Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

MONSTER

Star Trek: Resurgence

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Star Trek: Resurgence
Item: Star Trek: Resurgence
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2023

GenresAdventure, Action, Science Fiction and Futuristic, Third Person Perspective, Single Player

AvailableMay 23, 2023

PlatformXbox Series X, PC, PlayStation 4, PlayStation 5, Xbox One

DeveloperDramatic Labs

Overview

Star Trek: Resurgence is an interactive narrative video game that tells an original story in a choice-driven adventure set within the iconic sci-fi universe

Elsewhere

8.2

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Star Trek: Resurgence earns overwhelming praise for its authentic, emotionally resonant narrative that captures Star Trek’s spirit through diplomacy, moral complexity, and character depth—though plot recycling, clunky mechanics, and an unsatisfying ending slightly mar its otherwise stellar execution.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

86%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

14%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The majority of critics praised Star Trek: Resurgence for its faithful adherence to the spirit of the franchise, highlighting its engaging narrative structure and thematic depth. Reviewers like But Why Tho? and Eurogamer Germany emphasized that the story feels authentically "plucked from a Star Trek episode," with diplomatic conflicts, moral dilemmas, and character-driven moments reminiscent of The Next Generation. The game’s focus on interpersonal relationships, as noted by Gaming Nexus, and its exploration of complex themes like diplomacy and conflict resolution resonated strongly. Critics such as RPG Site and Adventure Gamers lauded the narrative’s intrigue, with choices that shape the story and character dynamics, while TheXboxHub and VG247 appreciated the evolving relationships between characters. The game’s ability to balance classic Trek elements—such as peace talks, phaser battles, and ethical quandaries—with fresh storytelling was a recurring highlight, making it feel like a "true Star Trek adventure" (Gaming Nexus) or a "quintessential Star Trek" experience (Screen Rant). While the story was widely acclaimed, some critics pointed to minor flaws. SECTOR.sk noted that the plot draws heavily from lesser-known TNG episodes, lacking originality in its approach, while VG247 questioned the necessity of Spock’s inclusion, calling it an "unnecessary" element. Additionally, GameStar criticized the narrative’s ending as "unsatisfying," and Game Rant highlighted that clunky gameplay mechanics and outdated systems detracted from the experience. A few reviewers, like Adventure Game Hotspot, mentioned that while the story’s conclusion was satisfying, its denouement felt "a bit cold." These critiques, however, were relatively isolated compared to the overwhelming praise for the narrative’s depth and emotional resonance. Overall, the consensus among critics was overwhelmingly positive, with nearly all agreeing that Star Trek: Resurgence delivers a compelling, franchise-appropriate story. The game’s ability to capture the essence of Star Trek—through its focus on diplomacy, moral complexity, and character development—was universally praised. RPG Fan and We Got This Covered highlighted its emotional impact and believable characters, while PC Gamer and Wccftech celebrated its blend of humor, drama, and philosophical themes. Though some critiques about originality and gameplay surfaced, they did not overshadow the narrative’s strengths. As But Why Tho? noted, the story feels like a natural extension of the TNG era, and this authenticity, paired with engaging choices and twists, solidified Resurgence as a standout entry in the Star Trek canon.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Star Trek: Resurgence delivers a bold, story-first adventure with rich decision-making and Star Trek authenticity, but clunky mechanics, overreliance on QTEs, and tedious gameplay undermine its potential, leaving fans divided between immersive narrative and frustrating execution.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

11%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

75%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

14%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Star Trek: Resurgence is largely praised for its narrative-driven approach and emphasis on decision-making, which many critics highlight as a strong suit. Reviewers like IGN and TheXboxHub commend the game’s variety of activities, including shuttle flying, phaser combat, and puzzle-solving, which they argue align well with the Star Trek universe. The choice-and-consequence system is frequently lauded for its impact on character relationships and story progression, with But Why Tho? noting that decisions “have significant consequences” despite other flaws. Adventure Gamers and Shacknews also appreciate the blend of point-and-click mechanics, stealth sequences, and dialogue choices, framing it as a natural evolution of adventure game tropes. The ability to switch between characters and engage in interactive storytelling is seen as a refreshing element by several critics, including Gamereactor Finland, who emphasize its “varied” gameplay experience. However, the gameplay faces significant criticism for its technical shortcomings and repetitive mechanics. Multiple reviewers, such as But Why Tho? and XboxAddict, lambaste the overuse of quick-time events (QTEs), which they describe as “slow,” “clumsy,” and disruptive to immersion. RPG Site and PC Gamer highlight stiff controls, janky combat, and unresponsive stealth sections, with God is a Geek calling the engineering segments “tedious” and GameStar dismissing the gameplay as “laughably bad.” The phaser combat and shuttle-flying mechanics are particularly criticized for being simplistic or frustratingly clunky, while VG247 and COGconnected note that the Telltale-style formula feels outdated. Additionally, Adventure Game Hotspot and Siliconera criticize the lack of meaningful interactivity, with puzzles and exploration often deemed “dull” or unnecessary. Despite these flaws, the overall consensus among critics is that Star Trek: Resurgence is a polarizing experience, leaning heavily on its narrative strengths while struggling with gameplay execution. While IGN and TheXboxHub acknowledge its ambition in blending adventure mechanics with Star Trek lore, many reviewers—such as PC Gamer, GameStar, and We Got This Covered—argue that the technical issues and repetitive design undermine its potential. The game’s reliance on QTEs, clunky controls, and minimal exploration divides opinions, with some (like Noisy Pixel) finding it “immersive and fun” and others (like Destructoid and Game Rant) calling it “tedious and outdated.” Ultimately, the gameplay is seen as a mixed bag: a story-focused title that appeals to fans of narrative-driven experiences but falters in delivering smooth, engaging mechanics.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Mixed reviews: Star Trek: Resurgence nails nostalgic charm and thematic consistency with its artful design, evoking the 24th century through detailed environments and comic book-style visuals, but technical flaws—blocky models, stiff animations, outdated textures—hold it back, making it a stylistic but inconsistent experience that prioritizes heart over polish.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

83%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

10%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of Star Trek: Resurgence receive mixed but generally positive feedback, with several critics praising its stylistic approach and attention to Star Trek’s iconic aesthetic. But Why Tho? acknowledges the game’s “look and feel of a mobile game” but appreciates its ability to evoke the 24th century through detailed environments and character designs, even if it falls short of leveraging Unreal Engine 5’s full potential. VG247 highlights the USS Resolute’s design as a standout, noting that while visuals are below AAA standards, they “capture the essence of Star Trek.” ZTGD praises the comic book-style visuals for their nostalgic appeal and immersive atmosphere, while TheXboxHub commends the “beautiful space vistas” and “amazing facial expressions.” RPG Site also lauds the “stellar art design from start to finish,” emphasizing that the game’s visuals, though not cutting-edge, effectively serve its narrative and thematic goals. However, several critics point to technical shortcomings and a lack of polish that detract from the experience. Gamereactor Finland calls the graphics “outdated and simplistic,” citing blocky models and stiff animations, while God is a Geek compares character models to Mass Effect: Andromeda, criticizing their “wooden” movements and uniformity. PC Gamer notes a “last-gen look” with low-quality textures and awkward animations, and Siliconera highlights issues like lighting that makes models appear “dull or washed out.” Destructoid mentions “blurry faces” and “lack of detail in character models,” while Adventure Gamers points to frame rate dips and environments that feel “not up to modern standards.” Many also note repetitive or copy-paste assets, with Stevivor criticizing “janky animations and copy/paste models,” and COGconnected describing the visuals as “serviceable but not impressive.” These flaws often clash with the game’s ambition to evoke a rich Star Trek universe. Overall, critics agree that Star Trek: Resurgence prioritizes style and thematic consistency over technical polish, resulting in a visual identity that resonates with fans despite its limitations. While some praise its nostalgic charm and attention to detail—such as ZTGD’s “attention to detail” and RPG Site’s “stellar art design”—others argue it fails to meet modern expectations for graphical fidelity. The consensus leans toward a middle ground: the game’s visuals are adequate for its narrative-driven approach but suffer from technical inconsistencies and dated aesthetics. As But Why Tho? notes, the art direction is “ok to tell a Star Trek story in a stylistic way,” even if it doesn’t fully capitalize on the power of Unreal Engine 5. Ultimately, while not a visual standout, Resurgence succeeds in capturing the spirit of Star Trek through its design choices, even if those choices come with trade-offs.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Star Trek: Resurgence’s sound design earns praise for stellar voice acting, nostalgic scores, and authentic Star Trek ambiance, but technical flaws like clunky audio mixing, repetitive dialogue, and subpar music undermine its potential—resulting in a mixed legacy that leans more on heartfelt homage than flawless execution.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

50%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

38%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

13%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of Star Trek: Resurgence received generally positive feedback from several reviewers, particularly praising the voice acting and atmospheric elements. Critics like IGN highlighted the "excellent" voice acting, especially noting Piotr Michael’s standout performance as Ambassador Spock, while XboxAddict praised the "wonderful" score reminiscent of the show’s legacy. ZTGD commended the "sweeping musical score" that enhanced the game’s sense of wonder, and Adventure Game Hotspot appreciated how the music was "well-integrated into each scene." The sound design also drew praise for its authenticity, with KeenGamer noting the "authentic" use of original series sound effects and the iconic theme song. Noisy Pixel and RPG Fan similarly lauded the immersive audio direction, emphasizing how it effectively recreated the Star Trek universe’s sonic identity. However, several critics pointed out significant technical issues that detracted from the experience. Gaming Nexus, Stevivor, and TheXboxHub reported problems like dialogue clipping, missing sound effects, and inconsistent audio levels, while PC Gamer criticized the soundtrack as "disappointing," comparing it to low-quality MIDI tracks rather than the orchestral scores typical of Star Trek. Siliconera and We Got This Covered highlighted recurring bugs, such as repeated lines and skipped dialogue, which disrupted immersion. Wccftech noted that while voice acting was strong, "audio issues" were obtrusive, and Destructoid mentioned "repeated dialogue" and missing subtitles. These technical flaws, though not universal, created a mixed impression of the game’s audio quality. The overall consensus among critics is one of cautious optimism, with praise for the voice acting and nostalgic sound design outweighing some technical shortcomings. While many reviewers, including IGN, XboxAddict, and Adventure Gamers, celebrated the immersive audio elements that honored the Star Trek legacy, others like PC Gamer and Siliconera emphasized that the music and sound effects fell short of expectations. The game’s audio remains a mixed bag: strong performances and atmospheric design elevate it for fans, but persistent technical issues—particularly in sound mixing and consistency—prevent it from fully realizing its potential. Despite these flaws, the voice acting and nostalgic touches suggest that Star Trek: Resurgence succeeds as a love letter to the franchise, even if its audio execution is occasionally uneven.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Star Trek: Resurgence’s voice acting is a masterclass in immersion, with critics hailing its authenticity, emotional depth, and faithful portrayals—especially Piotr Michael’s Spock and Krizia Bajos’ Uhura—as instant classics. While minor gripes about pacing and gravitas surfaced, the ensemble’s brilliance overshadows flaws, making it a narrative cornerstone that feels like a genuine Trek episode.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

79%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

13%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in Star Trek: Resurgence is widely praised for its quality and immersion, with numerous critics highlighting its strengths. GameGrin noted that the performances are "great overall," while Gaming Nexus lauded the "strong" delivery, particularly emphasizing Spock’s portrayal. RPG Site commended the lack of awkward direction, stating characters "consistently charmed" them, and SECTOR.sk praised the "excellent" depth of main characters despite some deviations from original actors. Stevivor and TheXboxHub celebrated the authenticity of lines, with the latter noting that "each line delivered feeling real." Notable standouts include Piotr Michael’s portrayal of Ambassador Spock, repeatedly highlighted as "remarkably similar to Leonard Nimoy" (RPG Fan) and "fantastic" (ZTGD), while Krizia Bajos and Josh Keaton received specific acclaim for their roles. Adventure Gamers and IGN praised the cast’s ability to bring well-written characters to life, with IGN calling the entire ensemble "strong" and "excellent." These reviews underscore a consensus that the voice acting elevates the game’s narrative and emotional resonance. However, some critics pointed to minor flaws. VG247 criticized Spock’s performance for lacking "gravitas," while Gamereactor UK found the voice acting "stiff and lacking emotion," though they acknowledged well-written characters. Siliconera noted technical issues, such as lines being cut short due to repetition of the first few words. These critiques were relatively isolated, with most reviewers focusing on positives rather than negatives. While a handful of voices pointed to inconsistencies or emotional shortcomings, these concerns did not overshadow the overall praise for the voice work’s authenticity and craftsmanship. The majority of critics overwhelmingly praised Star Trek: Resurgence’s voice acting, framing it as a standout feature that enhances the game’s storytelling and fidelity to the Star Trek universe. Reviews from IGN, New Game Network, and Wccftech emphasized the "exceptional" performances, with specific nods to Piotr Michael, Krizia Bajos, and Josh Keaton. Even critics who mentioned minor issues, like VG247 or Gamereactor UK, acknowledged broader strengths in character delivery or writing. The consensus reflects that the voice acting not only meets but exceeds expectations for a narrative-driven game, with many calling it "the standout best feature" (New Game Network) and a key factor in making the experience feel like an authentic Star Trek episode. While no performance was flawless, the collective praise underscores its significance in the game’s success.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Star Trek: Resurgence stumbles under a mountain of technical bugs, with Xbox Series X offering smoother play despite glitches, while PC and PS4/PS5 versions face crashes, broken controls, and unplayable hiccups—highlighting a fragile foundation that needs urgent fixes.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

54%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

46%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of Star Trek: Resurgence varies significantly across platforms, with some reviewers highlighting commendable aspects despite notable flaws. On Xbox Series X, Eurogamer Germany and Gamereactor Finland praised the game’s smooth performance, noting minimal loading times and no major issues that disrupt gameplay. TheXboxHub acknowledged minor "niggles" like jankiness and glitches but suggested they could be resolved via patches, while Adventure Gamers on PC observed only "minor flaws" in presentation that didn’t detract from the experience. These positives indicate that the game runs relatively well on Xbox Series X and PC, with some critics emphasizing its potential for improvement through updates. However, the negatives are more pronounced across all platforms. On Xbox Series X, GameGrin criticized graphical glitches, inconsistent controls, and missing subtitles, while Gaming Nexus described the technical execution as "rough" with bugs impacting gameplay. SECTOR.sk noted frame drops and awkward animations, and RPG Site highlighted bugs that could lock players out of critical functions. On PC, the issues were more severe: GameStar reported crashes every two hours, PC Gamer cited a lack of accessibility options, and MMORPG.com criticized "significant technical issues" like frequent crashes. For PS4 and PS5, critics like RPG Fan and Destructoid pointed to graphical hiccups, audio glitches, and repeated dialogue, with We Got This Covered calling the PS4 version "a mountain of bugs." These challenges suggest that the game’s technical foundation is fragile, particularly on PC and older consoles. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Star Trek: Resurgence suffers from a lack of polish and stability across all platforms, though some reviewers found it playable despite its flaws. While Xbox Series X received relatively more positive feedback (e.g., Eurogamer Germany’s "good" performance), PC and PS4/PS5 versions faced more severe issues, with critics like GameStar and MMORPG.com calling them "unplayable" at times. The game’s technical shortcomings—ranging from bugs to control inconsistencies—are widely acknowledged, but there is a shared hope that future patches might address these problems. Despite the criticism, some reviewers, such as Adventure Gamers and Noisy Pixel, noted that many issues are "potentially patchable," suggesting that the core experience could improve with time. However, the lack of consistency in performance across platforms highlights a significant barrier to enjoyment for many players.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Choice-driven mechanics boost replayability through branching narratives and character dynamics, but structural flaws like no chapter-select and shallow decisions undermine potential, leaving mixed praise for dedicated fans.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

25%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

60%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

15%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The reviewers generally highlight the game’s choice-driven mechanics as a significant positive for replay value. GameGrin notes that decisions influence character perceptions, while Gamereactor Finland and Gaming Nexus emphasize how dialogue options create curiosity about their impact on the story. XboxAddict and KeenGamer explicitly mention the appeal of exploring different outcomes through alternate choices, and RPG Fan praises the narrative duality offered by varying character perspectives. Adventure Gamers and Adventure Game Hotspot also acknowledge that dialogue choices lead to distinct progressions and endings, with some critics like TheXboxHub pointing out that dying allows retries or story mode exploration. These points collectively suggest that the game’s decision-making system provides a foundation for replayability, particularly for players interested in character dynamics and branching narratives. However, several critics point to limitations that detract from replay value. Stevivor and TheXboxHub criticize the absence of a chapter-select feature, making it tedious to revisit specific choices without restarting the entire game. Adventure Game Hotspot and IGN note that the lack of this feature forces players to begin anew, while PC Gamer highlights the linear story structure and minimal impactful decisions. MMORPG.com argues that choices often fail to alter the overall narrative significantly, and New Game Network mentions superficial decision-making, with some options feeling pointless or even buggy. Destructoid further criticizes the slow progress and lack of chapter select as barriers to revisiting alternate paths. These critiques underscore technical and design flaws that diminish the game’s replayability despite its narrative ambitions. The overall consensus among critics is mixed but leans toward acknowledging the game’s potential for replayability through its decision-making system, tempered by structural limitations. While many praise the meaningful character interactions and branching storylines—particularly in arcs involving Jara and her crew (as noted by New Game Network and RPG Fan)—others like PC Gamer and MMORPG.com argue that these choices rarely reshape the core narrative. The absence of a chapter-select feature, highlighted by multiple reviewers including Stevivor and Destructoid, remains a critical drawback. Despite this, several critics, such as XboxAddict and KeenGamer, express interest in replaying the game to explore alternative outcomes, suggesting that the story’s engagement and character depth may still justify repeated playthroughs for dedicated fans.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

29%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

69%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall sentiment among reviewers highlights Star Trek: Resurgence as a narrative-driven experience that successfully captures the essence of the Star Trek universe, particularly appealing to fans of the franchise. Critics like Eurogamer Germany and TheXboxHub praise its "classic Trek story" and immersive gameplay, with TheXboxHub even calling it the "best evolution of the point-and-click genre." Many emphasize the game’s strong storytelling, character development, and dedication to the Star Trek ethos, such as Adventure Gamers’ assertion that it “recaptures the essence of the franchise” and RPG Site’s note that its “characters and story make it worth playing.” The game’s focus on dialogue-heavy adventures and episodic structure resonates with fans, with Gaming Nexus highlighting its “engaging story and strong performances,” while IGN acknowledges its “dialogue-heavy approach” as a key strength. These positives suggest the game succeeds in delivering a heartfelt, fan-service-oriented experience that feels authentic to Star Trek’s legacy. However, technical and gameplay flaws are consistently cited as major drawbacks. Multiple critics, including VG247 and MMORPG.com, point out issues like “bugs,” “graphical hiccups,” and “tedious gameplay,” while Siliconera and We Got This Covered criticize the game for being “marred by bugs” and “poor visuals.” Others, such as GameStar and Gamereactor UK, note that decisions feel “unchallenging” or “forgettable,” and Destructoid mentions “graphical and audio issues.” The gameplay mechanics also face criticism: PC Gamer notes “gameplay and technical shortcomings,” while Game Rant calls the puzzles “tedious” and controls “clunky.” Despite these flaws, many reviewers acknowledge that the narrative and characters outweigh these issues, with ZTGD stating they “loved every moment of their time with the game” despite its gameplay problems. The consensus is that while the game isn’t without its technical shortcomings, its core strengths lie in its storytelling and thematic fidelity. The overall consensus among critics is largely positive, with most agreeing that Star Trek: Resurgence is a worthwhile experience for fans of the franchise, even if it falls short in polish and gameplay. While some reviewers, like RPG Fan and Adventure Game Hotspot, note that the game “suffers from technical issues” or “slow gameplay,” the majority emphasize its narrative depth and emotional resonance. For instance, XboxAddict gives it a 7.7/10, calling it “a solid game for fans,” while Stevivor highlights its “engaging narrative and promising future for the developer.” Critics across platforms (Xbox, PC, PS4/PS5) concur that the game’s strengths—its story, characters, and Star Trek authenticity—outweigh its flaws. Though not a perfect title, Resurgence is seen as a heartfelt tribute to the franchise, with many recommending it to fans who prioritize storytelling over technical polish. As Gaming Nexus puts it, despite its issues, it’s “highly recommended for fans of the franchise,” reflecting a broad but nuanced appreciation for its ambitions and execution.

TL;DR

Star Trek: Resurgence delivers a heartfelt, narrative-driven Star Trek experience with strong character work and thematic authenticity, but its clunky controls, buggy performance, and tedious gameplay drag it down.

MONSTER

Reviews

52 reviews found

Adventure Gamers

Aug 4, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Star Trek: Resurgence is a work of Star Trek art that recaptures the essence of the franchise and rejects the grim direction of the present-day Star Trek series. It is the ideal contemporary Star Trek, particularly for fans who want a pure Federation playthrough.

Read full review

TheXboxHub

Xbox Series X

Jun 12, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Star Trek: Resurgence is the best evolution of the point and click genre, deserving recognition as one of the best games of 2023 so far.

Read full review

Movies Games and Tech

PlayStation 5

Sep 5, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Star Trek: Resurgence is a fantastic game that allows players to feel like they're part of the Star Trek Universe. It offers great storytelling, fun mini-games and puzzles, and an immersive experience for Star Trek fans.

Read full review

COGconnected

Jun 6, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Resurgence is recommended for Star Trek fans and offers a good experience for those who enjoy the Telltale formula. However, the graphics are not impressive and there are a lot of quick time events, which may not appeal to everyone.

Read full review

GameCritics

Jun 7, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A thrilling and refreshing dose of Trek fan service, with some technical issues that can be overlooked.

Read full review

Eurogamer Germany

Xbox Series X

May 23, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Star Trek: Resurgence is a good Star Trek adventure that will particularly appeal to fans of The Next Generation era.

Read full review

Noisy Pixel

May 22, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Star Trek: Resurgence is likely to be a sleeper hit, offering a memorable and exciting space adventure with complex dialogue and excellent scenario writing. It does more with its characters than other narrative adventures.

Read full review

Screen Rant

Jun 12, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Star Trek: Resurgence is a game made by fans for fans, with a strong focus on storytelling and characters. While the gameplay may have its shortcomings, the game captures the essence of Star Trek and will be loved by fans of the franchise.

Read full review

KeenGamer

Jun 1, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Star Trek: Resurgence is an entertaining narrative-driven game that captures the essence of Star Trek, despite some visual shortcomings.

Read full review

RPG Fan

PlayStation 4

May 30, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Star Trek: Resurgence is a remarkable narrative adventure game set in a classic space opera universe. It is a solid game with strong storytelling, but is hindered by graphical hiccups and technical issues. Star Trek fans and adventure game fans who enjoy sci-fi should give it a try.

Read full review