Ultros

The story of Ultros is widely praised for its abstract, thematic depth, and emphasis on exploration over conventional storytelling. Critics like GAMINGbible highlight its intentional vagueness, which encourages players to engage with themes of cycles, existential mystery, and personal growth without relying on explicit exposition. GamesRadar+ and MeuPlayStation commend the game’s surreal narrative elements, such as the "cosmic uterus" and psychedelic environments, which create an immersive, thought-provoking experience. Eurogamer Germany and Meristation note the game’s reliance on environmental storytelling and player interpretation, with fragments of lore revealed through exploration rather than direct dialogue. The focus on philosophical themes—life, death, mental health, and cosmic cycles—resonates strongly, as seen in Gamer.nl’s praise for its ethical dilemmas and GameGrin’s appreciation for its environmental care motifs. Many reviewers, including Eurogamer and Push Square, laud the game’s unique blend of cosmic horror, esotericism, and metaphysical reflection, which rewards players who embrace ambiguity. However, several critics find the narrative overly opaque or frustratingly inaccessible. COGconnected and Checkpoint Gaming criticize the story as pretentious and confusing, with GameSpew and New Game Network noting that the lack of direction leads to player frustration. Hooked Gamers and God is a Geek argue that the narrative’s "obtuse" structure and disjointed clues fail to coalesce into a coherent whole, while IGN France and Everyeye.it acknowledge the difficulty in grasping its dense lore and abstract concepts. TRG and Hey Poor Player mention that the plot’s reliance on time loops and cryptic mechanics can feel unsatisfying without clear objectives. Even XboxEra and Noisy Pixel, who appreciate the game’s surreal tone, admit the story’s minimalism and lack of traditional progression may alienate players seeking a more linear or explanatory narrative. Overall, critics agree that Ultros prioritizes atmosphere, thematic resonance, and player interpretation over a straightforward plot, creating a polarizing but distinctive experience. While GAMINGbible, GamesRadar+, and MeuPlayStation celebrate its ambition and creativity, others like COGconnected and Checkpoint Gaming find it frustratingly impenetrable. The consensus leans toward the narrative being a double-edged sword: a bold, philosophical exploration that rewards patience and introspection but risks alienating those craving clarity or traditional storytelling. As Eurogamer and Push Square note, the game’s strength lies in its ability to provoke reflection through ambiguity, even if it leaves many questions unanswered.

The gameplay of Ultros is widely praised for its innovative fusion of metroidvania exploration with unique mechanics like gardening, time loops, and roguelike elements. Critics highlight the game’s creative systems, such as the gardening mechanic that allows players to cultivate plants for traversal and progression (GameGrin, Jeuxvideo.com), and the time-loop system where progress resets but upgrades persist across cycles (Hey Poor Player, Vandal). The Extractor drone and nutrient-based upgrade system are also lauded for adding strategic depth (Eurogamer, Hobby Consolas), while the combination of platforming, combat, and puzzle-solving creates a dynamic experience. Many reviewers, including GameSpot and TheXboxHub, commend the game’s emphasis on exploration and adaptive difficulty, with some noting that its cyclical progression and skill tree evolution encourage creative play. The combat, though simple, is praised for its rhythmic satisfaction (Eurogamer Germany, GameOver.gr), and the plant-based traversal offers a fresh twist on traditional metroidvania design. However, several critics point to technical and design flaws that detract from the experience. Issues with combat precision and movement are recurring complaints, with GAMINGbible and Shacknews noting sluggish controls and imprecise mechanics that clash with the game’s fast-paced elements. The time-loop system, while innovative, is criticized for causing frustration due to repeated resets of abilities (Malditos Nerds, Everyeye.it), and some find the lack of guidance and unclear visual design challenging (Digital Trends, MeuPlayStation). Additionally, backtracking and pacing issues are highlighted as drawbacks (PlayStation Universe, Digital Trends), while others like COGconnected and New Game Network argue that combat lacks depth compared to other titles. The gardening mechanic, though praised for its originality, is occasionally described as cumbersome or overly complex (Pure Nintendo, Voxel). Overall, the critics agree that Ultros is a bold experiment in blending metroidvania with roguelike and gardening mechanics, offering a unique but polarizing experience. While many praise its originality and exploration-driven design (IGN France, GameGrin), others feel its technical shortcomings and unpolished systems hinder its potential. The game’s cyclical progression and creative mechanics are seen as its strongest suits, but the combat polish and control responsiveness remain contentious. As Eurogamer and GameSpot note, Ultros succeeds in pushing boundaries but struggles to balance innovation with refinement, leaving players divided between admiration for its ambition and frustration with its execution.

The graphics and visual design of Ultros are widely celebrated for their vibrant, psychedelic, and immersive qualities, with critics consistently highlighting its artistic ambition and creativity. Multiple reviewers praised the game’s hand-drawn, surreal environments, which blend organic, biomechanical, and cosmic elements into a cohesive yet otherworldly aesthetic. But Why Tho? described the environmental design as “breathtaking and psychedelic,” while Checkpoint Gaming noted the “gorgeous cosmic-colored art style” that aligns with the game’s mysterious, time-bending themes. Eurogamer praised the “vibrant, surreal 2D environments” inspired by 1980s indie comics, and GameSpot highlighted the “biomechanical designs” and distinct biomes like a “space spa” or “neon-lit game show.” The art style’s influence from artists like Niklas Åkerblad (referred to as “El Huervo”) and French artist Moebius was frequently cited, with critics like GamesRadar+ and IGN France emphasizing its dreamlike, immersive atmosphere. Many also noted the attention to detail in animations, environmental storytelling, and the game’s ability to transport players into a unique alien world. Despite these accolades, several critics pointed out challenges related to visual clarity and accessibility. COGconnected and Digital Chumps both mentioned that the “abundance of colors and visual energy” could make it difficult to distinguish important elements, with some areas feeling overwhelming or confusing. Jeuxvideo.com and PC Gamer noted that intricate backgrounds sometimes hindered readability during gameplay, while Hooked Gamers warned that “black shadows can blend foreground and background.” God is a Geek critiqued the game for prioritizing style over substance in certain sections, calling out repetitive design and visual tedium from backtracking. Additionally, Meristation pointed to limited character animations as a minor drawback. These issues, while not universal, suggest that the game’s bold aesthetic occasionally sacrifices practicality for artistic expression, though many reviewers acknowledged accessibility options (like background blurring or color adjustments) as helpful mitigations. Overall, the consensus among critics is overwhelmingly positive, with Ultros being lauded as a visual standout in modern gaming. The majority of reviews emphasized its unique art direction, vibrant color palettes, and immersive world-building, with many calling it a “masterpiece” or “feast for the eyes.” Critics like Siliconera and Push Square highlighted the game’s ability to balance surreal creativity with cohesive design, while others, such as GameGrin and TheXboxHub, praised its ability to evoke a sense of wonder. Even when acknowledging flaws—such as readability issues or repetitive sections—the general sentiment was that Ultros’s visual design is a defining strength that elevates its experience. As IGN France noted, the art direction “maintains clarity and differentiation between zones,” while Vandal emphasized that accessibility features helped address potential drawbacks. For most reviewers, Ultros represents a bold, artistic achievement that prioritizes visual innovation over conventional polish, earning it widespread acclaim as one of the most visually striking games of its kind.

The sound design and music of Ultros have been overwhelmingly praised by critics, with many highlighting their ability to elevate the game’s atmosphere and thematic depth. Reviewers consistently lauded the eclectic fusion of musical influences, such as But Why Tho?’s mention of a “brilliant score combining Swedish and Peruvian music” that enhances introspection and boss battles, or Checkpoint Gaming’s admiration for Oscar Rydelius’ “atmospheric” use of Amazonian sounds to mirror the game’s themes of regeneration. The soundtrack’s dreamlike and surreal qualities were frequently noted, with Digital Trends calling it “positively hypnotic” and PC Gamer praising its “ambient ragas with shimmering violins” that create a mystical atmosphere. Others, like GameGrin, highlighted the relaxing, exploratory vibe of the music, while Multiplayer.it and Jeuxvideo.com emphasized how classical and South American elements, or diverse soundscapes, respectively, enriched the game’s immersive experience. The work of composers like El Huervo (Digital Trends) and Oscar Rydelius (Everyeye.it) was particularly celebrated for their ability to blend organic and electronic textures, creating a cohesive yet unconventional auditory identity. While the majority of critiques were positive, some reviewers pointed to minor shortcomings. Softpedia noted that combat sounds felt underwhelming due to repetitive blade swooshes, and Vandal remarked that the music “was not as impactful as the visual design,” though it still complemented the atmosphere. Additionally, several reviews provided only brief or general praise without delving into specific details—such as GameSpew’s vague mention of a “neat soundtrack” or GAMINGbible’s single-line commendation of “top-notch sound design.” These critiques suggest that while the audio elements were largely effective, they occasionally lacked the depth or variety to fully stand out in every context. However, these points were relatively minor compared to the widespread acclaim for the score’s creativity and integration with the game’s themes. Overall, critics overwhelmingly agreed that Ultros’ sound design and music were a standout feature, contributing significantly to its immersive and surreal experience. The consensus emphasized the composers’ ability to craft an auditory landscape that mirrored the game’s psychedelic, mysterious, and introspective tone. From the “dreamy, doomy atmosphere” praised by Eurogamer to the “emotional depth” highlighted by The Games Machine, the soundtrack was seen as integral to the game’s identity. Even critics who noted minor flaws acknowledged its effectiveness in enhancing the overall experience, with Siliconera calling it “complementary to the game’s aesthetic” and TheXboxHub describing it as “magical and ethereal.” Despite some variations in detail, the collective sentiment underscores that Ultros’ audio design was a critical success, blending innovation with thematic coherence to create a memorable auditory journey.

Summary unavailable

The technical performance of Ultros varies across platforms, with notable positives highlighted by several reviewers. On PC, GameGrin praised the smooth controls and gameplay experience, particularly with an Xbox controller, while Try Hard Guides acknowledged the game’s responsiveness despite some polish issues. For PS5, MeuPlayStation noted seamless 60 FPS performance with no crashes, and The Games Machine commended its optimization and stability across platforms. TierraGamer emphasized the “technically impressive” controls on PS5, enhancing agility and control. On Nintendo Switch, XboxEra mentioned stable frame rates on Xbox Series X despite minor tearing in larger rooms, while Pure Nintendo acknowledged the Switch version’s technical shortcomings but didn’t outright dismiss its performance. Overall, PS5 and PC received more consistent praise for their stability and polish compared to other platforms. However, several technical issues were reported across platforms. On PC, Digital Trends criticized frustrating bugs like fragile walls failing to break properly and sticky wall jumps, while Shacknews described movement mechanics as “loose,” and Try Hard Guides highlighted awkward platforming and a buggy boss fight. For PS5, IGN France warned of accidental soft-locks due to experimental mechanics, and Malditos Nerds pointed to control issues like conflicting button assignments. Push Square and TechRadar Gaming noted janky moments and finicky tools, such as the extractor’s unreliable use. On Switch, Pure Nintendo cited lengthy load times and inconsistent jumping, while XboxEra mentioned tearing in larger rooms on Xbox Series X despite stable frame rates. These issues collectively suggest that technical polish remains a work in progress across all platforms. The overall consensus among critics is that Ultros has strong foundational performance but suffers from platform-specific bugs and inconsistencies. While PS5 and PC versions generally run smoothly, with MeuPlayStation and GameGrin highlighting stability and control, issues like soft-locks, input errors, and awkward mechanics persist. The Switch version faces notable challenges with load times and jumping mechanics, while Xbox Series X’s tearing issues detract from its otherwise stable performance. Despite these flaws, many reviewers acknowledged the game’s potential, with The Games Machine praising its optimization and TierraGamer celebrating its responsive controls. Ultimately, Ultros demonstrates technical promise but requires refinement to fully deliver on its gameplay vision across all platforms.

The majority of critics highlight Ultros’ Replay Value through its innovative mechanics and structured design. Critics like Checkpoint Gaming and Eurogamer emphasize the game’s unique "gardenvanias" sub-genre and time-loop mechanics, which encourage experimentation with seed placement and environmental changes across multiple playthroughs. GameSpot and Shacknews note that cyclical progression, varied biomes, and optional objectives create incentives for revisiting areas, while Multiplayer.it points to three distinct endings based on player choices. The roguelike elements, such as persistent skill retention (God is a Geek) and procedural level generation (The Games Machine), further enhance replayability by offering fresh challenges and strategic depth. Additionally, Digital Chumps and GameGrin praise the loop system’s ability to foster exploration and experimentation, with some critics like Gamer.nl highlighting multiple playstyles (destructive vs. creative) that add variety. However, several reviewers caution that Ultros’ Replay Value is tempered by repetitive mechanics and design flaws. Hey Poor Player criticizes the time-loop mechanic as a "painful slog" due to lost abilities and monotonous backtracking, while Jeuxvideo.com and New Game Network note that static environments and lack of variation can lead to burnout. Digital Trends and Eurogamer Germany mention confusing gardening mechanics and unclear systems, which may frustrate players seeking deeper engagement. God is a Geek also points out that the game’s reliance on memorization and minimal new content per run could limit long-term appeal, despite some progression systems like Memory Locks (as noted by Noisy Pixel) offering incremental rewards. These critiques suggest that while the game’s structure supports multiple playthroughs, its execution may not fully satisfy all players. Overall, critics agree that Ultros offers moderate to strong Replay Value, driven by its creative mechanics and exploration incentives, but with notable caveats. While IGN France and Malditos Nerds praise the game’s potential for uncovering hidden secrets and varied endings, others like New Game Network and Jeuxvideo.com warn that repetition and unclear design could deter some players. The consensus leans toward a balanced assessment: the game’s unique systems and strategic depth make it worth revisiting for many, but its flaws—such as repetitive loops and combat issues—may limit its appeal to a broader audience. As TheXboxHub notes, despite frustrations, the game’s lingering intrigue and personalization options suggest it will resonate with players seeking a challenging, exploratory experience.