Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

About

Navigation

Home

Games

Links

Xbox

Twitch

MONSTER

ScreamRide

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of ScreamRide
Item: ScreamRide
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2015

GenresAdventure, Third Person Perspective, Simulation, Puzzle and Logic, Top-Down Perspective, Strategy, Single Player

AvailableMar 3, 2015

PlatformXbox One

DeveloperFrontier Developments

Overview

Screamride is a full-featured, physics-based coaster game where creativity and destruction are equally welcomed. This game features stunning high definition graphics, hundreds of customizable building components, physics-based destruction, cinematic collisions, unlockable levels, in-game leaderboards, global rankings & more.

Elsewhere

4.9

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

ScreamRide’s lightweight, absurdist story—packed with whimsical humor and sci-fi satire—fails to match its engaging career modes, leaving a shallow, repetitive plot that underwhelms despite clever premises.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

43%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

57%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The reviewers generally acknowledge that ScreamRide’s narrative, while minimal, has some unique charms and creative elements. Critics like Gaming Age highlight the game’s humorous tone, noting the GLaDOS-like voice that adds wit and intertextual humor, while IGN Italia points to a mysterious narrative set in Screamworld, where an overarching “higher purpose” is revealed gradually with a whimsical tone. Others, such as Eurogamer Poland and GamesRadar+, appreciate the game’s framework of three career modes (Screamrider, Demolition Expert, Engineer) that provide structure without requiring a deep plot. The sci-fi premise of testing extreme rides for “science” or corporate experimentation is also noted as quirky by Gameplanet and Official Xbox Magazine UK, with some critics finding the absurdity of scaring people for fun amusingly engaging. These positives suggest that while the story isn’t central, it offers a lighthearted or satirical backdrop that complements the gameplay. However, the majority of reviewers criticize ScreamRide’s narrative as underdeveloped and lacking in depth. Arcade Sushi condemns the repetitive structure of the story mode, citing long waits between levels and a lack of engaging elements, while Gameplanet calls the storyline “half-baked,” failing to unify the game’s mechanics. Multiple critics, including Critical Hit, Eurogamer Poland, and GamesRadar+, emphasize that the plot is “paper thin” or “basic,” serving only as a framework for gameplay rather than offering meaningful progression or emotional investment. The absence of traditional storytelling is a recurring issue: IGN notes minimal background radio chatter, Destructoid mentions a balanced but shallow tone, and GamingTrend points to brief cutscenes that don’t flesh out the world. Even the dystopian setting described by DarkStation and NZGamer feels more like a backdrop than a compelling narrative force. Overall, the critics concur that ScreamRide’s story is a secondary focus, prioritizing gameplay mechanics over narrative depth. While some praise its quirky humor and satirical edge—such as IGN Italia’s “whimsical” tone or Gaming Age’s absurdity—the consensus leans toward the narrative being a weak point. The game’s three career modes are seen as more engaging than its story, with reviewers like Attack of the Fanboy and Game Informer noting that missions and objectives overshadow any attempt at a cohesive plot. Despite occasional praise for its creative premise, most critics agree that ScreamRide’s narrative fails to elevate the experience beyond its gameplay, leaving it as a surface-level exploration of its sci-fi concepts. The lack of depth is a consistent critique, with Arcade Sushi and Gameplanet among the harshest in their assessments, while others acknowledge the story’s minimal charm but ultimately find it insufficient.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

ScreamRide dazzles with inventive coaster-building puzzles and addictive sandbox creativity but falters under repetitive modes, uneven design, and simplistic mechanics that feel like a watered-down Angry Birds. While its engineer mode and physics-based chaos shine, Demolition Expert’s clunky structure and cyclical gameplay leave players frustrated. A mixed bag of innovation and execution—worth trying for fans of playful experimentation, but flawed enough to alienate purists.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

47%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

51%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of ScreamRide is generally praised for its variety and creative potential, with multiple modes offering distinct experiences. Critics like Gameplanet and We Got This Covered highlighted the fun and creativity in "build" and "ride" modes, particularly noting the engaging coaster-building puzzles in Engineer mode. Xbox Achievements and Impulsegamer emphasized the addictive "one more go" mechanics across racing, building, and destruction elements, while GamingTrend and MondoXbox lauded the sandbox mode for its creative freedom and physics-based challenges. The game’s blend of precision-driven coaster control, destructive gameplay reminiscent of Angry Birds, and puzzle-like engineering tasks was seen as innovative by reviewers such as Eurogamer Poland and Pure Xbox, who appreciated the diversity of mechanics and the emphasis on player creativity. However, several critics pointed to repetitive and uneven design choices that detract from the experience. GamesRadar+ criticized the gameplay as "bland and repetitive," with Screamrider feeling like a "slot-car racetrack" lacking strategy, while We Got This Covered and Level7.nu called out the Demolition Expert mode as disjointed or poorly designed. JeuxActu and Toronto Sun noted issues with camera controls and difficulty spikes, and Gameplanet and ZTGD described the game as overly simplistic or structured, comparing it to Angry Birds. The repetitive nature of modes like Screamrider and Demolition Expert was a recurring complaint, with Arcade Sushi and InsideGamer.nl pointing to cyclical mechanics that diminished engagement over time. Additionally, IGN Spain and GamesVillage.it mentioned that the core campaign felt short or lacking in depth when focusing solely on main objectives. Overall, critics were divided but largely acknowledged ScreamRide’s creative ambition and varied gameplay. While GameSpot and Eurogamer Poland praised its innovation and challenge-driven design, others like GamesRadar+ and We Got This Covered felt it fell short in polish and originality. The game’s strength lay in its sandbox mode and Engineer mechanics, which many found rewarding, but the repetition and uneven execution of other modes created a mixed reception. Xbox Achievements and Impulsegamer highlighted its addictive qualities, while Gameplanet and Level7.nu cautioned that its simplicity and structural issues limited its appeal. Despite these critiques, the consensus was that ScreamRide offered an engaging, if imperfect, blend of creativity and variety for fans of simulation and puzzle-based gameplay.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

ScreamRide’s visuals dazzled with stylized art, physics-driven thrills, and Portal-esque polish, but technical clunkiness, bland environments, and underwhelming destruction left many frustrated—its aesthetics were bold but often fell flat.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

85%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of ScreamRide received a mix of praise, particularly for its stylized art direction and technical execution in certain areas. Critics like 3DJuegos highlighted the game’s “clean, polished art style” with appealing character designs and solid environmental details, while CGMagazine compared its aesthetic to Portal’s “sharp, shiny, chrome” look, emphasizing a “sterile yet visually appealing futuristic theme.” Destructoid praised the “bright, beautiful skylines” and detailed destruction effects in the Demolition mode, noting how the visual style aligned with the game’s therapeutic aesthetic. IGN commended the “visually impressive destruction effects,” including “detailed crumbling buildings and chain reactions,” while Impulsegamer appreciated the “colorful visuals” and “realistic crash animations.” These positive remarks often centered on the game’s cohesive art direction, physics-based interactions, and creative use of environments to enhance gameplay. However, several critics pointed out significant shortcomings in graphical quality and technical execution. Atomix called the graphics “deficient for an Xbox One game,” citing poor textures, frame rate drops during intense moments, and unresponsive water effects. GamesRadar+ criticized the visuals as “sterile and uninspired,” with environments resembling a “giant mass of water” and minimal thematic details. Eurogamer Poland noted technical issues like frame rate drops during large explosions and poor water animation, while Digital Chumps described the visuals as “average” with a frustratingly small text size. VideoGamer criticized the lack of dramatic flair in destruction effects, noting buildings broke into “large blocks rather than smaller debris,” and Worth Playing called the graphics “slightly underwhelming,” comparing them to an “Xbox 360-era title.” Many reviewers also highlighted issues like cold color palettes, bland backgrounds, and a lack of personality in the art style, with Dealspwn describing it as “soulless futuristic” and InsideGamer.nl calling the aesthetic “minimalistic” but uninspiring. Overall, the consensus among critics was mixed, reflecting a game that prioritized gameplay mechanics over cutting-edge visuals. While some praised its stylized design, physics-driven destruction, and cohesive aesthetic—particularly in modes like Demolition or for coaster construction—others found the graphics unremarkable, technically flawed, and lacking in creativity. 3DJuegos and CGMagazine celebrated the game’s distinct visual identity, but Atomix, GamesRadar+, and Eurogamer Poland emphasized its shortcomings in technical polish and artistic ambition. The polarizing reception suggests that ScreamRide’s visuals were functional and occasionally impressive but ultimately fell short of expectations for an Xbox One title, with the physics engine and gameplay mechanics often overshadowing its visual design. Despite this, many critics acknowledged that the game’s aesthetic and destruction systems offered a unique, if imperfect, experience.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

ScreamRide’s sound design is functional and immersive but ultimately forgettable—praised for dynamic, mode-specific tracks and effective audio cues, yet criticized for repetitive, generic compositions, annoying voiceovers, and a lack of originality that fails to elevate the experience beyond its mechanics.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

13%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

75%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

13%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of ScreamRide received mixed but generally positive feedback, with several critics highlighting its functional and immersive qualities. 3DJuegos praised the effective audio cues and tutorials, while Destructoid noted a "chill electronic soundtrack" that complements the game’s tone without being memorable. Digital Chumps emphasized the dynamic variation in music across gameplay modes—soothing electronic tracks for engineering, aggressive dubstep for action sequences, and rhythmic jazz for Demolition Expert—which aligns with the game’s chaotic yet cohesive themes. Gameblog.fr appreciated the electro style that matches the retro-psychedelic visuals, enhancing immersion, while Worth Playing commended the realistic sound effects and a mix of calm and energetic music that contributes to the game’s enjoyable atmosphere. These reviews suggest the audio elements effectively support gameplay without overshadowing it. However, several critics pointed out notable shortcomings, particularly regarding repetition and lack of originality. GamesRadar+ criticized the "generic mix of dubstep and drum-and-bass" and a lifeless narrator voice, while IGN Italia noted minimal musical variety beyond humorous sound effects like screams and explosions. GameOver.gr described the music as "indifferent to annoying dance tracks," and TheSixthAxis called the robotic female voiceover "annoying and repetitive." Xbox Achievements highlighted the risk of upbeat dance tracks becoming monotonous, and Vandal and Multiplayer.it both noted that the audio felt "functional but unremarkable," lacking emotional impact or memorability. Even 3DJuegos acknowledged the soundtrack’s monotony during long sessions, suggesting that while the sound design serves its purpose, it fails to leave a lasting impression. Overall, the consensus among critics is that ScreamRide’s sound design and music are adequate but unexceptional, prioritizing functionality over innovation. While some praise the variety in musical styles—such as Digital Chumps’ acknowledgment of mode-specific tracks or MondoXbox’s emphasis on adrenaline-fueled electronic beats—the majority feel the audio lacks originality and emotional depth. The game’s soundscapes enhance gameplay immersion to an extent, but they are often described as secondary to the core experience. Critics like 3DJuegos and Destructoid recognize the technical execution, yet the recurring critiques of repetition, generic compositions, and unremarkable voice work underscore a broader sense that the audio elements, while serviceable, do not elevate the game beyond its mechanical foundations.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

ScaremRide’s voice acting splits critics: hailed for its deadpan humor and GLaDOS-esque charm but panned for repetitive, flat delivery and shallow execution, with many calling it a hollow imitation of Portal’s iconic narration.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

44%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

50%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in ScreamRide receives mixed but generally positive remarks, with several critics highlighting its unique tone and humor. Game Revolution and Gaming Age praise the GLaDOS-like narrator, noting its humorous and distinctive delivery that complements the game’s absurdity. IGN Italia acknowledges a well-executed Italian dub for the AI narrator, while NZGamer appreciates the deadpan humor of the robotic narration, which aligns with the game’s quirky personality. Worth Playing also highlights subtle comedic elements through radio chatter and PA announcements, suggesting that the voice work, though limited, adds character to the experience. These positives often center on the narrator’s role in enhancing the game’s tone rather than deep character development. However, several critics criticize the voice acting for being minimal, repetitive, or poorly executed. GamesRadar+ and Vandal point out that the narrator’s lines lack personality, with the former describing them as sounding like "free text-to-speech software" and the latter criticizing the absence of Spanish localization. InsideGamer.nl and TheSixthAxis both find the robotic voice irritating due to repetitive dialogue and unnecessary cutscenes, while XGN explicitly calls the female robot’s voice "unpleasant." Additionally, Gameplanet and IGN Italia note that the voice work feels like a poor imitation of Portal’s GLaDOS, undermining originality. The limited scope of voice acting—primarily confined to narration or minimal character interactions—leaves many critics unimpressed with its depth or variety. Overall, the consensus leans toward a lukewarm reception, with critics acknowledging the narrator’s humor and stylistic choices but questioning their execution and impact. While some praise the deadpan delivery and quirky tone (as noted by NZGamer and Game Revolution), others argue that the voice acting fails to elevate the experience, instead feeling repetitive or underdeveloped (GamesRadar+, Vandal). The lack of substantial character dialogue and reliance on a single robotic voice limit its effectiveness, creating a polarizing effect. Despite this, the game’s use of voice work as a narrative tool—however limited—remains a notable, if uneven, aspect of its design.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

ScreamRide nails smooth mechanics and realistic physics but stumbles on frame drops, clunky cameras, and poor optimization, leaving a technically functional yet frustrating experience that undercuts its creative potential.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

86%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of ScreamRide on the Xbox One receives a mixed but generally favorable reception, with several reviewers highlighting its stability and functional mechanics. Critics like 3DJuegos note that the game runs smoothly without major bugs, while IGN Italia praises its lack of significant technical issues and commendable physics engine. Metro GameCentral and Pure Xbox emphasize consistent performance, with the latter stating "very, very few limitations" despite minor save-related quirks. The physics in demolition sequences are particularly lauded by Destructoid, who appreciates their detail and realism, and IGN Italia acknowledges the game’s ability to handle dynamic environmental interactions effectively. These positives suggest that ScreamRide meets baseline expectations for technical execution on Xbox One, even if it doesn’t push hardware boundaries. However, numerous critics point to persistent technical flaws that detract from the experience. Atomix and Attack of the Fanboy highlight frame rate drops during intense destruction sequences, while Gameblog.fr criticizes the game’s lack of optimization, suggesting it could run on older hardware like the Xbox 360. Issues with camera controls plague multiple reviews: GamesRadar+ and JeuxActu note awkward, unresponsive cameras that hinder precision in demolition and construction modes, while Critical Hit describes the sandbox mode’s creation process as "stifling" due to technical constraints. Game Informer and We Got This Covered point to inconsistent mechanics, such as unpredictable derailments and frustrating design choices, further complicating gameplay. These challenges, coupled with UI quirks like tiny text (Attack of the Fanboy) and clunky track-editing interfaces (Dealspwn), reveal a game that struggles to balance creativity with technical polish. The overall consensus among critics is that ScreamRide is technically functional but marred by optimization issues and design shortcomings. While IGN Italia and Metro GameCentral acknowledge its smooth performance, the majority of reviews—such as those from CGMagazine, GameOver.gr, and Vandal—emphasize frame rate instability, camera flaws, and a lack of polish that detract from immersion. Despite these issues, many recognize the game’s creative potential, with Destructoid praising its physics and IGN Italia noting its realistic destruction mechanics. The mixed reception reflects a title that, while stable and enjoyable in parts, fails to fully leverage Xbox One’s capabilities, leaving room for improvement in future iterations.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

ScreamRide thrives on its inventive sandbox mode and community creativity but falters with repetitive mechanics, lackluster post-creation purpose, and missing online features, splitting opinions between creative enthusiasts and those craving depth.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

35%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

60%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The reviewers generally acknowledge that ScreamRide’s replay value is bolstered by its creative and community-driven elements. The sandbox mode, in particular, is praised for offering players extensive freedom to design tracks and structures, with critics like IGN highlighting its "creative freedom" and the ability to share user-generated content. MondoXbox emphasizes the game’s "high replayability" through a robust sandbox mode, 60 career levels with varied objectives, and endless experimentation opportunities. Additionally, challenge modes, leaderboards, and score-chasing mechanics are noted as incentives for repeated play, with GameOver.gr and Gaming Nexus pointing to the appeal of mastering levels and achieving higher scores. The game’s diverse modes—such as Demolition Expert and Carrera—also provide some variety, as mentioned by Vandal and IGN Italia, who note the engagement from unlocking content and tackling secondary objectives. However, several critics highlight significant limitations that undermine long-term appeal. The lack of a cohesive post-creation experience is a recurring issue, with GamesRadar+ criticizing the "aimless" sandbox mode without a park simulation to give it purpose. Level7.nu and XGN point to the cumbersome track editor and underdeveloped modes like Demolition Expert, which fail to sustain interest. Repetitive gameplay mechanics and a short campaign also detract from replayability, as noted by Game Informer (repetitive late-game content) and Dealspwn (mechanics that become a "chore" after initial novelty). Additionally, the absence of online multiplayer and limited community engagement—mentioned by Eurogamer Poland and TheSixthAxis—further restricts the game’s longevity. Many reviewers, including Gameplanet and Atomix, argue that the core experience lacks the depth or innovation to justify its price or retain players beyond the initial novelty. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed but leans toward a nuanced assessment: while ScreamRide excels in creative modes and community-driven content, its replayability is constrained by repetitive mechanics and underdeveloped systems. IGN and MondoXbox view the sandbox mode as a standout feature that justifies repeated play for enthusiasts, whereas GamesRadar+ and Gameblog.fr argue that the game’s "limited" post-creation content and lack of long-term goals make it feel incomplete. The divide reflects differing expectations—those prioritizing creativity may find value in the tools provided, while others are frustrated by the game’s shortcomings in progression and variety. Ultimately, ScreamRide appears to cater more to niche audiences who appreciate its sandbox potential, but its broader appeal is tempered by a lack of sustained engagement beyond initial experimentation.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

36%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

64%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall reception of ScreamRide highlights its creative ambition and engaging mechanics, particularly its unique blend of roller coaster creation, destruction, and physics-based gameplay. Many reviewers praised its innovative approach, with IGN noting its "fun, varied gameplay" and "satisfying destruction mechanics," while Digital Chumps described it as a "wildly divergent and simultaneously cohesive package." The game’s creative tools, such as the roller coaster builder and sandbox mode, were frequently lauded for their flexibility and originality. Gameblog.fr highlighted its "original concept" and "engaging gameplay," and Gaming Nexus even called it "amazing" and "pure fun," placing it among the top titles of 2015. The variety of modes—ranging from coaster design to demolition challenges—was seen as a strength, with JeuxActu noting its "creative mayhem" and Attack of the Fanboy appreciating its spiritual successor status to RollerCoaster Tycoon. These elements collectively underscore the game’s potential as a fresh take on simulation gaming. However, critics consistently pointed to significant flaws that undermined the experience. Issues like repetitive gameplay, technical glitches, and a lack of depth were recurring complaints. GamesRadar+ criticized it for an "identity crisis," calling it "dull, unpolished, and unsatisfying," while VideoGamer noted its "repetitive gameplay" and "unmet potential." Dealspwn described it as "average" with "poor execution," and XGN found it "competent but shallow" compared to RollerCoaster Tycoon. Technical shortcomings, such as poor camera control (TheSixthAxis) and "frustrating mechanics" in later levels (Game Informer), further detracted from its appeal. Additionally, the game’s high price point and limited narrative or park management elements were seen as drawbacks, with Metro GameCentral calling it "overpriced and underdeveloped." Many reviewers also criticized disjointed modes, like the "unnecessary demolition mode" (JeuxActu) and a "rushed campaign" (IGN Spain), which failed to fully realize its ambitious vision. Despite these criticisms, the overall consensus among critics is that ScreamRide is a mixed but intriguing experience. While it struggles with consistency and polish, its creative ideas and unique mechanics earned it praise from niche audiences. Gaming Nexus and IGN highlighted its potential as a standout title, while others like TheSixthAxis and Game Informer acknowledged its "mixed reception" due to technical and design flaws. The game’s appeal seems to hinge on player preferences: those who prioritize creativity and physics-based fun may find it rewarding, whereas others might be deterred by its shortcomings. As GamesVillage.it noted, it’s a "worthwhile purchase for fans of simulation and demolition gameplay," but its "limited longevity" and "technical flaws" prevent it from achieving broader acclaim. Ultimately, ScreamRide is seen as an ambitious, if imperfect, entry in the simulation genre that succeeds in offering unique experiences but falls short of fully delivering on its promises.

TL;DR

ScreamRide is a bold, chaotic simulation blending roller coaster design and destruction, praised for its inventive mechanics and creativity by IGN and Gaming Nexus, but plagued by technical flaws, repetitive gameplay, and a rushed campaign that left critics like GamesRadar+ calling it "dull" and "unpolished." While niche fans may revel in its wild ideas, its overpriced, shallow execution and disjointed modes undermine its potential, making it a mixed bag of ambition and inconsistency.

MONSTER

Reviews

76 reviews found

100

Gaming Age

Xbox One

Mar 9, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

ScreamRide is a fun, silly, and challenging physics-based game that balances humor with gameplay mechanics. Despite its flaws, it delivers enjoyment through absurdity and variety, making it a satisfying experience for fans of mindless destruction and puzzles.

Read full review

Gaming Nexus

Xbox One

Mar 2, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review calls ScreamRide 'amazing' and 'pure fun,' placing it in the top 10 of 2015. It praises the game's creativity, physics-based mechanics, and addictive gameplay, recommending it as a must-have for Xbox One owners.

Read full review

Pure Xbox

Xbox One

Mar 2, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

ScreamRide is described as 'thrilling, addictive, fun, enjoyable, well-crafted, rewarding, challenging,' with potential for long-term success despite minor flaws. The review calls it a surprising and innovative title that exceeds expectations.

Read full review

Game Revolution

Xbox One

Mar 2, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A surprisingly remarkable Xbox exclusive with high fun factor, combining multiple modes into a cohesive experience that delivers entertainment and replayability despite minor flaws like lack of multiplayer.

Read full review

Digital Chumps

Xbox One

Mar 2, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

ScreamRide is praised for its innovative mechanics, variety of modes, and satisfying destruction, despite technical flaws and a high price tag. It’s described as a 'wildly divergent and simultaneously cohesive package' with enough novelty to justify its cost, though some issues need fixing.

Read full review

Similar Games

Games you might also enjoy

Revhead

2017

Persona 5 Tactica

2023

The Escapists 2

2017

Moving Out

2020

The Escapists

2015

Tharsis

2016

Cozy Grove

2021

WHAT THE GOLF?

2019

Arcade Paradise

2022

Sid Meier's Pirates!

2004

Teardown

2022

Serial Cleaners

2022

Dice Legacy

2021

The Sims

2000

Biped

2020

Forager

2019

The Sims 3: World Adventures

2009

Dungeons 3

2017

Space Rangers 2: Rise of the Dominators

2006

Road to Ballhalla

2016

Popular Right Now

Trending games the community is playing

Battlefield 6

2025

Ghost of Yotei

2025

Silent Hill f

2025

The Outer Worlds 2

2025

Mafia: The Old Country

2025

Ninja Gaiden 4

2025

WUCHANG: Fallen Feathers

2025

Cronos: The New Dawn

2025

Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater

2025

Call of Duty: Black Ops 7

2025

Little Nightmares III

2025

Shinobi: Art of Vengeance

2025

FINAL FANTASY TACTICS - The Ivalice Chronicles

2025

EA Sports FC 26

2025

MARVEL Cosmic Invasion

2025

Recently Reviewed

Games with full Monster Scorecards

Total Chaos

2025

SkateBIRD

2021

Destiny 2: The Edge of Fate

2025

Super Robot Wars Y

2025

Strange Antiquities

2025

Terminator 2D: NO FATE

2025

A Pizza Delivery

2025

Divinity: Original Sin II - Definitive Edition

2018

Metroid Prime 4: Beyond

2025

SUPERHOT VR

2016

Project Motor Racing

2025

New Super Lucky's Tale

2019

Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag

2013

ISLANDERS: New Shores

2025

A.I.L.A

2025

Bubble Bobble 4 Friends

2020

MADO MONOGATARI: Fia and the Wondrous Academy

2025

Tails of Iron

2021

Aven Colony

2017

Sacred 2 Remaster

2025

Links

Xbox

Twitch

MONSTER

ScreamRide

2015

GenresAdventure, Third Person Perspective, Simulation, Puzzle and Logic, Top-Down Perspective, Strategy, Single Player

AvailableMar 3, 2015

PlatformXbox One

DeveloperFrontier Developments

Overview

Elsewhere

4.9

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

43%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

57%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

47%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

51%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

85%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

13%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

75%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

13%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

44%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

50%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

86%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

35%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

60%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

36%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

64%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

TL;DR

MONSTER

Reviews

76 reviews found

100

Gaming Age

Xbox One

Mar 9, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Gaming Nexus

Xbox One

Mar 2, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Pure Xbox

Xbox One

Mar 2, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Game Revolution

Xbox One

Mar 2, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Digital Chumps

Xbox One

Mar 2, 2015

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Similar Games

Games you might also enjoy

Revhead

2017

Persona 5 Tactica

2023

The Escapists 2

2017

Moving Out

2020

The Escapists

2015

Tharsis

2016

Cozy Grove

2021

WHAT THE GOLF?

2019

Arcade Paradise

2022

Sid Meier's Pirates!

2004

Teardown

2022

Serial Cleaners

2022

Dice Legacy

2021

The Sims

2000

Biped

2020

Forager

2019

The Sims 3: World Adventures

2009

Dungeons 3

2017

Space Rangers 2: Rise of the Dominators

2006

Road to Ballhalla

2016

Popular Right Now

Trending games the community is playing

Battlefield 6

2025

Ghost of Yotei

2025

Silent Hill f

2025

The Outer Worlds 2

2025

Mafia: The Old Country

2025

Ninja Gaiden 4

2025

WUCHANG: Fallen Feathers

2025

Cronos: The New Dawn

2025

Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater

2025

Call of Duty: Black Ops 7

2025

Little Nightmares III

2025

Shinobi: Art of Vengeance

2025

FINAL FANTASY TACTICS - The Ivalice Chronicles

2025

EA Sports FC 26

2025

MARVEL Cosmic Invasion

2025

Recently Reviewed

Games with full Monster Scorecards

Total Chaos

2025

SkateBIRD

2021

Destiny 2: The Edge of Fate

2025

Super Robot Wars Y

2025

Strange Antiquities

2025

Terminator 2D: NO FATE

2025

A Pizza Delivery

2025

Divinity: Original Sin II - Definitive Edition

2018

Metroid Prime 4: Beyond

2025

SUPERHOT VR

2016

Project Motor Racing

2025

New Super Lucky's Tale

2019

Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag

2013

ISLANDERS: New Shores

2025

A.I.L.A

2025

Bubble Bobble 4 Friends

2020

MADO MONOGATARI: Fia and the Wondrous Academy

2025

Tails of Iron

2021

Aven Colony

2017

Sacred 2 Remaster

2025