Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

Amazon

Xbox

Twitch

MONSTER

Dragon Ball: Xenoverse

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Dragon Ball: Xenoverse
Item: Dragon Ball: Xenoverse
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2015

GenresFantasy, Adventure, Action, Side View Perspective, RPG, Fighting, Anime and JRPG, Single Player, Multiplayer

AvailableFeb 24, 2015

PlatformPlayStation 4, Xbox One, PC

DeveloperDimps Corporation

Overview

Dragon Ball Xenoverse is the first installment of the Xenoverse series and the Dragon Ball game developed by Dimps. It is the first fighting game to feature full 3D battles similar to the Budokai Tenkaichi series. Fighters can traverse the levels free-roaming in large spaces and can fight on ground, in the air and underwater. The game features spoken dialogue from a majority of main characters while in battle, and characters show facial expressions when they strike an opponent or take damage. Although limited, the players have some freedom to explore the planet Earth as it exists in the Dragon Ball universe along with a handful of other locations.

Elsewhere

7.2

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Dragon Ball: Xenoverse dazzles with inventive time-travel twists and fan-service-packed lore interactions but falters by leaning too heavily on recycled tropes, offering a clever yet shallow experience that prioritizes nostalgia over original storytelling.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

13%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

78%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The story of Dragon Ball: Xenoverse is widely praised for its creative approach to engaging with Dragon Ball lore, offering fans a unique opportunity to interact with iconic moments in the franchise. Critics like COGconnected highlighted its fresh take on canon by allowing players to create their own characters and alter historical battles, while God is a Geek commended the "fresh and different" over-arching plot involving time travel and dream match-ups. Push Square noted the game’s clever use of alternate realities and reimagined events, balancing nostalgia with originality through "creative scenarios" and anime-style cutscenes. Additionally, GameOver.gr and PlaySense appreciated the personalized experience, where players influence key moments involving characters like Goku and Vegeta, making the narrative feel immersive for long-time fans. The game’s focus on time-travel mechanics and "what if?" scenarios also resonated with reviewers who valued its ability to reframe familiar arcs, as seen in Digitally Downloaded’s praise for reimagining Raditz’s defeat. However, several critics criticized the story for relying heavily on fan service at the expense of originality and narrative depth. Eurogamer Poland and GRYOnline.pl argued that the plot felt repetitive, recycling familiar Dragon Ball Z tropes without significant innovation, while IGN Spain noted the "relatively short" main storyline with only 12 missions. LevelUp described the narrative as "poco profundo" (not deep) but "diseñado de forma ingeniosa" (cleverly designed), highlighting its lack of emotional or thematic complexity. Arcade Sushi and PlayStation LifeStyle criticized the story’s reliance on prior knowledge of the series, calling it confusing for newcomers and reducing its accessibility. Additionally, Game Revolution and NZGamer pointed out that the plot often felt like a vehicle for "greatest hits" battles rather than a cohesive narrative, with some elements—like villain motivations—coming across as forced or underdeveloped. Overall, critics generally agreed that Xenoverse strikes a balance between fan service and creative experimentation, but its success hinges on prior familiarity with the Dragon Ball universe. While COGconnected and God is a Geek celebrated its innovative use of time-travel mechanics and fresh storytelling angles, many felt it failed to break free from the constraints of established lore. The consensus leans toward it being a satisfying experience for dedicated fans who appreciate its nostalgic nods and interactive approach to canon, but less impactful for newcomers or those seeking a more original narrative. As Eurogamer Poland and GRYOnline.pl noted, the game’s reliance on reenacting iconic moments and recycling plotlines ultimately limits its potential, despite its clever framework. For many, Xenoverse is a fun, if somewhat derivative, entry in the Dragon Ball series that prioritizes engagement over groundbreaking storytelling.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Dragon Ball: Xenoverse delivers flashy, customizable combat and RPG depth but falters with repetitive missions, clunky controls, and underwhelming AI, leaving a mixed legacy despite its fan-friendly core.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

31%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

66%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Dragon Ball: Xenoverse receives praise for its engaging combat mechanics and RPG elements, with many critics highlighting its accessibility and variety. Atomix notes that the combat is "functional and intuitive," featuring strategic 1v1 and cooperative battles, while COGconnected praises its "polished and fast-paced" nature with customizable skills and diverse battle modes. IGN Spain commends the blend of action and progression systems, emphasizing character creation, leveling up, and side missions. Dealspwn lauds the "fluid aerial battles" and responsive controls, describing the combat as "sensational," while PlaySense appreciates its resemblance to the Budokai series with skill-based combos and customization. The game’s focus on character development, mission variety, and team-based battles also earns nods from critics like Hobby Consolas and Push Square, who acknowledge its depth despite minor flaws. However, several critics point to repetitive mechanics and technical shortcomings that detract from the experience. Eurogamer Poland and GameOver.gr criticize the "repetitive" nature of missions and combat, with the latter calling the mechanics "outdated and simplistic." Metro GameCentral and God is a Geek highlight the lack of innovation, noting that combat feels "stale" compared to predecessors, while AI issues—such as poor decision-making in team-up scenarios (God is a Geek) or unresponsive allies (Hobby Consolas)—are frequently mentioned. Camera problems, clunky controls, and unbalanced multiplayer (Cheat Code Central) further undermine the experience. Additionally, reviewers like Arcade Sushi and Gameblog.fr criticize the "sloppy" combat and frustrating AI, while PlayStation Universe points to technical flaws in online modes and difficulty spikes that require strategic planning. Overall, critics agree that Xenoverse delivers a fun, accessible gameplay loop with strong RPG elements and dynamic combat, but its repetitive structure, technical issues, and lack of innovation limit its appeal. While positives like customization, mission variety, and fast-paced battles (noted by IGN Spain, Dealspwn, and COGconnected) are widely appreciated, the negatives—repetitive mechanics (Eurogamer Poland, GameOver.gr), control flaws (Hobby Consolas, GRYOnline.pl), and AI shortcomings (God is a Geek, Metro GameCentral)—create a mixed reception. The game’s blend of action and RPG systems is seen as promising but uneven, with many critics feeling it falls short of the depth and polish expected from a Dragon Ball title. Despite its flaws, the core combat remains engaging for fans of the franchise, though its shortcomings prevent it from achieving broader acclaim.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Praised for its anime-accurate cel-shaded visuals and dynamic action sequences, but plagued by technical flaws like poor textures, frame rate issues, and an outdated hub city, resulting in a mixed reception that balances creative ambition with graphical shortcomings.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

36%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

64%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of Dragon Ball: Xenoverse received praise for their faithful adaptation of the franchise’s iconic anime aesthetic, with many critics highlighting its cel-shaded style as a standout feature. Metro GameCentral commended the game for coming closest to an “interactive cartoon,” while ZTGD called it the “best-looking Dragon Ball Z game” with smooth performance and detailed character models. The art direction was consistently lauded for capturing the essence of the Dragon Ball universe, including vibrant environments like Toki Toki City, which GameOver.gr described as a “visually engaging world.” Additionally, CGMagazine and Twinfinite noted that the visuals effectively mirrored the anime’s dynamic action sequences, with expressive animations and semi-destructible backdrops adding to the experience. The character creation system also drew praise for its nods to the source material, as highlighted by Push Square, which emphasized the game’s consistency in style despite limited customization depth. However, several critics pointed out technical shortcomings that undermined the visual polish. Atomix criticized the game for “poor textures, subpar animations, and lackluster cinematics,” while COGconnected noted it “lagged behind current generation standards.” Eurogamer Poland and Hobby Consolas highlighted issues with texture quality, frame rate drops during intense action, and inconsistent environmental destruction effects. LevelUp and MondoXbox criticized camera mechanics, unresponsive targeting, and repetitive energy attack effects, while PlaySense and PlayStation LifeStyle found the hub city “outdated” and “barren,” lacking interactivity. Additionally, Arcade Sushi and Dealspwn noted that backgrounds often felt “outdated” or “bland,” with environments failing to match the vibrancy of the anime’s fight scenes. These technical limitations, particularly on older platforms like the PS3, created a mixed impression of the game’s graphical fidelity. Overall, critics generally agreed that Dragon Ball: Xenoverse struck a balance between honoring the franchise’s visual identity and falling short of next-gen expectations. While many praised its anime-accurate art style and dynamic action sequences—such as God is a Geek’s acknowledgment of “visually appealing aesthetics” and XGN’s praise for “sharp character models”—the technical execution remained a point of contention. The game’s visuals were seen as a step forward for the series but not without flaws, with some platforms experiencing more pronounced issues than others. Despite these drawbacks, the consensus leaned toward appreciation for its creative direction and effort to translate the Dragon Ball universe into an interactive format, even if it didn’t fully deliver on graphical ambition.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Dragon Ball: Xenoverse's sound design and music delivered nostalgic highs with energetic rock-metal themes and iconic callbacks, but technical flaws—like muddled mixing, missing audio, and jarring lip-sync—overshadowed its efforts, leaving critics underwhelmed by an ultimately forgettable audio experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

73%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

27%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of Dragon Ball: Xenoverse received a mix of praise for its nostalgic nods and energetic elements. Critics like God is a Geek highlighted the soundtrack’s "crazed" energy that aligns with the franchise’s expectations, while Hobby Consolas appreciated the rock-metal themes and the inclusion of the iconic Cha-La Head-Cha-La intro, which evoked nostalgia for long-time fans. LevelUp and Push Square both noted the presence of the 2013 movie’s version of Cha-La Head-Cha-La, a welcome touch for enthusiasts. Additionally, Attack of the Fanboy praised the voice actors’ energetic performances, particularly citing specific character callbacks like Nappa’s voice. These positives underscore the game’s effort to honor the series’ legacy through its audio elements, even if not all aspects were universally celebrated. However, several critics pointed out significant shortcomings in the sound design and music. GRYOnline.pl criticized the audio as "nijaka" (lackluster), while Worth Playing described the soundtrack as "flat and generic," with missing audio in key moments. Issues like poor sound mixing were frequently mentioned: Hobby Consolas noted dialogue was often drowned out during combat, and Attack of the Fanboy pointed out that conversations were too quiet, detracting from immersion. Push Square and Dealspwn both highlighted problems with lip-syncing in cutscenes and background music disappearing mid-battle, respectively. CGMagazine even raised suspicions about potential borrowed lobby music from Mario Party, though this remained unconfirmed. These critiques reveal a recurring theme of technical and creative underachievement in the audio department. Overall, the consensus among critics was mixed but leaned toward disappointment. While the game’s soundtrack occasionally delivered nostalgic or energetic moments—such as God is a Geek’s praise for its "crazed" energy and Hobby Consolas’ appreciation for rock-metal themes—the majority felt it fell short of expectations. The sound design faced consistent criticism for being forgettable, poorly mixed, or technically flawed, with Worth Playing and GRYOnline.pl leading the charge in pointing out its lackluster execution. Despite some positive notes on voice acting and nostalgic references, the audio elements were seen as a weak link, failing to elevate the experience beyond functional mediocrity. This suggests that while Xenoverse aimed to honor the Dragon Ball legacy, its sound design and music left much to be desired for many reviewers.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Bilingual voice options and iconic character performances win praise, but technical flaws, uneven delivery, and poor lip-sync plague the dubbing, making it a polarizing, fan-pleasing yet flawed experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

12%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

76%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

12%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in Dragon Ball: Xenoverse receives mixed but generally positive reception, particularly for its bilingual options and strong performances from key characters. Critics like Atomix and NZGamer highlight the availability of Japanese and English dubs, with some fans preferring the original Japanese voices for authenticity. Push Square praises the Japanese dub as a better experience, noting that it avoids the common issue of subpar English dubs in many games. Additionally, Hobby Consolas and Worth Playing commend the strong performances from main cast members like Goku and Vegeta, while Arcade Sushi appreciates the energetic delivery from the original Dragon Ball Z voice actors. The inclusion of unique features, such as Trunks’ DualShock 4 communication and Nappa’s cameo in custom characters, also adds to the appeal for fans. However, several critics criticize the voice acting for its technical flaws and inconsistent quality. PlayStation LifeStyle and XGN harshly condemn the English and Japanese dubs as among the worst they’ve encountered, with the former opting to play in mute due to poor delivery. Push Square points out that English dubs suffer from poor lip-syncing in cutscenes, while CGMagazine notes that much of the dialogue is presented as subtitles, diminishing the impact of vocal performances. Other issues include Arcade Sushi’s critique of weaker deliveries by supporting actors and the game’s failure to adapt voice lines to player gender choices. Dealspwn also mentions lip-sync problems in English dubs, further highlighting technical shortcomings that detract from immersion. Overall, the consensus reflects a divided reception. While many praise the bilingual options, strong performances from core characters, and fan-service elements, others find the voice acting technically flawed or unimpressive. Atomix, Push Square, and NZGamer emphasize the value of Japanese dubs and customization, whereas PlayStation LifeStyle and XGN express significant dissatisfaction. The game’s voice work appears to cater more to dedicated fans who prioritize authenticity over polish, but its technical inconsistencies and uneven quality prevent it from being universally acclaimed. Despite this, the presence of recognizable voices and fan-pleasing touches ensures that the voice acting remains a notable, if polarizing, aspect of the experience.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Dragon Ball: Xenoverse's tech is a patchwork of promise and pitfalls—stable core mechanics on PS4/Xbox One but plagued by online instability, glitchy controls, and design flaws; PC improved over time but faced early server chaos. While playable, its polish fell short, with updates offering partial fixes but not erasing persistent issues across platforms.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

96%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of Dragon Ball: Xenoverse across its platforms shows a mix of positives and persistent issues. On PS4, reviewers like PlaySense praised stable online multiplayer with no lag, while Push Square highlighted smooth matchmaking and minimal latency in combat. IGN Spain noted the hub world’s lack of agility but acknowledged no major technical bugs, and Hobby Consolas commended solid optimization despite minor frame-rate hiccups. For Xbox One, Dealspwn observed functional online servers post-launch and stable core mechanics, while New York Daily News emphasized playable gameplay despite matchmaking delays. On PC, Gameplanet reported improved server stability over time and smooth character animations, indicating some platform-specific improvements. These positives suggest the game’s technical foundation was generally sound, though not without flaws. However, technical challenges plagued all platforms. On PS4, Atomix and COGconnected criticized unstable online servers and connectivity issues, while Hobby Consolas and PlayStation Universe cited camera glitches, unresponsive controls, and inconsistent multiplayer stability. LevelUp and ZTGD highlighted design flaws like level regeneration and hub-world glitches, and GameOver.gr noted a lack of polish in mechanics. For Xbox One, Arcade Sushi and CGMagazine reported server crashes, respawning problems, and AI inconsistencies, while Digitally Downloaded and Twinfinite criticized tedious travel systems and clunky navigation. MondoXbox and Gameblog.fr pointed to underwhelming graphical fidelity and cross-gen development flaws, and Worth Playing mentioned camera glitches and enemy regeneration issues. These negatives reveal recurring problems with online infrastructure, control responsiveness, and optimization across platforms. Overall, critics generally agreed that Dragon Ball: Xenoverse suffered from technical shortcomings, particularly in online stability and design polish, but acknowledged its core mechanics were functional. PS4 and Xbox One shared similar issues like camera controls and AI behavior, while PC saw initial server instability improve over time. Despite these challenges, many reviewers noted that the game remained playable, with some platforms (like Xbox One) benefiting from post-launch patches (e.g., DarkStation’s positive update note). The consensus was that while technical flaws detracted from the experience, they were often mitigated by updates or overlooked in favor of the game’s creative depth. The mixed reception underscores the importance of ongoing support for cross-platform titles, as seen in the varied experiences across systems.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Dragon Ball: Xenoverse excels in customization, side content, and multiplayer but suffers from repetitive missions, grinding, and lackluster post-game polish, offering mixed replay value that leans toward fan service over innovation.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

17%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

79%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The replay value of Dragon Ball: Xenoverse is generally praised for its robust character customization, mission variety, and online multiplayer elements. Critics like COGconnected highlight the game’s substantial replayability through sidequests, Parallel Quests, and online modes, while IGN Spain notes 55 side missions and progression systems that encourage repeated playthroughs. Thunderbolt emphasizes that repetition of missions for rewards, cooperative play, and customization options provide significant incentive for fans. Additionally, Dealspwn and Digitally Downloaded commend the game’s extensive content, including Parallel Quests, multiplayer modes, and RPG progression systems, which create an MMORPG-like experience. The ability to influence story paths and explore multiple character builds, as mentioned by GameOver.gr, further enhances its appeal for dedicated fans of the franchise. However, several critics point out significant drawbacks that limit long-term engagement. Eurogamer Poland criticizes the repetitive mission structure and formulaic gameplay, while Cheat Code Central and God is a Geek note that multiplayer flaws and repetitive combat mechanics can deter players. The grind for leveling up, as highlighted by COGconnected, feels tedious, and Game Revolution and Twinfinite mention that the core loop may feel monotonous despite diverse missions. PlayStation Universe and XGN also point to a lack of post-game content and repetitive enemy types, which reduce the game’s longevity for some players. Additionally, technical issues like unstable servers (Atomix) and unnecessary hub city elements (PlaySense) further diminish the experience. Overall, the critics agree that Dragon Ball: Xenoverse offers moderate replay value, balancing strong customization, side content, and multiplayer options with repetitive gameplay and grind. While COGconnected, IGN Spain, and Dealspwn celebrate its depth and variety, others like Eurogamer Poland and XGN caution that the game’s reliance on familiar mechanics and lack of post-game innovation may limit its appeal. The consensus leans toward a mixed reception: it is engaging for fans who prioritize customization and Dragon Ball lore but less so for those seeking originality or sustained challenge. Despite these flaws, the game’s accessibility and fan service ensure it remains a worthwhile experience for dedicated players.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

26%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

73%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall sentiment toward Dragon Ball: Xenoverse is largely positive among fans, with critics praising its deep customization, creative storytelling, and nostalgic appeal. Many highlight its innovative RPG mechanics, such as character creation and time-travel narratives, which offer a fresh take on the Dragon Ball universe. IGN Spain calls it "one of the best Dragon Ball games in years," while GameOver.gr describes it as an "immersive, personalized journey" through the series' lore. The combat system is frequently lauded for its responsiveness and depth, with PlaySense noting its "strong gameplay reminiscent of classic Budokai titles." Additionally, critics like NZGamer and Metro GameCentral acknowledge its satisfying blend of RPG elements and familiar Dragon Ball mechanics, making it a standout entry for dedicated fans who appreciate its authenticity and creative freedom. However, the game faces significant criticism for its technical flaws, repetitive design, and underdeveloped systems. Multiple reviewers, including GRYOnline.pl and God is a Geek, point to "wasted potential" and a "repetitive story," while others like Arcade Sushi call it "disappointing" due to unmet expectations. Issues such as clunky online features, poor voice acting, and a steep learning curve for newcomers are recurring complaints. For instance, PlayStation Universe acknowledges "flaws in controls, technical performance, and pacing," while Hobby Consolas notes the "steep learning curve for newcomers." The game’s reliance on fan service over innovation also draws criticism, with XGN stating it "fails to deliver as the best Dragon Ball Z game" due to its focus on peripheral features. These shortcomings often overshadow its strengths, leaving some critics questioning its place in the franchise. Despite mixed reception, the consensus among reviewers is that Dragon Ball: Xenoverse is a solid, fan-focused title that succeeds as an ambitious experiment but falls short of perfection. While it excels in engaging fans with its creative freedom and nostalgic elements—as noted by COGconnected and Push Square—it struggles to balance innovation with polish. Critics like Gameplanet and Digitally Downloaded acknowledge its "significant step forward" for the series, even if technical issues and repetitive gameplay hinder its potential. Ultimately, the game is seen as a worthwhile experience for longtime fans but less accessible to newcomers, with many agreeing that it lays a foundation for future improvements rather than cementing itself as a definitive Dragon Ball title. The divide between praise for its creativity and criticism of its execution reflects a broader debate about its legacy within the franchise.

TL;DR

Dragon Ball: Xenoverse dazzles with inventive RPG mechanics, nostalgic depth, and responsive combat, hailed as a standout for fans. Yet, tech glitches, repetition, and underdeveloped systems tarnish its potential, leaving mixed reviews that praise its ambition but question its polish.

MONSTER

Reviews

85 reviews found

NZGamer

PlayStation 4

Mar 16, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Considered one of the best Dragon Ball games, combining RPG elements with familiar combat mechanics, offering a satisfying experience for fans.

Dealspwn

Xbox One

Mar 22, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A strong recommendation for its immersive storytelling, exceptional combat, and unique ability to let players become part of the Dragon Ball universe. While it has technical and design flaws, it's hailed as a significant step forward for anime-based games.

MondoXbox

Xbox One

Mar 11, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A positive experiment that successfully blends fighting game and RPG elements, offering a fresh take on the Dragon Ball universe. While not perfect, it lays a strong foundation for future titles.

Read full review

Attack of the Fanboy

Xbox One

Feb 25, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Dragon Ball Xenoverse is praised as a significant improvement for the series, with a fresh story and MMO-inspired features. However, flaws like camera issues and missing training modes prevent it from being perfect, making it a must-play for fans but a blueprint for future entries.

Read full review

Hobby Consolas

PlayStation 4

Feb 24, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Dragon Ball: Xenoverse is a mixed experience that excels in fan service with its deep customization, combat mechanics, and narrative freedom but struggles with technical flaws, camera issues, and a steep learning curve for newcomers. It appeals primarily to dedicated Dragon Ball enthusiasts.

Read full review

Cheat Code Central

PlayStation 4

Feb 25, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Dragon Ball: Xenoverse is a mixed experience that caters to fans with its homage to Dragon Ball lore and creative freedom but suffers from gameplay flaws, shallow storytelling, and technical shortcomings. It succeeds as a fan-driven project but falls short of being a polished fighting game.

Gameplanet

Mar 13, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Xenoverse is praised as the best Dragon Ball title in a while for fans, despite issues with online stability and a steep difficulty curve. It successfully blends fighting game elements with RPG mechanics.

Push Square

PlayStation 4

Feb 24, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A refreshing take on the Dragon Ball universe that prioritizes RPG elements over traditional fighting mechanics. It succeeds in offering accessible combat, customization, and online features but may disappoint fans seeking a conventional brawler.

Read full review

IGN Spain

PlayStation 4

Feb 24, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review praises Dragon Ball: Xenoverse as a significant evolution of the series, combining familiar elements with new RPG mechanics, and calls it one of the best Dragon Ball games in years despite minor flaws.

Read full review

COGconnected

PlayStation 4

Mar 6, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A well-received game for Dragon Ball fans despite its flaws, with praise for its innovative story approach, combat, and content, though technical issues and a grinding mechanic may deter some players.

Read full review