, technical flaws, and poor voice acting that detract from the experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

57%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

43%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design of Agony receives mixed but largely positive praise for its atmospheric contributions to the horror experience. Several reviewers highlight the effectiveness of ambient audio in creating an oppressive and immersive environment. GameGrin commends the "immersive screams and moans," while Twinfinite notes that the "horrifying atmosphere" is enhanced by "screams and ambient noises." Hooked Gamers emphasizes that the "chilling ambient audio" effectively builds tension without relying on jump scares, and PlaySense praises the "relentless screams, wailing souls, and oppressive atmosphere" as key to the game’s unsettling tone. Additionally, Push Square and PlayStation Universe acknowledge the use of "atmospheric soundscapes" and "tense ambient noises" to heighten horror, suggesting that the audio design successfully evokes a sense of dread through environmental cues. However, the negatives are significant and frequently cited. Critics like PlayGround.ru criticize the repetitive and annoying nature of the sound design, noting the overuse of unsettling noises and lack of real silence. TrueAchievements and Trusted Reviews condemn the "severely flawed" audio, citing issues such as looping dialogue, static, and audio failures that disrupt immersion. God is a Geek argues that the sound design "masks enemy movements," creating confusion rather than fear, while Jeuxvideo.com criticizes the failure to create tension through poor enemy detection cues. Voice acting is another major weakness: TrueAchievements calls it "among the worst in recent decades," and 3DJuegos points to "uneven" performances with "poorly performed secondary characters." Generación Xbox and TheXboxHub also highlight technical flaws like fragmented audio and dialogue glitches, further undermining the experience. Overall, while Agony’s sound design is lauded for its atmospheric intensity and horror-adjacent elements, it is marred by technical inconsistencies and poor execution. The ambient audio is consistently praised for its ability to evoke fear and immersion, as noted by GameGrin, Twinfinite, and PlaySense, but these positives are often overshadowed by criticisms of repetitive soundscapes, subpar voice acting, and audio glitches. Critics like TrueAchievements and Trusted Reviews emphasize that the flaws in sound design significantly detract from the game’s potential, while others, such as Wccftech and Hobby Consolas, acknowledge its strengths despite limited musical elements. The consensus leans toward a mixed reception: the sound design succeeds in creating an unsettling atmosphere but struggles with technical execution and consistency, leaving players divided between appreciation for its horror-imbued audio and frustration with its shortcomings.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Agony's voice acting is a jarring mess of uneven deliveries, over-the-top performances, and technical gaffes that sabotage its dark tone, with only rare cinematic moments offering fleeting redemption.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

11%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

83%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in Agony receives mixed but notable praise, particularly in specific contexts. CGMagazine highlights “hellishly good voice acting” in cinematics, emphasizing how it enhances the game’s atmosphere and story delivery. This suggests that certain narrative sequences effectively leverage vocal performances to immerse players, even if other aspects fall short. Additionally, some critics acknowledge moments where voice work contributes to the game’s tone, such as in interactions with key characters like the Red Goddess, though these instances are often overshadowed by broader issues. The positive feedback underscores that while the voice acting is not universally strong, it occasionally succeeds in aligning with the game’s dark, intense themes. The negatives dominate the critical reception, with numerous reviewers condemning the voice acting as a significant flaw. PLAY! Zine criticizes it as “komično loša” (comically bad), suggesting cost-cutting measures like using developers’ own voices undermined the atmosphere. GameSpot and God is a Geek specifically target the Red Goddess’s over-the-top, unconvincing performance, which clashes with the game’s serious tone. Other critiques include uneven delivery for secondary characters (Generación Xbox), unclear dialogue (3DJuegos), and technical issues like poor lip sync and broken loops (TrueAchievements). Push Square and TheXboxHub compare the voice acting to parody, while Game Revolution and PlayStation Universe lament its subpar quality, with some lines feeling outdated or distractingly cheesy. These criticisms collectively paint a picture of inconsistent and often jarring vocal performances that detract from immersion. The overall consensus among critics is overwhelmingly negative, with only a few isolated positives. While CGMagazine and a handful of others note occasional strengths in cinematics or specific character portrayals, the majority view the voice acting as a major weakness. The recurring themes of poor delivery, over-the-top performances, and technical flaws suggest that the voice work fails to meet expectations for a game aiming to evoke fear and intensity. Critics like GameGrin, TrueAchievements, and PlayStation Universe emphasize how these issues undermine the game’s atmosphere, making it difficult to take the narrative seriously. Despite some mixed feedback from reviewers like 3DJuegos and Worth Playing, the prevailing sentiment is that Agony’s voice acting is a significant detractor from its overall experience.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Agony’s technical performance was a disaster across all platforms, with unpolished bugs, severe optimization failures, and frustrating glitches drowning out sparse praise for its Unreal Engine 4 foundation—proving a cautionary tale of unmet potential.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

19%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

78%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of Agony received mixed feedback across platforms, though some positives were noted. For Xbox One, MondoXbox highlighted the game’s use of Unreal Engine 4 as a strong foundation, suggesting that its technical framework had potential despite other issues. On PC, while most critics focused on flaws, the engine’s capabilities were occasionally acknowledged as a baseline for improvement. Similarly, PlayStation 4 reviews mentioned occasional praise for the game’s artistic direction, though this was overshadowed by technical shortcomings. These positives, however, were minimal and often framed as unmet potential rather than genuine strengths. The negatives across all platforms were overwhelmingly severe. On PC, critics like GameGrin, PLAY! Zine, and GameSpot cited persistent issues such as framerate dips, clipping, unresponsive controls, and poor optimization, with some calling the experience “frustrating” or “unplayable.” Xbox One faced similar struggles, with Generación Xbox and TrueAchievements criticizing frame drops, broken dialogue, and unstable mechanics. PlayStation 4 users endured screen tearing, texture pop-in, and crashes, as noted by PlaySense and PlayStation Universe, while Hobby Consolas lamented inconsistent AI and poor control responsiveness. Even the Unreal Engine 4’s promise was undermined by these flaws, with critics like Eurogamer Italy calling the technical execution “dated.” The consensus was that Agony felt under-polished, with many issues persisting despite post-launch patches. Overall, the critical reception of Agony’s technical performance was uniformly negative, with no platform escaping significant problems. While MondoXbox’s praise for the engine’s foundation offered a rare glimmer of hope, it was overshadowed by widespread frustration over bugs, optimization failures, and unresponsive systems. Critics across PC, Xbox One, and PS4 agreed that the game’s technical flaws—ranging from screen tearing to broken mechanics—severely hindered immersion and enjoyment. Despite some post-launch improvements, as noted by 3DJuegos, Agony was widely seen as a cautionary tale of unmet potential, with its technical shortcomings casting a long shadow over its creative ambitions. The lack of consistency across platforms further highlighted the game’s failure to deliver a stable or polished experience.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Agony’s replay value is severely undermined by repetitive mechanics, frustrating difficulty, and lackluster content, despite minor positives like multiple endings and modes—most critics advise against revisiting this flawed horror experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

13%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

83%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The review landscape for Agony’s replay value presents a few scattered positives, though they are overshadowed by broader criticisms. Some critics acknowledge elements that could theoretically encourage multiple playthroughs, such as the game’s multiple endings, additional modes like Súcubo and Agonía, and procedural level generation in the roguelike mode. For instance, MondoXbox highlights that these features—alongside collectibles and varied difficulty settings—might entice players to revisit the experience, while Eurogamer Italy notes that the “multiple endings” and separate Succube mode add some replayability. Similarly, Push Square mentions that post-game modes like Challenge Mode and Succubus Mode offer a “unique perspective,” even if they feel underdeveloped. These points suggest that Agony’s structure allows for some degree of repetition, particularly for fans of horror or niche mechanics. However, the negatives dominate the critical consensus, with nearly all reviewers citing significant flaws that deter repeated play. The game’s repetitive mechanics, frustrating difficulty, and lack of engaging content are repeatedly highlighted as major drawbacks. IGN and GameSpot criticize the “repetitive tasks” and “diminishing horror impact,” while PlayGround.ru and Worth Playing describe the roguelike mode as “repetitive and unenjoyable.” Technical issues, poor checkpoint placement, and a short runtime (8–12 hours) further diminish appeal. TrueAchievements and Ragequit.gr emphasize that even with fixes, the game’s flaws make multiple playthroughs feel tedious. The lack of meaningful progression or rewards, combined with an unpolished design, creates a negative experience that discourages players from returning, as noted by Stevivor, which strongly advises against playing the game altogether. Overall, the critical consensus leans heavily toward low replay value, with only a handful of critics offering cautious optimism. While some praise the game’s structural elements—such as multiple endings or modes—the overwhelming sentiment is that Agony fails to deliver a compelling enough experience for repeated engagement. MondoXbox and Eurogamer Italy stand out as exceptions, but their positive remarks are tempered by broader critiques. Most reviewers, including GameGrin, IGN, and COGconnected, argue that the game’s flaws—repetitiveness, poor mechanics, and lack of variety—make it unlikely to be revisited beyond a single playthrough. The few positives mentioned are seen as insufficient to outweigh the negatives, resulting in a largely negative assessment of Agony’s replayability.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

35%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

64%

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall verdict of Agony highlights several positive aspects that some critics acknowledged despite its flaws. Many reviewers praised its artistic ambition and atmospheric design, noting its unique visual style and immersive horror elements. For instance, IGN recognized its "impressive art direction and horror elements," while Wccftech lauded it as the "best video game representation of Hell." The game’s unconventional mechanics and thematic depth also drew praise, with Push Square highlighting its "visually ambitious and thematically rich" approach. Additionally, some critics appreciated its narrative ambition, such as GameSpot’s acknowledgment of its "unique depiction of Hell," and CGMagazine’s observation that it blends ideas from Outlast and Doom. These elements suggest that Agony succeeded in creating a distinct horror experience, even if it struggled to fully realize its potential. However, the negatives overshadowed these positives for most critics. The game faced widespread criticism for poor gameplay design, technical flaws, and repetitive mechanics. PlayGround.ru called it "unsatisfying" with a score of 3.0, while GameGrin deemed it "underwhelming" and not worth purchasing. TrueAchievements condemned it as a "broken, unpolished game," and Jeuxvideo.com labeled it a "failure" in every aspect. Issues like clunky controls, unbalanced progression, and lack of polish were frequently cited, with GameOver.gr criticizing its "poor gameplay" and "unoriginal storytelling." The narrative was also criticized for being underdeveloped or confusing, as noted by PlaySense and Everyeye.it. Even the PlayStation 4 version faced backlash for technical shortcomings, with Everyeye.it calling it a "shapeless monster" in its worst form. These flaws created a frustrating experience that many felt undermined the game’s ambitions. The overall consensus among critics is that Agony is a bold but deeply flawed attempt at a horror game, appealing primarily to niche audiences. While some praised its artistic vision and atmospheric strengths, the majority found it unpolished, repetitive, and frustrating. The game’s ambitious concept—a visceral depiction of Hell—was often overshadowed by poor execution, as highlighted by GameSpot (“dreadful experience”) and Worth Playing (“frustrating gameplay”). Despite a few mixed or slightly positive reviews (e.g., MondoXbox and Eurogamer Italy), the overwhelming sentiment was one of disappointment. Critics like IGN and CGMagazine acknowledged its potential but concluded it fell short due to design flaws and technical issues. Ultimately, Agony is seen as a game that prioritized shock value and style over substance, leaving most reviewers unconvinced of its lasting appeal.

TL;DR

Agony is a bold but deeply flawed horror game that prioritizes shock value over substance. While its ambitious art direction and atmospheric design impressed some, clunky mechanics, technical issues, and unpolished execution overwhelmed most critics, leaving a frustrating experience that failed to live up to its visceral vision of Hell.

MONSTER

Reviews

92 reviews found

Impulsegamer

Dec 11, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A challenging horror game not for the faint of heart, with a unique aesthetic and narrative but limited gameplay depth. The reviewer gives it a 4/10, noting its niche appeal and mixed elements.

Read full review

Eurogamer Italy

May 31, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review presents a mixed assessment, acknowledging artistic strengths and unique concepts but highlighting flaws in gameplay balance, technical performance, and boss design. It recommends the game to stealth fans and enthusiasts of its themes.

Read full review

Hooked Gamers

May 31, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Agony delivers a visually and atmospherically strong horror experience with unique mechanics but suffers from repetitive gameplay and technical issues. The review acknowledges its strengths in style and design but criticizes its lack of substance and polish.

Read full review

CGMagazine

Jun 1, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Agony is a visually ambitious game with unique mechanics but fails to deliver a cohesive experience. It feels like a mix of Outlast and Doom but falls short due to design flaws and lack of polish, leaving the player with mixed feelings.

Read full review

Hobby Consolas

PlayStation 4

May 29, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The game is praised for its ambitious, atmospheric horror design and unique mechanics but criticized for technical shortcomings and uneven gameplay. It appeals to fans of extreme survival horror but may frustrate those seeking polish.

Read full review

Similar Games

Games you might also enjoy

Alone in the Dark

2024

GARAGE: Bad Trip

2018

Endoparasitic

2022

The Sinking City

2019

Alan Wake II

2023

Amnesia: The Bunker

2023

Still Wakes the Deep

2024

Murdered: Soul Suspect

2014

Chernobylite

2021

Fatal Frame: Mask of the Lunar Eclipse

2023

Sundered

2017

Dead Rising 3

2013

Resident Evil 4: Separate Ways

2023

Crow Country

2024

Signalis

2022

V Rising

2024

Onimusha: Warlords

2019

Resident Evil 5

2009

Fatal Frame: Maiden of Black Water

2021

White Day: A Labyrinth Named School

2017

Popular Right Now

Trending games the community is playing

Resident Evil Requiem

2026

The Outer Worlds 2

2025

Nioh 3

2026

Ninja Gaiden 4

2025

Call of Duty: Black Ops 7

2025

REANIMAL

2026

Romeo is a Dead Man

2026

Dragon Quest VII Reimagined

2026

MARVEL Cosmic Invasion

2025

Dispatch

2025

Code Vein II

2026

Painkiller

2025

Octopath Traveler 0

2025

MIO: Memories in Orbit

2026

ARC Raiders

2025

Recently Reviewed

Games with full Monster Scorecards

Angry Video Game Nerd 8-bit

2025

Esoteric Ebb

2026

WWE 2K26

2026

Legacy of Kain: Defiance Remastered

2026

Planet of Lana II: Children of the Leaf

2026

Scott Pilgrim EX

2026

Reigns: The Witcher

2026

Love Eternal

2026

Gloomy Eyes

2025

Big Hops

2026

The Last Case of John Morley

2025

Dragon Quest VII Reimagined

2026

Dynasty Warriors: Origins - Visions of Four Heroes

2026

Romancing SaGa: Minstrel Song Remastered International

2025

Escape from Ever After

2026

SYNDUALITY: Echo of Ada

2023

Highguard

2026

Super Bomberman Collection

2026

Carmageddon: Rogue Shift

2026

Don't Stop, Girlypop!

2026

Links

Twitch

MONSTER

Agony

2018

GenresFantasy, Adventure, Action, Horror, Top-Down Perspective, Single Player

AvailableMay 29, 2018

PlatformPC, Xbox One, PlayStation 4

DeveloperMadmind Studio

Overview

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

50%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

50%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

26%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

71%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

15%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

59%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

26%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

57%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

43%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

11%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

83%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

19%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

78%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

13%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

83%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

35%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

64%

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

TL;DR

MONSTER

Reviews

92 reviews found

Impulsegamer

Dec 11, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A challenging horror game not for the faint of heart, with a unique aesthetic and narrative but limited gameplay depth. The reviewer gives it a 4/10, noting its niche appeal and mixed elements.

Read full review

Eurogamer Italy

May 31, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Hooked Gamers

May 31, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

CGMagazine

Jun 1, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Hobby Consolas

PlayStation 4

May 29, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Similar Games

Games you might also enjoy

Alone in the Dark

2024

GARAGE: Bad Trip

2018

Endoparasitic

2022

The Sinking City

2019

Alan Wake II

2023

Amnesia: The Bunker

2023

Still Wakes the Deep

2024

Murdered: Soul Suspect

2014

Chernobylite

2021

Fatal Frame: Mask of the Lunar Eclipse

2023

Sundered

2017

Dead Rising 3

2013

Resident Evil 4: Separate Ways

2023

Crow Country

2024

Signalis

2022

V Rising

2024

Onimusha: Warlords

2019

Resident Evil 5

2009

Fatal Frame: Maiden of Black Water

2021

White Day: A Labyrinth Named School

2017

Popular Right Now

Trending games the community is playing

Resident Evil Requiem

2026

The Outer Worlds 2

2025

Nioh 3

2026

Ninja Gaiden 4

2025

Call of Duty: Black Ops 7

2025

REANIMAL

2026

Romeo is a Dead Man

2026

Dragon Quest VII Reimagined

2026

MARVEL Cosmic Invasion

2025

Dispatch

2025

Code Vein II

2026

Painkiller

2025

Octopath Traveler 0

2025

MIO: Memories in Orbit

2026

ARC Raiders

2025

Recently Reviewed

Games with full Monster Scorecards

Angry Video Game Nerd 8-bit

2025

Esoteric Ebb

2026

WWE 2K26

2026

Legacy of Kain: Defiance Remastered

2026

Planet of Lana II: Children of the Leaf

2026

Scott Pilgrim EX

2026

Reigns: The Witcher

2026

Love Eternal

2026

Gloomy Eyes

2025

Big Hops

2026

The Last Case of John Morley

2025

Dragon Quest VII Reimagined

2026

Dynasty Warriors: Origins - Visions of Four Heroes

2026

Romancing SaGa: Minstrel Song Remastered International

2025

Escape from Ever After

2026

SYNDUALITY: Echo of Ada

2023

Highguard

2026

Super Bomberman Collection

2026

Carmageddon: Rogue Shift

2026

Don't Stop, Girlypop!

2026