F1 22

The reviews of F1 22 highlight several positive aspects, particularly in its career mode and immersive elements. Critics like IGN Italia praised the game’s ability to mirror the real-world tension and unpredictability of Formula 1, noting that each race feels like a story filled with high-stakes decisions and dynamic events. NME emphasized the career mode’s depth, where players rise from F2 to F1 through immersive choices and interactions, while The Games Machine pointed to the inclusion of interviews and rivalries that add layers to the progression system. Additionally, PC Gamer noted the introduction of a customizable living space for avatars, even if it lacked interactivity, suggesting a shift toward personalization over narrative. These elements indicate an attempt to innovate beyond traditional story modes, though they were not universally celebrated. The negatives dominate the critique, with most reviewers expressing disappointment over the absence of a structured story mode. The removal of Braking Point, a narrative-driven mode from F1 2021, was a recurring point of frustration. GameOver.gr and IGN Brasil criticized the lack of a new chapter in Braking Point, calling it a missed opportunity to expand the game’s storytelling. Atomix and MeuPlayStation highlighted the shift to F1 Life, a mode focused on avatar customization that many found shallow and disconnected from the sport’s intensity. SECTOR.sk and Generación Xbox specifically called out F1 Life for its lack of depth, arguing it failed to capture the essence of an F1 driver’s lifestyle. Even Dexerto and GameGrin lamented the absence of a narrated story mode, with XboxEra noting that the new supercar challenges felt like a poor substitute for meaningful narrative content. The overall consensus among critics is that F1 22’s lack of a traditional story mode represents a significant step back, particularly for fans of Braking Point. While some praised the career mode’s mechanics and the game’s real-world authenticity, the majority felt the shift to F1 Life and the removal of narrative elements left the experience feeling hollow. IGN Adria and Eurogamer Italy acknowledged the game’s focus on traditional championship options but noted the absence of innovation. However, a few critics, like IGN Italia and NME, found value in the game’s emphasis on player agency and dynamic racing scenarios. Despite these positives, the overwhelming sentiment was that F1 22 failed to deliver the storytelling depth that made its predecessor memorable, leaving many players unimpressed with its narrative approach.

The gameplay of F1 22 received widespread acclaim from critics, with many highlighting its refined mechanics, immersive realism, and engaging features. Reviewers praised the improved physics models, such as the enhanced tire management system and heavier car dynamics, which added depth to the driving experience (e.g., MondoXbox and GAMES.CH). The adaptive AI was frequently lauded for its responsiveness and challenge, with GameSpot noting its ability to cater to varying skill levels. New features like Sprint Races, Pirelli Hot Laps, and F1 Life were celebrated for adding variety, while the handling of cars was described as "tight and responsive" by TheSixthAxis and "thrillingly authentic" by Metro GameCentral. Additionally, the game’s scalability—offering both arcade-style and simulation-focused modes—was highlighted as a strength, with PlayStation Universe and The Guardian noting its accessibility for newcomers and depth for veterans. Critics like IGN Italia and PC Gamer emphasized the game’s robust career mode and realistic driver standings, which enriched the overall racing experience. Despite these positives, some critics pointed to notable shortcomings. A recurring criticism was the lack of significant innovation compared to previous entries in the series, with PLAY! Zine and Eurogamer Italy noting that the gameplay felt "similar to F1 21" with minimal changes. Issues like aggressive AI behavior (e.g., PC Games) and repetitive challenges were mentioned, as well as concerns about unnecessary features such as the Supercars mode (GameByte). Some reviewers, including Everyeye.it, pointed out that while the adaptive AI and tire management were improvements, aspects like DRS mechanics and AI decision-making still needed refinement. Additionally, Softpedia noted that the game’s complexity could overwhelm casual players, despite assist options. These critiques suggest that while F1 22 built on its predecessors, it occasionally struggled to balance familiarity with meaningful evolution. Overall, the majority of critics viewed F1 22 as a strong entry in the series, with its gameplay praised for its realism, polish, and accessibility. While some felt the game lacked bold innovations, the consensus was that it delivered a satisfying experience through improved physics (GameGrin, COGconnected), refined AI (XboxEra, God is a Geek), and engaging modes like Sprint Races (GameByte). Critics like GamersRD and Screen Rant highlighted the dynamic, rewardingly challenging nature of the racing, while PC Gamer and IGN Italia celebrated its comprehensive career mode and simulation depth. Though minor criticisms existed, the overwhelming sentiment was that F1 22 successfully balanced accessibility with realism, making it a standout title for both casual fans and hardcore sim enthusiasts.

The graphics and visual design of F1 22 received widespread praise for their realism, attention to detail, and technical execution. Many reviewers highlighted the game’s ability to recreate Formula 1 cars, tracks, and weather effects with impressive fidelity. For instance, CGMagazine and GameOver.gr commended the realistic car models and visually stunning environments, while GamersRD emphasized polished graphics with enhanced reflections, HDR support, and detailed vehicle designs. The inclusion of ray tracing in specific areas, as noted by Everyeye.it, and dynamic weather effects, praised by PSX Brasil, added to the immersive experience. Additionally, GameGrin and GameSpew lauded the EGO engine’s performance, particularly in night races under floodlights and sharp, stable frame rates. The game’s ability to replicate the television broadcast style of Formula 1, as noted by Hobby Consolas and XboxEra, further enhanced its authenticity. However, several critics pointed out notable shortcomings. Atomix criticized the graphics as “disappointing,” arguing that they showed little evolution from previous iterations despite next-gen hardware. Similar concerns were raised about outdated character models and animations, with MeuPlayStation and PlaySense noting a lack of realism in driver designs compared to prior titles. PC Gamer and IGN Italia highlighted technical limitations, such as blurry reflections during fast-paced gameplay and an unimpressive ray tracing implementation. Issues with cutscenes, character animations, and the overall visual engine’s stagnation were also mentioned by Eurogamer Italy, IGN Spain, and GamePro Germany, who felt the game relied on familiar assets without significant innovation. Additionally, Gfinity and Everyeye.it noted minor flaws in VR implementation and cutscene quality, which detracted from the experience. Overall, the consensus among critics was mixed but leaned toward appreciation for F1 22’s visual polish and technical execution, despite its lack of groundbreaking advancements. While many praised the game’s detailed car models, dynamic weather effects, and improved lighting (as noted by IGN Adria, GameStar, and Xbox Achievements), others felt it failed to capitalize on next-gen capabilities fully. The divide between positive feedback on track visuals and criticism of character models or engine limitations reflected a broader sentiment that F1 22 is a solid but incremental update. Critics like GamersRD and GameSpew celebrated its immersive presentation, while Atomix and IGN Spain expressed frustration over the absence of meaningful improvements. Ultimately, the game’s visuals were seen as a strong foundation for Formula 1 simulation, albeit one that left room for growth in future releases.

The sound design and music of F1 22 received widespread acclaim for their realism, immersion, and technical execution. Critics consistently praised the game’s engine sounds, which were described as "realistic" (GamePro Germany, Multiplayer.it) and "faithful to reality" (PLAY! Zine), enhancing the authenticity of the racing experience. The integration of 3D audio effects and haptic feedback via the PS5 DualSense controller was highlighted as a standout feature, with GamersRD noting how engine sounds, gear shifts, and braking effects create an "immersive gameplay experience." Licensed music also garnered praise, with GameByte and GameGrin celebrating its debut in an F1 game, while NME lauded the "killer licensed soundtrack" that complements the game’s fast-paced action. Additionally, the inclusion of diverse commentator options and improved team communication (IGN Brasil, XboxEra) added depth to the audio experience, making it feel more dynamic and engaging. Despite these positives, some critics pointed out notable flaws. Hardcore Gamer criticized the "tire squeal with supercars" as a downside, while Worth Playing found the licensed music "oddly included" and somewhat out of place. SECTOR.sk noted that the sound design did not represent a significant evolution from previous titles, and Pure Xbox dismissed the soundtrack as featuring "terrible contemporary music." Additionally, Hobby Consolas mentioned repetitive commentary and issues with car movement at high speeds, which detracted from immersion. While these critiques were less frequent, they highlighted areas where the audio design fell short of expectations, particularly in balancing innovation with traditional F1 aesthetics. Overall, the consensus among critics was overwhelmingly positive, with most agreeing that F1 22 delivered a polished and immersive audio experience. The realistic engine sounds (IGN Spain, PSX Brasil), improved environmental effects (Everyeye.it), and enhanced team communication (IGN Brasil) were frequently cited as major strengths. While some concerns about licensed music placement and minor technical issues persisted, these were overshadowed by the game’s broader achievements in sound design. As GamersRD and Multiplayer.it emphasized, the attention to detail in audio elements significantly elevated the racing simulation, making it a strong contender for best-in-class audio in sports games. The mixed feedback on specific aspects did not detract from the overall praise, reflecting a well-rounded and technically impressive auditory experience.

The voice acting in F1 22 receives mixed but generally positive feedback from critics, with several praising its enhancements and variety. GamePro Germany highlights the commendable performance of new commentator Sascha Roos, while IGN Brasil notes the inclusion of a fresh race engineer voice and customizable commentators, which add depth to the experience. PlaySense lauds the voice acting as "excellent," emphasizing its contribution to immersion, and PSX Brasil applauds the well-localized Brazilian Portuguese dialogue, which enriches contextual interactions. Additionally, IGN Spain and MondoXbox appreciate the presence of recognizable voices like Julien Fébreau and Jean-Eric Vergne, while XboxEra mentions the diversity provided by David Croft and Alex Jacques. These positives underscore efforts to modernize and diversify the commentary, offering fans a more dynamic auditory experience. However, several critics point out notable shortcomings. MeuPlayStation criticizes the voice acting as "repetitive" and lacking variety, which diminishes immersion during races, while Eurogamer Italy lambasts inconsistent synchronization and irrelevant interview questions, suggesting a lack of refinement. Atomix highlights the absence of Spanish localization for Latin America, calling it a missed opportunity, and SomosXbox notes that the Spanish adaptation fails to match the quality of other regions, detracting from the experience. Multiplayer.it acknowledges new voices but admits they don’t elaborate on their quality, while Everyeye.it expresses a desire for real-time commentary rather than pre-recorded lines. These critiques reveal persistent issues with repetition, technical polish, and regional inclusivity that hinder the overall impact of the voice acting. The overall consensus reflects a balanced view: while F1 22 introduces improvements like new commentators and localized voices, it struggles to fully satisfy due to repetitive dialogue, technical flaws, and incomplete language support. Critics like PSX Brasil and GamePro Germany celebrate specific strengths, but concerns about immersion and consistency—highlighted by MeuPlayStation, Eurogamer Italy, and Atomix—underscore areas needing refinement. Despite these issues, the game’s voice acting remains a notable step forward for fans of the series, though its shortcomings prevent it from being universally lauded. The mix of praise and criticism suggests that while F1 22 has made progress, there is still room for growth in delivering a more cohesive and immersive auditory experience.

The technical performance of F1 22 across platforms shows a mix of strengths and inconsistencies. On PS5, several critics praised its smooth gameplay and stable frame rates, with GameOver.gr highlighting "impressive" visuals and high-quality graphics, while IGN Adria noted the game runs at 60fps on next-gen consoles with quick load times. The Games Machine commended the excellent DualSense controller support, enhancing immersion. For PC, reviews were largely positive, with Dexerto and Vandal emphasizing stable performance and no major issues, while COGconnected praised the polished experience and compatibility with force feedback steering wheels. On Xbox Series X, IGN Spain and MondoXbox highlighted smooth 60fps performance and high-resolution visuals, with Pure Xbox noting rapid event load times. These platforms generally received praise for their optimization and responsiveness, though some critics pointed to minor hiccups. However, technical issues plagued several platforms. On PS5, input delay on controllers (CGMagazine) and VR-specific bugs (PLAY! Zine, Gfinity) were notable, alongside cutscene glitches (Everyeye.it) and crashes (MeuPlayStation). The Games Machine and Push Square also cited visual glitches and instability. For PC, while stability was praised by Dexerto and Vandal, PC Gamer highlighted AI pacing issues in weather conditions, and SECTOR.sk criticized Origin’s limitations on community content. On Xbox Series X, XboxEra reported audio cuts and crashes requiring a day-one patch, while Generación Xbox noted AI bugs affecting gameplay. These problems, though varied, suggest that no platform was entirely free of technical flaws, with some critics emphasizing the need for post-launch fixes. Overall, the consensus among critics is that F1 22 delivers strong technical performance across all platforms, particularly in terms of frame rates and optimization, but faces challenges with bugs, AI behavior, and specific features like VR. While PS5 and Xbox Series X received praise for their stability and graphical fidelity (e.g., IGN Spain’s 60fps claims), PC users encountered mixed experiences, with some noting minor glitches (NME) or software limitations (SECTOR.sk). Despite these issues, the game’s technical foundation was widely acknowledged as solid, with many reviewers expecting patches to address lingering problems. The varied feedback underscores that while F1 22 is a technically impressive title, its execution on different platforms requires further refinement to fully meet expectations.

The overall sentiment regarding the replay value of F1 22 is mixed but leans toward positive, with many critics highlighting its diverse modes and customization options as key strengths. GamersRD praised the game’s "high replay value" through multiple gameplay modes, challenges, and features like F1 Life, driving supercars, and Pirelli Hot Lap challenges, while MeuPlayStation emphasized that "various modes and customization options [offer] significant replay value, especially for fans of Formula 1." IGN Brasil noted the game’s accessibility for both new and returning players due to its deep career mode and assist settings, and GameSpew highlighted the "highly customizable" career mode with events like Pirelli Hot Laps. Additionally, the inclusion of multiplayer options, online qualifiers, and Esports events (as mentioned by GamersRD) adds layers of engagement for competitive players. Critics like IGN Italia and The Games Machine also acknowledged the game’s immersive experience through scalable difficulty and special events, suggesting that dedicated fans will find plenty to explore. However, several critics pointed out significant drawbacks that limit long-term appeal. Atomix and CGMagazine both noted that casual players might find the game "boring after a few hours" or "lacking in content outside of career mode and online play." Gfinity criticized the lack of "significant changes" beyond VR (exclusive to PC) and the "floaty" supercars, while Hardcore Gamer and PlaySense argued that reduced features like classic cars and tracks, along with repetitive modes, could diminish replayability. The absence of a story mode (as noted by PC Gamer) and the presence of microtransactions (mentioned by PLAY! Zine) further detracted from the experience for some. Critics like GameByte and Vandal also highlighted that while core gameplay is engaging, the lack of "diverse content" or innovative modes left many feeling underwhelmed, particularly compared to previous entries in the series. The overall consensus among critics suggests that F1 22 offers moderate replay value for its target audience—Formula 1 enthusiasts and racing fans—but falls short for those seeking substantial new features or depth. While GamersRD, IGN Italia, and XboxEra celebrated the game’s variety of modes, customization, and competitive elements, others like Gfinity, Hardcore Gamer, and Vandal emphasized that the lack of innovation and reliance on familiar mechanics may not justify repeated play for all players. The game’s strengths lie in its accessibility, immersive career mode, and multiplayer options, but its limitations—such as repetitive content, missing features from prior installments (e.g., Braking Point), and a focus on gameplay over new modes—create a divide between casual and hardcore fans. Ultimately, F1 22 is seen as a solid entry for existing fans but one that may struggle to retain players without significant updates or additions in the future.