Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

MONSTER

Road 96: Mile 0

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Road 96: Mile 0
Item: Road 96: Mile 0
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2023

GenresAdventure, Indie, Action, Puzzle and Logic, Music and Dance, Drama, Single Player, First Person Perspective

AvailableApr 4, 2023

PlatformPC, Nintendo Switch, Xbox Series X, Xbox One, PlayStation 4, PlayStation 5

DeveloperDigixart Entertainment

Overview

The prequel to Road 96. Play Zoe and Kaito where it all started. Challenge your beliefs!

Elsewhere

8.3

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Road 96: Mile 0 is a polarizing prequel praised for its thematic depth, character dynamics, and narrative ambition but criticized for its linear structure, shallow characters, and missed potential, leaving fans divided between heartfelt expansion and underwhelming execution.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

38%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

54%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The story of Road 96: Mile 0 receives praise for its exploration of political and social themes, as well as its role as a prequel that enriches the broader universe of the original game. Critics like Digital Chumps highlight its sincerity and well-crafted narrative, noting how it provides deeper context to Zoe’s journey in Road 96. The Games Machine appreciates the blend of walking simulator and Telltale-style adventure elements, with dialogue choices that influence political perspectives. Others, such as Everyeye.it, commend the moral decisions that lead to multiple endings, balancing humor and poignant moments, while COGconnected praises its complexity and self-contained nature for newcomers. The focus on Zoe and Kaito’s friendship, alongside their ideological clashes, is seen as a strength by reviewers like Push Square, who call the characters’ relationship “the strongest component of the game.” However, several critics criticize Mile 0 for its lack of depth, linear structure, and missed opportunities. TheXboxHub and Gamersky argue that the narrative feels manufactured, with minimal character growth and predictable outcomes, while BaziCenter and Multiplayer.it describe it as a “flat” or “clichéd” experience lacking emotional impact. The game’s reliance on predetermined paths and limited choices is a recurring complaint: Checkpoint Gaming notes “narrative dissonance” and “diluted player agency,” while IGN France criticizes the rushed conflict and underdeveloped twists. Many also point to one-dimensional characters, with Worth Playing calling them “one-note” and PSX Brasil noting the story’s failure to handle sensitive issues effectively. The prequel’s inability to match the original’s impactful choices and branching narratives is a common frustration among reviewers. The overall consensus reflects a divided reception, with some critics appreciating Mile 0 as a meaningful expansion of the Road 96 universe, while others find it underwhelming. Positive reviews emphasize its thematic depth, character dynamics, and narrative ambition, as seen in TierraGamer’s praise for its “politically and socially insightful” exploration of contrasting realities. However, the majority of critiques highlight its shortcomings in execution, with TheXboxHub and IGN Spain noting a lack of emotional connection and overly obvious political messaging. While some, like Finger Guns, find the story engaging and choice-driven, others, such as Worth Playing and Gamersky, feel it fails to live up to expectations. Ultimately, Mile 0 is seen as a flawed but occasionally compelling prequel that offers value for fans of the series but may struggle to resonate with newcomers or those seeking greater narrative innovation.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Polarizing mess of ambition and chaos: Road 96: Mile 0 dazzles with narrative-driven experimentation and quirky "Rides" but drowns in repetition, clunky controls, and shallow mechanics, leaving its bold vision mired in execution flaws.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

19%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

64%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

17%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Road 96: Mile 0 receives mixed praise, with several critics highlighting its innovative mechanics and narrative-driven elements. Vandal acknowledges the inclusion of musical sections and minigames, while Checkpoint Gaming notes the unique "rides" on skateboards or rollerskates, which add variety despite their flaws. BaziCenter and GameMAG commend the rhythm-based runner style and linear adventure structure, respectively, with some critics like Push Square praising the visuals and licensed music in the "Rides" segments. Finger Guns and But Why Tho? highlight enjoyable aspects such as exhilarating skating sequences and fun minigames, while Digital Chumps and COGconnected appreciate the addictive nature of the gameplay despite its shortcomings. These positives suggest that the game’s experimental mechanics and narrative focus resonate with some players, offering a fresh take on the series’ formula. However, the negatives dominate the critique, with widespread complaints about repetitive design, poor optimization, and lack of depth. Vandal and Impulsegamer criticize the musical sections as "less stimulating" or "annoying," while Checkpoint Gaming and TouchArcade condemn the controls as "mediocre" and "unpleasant." Twinfinite and IGN France describe the "Rides" as boring and repetitive, with Everyeye.it noting simplistic quick-time events. Multiplayer.it and Gamersky point to incoherent minigames and poorly executed rhythm mechanics, while IGN Spain and XboxEra argue that the game’s linear structure and lack of impactful choices undermine its potential. Critics like GameMAG and New Game Network also highlight disconnection between mini-games and the narrative, with some finding the gameplay "jarring" or "disjointed." These issues collectively suggest a significant disconnect between the game’s ambition and its execution. The overall consensus among critics is that Road 96: Mile 0 is a polarizing experience, balancing creative ideas with substantial flaws. While some praise its narrative-driven exploration, rhythm-based mechanics, and unique "Rides" (as noted by Push Square and Finger Guns), the majority criticize its repetitive structure, poor optimization, and lack of meaningful interactivity. The game’s shift toward a more linear adventure style, as highlighted by IGN Spain and TierraGamer, has divided opinions, with some appreciating the focus on storytelling and others missing the open-ended chaos of the original. Despite mixed reactions, many agree that the gameplay’s experimental elements, though flawed, offer a distinct identity for the series. However, the recurring complaints about control issues, shallow mechanics, and tonal inconsistencies suggest that Mile 0 struggles to fully realize its ambitious vision.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Road 96: Mile 0 dazzles with whimsical, colorful visuals and creative musical sequences, but its charm is undercut by clunky animations, outdated tech, and tonal clashes—proving style overshadows polish.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

37%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

63%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of Road 96: Mile 0 receive largely positive feedback from critics, with many praising its consistent yet refined artistic direction. Reviewers like But Why Tho? highlight the game’s "unique aesthetic" and "detailed, cartoony 3D models," while COGconnected notes that the world is "full of character" with a "vivid color palette." The musical segments are particularly lauded, as seen in Gameblog.fr’s observation of "impressive artistic visuals during musical segments" and ZTGD’s admiration for "striking" skating environments. SpazioGames and IGN Italia commend the improved texture quality and fluidity in character movements, though they acknowledge the style remains rooted in the original game’s identity. The cartoonish, stylized approach is seen as effective in conveying the game’s narrative tone, with Movies Games and Tech noting its "inviting and fun" contrast to heavier themes, and XboxEra calling it one of the "best aspects of the experience." However, several critics point out technical and artistic limitations. Everyeye.it criticizes "less authentic facial expressions" and "pop-in effects," while Finger Guns and GamingBolt describe animations as "stiff" and "outdated," with PSX Brasil noting "rudimentary animations" and a lack of advanced lighting. Push Square highlights a "tonal incongruity" between the game’s playful visuals and its serious narrative, and Gamereactor UK calls the animation style "clunky" with conflicting lip-syncing. Checkpoint Gaming and Worth Playing mention issues like "stiff character animations" and mismatched mouth movements, while Xbox Tavern suggests more polish on character models would have been appreciated. These critiques collectively point to a design that prioritizes charm over technical perfection, often at the expense of immersion or emotional depth. Overall, critics agree that Road 96: Mile 0 maintains the quirky, stylized aesthetic of its predecessor while showing incremental improvements in visual polish. While BaziCenter and COGconnected note "polished graphics" and "improved texture quality," the consensus is that the game’s art style is more about atmosphere than technical prowess. The vibrant environments and creative musical sequences are widely praised, but animation flaws and occasional graphical inconsistencies remain notable drawbacks. Despite these issues, many reviewers, including XboxAddict and Generación Xbox, find the visuals "visually appealing" and fitting for the game’s narrative, suggesting that the artistic choices align with the title’s identity even if they don’t push boundaries. The mixed reception reflects a balance between charm and technical limitations, with most critics acknowledging the visual design as a key strength despite its flaws.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Energetic, diverse soundtrack elevates Road 96: Mile 0 with genre-blending flair, but tonal clashes, technical hiccups, and uneven memorability temper its impact—critics split between awe and frustration over its ambitious, if flawed, audio identity.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

70%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

23%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The majority of reviewers praise the sound design and music of Road 96: Mile 0 as a standout element, emphasizing its energetic, diverse, and emotionally resonant qualities. Critics like But Why Tho?, COGconnected, and Digital Chumps highlight the soundtrack’s ability to enhance gameplay through high-octane tracks, melodic compositions, and immersive soundscapes. The inclusion of licensed songs such as The Offspring’s "No Brakes" (noted by GameSpew) and original pieces from artists like The Midnight (mentioned by XboxAddict and GameMAG) is frequently lauded for its ability to complement the game’s narrative and rhythm-based mechanics. Additionally, IGN Italia, Push Square, and The Games Machine commend the music’s role in setting the tone, with The Games Machine specifically praising the re-arranged “Bella ciao” for its thematic resonance. The variety of styles—ranging from synth-rock to punk and electronic—creates a dynamic audio experience that many reviewers feel elevates the game’s atmosphere and storytelling. However, several critics point out notable flaws in the sound design and music. BaziCenter and Multiplayer.it express disappointment, noting that the soundtrack feels less impactful than the original Road 96, with some tracks failing to resonate emotionally or maintain memorability. Push Square criticizes the tonal dissonance between the upbeat music and the game’s serious narrative moments, while PSX Brasil highlights issues with composition and transitions in cutscenes. Gamersky and Impulsegamer point to technical shortcomings, such as flawed rhythm mechanics and muffled audio quality, which detract from the experience. Additionally, Worth Playing argues that the game’s short runtime and jarring tonal shifts undermine the music’s potential to fully immerse players. These critiques suggest that while the soundtrack is ambitious, its execution occasionally falls short of expectations. Overall, the consensus among critics leans heavily toward appreciation for Road 96: Mile 0’s sound design and music, with many considering it a defining strength of the game. While there are valid criticisms about consistency, memorability, and technical issues, the majority of reviews emphasize its ability to enhance gameplay, evoke emotion, and reflect the game’s rebellious spirit. Gameblog.fr, God is a Geek, and XboxEra note that the soundtrack effectively bridges gameplay and storytelling, even if some elements—like rhythm sections or tonal cohesion—require refinement. The mixed reception underscores that while the music may not fully replicate the original’s magic for all players, it remains a compelling and integral part of Mile 0’s identity.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Voice acting in Road 96: Mile 0 shines as a standout asset, breathing life into characters and deepening narrative immersion—praised for its "excellent," "stellar," and "fantastic" performances by outlets like But Why Tho? and Pocket Tactics. Yet flaws linger: muted player interactions, stereotypical tropes, and inconsistent dialogue options temper its impact, with some critics calling out missed opportunities for nuance. Overall, it’s a strong, emotive pillar despite minor missteps.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

42%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

50%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in Road 96: Mile 0 receives widespread praise for its ability to elevate the game’s characters and narrative. Critics like But Why Tho? and COGconnected highlight its “excellent” and “believable” quality, noting that it breathes life into the characters and immerses players in their struggles. IGN Italia acknowledges the cast’s strong performances despite some stereotypical character portrayals, while Movies Games and Tech lauds the entire ensemble for delivering a “fantastic performance” that adds depth to interactions. Pocket Tactics and PLAY! Zine also commend the voice acting as “stellar” and “well-executed,” emphasizing how it effectively brings characters to life. Even Multiplayer.it, which calls the voice acting “decent,” praises its good translation, suggesting it enhances accessibility without overshadowing other elements. However, several critics point out notable shortcomings. Twinfinite criticizes the absence of voice acting during normal gameplay sections, arguing that this lack of polish detracts from immersion. Game Rant notes that while dialogue flows well, the game’s failure to establish strong connections between characters diminishes its emotional impact. New Game Network and Multiplayer.it also highlight specific issues: the player character’s muteness and the overall lack of significant enhancement to the experience. Additionally, IGN Italia critiques the reliance on stereotypical tropes, which could have been mitigated by more nuanced voice work. These criticisms suggest that while the voice acting is generally strong, it occasionally falls short in areas like character development or consistency. Overall, the consensus among critics leans positive, with most agreeing that the voice acting is a standout feature despite its flaws. The majority of reviews—such as those from But Why Tho?, COGconnected, and Pocket Tactics—emphasize its effectiveness in enriching the game’s storytelling and character dynamics. While some critiques about dialogue options, stereotypical characters, or the mute player character exist, they are often framed as minor drawbacks rather than major issues. The voice acting is broadly seen as a key strength, contributing significantly to the game’s charm and emotional resonance, even if it doesn’t fully overcome its narrative limitations.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Road 96: Mile 0’s tech performance varies wildly—PS5 and Xbox Series X shine with stability but face minor hiccups, while PC and Switch struggle with crashes, lag, and stuttering, undermining their polish despite the game’s charm.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

21%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

53%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

26%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of Road 96: Mile 0 varies significantly across platforms, with some systems showcasing smoother experiences than others. On the PS5, several critics highlighted positive aspects, such as But Why Tho? noting "no graphical or performance issues" and IGN Italia stating the game runs "smoothly without major technical issues." The Xbox Series X also received praise for its stability, with The Games Machine observing "no issues" and XboxEra calling it a "perfect run," though The Games Machine acknowledged low polygon counts as a minor limitation. On PC, Worth Playing commended the game’s "steady frame rate" even during intense scenes like sandstorms, while also noting improved performance on the Steam Deck. For the Nintendo Switch, while critics like Checkpoint Gaming and Pocket Tactics pointed to loading times and stuttering, there were no outright negatives mentioned for the platform beyond these general concerns. However, technical shortcomings plagued several platforms. The PS5 faced criticism from multiple reviewers: Gameblog.fr cited "long loading times and control responsiveness problems," while GamingBolt noted "framerate not entirely smooth" and "strange storybook-style pop-in." Finger Guns and Multiplayer.it also highlighted issues like stiff animations and bugs that disrupted gameplay. On the Xbox Series X, Xbox Tavern criticized "latency issues during skateboarding sections," which led to frustrating restarts, while The Games Machine’s mention of low polygon counts suggested a lack of visual polish. For PC, GameMAG reported "performance issues" like lag on high-end hardware, and Shacknews documented crashes after the second act, causing progress loss. Meanwhile, the Switch version struggled with "framerate stutters," "texture pop-in," and "long loading screens," as noted by Pocket Tactics and Checkpoint Gaming, making it the most technically flawed platform. Overall, the consensus among critics reveals a mixed reception for Road 96: Mile 0’s technical performance. While the Xbox Series X and PS5 versions received more balanced feedback—with some praising stability and others pointing to specific flaws—the PC and Switch iterations faced more significant challenges, including crashes, lag, and inconsistent frame rates. The PS5’s issues, though varied, were often described as minor compared to the PC’s performance problems, which affected core gameplay. Meanwhile, the Switch’s technical limitations, such as loading times and visual glitches, detracted from its experience. Despite these disparities, many reviewers acknowledged that the game’s charm and narrative could overshadow some technical hiccups, though the platform-specific struggles highlight the importance of optimization in delivering a polished experience.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Road 96: Mile 0’s branching choices and replayable rhythms thrill fans, but its linear, shallow narrative leaves critics divided—calling it a brief, nostalgia-driven prequel with little incentive for repeat play.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

20%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

60%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

20%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The reviewers who highlight positive aspects of Road 96: Mile 0’s replay value emphasize its branching narrative choices, multiple endings, and score-based mechanics that encourage revisiting the game. Critics like But Why Tho? praise the short, enjoyable levels with checkpoints and minigames, while COGconnected notes that choices alter outcomes and create a sense of addictive variety. Everyeye.it and God is a Geek point to moral decision systems leading to different endings, and Hobby Consolas highlights the ability to replay rhythm sections for better scores. Additionally, IGN Italia and Twinfinite acknowledge that the game’s narrative twists and rhythmic challenges provide enough incentive for multiple playthroughs, even if the overall experience is brief. These perspectives suggest that the game’s design elements—such as character interactions, score tracking, and branching paths—create a foundation for replayability, particularly for fans of the original title. However, several critics argue that Road 96: Mile 0 falls short in delivering substantial replay value due to its linear structure, limited narrative depth, and lack of impactful consequences. BaziCenter directly states the game lacks meaningful choices or engaging content to warrant revisiting, while Digital Chumps and Gameblog.fr note that it feels shorter and less consequential than the original. Multiplayer.it criticizes the absence of narrative branches, and IGN Spain points out that predetermined character arcs reduce player agency. Others like XGN and Gamersky highlight its linear nature and lack of roguelike elements, making repeated playthroughs feel unappealing. Even Checkpoint Gaming mentions that choices don’t significantly affect the outcome, diminishing the incentive to replay. These critiques underscore a recurring concern about the game’s brevity and limited opportunities for exploration beyond its core mechanics. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed but leans toward acknowledging Road 96: Mile 0’s replayability as niche or conditional. While COGconnected, Everyeye.it, and God is a Geek argue that its moral choices and multiple endings justify revisiting, others like BaziCenter and Digital Chumps dismiss it as lacking depth. The game’s prequel status and reliance on fan nostalgia play a role in its appeal, with IGN France and ZTGD noting it serves more as a companion to the original than an independent experience. Despite some praise for rhythm sections and score-chasing (e.g., SomosXbox, Worth Playing), many critics agree that its short runtime and limited branching narratives make it less compelling for general audiences. Ultimately, the game’s replay value seems to depend on player interest in its specific mechanics and story context, with a clear divide between those who appreciate its design and those who find it underwhelming.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

19%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

77%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall reception of Road 96: Mile 0 highlights several positive aspects that resonate with fans and critics alike. Many praise its engaging storytelling, unique gameplay mechanics, and emotional depth, particularly for those familiar with the original game. For instance, IGN France acknowledges its "commendable prequel" status, while XboxAddict gives it an 8/10, noting its "solid game" qualities and developer passion. The game’s rhythm-based sections, character-driven narratives, and vibrant soundtrack are frequently highlighted as standout elements. Pocket Tactics commends its emotional story and stellar performances, and Everyeye.it appreciates its "unique gameplay experience" despite pacing issues. Critics like GameSpew and COGconnected argue that it successfully builds on the original’s legacy, offering a "wonderfully unique" narrative and "stellar presentation." These positives suggest the game has meaningful moments for dedicated fans, even if it doesn’t fully replicate the predecessor’s magic. However, the negatives are equally prominent, with many critics pointing to its shortcomings compared to Road 96. The prequel is frequently criticized for lacking the original’s political and emotional weight, as noted by Multiplayer.it and BaziCenter, who call it a "disappointing prequel" and a "missed opportunity." Issues like poor controls (e.g., TouchArcade on Switch) and technical flaws (XGN) undermine the experience, while others criticize its linear structure and shallow storytelling. IGN France and Game Rant highlight a "rushed narrative" and "lack of emotional connection," with Twinfinite and Checkpoint Gaming noting a deviation from what made the original compelling. The game’s reliance on choose-your-own-adventure mechanics is seen as ineffective (XGN), and its "uneven tone" (Worth Playing) and "flawed narrative" (XboxEra) further detract from its impact. These critiques paint a picture of a game that struggles to match the original’s ambition and depth. Despite mixed reactions, the overall consensus leans toward Road 96: Mile 0 being a worthwhile but flawed entry for fans of the series. While it fails to surpass the original in many areas, it offers value through its character exploration, unique gameplay elements, and narrative expansion. Generación Xbox and SpazioGames argue it’s still "Worth Playing" for longtime fans, even if it lacks the "on-the-road component" of its predecessor. Conversely, XboxEra suggests it’s only worth trying if available on Game Pass, and Worth Playing warns that newcomers might find it underwhelming. The game’s polarizing reception reflects a divide between those who appreciate its creative risks and those who feel it falls short of expectations. Ultimately, while Mile 0 is not a definitive successor, it remains a niche but meaningful addition to the Road 96 universe for dedicated players.

TL;DR

"Road 96: Mile 0" is a divisive, imperfect prequel that dazzles with creative storytelling and unique mechanics but falters in emotional depth, pacing, and polish, leaving fans split between appreciation for its ambition and frustration over its compromises.

MONSTER

Reviews

73 reviews found

God is a Geek

PlayStation 5

Apr 4, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Road 96: Mile 0 is a strong narrative adventure that builds on the original while introducing exciting gameplay elements, making it a compelling experience.

Read full review

Pure Xbox

Xbox Series X

Apr 4, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Road 96: Mile 0 captures everything loved about Road 96 and is equally captivating. It can be played before or after the original game.

Read full review

COGconnected

PlayStation 5

Apr 4, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Road 96: Mile 0 is a must-play for fans of narrative-driven games. It offers a fresh experience with a great story, addictive gameplay, and stellar presentation.

Read full review

GameSpew

PlayStation 5

Apr 4, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Road 96: Mile 0 is an excellent addition to Road 96, adding weight and context to the events of the previous game. The storytelling is wonderfully unique and the game stands strong on its own.

Read full review

TierraGamer

May 31, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Road 96: Mile 0 is a dynamic and relaxing game that invites players to engage with the emotional and ideological complexities of its characters, supported by a beautiful soundtrack.

Read full review

XboxAddict

Xbox Series X

Apr 5, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Road 96: Mile 0 is a solid game that brings new elements and stories to the world of Road 96. While it may not have the same impact as the original game, it is still enjoyable and showcases the developer's love for the world and characters. The game received an overall score of 8.0 out of 10.

Read full review

Noisy Pixel

PlayStation 5

Apr 4, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The game is praised for its unique protagonists, player choice system, and conclusion. Pacing and writing can be issues, but the overall experience is considered worth it.

Read full review

Finger Guns

PlayStation 5

Apr 4, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Road 96: Mile 0 is a strong entry point for the franchise, with a compelling story and enjoyable gameplay, despite some minor flaws. It successfully builds on the original while offering a focused narrative.

Read full review

Hobby Consolas

PlayStation 5

Apr 4, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Road 96 Mile 0 is seen as a valuable addition for fans of the original, offering a more conventional narrative but enriched with engaging gameplay and a strong soundtrack. It is viewed as a complement rather than a standalone title.

Read full review

The Games Machine

Xbox Series X

Apr 27, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Road 96: Mile 0 is a pleasant game that introduces a variation with its rhythm game sections. It is recommended for those who have played and enjoyed the previous game, but may not have much appeal for newcomers. The technical performance is acceptable for a smaller production.

Read full review