Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

Twitch

MONSTER

Live A Live

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Live A Live
Item: Live A Live
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2022

GenresFantasy, Adventure, Action, RPG, Top-Down Perspective, Anime and JRPG, Single Player

AvailableJul 22, 2022

PlatformPC, PlayStation 5, Nintendo Switch

Developerhistoria Inc.

Overview

Live A Live's story is split across seven seemingly unrelated chapters that can be played in any order, based on popular genres such as Western, science fiction, and mecha. Each chapter has its own plot, setting, and characters. Although the basic gameplay is the same throughout the game, each chapter adds a new factor to the basic formula, such as the stealth elements in the ninja chapter. After the first seven chapters are completed, two final chapters take place to establish the connection between the seven previous and resolve the story.

Elsewhere

7.7

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Live A Live receives overwhelmingly positive reviews for its innovative anthology-style storytelling and thematic depth, but critics note a lack of cohesion and emotional investment due to the self-contained nature of its chapters. While the game is praised for creativity and diverse gameplay, some players may find it superficial and unsatisfying in narrative depth. Overall, it’s a bold experiment in the JRPG genre that shines in parts but may leave narrative-seekers wanting more.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

83%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

17%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The overall sentiment regarding the story of Live A Live is predominantly positive, with many critics praising its unique structure and ambitious narrative approach. Reviewers such as Digital Trends and Hey Poor Player highlight the game's anthology-style storytelling, which allows players to engage with eight distinct stories across various time periods and genres. Critics like GamersRD and Nintendo Insider commend the game's creativity, noting that each chapter provides a fresh narrative experience, while IGN and Attack of the Fanboy appreciate the thematic depth, exploring concepts such as good versus evil and the complexities of human emotions. The incorporation of diverse gameplay mechanics and the ability to tackle scenarios in any order further enhance the game's appeal, as noted by DarkZero and Cubed3. Despite the praise, several critics express concerns about the story's cohesion and depth. GameSkinny and NintendoWorldReport point out that while each chapter is engaging, they often feel self-contained and lack a significant overarching narrative that ties them together effectively. Some reviewers, including NME and PlaySense, argue that the stories can rely on cultural shorthand and may not resonate deeply with players, leading to a sense of superficiality. Furthermore, the short length of each chapter can detract from character development and emotional investment, as mentioned by PlayStation Universe and CD-Action. In summary, while a majority of critics appreciate the innovative storytelling and thematic exploration in Live A Live, there is a consensus that the execution may leave some players wanting more in terms of narrative depth and cohesion. Critics like Destructoid and Digital Trends recognize the game's ambition but also acknowledge that not every chapter hits the mark. Overall, Live A Live is seen as a commendable experiment in storytelling within the JRPG genre, offering a mix of engaging narratives and unique gameplay experiences, but it may not fully satisfy those seeking a tightly woven narrative.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Live A Live impresses with its tactical turn-based combat and diverse gameplay mechanics that keep the experience fresh, appealing to both new and veteran RPG fans. Critics praise its strategic depth and innovative chapter designs, but many also highlight significant drawbacks: simplistic combat, inconsistent difficulty, and lack of enemy variety lead to repetitiveness. Despite its creative charm, the game risks disappointing hardcore RPG enthusiasts due to these shortcomings. In short, it offers a nostalgic experience but falls short of its potential.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

45%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

55%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Live A Live has garnered a generally positive reception among critics, highlighting its unique blend of turn-based combat and strategic elements. Many reviewers, such as Game Informer and IGN Italia, appreciate the tactical depth offered by the grid-based combat system, which encourages players to think critically about positioning and character abilities. Critics like The Mako Reactor and Nintendo Life commend the game's innovative mechanics, noting how each chapter introduces distinct gameplay styles, from puzzle-solving to stealth, which keeps the experience fresh and engaging. Additionally, the character abilities and the variety of attack patterns add layers to the combat, making it enjoyable for both newcomers and seasoned RPG fans, as pointed out by Pocket Tactics and Hardcore Gamer. However, several critics have pointed out notable drawbacks in the gameplay experience. Many reviews, including those from CD-Action and The Games Machine, mention that the combat can feel simplistic and underdeveloped, with some battles lacking the necessary challenge or depth. Critics like T3 and NME highlight issues with difficulty balancing, noting that certain sections can become repetitive or frustrating due to inconsistent difficulty spikes. Furthermore, the lack of enemy variety, as mentioned by XGN, contributes to a sense of monotony in some parts of the game, detracting from the overall engagement. This sentiment is echoed by Impulsegamer, who notes that while the game has traditional JRPG elements, some mechanics feel outdated. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while Live A Live offers a unique and engaging gameplay experience with its tactical turn-based system and varied chapter mechanics, it is marred by issues of simplicity and inconsistency in difficulty. Reviewers like PlaySense and Comicbook.com express that despite the potential for deeper gameplay, the execution often falls short, leading to a feeling of missed opportunities. While the game succeeds in providing a nostalgic yet innovative RPG experience, the criticisms regarding its repetitive nature and lack of progression suggest that it may not fully satisfy hardcore RPG enthusiasts. Ultimately, Live A Live stands out for its creativity and charm, but it may leave some players yearning for a more refined and challenging gameplay experience.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Live A Live's HD-2D art style receives rave reviews for its stunning visuals that blend pixel art with 3D environments, enhancing the game's storytelling. Critics praise its vibrant colors and depth, successfully modernizing the original aesthetic while retaining nostalgia. However, some concerns arise over certain visuals blending together and the absence of options to switch to original graphics. Overall, it’s hailed as a visually striking title on the Nintendo Switch, captivating both new players and veterans alike.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

95%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of Live A Live have garnered a predominantly positive reception among critics, with many praising the game's HD-2D art style. Reviewers like IGN Japan and Twinfinite highlighted how the visuals enhance the overall experience, noting the impressive blend of pixel art and 3D environments. Critics from outlets such as NME and Vandal appreciated the simplistic yet effective visuals that support the game's storytelling. The vibrant colors and detailed environments were frequently mentioned, with GameSpot and Cubed3 emphasizing the beauty and depth of the graphics. Many reviewers, including those from PC Games and The Independent, noted that the remake successfully modernizes the original's aesthetic while retaining its nostalgic charm, making it visually appealing to both new players and veterans of the original game. However, some critics did express minor concerns regarding the visual design. ZTGD pointed out that while the 16-bit art style holds up well, certain elements may start to blend together and lose their distinctiveness over time. PLAY! Zine echoed this sentiment by mentioning that some backgrounds can appear overly flashy, which may detract from the overall visual coherence. Additionally, while the majority of reviews were favorable, a few critics hinted at the lack of options to toggle between the original visuals and the new HD-2D graphics, which could have provided a more personalized experience for players. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Live A Live boasts a stunning visual presentation that effectively utilizes the HD-2D style to create a captivating aesthetic experience. The game has been praised for its ability to evoke nostalgia while simultaneously appealing to modern sensibilities, as noted by reviewers from outlets like GameOver.gr and Hardcore Gamer. Critics agree that the blend of retro and contemporary design elements results in a visually striking game that stands out on the Nintendo Switch. With the majority of reviews highlighting the impressive graphics and attention to detail, Live A Live is recognized as a visually captivating title that successfully enhances its storytelling through its art style.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics rave about Live A Live's sound design, especially Yoko Shimomura's remastered soundtrack, which enhances the game’s diverse settings. The use of live instruments and enjoyable voice acting in both English and Japanese are praised. However, some find the music repetitive and voice acting occasionally over-the-top. Despite minor critiques, the overwhelming consensus highlights the audio elements as significant strengths, delivering a captivating experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

88%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

12%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of Live A Live have garnered a largely positive reception among critics, with many praising the contributions of composer Yoko Shimomura. The remastered soundtrack is frequently highlighted as a standout feature, with critics like IGN and GameOver.gr noting its beauty and ability to fit the various settings of the game seamlessly. The use of live instruments has been commended, enhancing the overall auditory experience, as pointed out by Metro GameCentral. Additionally, the voice acting, available in both English and Japanese, has been described as enjoyable, with some critics, such as The Mako Reactor and Nintenderos, appreciating the quality of the performances. The music's ability to capture the essence of each chapter and its memorable themes, as noted by Twinfinite and Comicbook.com, further solidifies its positive reception. However, there are some criticisms regarding the sound design and voice acting. A few reviewers, such as SECTOR.sk and Hardcore Gamer, mentioned that the music can become repetitive over time, potentially detracting from the overall experience. Additionally, while many found the voice acting charming, others felt it could be over-the-top or lacking in natural delivery, as highlighted by Gfinity and GameOver.gr. Some critics, like WellPlayed, described the writing as standard and forgettable, which could impact the overall effectiveness of the voice performances. Overall, the consensus among critics is overwhelmingly favorable, with the majority agreeing that the sound design and music of Live A Live are significant strengths of the game. The remastered soundtrack by Yoko Shimomura is celebrated for its diversity and ability to enhance the gameplay experience, as noted by RPGamer and iMore. While there are minor criticisms regarding repetitiveness and voice acting quality, these do not overshadow the general appreciation for the game's audio elements. Critics like PCMag and Attack of the Fanboy encapsulate this sentiment, emphasizing the exceptional quality of the music and voice work, which together contribute to a captivating and immersive experience.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

The voice acting in "Live A Live" receives mixed reviews: praised for enhancing character depth and storytelling through strong English and Japanese performances, but criticized for low-quality English dubs, clichés, and inconsistent emotional delivery. While many critics appreciate the overall experience, significant flaws, like awkward accents and flat performances, detract from the game's potential.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

48%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

48%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in "Live A Live" has been met with a notable degree of praise from various critics, particularly for its dual-language options, which include both English and Japanese. Many reviewers, such as IGN and Nintendo Insider, highlight the positive impact of the voice acting on character development and emotional engagement, noting that it enhances the narrative experience significantly. Critics like RPGamer and Digital Trends commend the casting choices, suggesting that the performances generally align well with the characters and contribute to the overall atmosphere of the game. Additionally, reviewers from outlets like PCMag and TheSixthAxis describe the voice acting as excellent and phenomenal, respectively, indicating a strong appreciation for the quality of the performances. However, there are several criticisms regarding the voice acting that cannot be overlooked. Critics from PlayStation Universe and Press Start Australia express disappointment, labeling the English dub as low-quality, cliché, and overacted, which detracts from the otherwise high standards expected from a Square Enix title. Others, such as DarkZero and GameOver.gr, mention that certain performances lack emotional depth, with some voices feeling flat or awkward, which can break immersion. Additionally, the presence of questionable accents, particularly in the English version, has been pointed out by critics like Metro GameCentral and RPG Site, indicating a lack of consistency in the quality of voice performances. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed but leans towards a positive reception of the voice acting in "Live A Live." While many acknowledge the strengths of the voice performances, particularly in enhancing the storytelling and character immersion, others highlight significant flaws that can detract from the experience. Critics like Gfinity and Nintendo Life encapsulate this sentiment by recognizing both the melodramatic flair and the occasional missteps in delivery. Ultimately, while the voice acting adds a new dimension to the game, its execution varies, leading to a diverse range of opinions among reviewers.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Live A Live shines on PC and PS5 with smooth 60fps performance and customizable settings, earning high praise from critics. The PS5 boasts reduced load times and better graphics than the Switch, though some felt it lacked enhancements. Meanwhile, the Switch version struggles with frequent loading times, autosave crashes, and a flawed checkpoint system, leading to mixed reviews despite some stability praises. Overall, while the PC and PS5 deliver a solid experience, the Switch's issues make it the most contentious platform, showcasing the challenges of optimizing for different hardware.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

55%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

45%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of Live A Live across different platforms has generally received positive feedback, particularly for the PC and PS5 versions. On PC, critics like GameGrin and Windows Central noted a smooth experience, with the latter highlighting the game’s ability to run at 60fps and 1080p resolution, even on lower-end hardware. SECTOR.sk also praised the customizable graphics settings available on PC, which enhances the overall user experience. For the PS5, Finger Guns and GamersRD reported smooth performance at 60fps, with reduced loading times and improved graphics compared to the Switch version. The Mako Reactor also emphasized the PS5’s performance, noting significant reductions in load times, which enhances gameplay flow. On the Nintendo Switch, while performance was generally stable, several critics like Nintenderos and Pocket Tactics reported a flawless experience with no significant technical issues. However, there are notable negatives, particularly for the Nintendo Switch version. Critics like God is a Geek and IGN Japan pointed out frequent loading times that can disrupt gameplay, with some reviewers mentioning the annoying nature of these loading screens. Hardcore Gamer highlighted a critical issue with the autosave feature crashing, which could lead to frustrating gameplay experiences. Additionally, Gamezebo and Dexerto mentioned problems with the checkpoint system and cutscene pacing, which could detract from the overall enjoyment of the game. On the PS5, PlayStation Universe criticized the lack of enhancements over the Switch version, which may leave some players disappointed. Meanwhile, on PC, Movies Games and Tech raised concerns about some design flaws from the 90s, such as an infrequent autosave system that could lead to frustrating replay moments. Overall, the consensus among critics suggests that while Live A Live performs admirably on PC and PS5, the Nintendo Switch version has mixed reviews, with some critics praising its stability and others pointing out significant issues that could hinder the experience. The PC version stands out for its smooth performance and customizable settings, while the PS5 version benefits from improved load times and graphics. In contrast, the Switch version, despite its flaws, has also been acknowledged for its modernization efforts and stable gameplay by critics like Multiplayer.it and SECTOR.sk. Ultimately, while there are commendable aspects across all platforms, the Switch version appears to be the most contentious, highlighting the challenges of optimizing a remaster for varying hardware capabilities.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Live A Live garners mixed reviews on replay value. Critics praise its unique chapter-based structure and optional content, enhancing variety and gameplay styles. However, many argue it lacks substantial incentives for multiple playthroughs, with some labeling it a "one and done" experience due to short chapter lengths and limited character progression. While enjoyable, its replayability is hampered by brevity, leaving some players wanting more.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

33%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

64%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions of various critics regarding the replay value of Live A Live highlight several positive aspects that contribute to its overall appeal. Many reviewers, such as Game Informer and Nintendo Insider, emphasize the game's unique structure, which allows players to engage with multiple chapters that can be completed in any order. This design not only provides variety but also encourages players to explore different gameplay styles and narratives, making it feel like several distinct experiences within one game. Critics like T3 and The Mako Reactor note that the inclusion of optional content, multiple endings, and super-bosses adds further incentives for replaying certain chapters, enhancing the overall replayability of the game. However, there are notable criticisms regarding the game's replay value. Several reviewers, including GameSkinny and PlaySense, argue that the game lacks substantial incentive for multiple playthroughs, with some describing it as a "one and done" experience. Critics like IGN Japan and Metro GameCentral point out that while the game offers a range of scenarios, the overall experience may not compel players to return after completing the initial run. Additionally, the short duration of individual chapters, as mentioned by CD-Action and SpazioGames, may leave some players wanting more depth and engagement, which could detract from the desire to replay the game. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed when it comes to the replay value of Live A Live. While many acknowledge the game's innovative structure and the potential for varied experiences through different chapter selections, others highlight the limitations imposed by its short playtime and lack of character progression. Critics like GamersRD and Easy Allies note that the ability to replay chapters and explore different endings can be appealing, but the overall sentiment suggests that while there is some replay value, it may not be enough for every player. The game is seen as enjoyable and unique, yet its replayability is often tempered by the brevity of its content and the absence of deeper engagement, leading to a general sense that it may not hold the same allure for repeated playthroughs.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

84%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

16%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall sentiment surrounding Live A Live is predominantly positive, with many critics praising its unique storytelling, innovative gameplay mechanics, and impressive presentation. Critics like VG247 and Attack of the Fanboy highlight the game's cleverness and energy, appealing strongly to fans of classic JRPGs. The remake has been noted for its stunning visuals and rearranged soundtrack, which enhance the experience, as mentioned by T3 and Atomix. Additionally, the anthology structure allows for a diverse range of narratives, engaging players with memorable characters and creative scenarios, as emphasized by reviewers such as GamersRD and Digital Trends. The game is seen as a significant addition to the modern RPG landscape while honoring its roots, making it a must-play for genre enthusiasts. However, the game is not without its criticisms. Several reviewers, including NME and GameSkinny, pointed out issues such as uneven pacing, repetitive combat, and a lack of depth in character development. The battle system has been described as poorly balanced and sometimes frustrating, as noted by critics like Screen Rant and GameSkinny. While some chapters offer engaging gameplay, others can feel monotonous, leading to an underwhelming experience for certain players, as highlighted by GAMES.CH and Multiplayer.it. The outdated mechanics and occasional narrative shortcomings have also been flagged as detracting from the overall enjoyment of the game. Despite these criticisms, the overall consensus among critics is that Live A Live is a highly enjoyable and worthwhile experience, particularly for fans of the genre. While some reviewers acknowledge its flaws, they often emphasize the game's charm and creativity, with many considering it a hidden gem from the 16-bit era that still resonates today. Critics like RPGamer and Nintendo Insider assert that the game successfully captures the essence of classic JRPGs while providing a fresh experience for modern audiences. In summary, Live A Live stands out as a captivating and innovative RPG, earning a strong recommendation from the majority of critics.

TL;DR

Live A Live garners mostly positive reviews for its unique storytelling, innovative gameplay, and stunning visuals, appealing to classic JRPG fans. Critics praise its diverse narratives and memorable characters, marking it as a significant modern RPG. However, it faces criticism for uneven pacing, repetitive combat, and some outdated mechanics. Despite these issues, it remains a charming and creative experience, recommended as a must-play for genre enthusiasts.

MONSTER

Reviews

171 reviews found

100

Cubed3

Nintendo Switch

Jul 27, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Live A Live is a great game turned masterpiece with this fantastic remake. Highly recommended.

Read full review

100

Pocket Tactics

Nintendo Switch

Jul 21, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Live A Live is a splendid RPG that pays homage to the genre's heyday in the 90s while offering a rejuvenated experience for both original and new fans.

Read full review

100

Digitally Downloaded

Nintendo Switch

Jul 21, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Live A Live is a quirky and fundamentally experimental JRPG that stands out in the genre. It is an essential title for those curious and looking for genuinely different gameplay experiences.

Read full review

App Trigger

Nintendo Switch

Jul 26, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A rare and unique title that has been drastically improved with love and hard work, an absolute joy to experience

Read full review

But Why Tho?

Nintendo Switch

Jul 27, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The reviewer considers Live A Live an absolute masterpiece and highly recommends it to any fan of JRPGs.

Atomix

Nintendo Switch

Jul 26, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Live a Live is a well-crafted experience that offers a fantastic and diverse experience from start to finish. The game's strength lies in its variety, with different settings, objectives, and gameplay mechanics in each chapter. The visual and auditory presentation is spectacular, and the game is a testament to the passion behind its creation.

Read full review

CGMagazine

Nintendo Switch

Jul 21, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Live A Live is a classic game that feels fresh and stands apart from its contemporaries. The compelling storylines, engaging gameplay, and excellent remake make it a game that should be played.

Read full review

Inverse

Nintendo Switch

Jul 21, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Live A Live is a cinematic masterpiece and a must-play for fans of classic JRPGs, with its unique stories, satisfying gameplay, and extraordinary production value.

Read full review

Areajugones

Nintendo Switch

Jul 21, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

LIVE A LIVE is a classic RPG that offers captivating stories, enjoyable gameplay, stunning graphics, and a powerful soundtrack. It is a must-play for RPG fans.

Read full review

RPGamer

PlayStation 5

May 10, 2023

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Live A Live is a unique and joyful RPG experience with charming characters, superb storytelling, and varied gameplay, making it a top-notch recommendation for fans of the genre.

Read full review