Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

Steam

Playstation

Twitch

MONSTER

EA Sports FC 25

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of EA Sports FC 25
Item: EA Sports FC 25
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2024

GenresThird Person Perspective, Simulation, Sports, Top-Down Perspective, Single Player, Multiplayer

AvailableSep 27, 2024

PlatformPlayStation 4, Nintendo Switch, PlayStation 5, Xbox One, Xbox Series X

DeveloperEA Canada

Overview

EA SPORTS FC 25 gives you more ways to win for the club. Team up with friends in your favourite modes with the new 5v5 Rush, and manage your club to victory as FC IQ delivers more tactical control than ever before.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

EA Sports FC 25 trades narrative depth for mechanics, offering cinematic flair and player-driven flexibility but sacrificing cohesive storytelling, with critics calling out underdeveloped systems, missed opportunities, and a focus on realism over emotional engagement.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

20%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

40%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

40%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The critics generally acknowledge some positive aspects of EA Sports FC 25’s narrative approach, particularly its cinematic opening and thematic elements. CD-Action and Gaming Nexus highlight Zinedine Zidane’s engaging monologue in the intro, which sets a tone of tactical focus and excitement. IGN France and IGN Italia note that while there is no traditional linear story, the game integrates narrative elements through Career Mode scenarios, such as starting as young talents or returning from injury, and includes diversity via female football integration. MeuPlayStation mentions the appeal of playing as iconic players like Ronaldo, while VideoGamer points out features like Live Start Points and Career Mode that allow players to craft their own stories. These elements suggest a deliberate shift toward player agency over scripted narratives, which some critics view as a creative choice rather than a flaw. However, the negatives dominate the critique, with many critics emphasizing the lack of substantial storytelling. TierraGamer and SECTOR.sk criticize the removal of the Volta mode in favor of Rush, framing it as a move away from narrative-driven content. Shacknews specifically calls out the Career Mode’s reliance on text-based interactions and underdeveloped personality systems, comparing it unfavorably to games like NBA 2K25. PlaySense highlights issues with career progression, noting that starting skill levels are too high and the youth academy concept is poorly implemented. IGN Italia and CD-Action both stress that the game prioritizes gameplay mechanics over narrative depth, leaving little room for emotional engagement or traditional storytelling. These criticisms collectively paint a picture of a title that sacrifices narrative cohesion for mechanical polish. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed but leans toward disappointment regarding FC 25’s story. While some praise its cinematic flair and player-driven flexibility (as noted by VideoGamer), the majority view the lack of a cohesive narrative as a significant shortcoming. TierraGamer and SECTOR.sk explicitly call out the absence of storytelling as a missed opportunity, while IGN Italia and Shacknews emphasize that the game’s focus on mechanics overshadows any attempt at meaningful character development or plot. Despite these critiques, there is a shared acknowledgment that FC 25 prioritizes accessibility and realism over traditional narrative structures, reflecting broader industry trends in sports games. This approach may appeal to core fans but risks alienating those seeking deeper storytelling experiences.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

EA Sports FC 25 shines with tactical innovation like the FC IQ system and Rush mode, boosting depth and variety, but technical glitches, repetitive gameplay, and rigid AI undermine its potential, leaving mixed reviews between praise for evolution and frustration over missed revolution.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

63%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

35%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of EA Sports FC 25 receives widespread praise for its tactical depth and innovative features, particularly the FC IQ system, which allows players to assign specific roles (e.g., "Holding Midfielder" or "Box To Box Midfielder") and adjust strategies dynamically. Critics like IGN France and Push Square highlight this as a significant improvement, noting that it adds complexity for advanced players while reducing reliance on repetitive "Meta" formations. The Rush mode, a 5v5 variant with smaller fields, is also celebrated for its fast-paced, chaotic gameplay, with Radio Times and Gamer.no calling it a standout addition that offers fresh variety. Additionally, Oyungezer and CD-Action commend the enhanced AI behavior, which makes tactics more dynamic, while Gaming Nexus and The Games Machine appreciate the shift toward a more simulation-like experience with refined player attributes and passing mechanics. However, several critics point to persistent issues that undermine the gameplay experience. XGN criticizes the inconsistency in tackles, delays, and bugs affecting multiplayer, while PLAY! Zine and 4Players.de argue that the game feels like a recycled iteration of previous titles with minimal innovation. Technical flaws such as online lag (IGN Benelux), rigid AI behavior (PlaySense), and unmanageable menus (4Players.de) are recurring complaints. Some reviewers, like Jeuxvideo.com and Gamer.no, note that core mechanics remain stagnant, requiring players to master Playstyles for optimal performance despite minor adjustments to passes and deep runs. Additionally, TierraGamer and Atomix mention that while tactical elements are present, they don’t fully address deeper issues like defensive struggles or the game’s reliance on player skill over strategy. Overall, critics agree that FC 25 represents a step forward in tactical customization and innovation, particularly through FC IQ and Rush mode, but acknowledge it as an evolution rather than a revolution. IGN Adria and VG247 highlight the system’s potential to transform gameplay for strategic players, while XGN and Eurogamer Portugal caution that technical inconsistencies and repetition dilute its impact. The consensus leans toward mixed satisfaction: while TechRadar Gaming praises near-perfect responsiveness and tactical depth, others like GAMINGbible and SECTOR.sk note that the core gameplay loop remains largely unchanged. Ultimately, FC 25 is seen as a solid improvement for fans of the series but falls short of delivering the transformative experience some hoped for.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

EA Sports FC 25 dazzles with Cranium tech, ray tracing, and HyperMotionV for immersive visuals, but glitches, static animations, and a stale UI drag down its polish, offering a solid yet flawed football experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

40%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

57%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of EA Sports FC 25 received mixed but largely positive feedback from critics, with several praising incremental improvements and specific technical advancements. Many reviewers highlighted the game’s enhanced player models, stadiums, and lighting effects, particularly noting the inclusion of Cranium technology, which improves facial realism for non-scanned players (as noted by VG247 and GameSpew). The ray tracing options and enhanced visual modes (like "Preferuj ulepszony wygląd" from Eurogamer Poland) were celebrated for adding depth to environments, while HyperMotionV technology was praised for its detailed animations and immersive matchday atmosphere (Hobby Consolas, GAMINGbible). Critics like TechRadar Gaming and TierraGamer emphasized that the visuals represent the series’ highest fidelity yet, with realistic player expressions, sweat, and stadium shadows creating a "near peak of current-gen console visuals." Additionally, licensed leagues such as the Premier League and LaLiga were highlighted for their authentic presentation (LevelUp, IGN France). However, several critics pointed out persistent issues that undermined the game’s visual polish. Concerns included chromatic aberration, stale menu designs, and inconsistent facial animations (e.g., "some faces leave much to be desired" per Areajugones). The "template-like" UI (4Players.de) and glitches like incorrect logos or shirt displays (PlaySense) were frequently cited, as were minimal improvements over previous iterations (MGG, Eurogamer Portugal). While some praised the dynamic weather effects and stadium details, others noted that fan animations and crowd interactions remained static (4Players.de), and player likenesses in smaller leagues still felt artificial (PlaySense). Additionally, the performance trade-offs on the Nintendo Switch, with frame rate drops to 30fps, were a significant drawback for some (Nintendo Life). Overall, critics acknowledged that EA Sports FC 25 represents a step forward in visual fidelity but emphasized that these improvements are largely evolutionary rather than revolutionary. While technologies like Cranium and ray tracing elevated certain aspects of the game, many felt the core visuals remained stagnant, with technical flaws and lack of polish detracting from the experience (Power Unlimited, 4Players.de). The consensus leaned toward a balanced view: the game’s graphics are visually impressive and immersive for football fans, but not without its shortcomings. As VG247 noted, while the visuals are "near the peak of current-gen console visuals," others like GRYOnline.pl argued that the "stagnant" nature of updates and persistent glitches limited its overall impact. Ultimately, FC 25 is seen as a solid but not groundbreaking entry in the series’ visual evolution.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Praise for realism, immersive audio, diverse soundtrack, and standout crowd/feedback elements—but repetitive tracks, poor mixing, tedious commentary, and underwhelming music undermine the experience. Mixed reception: strong audio depth but flawed execution.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

27%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

65%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of EA Sports FC 25 received praise for its realism and immersive qualities, with several critics highlighting standout elements. Atomix commended the "realism" of crowd noise, DualSense haptic feedback, and "immersive audio effects," emphasizing that high-quality audio setups elevate the experience. GamingBolt noted "realistic crowd chants and overall audio quality," while Impulsegamer called it "one of the best in sports titles." The inclusion of original chants, new German commentators (GIGA), and diverse musical selections—such as French artists like Justice and Tiakola (Jeuxvideo.com)—added variety. Additionally, GameOver.gr praised the "diverse soundtrack" with a mix of well-known and lesser-known tracks, and some reviewers appreciated the fresh commentary duo in Career Mode (GamePro Germany). These positives underscored the game’s commitment to authenticity and auditory engagement. However, several critics pointed out significant flaws, particularly around repetition, balancing issues, and lack of innovation. 4Players.de criticized the "interchangeable" soundtrack between 2018 and 2023, while Eurogamer Poland and PlaySense lamented overly dramatic or irritating commentary in Rush Mode, with the latter noting 60% of tracks needed to be disabled. PlayStation Universe and 4Players.de highlighted problematic audio mixing, where stadium noise drowned out commentators and goal music, making adjustments cumbersome. New Game Network called the "music selection underwhelming," and GIGA noted the German commentators lacked energy. Additionally, some reviews (e.g., PlaySense) criticized repetitive tracks and a lack of genre variety, while others (e.g., PLAY! Zine) pointed to no notable improvements in sound design. These issues collectively undermined the audio experience for many players. The overall consensus reflects a mixed reception, with strong praise for realism and immersion but persistent criticisms about repetition and technical shortcomings. While outlets like Atomix, GamingBolt, and Impulsegamer celebrated the game’s auditory depth, others (e.g., 4Players.de, PlaySense) emphasized flaws that detracted from enjoyment. The commentary, though improved in some aspects (e.g., GamePro Germany’s new duo), remained a contentious point, with many finding it tiresome or poorly balanced. Despite these issues, the game’s sound design was generally seen as a step forward compared to previous entries, even if it fell short of revolutionary innovation. Critics like GIGA and Eurogamer Poland acknowledged pockets of excellence but agreed that the audio experience required refinement to fully match the game’s ambitions.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

EA Sports FC 25’s voice acting delivers standout moments—Zidane’s impact, improved commentary sync—but struggles with grating English voices, lackluster German delivery, and underdeveloped scripted dialogue, creating an uneven experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

40%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

40%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

20%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in EA Sports FC 25 receives a mixed reception, with several positives highlighted by critics. Gaming Nexus praised Zinedine Zidane’s impactful opening monologue, noting his performance as a strong contributor to the game’s atmosphere. Similarly, Eurogamer Germany acknowledged improvements in phrase synchronization and timing for commentators like DJ Mario and Miguel Ángel Román, calling their work a key strength in the audio presentation. Vandal also noted that Spanish commentators provided effective narration, with phrases aligning well with in-game action, while IGN France mentioned French commentators delivering in-game updates, suggesting some regional voice elements were competently executed. These positives indicate that certain voices and commentary styles enhanced the game’s immersion, particularly in specific languages or contexts. However, several critics pointed to notable flaws in the voice acting. Eurogamer Poland criticized the English commentator’s “grating” tone, describing excessive excitement during goals and a high-pitched delivery that detracted from the experience, though this issue was mitigated by switching to French commentary. GIGA noted that German commentators failed to convey sufficient pressure or enthusiasm, while 4Players.de found the new duo unremarkable, offering no direct praise for their performance. Additionally, Eurogamer Germany highlighted a lack of voice in interviews and transfer negotiations, suggesting missed opportunities for scripted dialogue. These critiques reveal inconsistencies in execution, with some voices falling short of expectations and others feeling underdeveloped or overly repetitive. Overall, the consensus among critics is that EA Sports FC 25’s voice acting is a mixed bag, with standout moments balanced by significant shortcomings. While Zidane’s involvement and improvements in commentary synchronization were praised, issues like the grating English commentator, lackluster German voices, and minimal scripted dialogue in key scenarios undermined the experience. The game’s audio design appears to prioritize commentary over character-driven voice acting, leaving some areas underexplored. Despite these flaws, the presence of skilled commentators in certain languages and the occasional strong performance (like Zidane’s) suggest that the voice acting has potential, but it remains uneven and inconsistent across different elements of the game.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

EA Sports FC 25 is a technical disaster, plagued by crash-filled PS5/PC versions, laggy menus, and unresolved bugs that ruined core gameplay, while minor fixes on other platforms couldn’t mask its overall polish failures.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

14%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

68%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

18%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

Positives for Each Platform: EA Sports FC 25 received mixed but notable praise for its technical performance across platforms. On PS5, critics like IGN France highlighted improved menu intuitiveness and smoother in-game mechanics compared to previous iterations, while VGC noted minor advancements in menu responsiveness. For Xbox Series X, Jeuxvideo.com and Multiplayer.it praised stable online functionality and cross-platform play at launch, with the latter acknowledging "technical execution" as a strength despite minor physics bugs. The Nintendo Switch version, though limited by hardware, was deemed playable by Nintendo Life, which noted its 30fps performance (potentially lower when docked) despite the Frostbite engine’s demands. On PC, BaziCenter acknowledged progress in offline simulation modes and competitive online play, while some critics like GIGA praised smooth technical execution despite UI sluggishness. Negatives for Each Platform: Technical issues dominated reviews across all platforms, with PS5 being the most criticized. Power Unlimited called the game "absoluut onacceptabel" (unacceptable) due to laggy menus, crashes in Ultimate Team, and poor performance, while XGN and GRYOnline.pl cited persistent bugs, unresponsive UIs, and unresolved glitches exacerbating multiplayer frustration. Xbox Series X faced criticism for physics inconsistencies (Multiplayer.it) and occasional server instability (IGN Benelux), though these were less severe than PS5’s issues. The Nintendo Switch struggled with performance, as Nintendo Life highlighted 30fps limitations and hardware constraints. On PC, MGG detailed severe problems like black screens, infinite loading, and controller compatibility issues, while GRYOnline.pl and IGN Portugal criticized unstable online servers and UI flaws. Even minor glitches, such as Vandal’s animation flaws or GameOver.gr’s outdated technical foundation, underscored broader polish concerns. Overall Consensus: The critical reception of FC 25’s technical performance was overwhelmingly negative, with widespread complaints about stability, UI responsiveness, and online functionality across all platforms. While some positives emerged—such as improved menus on PS5 (IGN France), stable crossplay on Xbox Series X (Jeuxvideo.com), and playable Switch performance (Nintendo Life)—these were overshadowed by recurring issues like crashes, lag, and unresolved bugs. Critics like Power Unlimited and MGG emphasized that the game’s technical flaws significantly detracted from its experience, with many noting that fixes were needed for long-term playability. Despite minor advancements in areas like AI mechanics (Atomix) or offline modes (BaziCenter), the consensus was clear: FC 25’s technical shortcomings, particularly on PS5 and PC, represented a major letdown for players expecting a polished release.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

EA Sports FC 25 delivers fresh replay value via chaotic Rush mode, enhanced career systems, and FUT experimentation, but repetitive mechanics, minimal innovation, and overreliance on microtransactions undermine its long-term appeal—a solid update, not a breakthrough.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

34%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

66%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The majority of critics highlight several positive aspects of EA Sports FC 25’s replay value, particularly its expanded modes and features. GamePro Germany and IGN Benelux praise the Rush mode as a standout addition, noting its chaotic 5v5 format and integration into various gameplay experiences, while also acknowledging improvements in career modes like Live Start Points and Women’s Career. Games.cz and Atomix emphasize the depth provided by customizable strategies, tactical flexibility, and enhanced career systems, which encourage repeated playthroughs. Additionally, Rush mode is frequently cited as a refreshing alternative to traditional gameplay, with Eurogamer Portugal calling it “diablement fun” (extremely fun) and noting its social interaction and progression systems. The inclusion of Ultimate Team (FUT) variations and the ability to experiment with team builds also contribute to sustained engagement, as highlighted by Gamer.no and MeuPlayStation. However, several critics express concerns about the game’s repetitive nature and lack of substantial innovation. 4Players.de directly criticizes the “repetitive nature” and “lack of fresh content,” while Gamer.no and Vandal question the replay value due to minimal changes from previous years and a focus on monetization over creativity. The Career Mode and Player Career are often seen as lacking meaningful updates, with Dexerto and TierraGamer noting that they feel stagnant despite new features like FC IQ. Additionally, while Rush mode is praised for its variety, some reviewers (e.g., XGN and GRYOnline.pl) argue it cannot fully compensate for the core game’s reliance on established mechanics. The overemphasis on FUT and microtransactions also draws criticism, with Gamer.nl and Eurogamer Germany suggesting these elements may dilute long-term appeal for players seeking deeper innovation. Overall, the consensus among critics is that EA Sports FC 25 offers a balanced mix of replayability through its new modes and expanded content, but it falls short of delivering a revolutionary experience. While Rush mode and tactical systems like FC IQ are widely praised for adding variety (as noted by IGN Benelux and Games.cz), many reviewers agree that the game feels more like an incremental update than a complete overhaul. Critics like MGG and Eurogamer Germany acknowledge the value of multiple modes but stress that the lack of groundbreaking changes may limit long-term engagement for dedicated fans. Despite these criticisms, the game’s diverse gameplay options—ranging from Career Mode customization to FUT progression—ensure it remains engaging for a broad audience, even if its replayability is tempered by repetitive elements and reliance on monetization strategies.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

58%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

41%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall sentiment among reviewers highlights several positive aspects of EA Sports FC 25, particularly its gameplay innovations and refined mechanics. Critics like IGN France praised the tactical improvements such as FC IQ and HyperMotion V, noting their immersive details in Ligue 1 and coach career modes. VGC called it the "best and most complete entry in years," emphasizing Rush mode as a standout addition that revitalizes gameplay. The Games Machine appreciated the "notable innovations in gameplay and AI," while Gamer.no acknowledged it as the "best football game available." These reviews underscore the game’s polished visuals, improved Career Mode, and strategic depth, with many agreeing that it delivers a satisfying experience for both casual and dedicated players. The introduction of features like Cranium and enhanced realism in match simulations also received praise, positioning FC 25 as a strong contender in the football gaming space. However, the negatives are equally prominent, with critics frequently pointing to incremental updates, technical flaws, and EA’s monetization practices. MGG criticized the game as "more of an incremental update than a substantial new release," while GamePro Germany argued that the full price is unjustified due to "minimal innovations" and an outdated business model. PlaySense and IGN Portugal highlighted underdeveloped offline modes and repetitive gameplay, despite tactical refinements. Technical issues like server instability, clunky menus, and inconsistent AI were recurring complaints, with Gamer.no noting the game’s lack of "significant innovation" just months after FC 24. Additionally, PLAY! Zine and Vandal lambasted the microtransaction-heavy Ultimate Team, calling for industry-wide competition to drive better practices. These critiques reflect a broader frustration with EA’s reliance on annual updates rather than bold overhauls. The overall consensus among critics is mixed but leans toward cautious optimism, acknowledging FC 25 as a solid improvement over previous entries while recognizing its limitations. While VGC and IGN Italia celebrated it as a "significant step forward" with meaningful innovations, many felt it failed to break away from FIFA’s formulaic roots. Jeuxvideo.com and Eurogamer Poland noted that the game feels "incremental" and "repetitive," despite refinements in modes like Rush and FC IQ. The divide between fans and skeptics is clear: dedicated players appreciate the polish and depth, while others see it as a missed opportunity for radical change. Ultimately, most reviewers agree that FC 25 is a worthwhile purchase for existing fans but caution against full-price buys unless specific features like Rush mode or career improvements are prioritized. The game’s success lies in its ability to refine what works, even if it doesn’t fully reinvent the wheel.

TL;DR

EA Sports FC 25 impresses with tactical refinements and Rush mode but struggles with incremental updates, technical hiccups, and overreliance on microtransactions, splitting critics between admiration and frustration.

MONSTER

Reviews

131 reviews found

TechRadar Gaming

PlayStation 5

Sep 26, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review calls EA Sports FC 25 the best football game ever made, praising its incremental improvements and near-perfect experience despite being a minor update from FC 24.

Read full review

MeuPlayStation

PlayStation 5

Sep 30, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review concludes that EA Sports FC 25 is worth purchasing despite early issues, emphasizing its balance of realism, challenge, and diverse gameplay options.

Read full review

Impulsegamer

PlayStation 5

Sep 26, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

FC 25 is a step in the right direction for the franchise, with solid gameplay improvements, visually stunning design, and exceptional sound design. It offers strategic depth and replay value, making it a worthwhile upgrade from FC 24.

Read full review

The Games Machine

PlayStation 5

Sep 20, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

EA Sports FC 25 is praised as an enjoyable and refined entry in the series, with notable innovations in gameplay and AI. While not perfect, it delivers a satisfying experience that should appeal to both casual and dedicated players.

Read full review

IGN Italia

PlayStation 5

Sep 30, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review concludes positively, calling EA Sports FC 25 the best version in years and a significant step forward for the franchise. It praises its tactical depth, integration of modes, and improvements in visuals and gameplay, despite acknowledging some minor flaws.

Read full review

Oyungezer

PlayStation 5

Sep 20, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review concludes that EA Sports FC 25 is one of the most improved football games in recent years, praising its tactical depth, AI advancements, and new modes like Rush. However, it acknowledges room for growth in areas like stability and referee consistency.

Read full review

LevelUp

PlayStation 5

Sep 26, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

EA Sports FC 25 marks a positive shift for the franchise, offering enhanced tactical systems, visual improvements, and refined gameplay. While it retains some flaws from previous years, it represents a significant step forward in realism and player engagement, making it a strong recommendation for fans.

Read full review

GAMES.CH

PlayStation 5

Sep 25, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review suggests EA Sports FC 25 represents a significant step forward with innovations like Rush mode and FC IQ, but acknowledges lingering issues in balance and AI. It balances praise with constructive criticism, implying a positive but not flawless experience.

Read full review

GIGA

PlayStation 5

Sep 26, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

EA SPORTS FC 25 offers a mixed experience. While it improves on gameplay mechanics and visuals, issues with AI behavior, defensive balance, and menu design hinder its potential. The Rush mode is a standout addition, but the game feels like an incremental update rather than a revolutionary leap.

Generación Xbox

Xbox Series X

Oct 3, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

EA Sports FC 25 is a step forward with meaningful improvements in tactics (FC IQ) and modes like Rush, but it retains longstanding issues in defense and goalkeeping. It balances arcade-style gameplay with depth, making it a strong entry for fans and newcomers alike.

Read full review