Search for games

Type three or more characters to search...

MONSTER

Need for Speed Payback

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Need for Speed Payback
Item: Need for Speed Payback
Author: Critik Editorial Team

2017

GenresThird Person Perspective, Vehicular, Single Player, Multiplayer, Racing

AvailableNov 7, 2017

PlatformPlayStation 4, Xbox One, PC

DeveloperElectronic Arts

Overview

A standalone chapter of the career in Need for Speed: Payback. The chapter follows Mac as he enters the Fortune Valley Speedcross Series using an experimental Mini JCW Countryman build by Rav.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics are split on Need for Speed Payback's story. Some like the action-packed missions and character bonds, while others criticize the corny dialogue and lack of originality. Overall, most reviewers find the narrative underwhelming, with weak writing and uninteresting characters, making it a disappointment for many.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive (80-100)

11%

Mixed (50-79)

44%

Negative (0-49)

44%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The opinions of the critics regarding the story of Need for Speed Payback are quite divided. Some critics, such as GameSpew and Game Over Online, appreciate the action-packed and tense nature of the story missions. They find the storyline to be serviceable and enjoyable, with attempts to build up bonds between the characters. Additionally, GamesRadar+ describes the story as brilliant, silly, and over-the-top, comparing it to a fantastic action movie. These positive opinions highlight the game's ability to provide entertaining and engaging moments within its narrative. However, the majority of critics express negative opinions about the story of Need for Speed Payback. PC Gamer criticizes the corny dialogue and jarring cut-scenes that rob the player of satisfaction, while Attack of the Fanboy and AusGamers find the storytelling to be cringe-worthy, lacking effort, and convoluted. IGN Spain and Polygon also mention that the story attempts to be powerful and interesting but falls short in terms of originality and engagement. These criticisms suggest that the story suffers from weak writing, lack of depth, and uninteresting characters. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that the story of Need for Speed Payback is underwhelming and disappointing. Critics like God is a Geek, Forbes, and Metro GameCentral describe the story as weak, poorly written, and lacking in originality and character development. The narrative is often described as predictable, campy, and nonsensical, with uncharismatic characters and bad dialogue. While some critics appreciate certain aspects of the story, such as the action-packed missions or the over-the-top nature, the majority of opinions lean towards the negative side. The story is seen as a weak point in the game, with many critics feeling disconnected or ambivalent towards it.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics have mixed opinions on Need for Speed Payback's gameplay. Positive reviews praise its satisfying arcade handling, sense of speed, and unique Side Bets feature. Some critics enjoy the fun, distinct feel of the gameplay and different car experiences. However, negative feedback includes criticism of monotonous driving, lack of challenge, and oversimplified mechanics like the Speed Card system. Overall, while some aspects fall short, the game offers an enjoyable arcade racing experience with a balance of good and bad points.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive (80-100)

48%

Mixed (50-79)

38%

Negative (0-49)

14%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The opinions of the critics regarding the gameplay of Need for Speed Payback are varied, with some positive and negative aspects highlighted. PC Gamer praises the gameplay for its satisfying arcade handling and sense of speed, as well as the addition of Side Bets which adds objectives to races and alleviates the sense of repetition. Attack of the Fanboy also appreciates the arcade racing mechanics and racing visuals, emphasizing the good sense of speed and simplistic controls. AusGamers finds the gameplay fun and enjoyable, with a distinct and different feel from other open-world racers. God is a Geek praises the fun and arcadey handling, with different car types offering unique experiences. ZTGD also commends the driving and racing mechanics, describing them as very good, fluid, and fun. However, there are also negative opinions regarding the gameplay. Gaming Nexus criticizes the driving as monotonous and boring, with a sense of invincibility and annoying drifting that adds to the "arcade" feel. IGN Spain describes the gameplay as completely arcade and not demanding much from the player, with low difficulty and simple controls. Polygon, on the other hand, considers the gameplay a strong arcade racer with challenging AI racers, but mentions that the handling and power inside the cars are praised only for drift racing events and getaway chases. Critical Hit highlights the fun aspects of the gameplay, such as speed and drifting, but criticizes the game for bad decisions like the Speed Card system. Overall, the consensus among the critics leans towards a positive view of the gameplay. Many critics appreciate the fun and arcadey handling, with different car types offering unique experiences. The sense of speed and the racing visuals are also praised by several critics. However, there are some negative aspects mentioned, such as monotonous driving, lack of challenge, and oversimplified mechanics. The gameplay is described as a mix of good and bad points, with some critics pointing out that it doesn't always live up to the expectations set by the movie-inspired missions. Nevertheless, the positive aspects seem to outweigh the negatives, making Need for Speed Payback an enjoyable racing experience for fans of arcade-style gameplay.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics have mixed opinions on the graphics of Need for Speed Payback. Some praise the visuals, especially the open world and car customization, for their detail and immersive experience. However, others criticize the game for technical issues, inconsistent graphics, and lack of creativity in design. Overall, while some aspects impress, there are concerns that prevent the game from standing out in terms of graphics and visual design among other racing games.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive (80-100)

26%

Mixed (50-79)

74%

Negative (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Graphics and Visual Design of Need for Speed Payback are varied. Some critics praise the game's visuals, particularly the open world of Fortune Valley. AusGamers commends the large and exceptionally well-designed open world, while ZTGD highlights the vast and varied car customization options. App Trigger also praises the beauty of the world and the strong point of cosmetic customization. Game Informer mentions that the open world captures the beauty of the southwest United States, with glitzy Vegas, sprawling deserts, and jagged rocks. These positive opinions highlight the attention to detail and the immersive experience that the game offers. However, there are also negative opinions regarding the graphics and visual design of Need for Speed Payback. PC Gamer criticizes the game for struggling to maintain a smooth frame rate at ultra settings and occasional collision issues. GameSpew states that the graphics are inconsistent and the handling model is not reliable. Forbes mentions that the visuals are good but lack a bit of pop and originality. Slant Magazine criticizes the game's locations for lacking depth and variety, with empty environments and a lack of scenic routes or landmarks. These criticisms point out technical issues and a lack of creativity in the visual design. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that Need for Speed Payback has visually appealing elements, particularly in terms of the open world and car customization. However, there are concerns about technical issues, inconsistent graphics, and a lack of memorable locations. While some critics, such as AusGamers and ZTGD, praise the visual aspects of the game, others, like GameSpew and Slant Magazine, express disappointment. The overall sentiment suggests that while the game has its visually impressive moments, it falls short in certain areas, preventing it from standing out among other racing games in terms of graphics and visual design.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics have mixed opinions on the sound design and music of Need for Speed Payback. While some praise the car engine sounds and vehicle physics, others criticize the repetitive sounds and underwhelming soundtrack. Positive comments focus on the customization options and fitting dialogue acting. Overall, the consensus leans towards disappointment with the soundtrack and a lack of standout elements in the sound design.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive (80-100)

25%

Mixed (50-79)

63%

Negative (0-49)

13%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The opinions of the critics regarding the Sound Design and Music of Need for Speed Payback are varied. Some critics, such as Gaming Nexus and Gamer.nl, express disappointment with the sound design. Gaming Nexus mentions that the car's sound is repetitive and the spinning tires make the engine go into a stuttering whir, while Gamer.nl states that the soundtrack and lengthy dialogues between characters are not impressive. However, there are also positive opinions about the sound design. Stevivor praises the physics and sounds of the vehicles, mentioning that they are well done. App Trigger goes even further, stating that the sound of the car engines is impeccable. CGMagazine mentions the unexpected organ music, which may not appeal to everyone, but does not provide a clear positive or negative opinion. COGconnected mentions that the soundtrack during races is high energy, but outside of races, the music is toned down. Game Over Online highlights the fine acting in the dialogue, which fits the characters, and also mentions that the car-crashing and siren sound effects work nicely. In terms of the negatives, critics like Gaming Nexus and Gamer.nl express disappointment with the soundtrack. Gaming Nexus mentions that the sound design does not stand out, while Gamer.nl states that the soundtrack is not impressive. FANDOM also criticizes the soundtrack, describing it as less than impressive. Furthermore, FANDOM mentions that the dialogue is nauseous, indicating a negative opinion towards the overall sound design and music. Overall, the critics' opinions regarding the Sound Design and Music of Need for Speed Payback are mixed. While there are some positive comments about the sound design, particularly in relation to the car engines and vehicle physics, there are also several criticisms about the soundtrack. The repetitive nature of the car sounds and the lack of impressiveness in the dialogue and soundtrack are mentioned by multiple critics. However, it is worth noting that some critics, such as Stevivor and Game Over Online, find redeeming qualities in the sound design, such as the extensive customization options and the fitting acting in the dialogue. Ultimately, the overall consensus seems to lean towards a disappointment with the soundtrack and a lack of standout elements in the sound design.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics have mixed feelings about the voice acting in Need for Speed Payback. Some appreciate the likable characters and fitting casting choices, adding depth to the game. However, many critics criticize the dialogue for being weak and one-dimensional, lacking appeal and strength. Overall, the consensus is negative, with disappointment in the voice acting quality and lack of immersive experience for players.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive (80-100)

Mixed (50-79)

80%

Negative (0-49)

20%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting of Need for Speed Payback receives mixed opinions from the critics. Some critics, such as CGMagazine and GameSpew, find the voice acting to be an improvement compared to previous Need for Speed games and appreciate the likability of the characters. This positive aspect adds depth to the game and helps players connect with the story. Additionally, Game Over Online praises the fitting casting choices, indicating that the actors successfully embody their respective characters. However, there are several negative opinions regarding the voice acting in Need for Speed Payback. Critics like PC Gamer and Forbes criticize the dialogue for being inept and weak, respectively. They feel that the lines lack the appeal and strength found in other similar franchises, such as the Fast and Furious series. Gaming Nexus also mentions that the characters are one-dimensional and have cliché dialogue, which hampers the overall experience. PlayStation Universe goes further to describe the voice acting as lacking gusto and sounding like a jaded casting director, making the dialogue become white noise and the characters uninteresting. Overall, the consensus among the critics leans towards the negative side. While there are some positive remarks about the likability of the characters and the improvement in voice acting compared to previous Need for Speed games, the majority of critics express disappointment in the dialogue and voice acting quality. The lack of natural delivery, one-dimensional characters, and weak lines contribute to the overall weakness of the story. It is evident that the voice acting in Need for Speed Payback falls short of expectations, failing to create a truly immersive and engaging experience for players.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics have mixed opinions on the technical performance of Need for Speed Payback across gaming platforms. While some praise smooth gameplay on PS4 Pro, others criticize issues like frame rate drops and long load times on Xbox One and PC. PS4 version faces crashes and UI failures. Overall, technical problems overshadow positive aspects, impacting the gaming experience and needing developer attention.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive (80-100)

Mixed (50-79)

36%

Negative (0-49)

55%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The opinions of the critics regarding the technical performance of Need for Speed Payback vary across different gaming platforms. Starting with the positives, GamesRadar+ mentions that the game runs smoothly on the PS4 Pro with constant framerates. This indicates that the technical performance on the PS4 Pro is commendable. Additionally, ZTGD states that there is some initial lag in the online mode on Xbox One, but it smooths out after a few minutes, suggesting that the technical performance improves over time. Moving on to the negatives, several critics highlight technical issues on various platforms. PC Gamer criticizes the PC version, stating that the game struggles to maintain a smooth frame rate, experiences frame drops, and occasional collision issues. This indicates that the technical foundation of the PC version is criticized. Gaming Nexus mentions long load times on Xbox One, particularly after a botched race, and compares the game's loading speed to that of an Xbox update. Stevivor reports a random visual glitch and unresponsive traffic when pausing and returning to the session on Xbox One. App Trigger points out technical issues such as bugs and interface problems on the PS4 version. Forbes mentions multiple crashes during the matchmaking process, affecting the online multiplayer experience on the PS4. CGMagazine highlights long load times, especially when booting and switching between single-player and multiplayer on the PS4. Game Informer mentions a range of technical problems on the PS4, including UI failures, pop-in issues, long load times, wonky opponent AI, and complex navigation. Shacknews reports technical hiccups such as glitches in drag races, checkpoints not loading, and issues with textures in online multiplayer on the PS4. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that Need for Speed Payback has several technical issues across different gaming platforms. While there are some positive mentions, such as the smooth performance on the PS4 Pro, the negatives outweigh the positives. The PC version is criticized for struggling with frame rate and collision issues, while the Xbox One version suffers from long load times and occasional glitches. The PS4 version faces a range of technical problems, including crashes, UI failures, and long load times. These technical issues negatively impact the overall gaming experience and should be addressed by the developers.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics are divided on the replay value of Need for Speed Payback. While some praise its diverse activities and multiplayer modes, others criticize its repetitive tasks, monotonous progression, and heavy emphasis on grinding and loot boxes. Despite offering a variety of race events and open-world activities, the game's drawbacks, such as lack of customization options and tedious progression, make it less appealing for extended play sessions.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive (80-100)

16%

Mixed (50-79)

37%

Negative (0-49)

47%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions of the critics regarding the replay value of Need for Speed Payback are quite varied. Some critics, such as App Trigger and CGMagazine, highlight the numerous activities and multiplayer modes available in the game, which provide ample replay value. These activities include minigames, jumps, collectibles, and multiplayer races. PlayStation LifeStyle also mentions the abundance of side events and collectibles, which could easily double the playtime and contribute to the game's replayability. However, there are several criticisms raised by the critics that impact the replay value of Need for Speed Payback. PC Gamer mentions the repetitive nature of finding jumps, speed traps, and billboards, which becomes tiresome over time. Attack of the Fanboy criticizes the design decisions that detract from the enjoyment and the monotonous progression system. Polygon highlights the punishing grind, loot boxes, and multiple currencies, which may discourage replayability. These negative aspects are further supported by critics such as ZTGD, Gaming Nexus, and Critical Hit, who mention the tedious grinding required to progress and upgrade cars. Overall, the consensus among the critics is that while Need for Speed Payback offers a variety of race events and activities in the open world, the game's replay value is hindered by certain factors. The grind required for progression and car upgrades, as well as the repetitive nature of certain tasks, are frequently mentioned as drawbacks. The emphasis on loot boxes and the lack of customization options for cars are also criticized. However, there are positive aspects such as the multiplayer modes, side events, and collectibles that contribute to the game's replay value. Ultimately, the critics' opinions suggest that while Need for Speed Payback may offer some replayability, it falls short in certain areas, making it less appealing for extended play sessions.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive (80-100)

15%

Mixed (50-79)

69%

Negative (0-49)

16%

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

Overall, the critics have mixed opinions regarding the overall verdict of Need for Speed Payback. There are some positive aspects of the game that are highlighted by the reviewers. PC Gamer praises the satisfying gameplay and sense of speed, while God is a Geek describes the game as fun and explosive, bringing together elements of Forza Horizon and Burnout Paradise. Stevivor also commends the game as a solid racer and a great installment in the franchise, particularly praising its nostalgia and character. PlayStation LifeStyle enjoys the natural evolution of the series and the potential for a sequel. These positive aspects contribute to the overall enjoyment of the game for some critics. However, there are several negative aspects that are consistently mentioned by the reviewers. Many critics criticize the weak story of Need for Speed Payback, including PC Gamer, Attack of the Fanboy, Polygon, and Cheat Code Central. The repetitive open world is also a common complaint, mentioned by PC Gamer and Gaming Nexus. Expensive customization options are criticized by PC Gamer, while GameSpew highlights the negative impact of the Speed Card system on the overall experience. Technical issues are mentioned by PC Gamer and Shacknews, with the latter also criticizing poor design and pacing. The lack of engaging series progression and the presence of microtransactions are criticized by IGN Spain and App Trigger. These negative aspects contribute to the overall disappointment expressed by some critics. In terms of the overall consensus, the opinions of the critics are divided. While some critics, such as Slant Magazine and Metro GameCentral, express strong negative sentiments and consider Need for Speed Payback as a disappointment or the worst game in the franchise, there are others who find the game to be enjoyable despite its flaws. AusGamers mentions that the game has several great ideas but also many poor executions, leading to a mix of confusion and delight. Game Over Online describes the game as a nice step up from prior entries, with exciting cop chases and arcade-style racing action. CGMagazine considers the game to be fine with more pros than cons. However, the overall consensus leans towards a more negative perception of the game, with criticisms outweighing the positive aspects mentioned by the critics.

TL;DR

Critics have mixed opinions on Need for Speed Payback. Positive aspects like satisfying gameplay and nostalgia are praised, but weak story, repetitive open world, and expensive customization options are criticized. Technical issues and microtransactions also dampen the experience. While some find the game enjoyable despite flaws, the overall consensus is more negative, with criticisms outweighing the positives.

MONSTER

Reviews

148 reviews found

Game Over Online

PlayStation 4

Nov 10, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Need for Speed Payback is a nice step up from prior entries, with exciting cop chases and arcade-style racing action. However, the story and action may not hold up very well.

Stevivor

Xbox One

Nov 7, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Need for Speed Payback is a solid racer and a great installment in the franchise. It is considered a sequel to the Underground games and is praised for its nostalgia and character.

Read full review

PlayStation LifeStyle

PlayStation 4

Nov 6, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The game is described as the natural evolution of the series and ends with a great tease for a potential sequel. The reviewer finished the story in around 15 hours and enjoyed the game.

God is a Geek

Xbox One

Nov 7, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The game is described as fun and explosive, bringing together elements of Forza Horizon and Burnout Paradise.

Read full review

CGMagazine

PlayStation 4

Nov 6, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Despite its flaws, Need for Speed Payback is a fine game with more pros than cons.

Gamer.nl

PlayStation 4

Nov 15, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The game is more enjoyable than the previous Need for Speed game, but lacks originality and focus for a glorious comeback.

COGconnected

PlayStation 4

Nov 11, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Need for Speed Payback is a step in the right direction for the series, but has a few missteps.

Read full review

GamesRadar+

PlayStation 4

Nov 7, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Despite its flaws, Need for Speed Payback is an incredibly enjoyable experience with a brilliant story.

Read full review

Cheat Code Central

PlayStation 4

Nov 10, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Need for Speed: Payback falls short in terms of story and gameplay. The upgrade system is frustrating and lacks direction. The game doesn't offer a sense of accomplishment or progression.

Read full review

Forbes

PlayStation 4

Nov 7, 2017

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Need for Speed Payback fails to stand out in any one area and feels like a game trying to do too many things at once.