Search for games

Type three or more characters to search...

Links

Playstation

Twitch

MONSTER

Foamstars

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Foamstars
Item: Foamstars
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2024

GenresAction, Third Person Perspective, Shooter, Single Player, Multiplayer, First Person Perspective

AvailableFeb 6, 2024

PlatformPlayStation 4, PlayStation 5

DeveloperToylogic

Overview

A 4v4 online party shooter from Square Enix that has you battling to foam as much of the city as you can while avoiding your opponents traps and weapons. Use foam to build terrain, creating slippery surfaces to surf around the arena at high speed, help defend from enemy attacks, or create vantage points to take out opponents. And most importantly, to foam up the opposition!

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Foamstars offers a colorful setting and quirky characters reminiscent of Overwatch, but the narrative falls flat. Critics praise its creativity and humor, yet many find the single-player mode repetitive and shallow, with basic missions and awkward dialogue. Overall, while it has potential, Foamstars fails to deliver an engaging story, leading to disappointment.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

64%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

36%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The story of Foamstars has garnered a mix of opinions from various critics, with some positive aspects highlighted in their reviews. Atomix appreciates the distinct characters and individual backstories, drawing a parallel to Overwatch, which suggests a level of character development that could engage players. IGN notes the quirky and engaging nature of the story, particularly the unique concept of competing in the Foamsmash Tournament in the vibrant city of Bath Vegas. This vibrant setting and the playful premise of using foam-based weapons add a layer of creativity that some critics find appealing. Additionally, Gamer Escape acknowledges the light narrative and humor, even if it is hit-or-miss, suggesting that there are moments of charm within the story. However, a significant number of critics point out the numerous shortcomings of Foamstars' narrative. Digital Trends criticizes the single-player mode for being repetitive and lacking depth, describing the missions as easy wave defense tasks that fail to engage players meaningfully. Similarly, Everyeye.it and GGRecon echo this sentiment, stating that the single-player campaign quickly becomes monotonous and uninspired. Critics like GamingBolt and TechRadar Gaming emphasize that the story feels basic and is primarily targeted toward a younger audience, with awkward dialogue that detracts from the overall experience. TRG goes as far as to label the single-player missions as "atrocious," indicating a strong dissatisfaction with the execution of the narrative. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while Foamstars presents an interesting concept and a vibrant setting, it ultimately falls short in delivering a compelling and engaging story. The characters and their unique gameplay mechanics are acknowledged, but many reviewers, including LevelUp and Siliconera, emphasize that the lack of depth and engaging missions severely undermines the potential of the narrative. The repetitive nature of the gameplay and the simplistic, often cringe-inducing humor lead to a general feeling of disappointment, suggesting that while Foamstars has the foundation for a fun story, it fails to build upon it effectively.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Foamstars is a fast-paced multiplayer shooter that impresses with its creative foam mechanics and fun combat, earning positive reviews for its engaging gameplay and character diversity. However, critics warn of repetitive gameplay and limited character options that may dull its appeal over time. While it offers chaotic PvP action, improvements in variety and clarity are needed to enhance the overall experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

42%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

58%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Foamstars has garnered a generally positive reception among critics, highlighting its fast-paced and enjoyable multiplayer battles. Reviewers such as Atomix and IGN commend the game for its creative foam-based mechanics that add variability and strategic depth to the experience. The unique character abilities and combat styles, as noted by GamingBolt and Digital Trends, contribute to a diverse and engaging gameplay environment. Critics like Checkpoint Gaming emphasize the fun combat and the effective integration of various game modes that complement the foam mechanics well, while But Why Tho? points out the easy-to-learn shooting and surfing mechanics that can be mastered over time, enhancing the overall enjoyment of the game. However, several reviewers have pointed out notable shortcomings that could detract from the game's longevity. Critics such as Everyeye.it and TechRadar Gaming express concerns over repetitive gameplay and limited character variety, which may lead to boredom over time. The lack of exciting and original content in some game modes, as highlighted by LevelUp, and the visibility issues mentioned by GGRecon, further contribute to a sense of imbalance in the gameplay experience. Vandal's critique of confusing mechanics and unbalanced modes suggests that while the game has potential, it struggles with execution in certain areas. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Foamstars offers a fresh take on the multiplayer shooter genre with its unique foam mechanics and engaging gameplay. While the game excels in providing chaotic and strategic PvP experiences, as noted by TRG and Siliconera, the repetitive nature of some modes and limited character variety could hinder its long-term appeal. The game is praised for its fun and frenetic gameplay, but critics agree that improvements in variety and clarity are necessary to elevate the experience.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Foamstars impresses with its vibrant, anime-inspired graphics and energetic character design, earning praise for its colorful aesthetic. However, critics highlight significant issues like visual clutter and lack of polish that detract from gameplay clarity. While the visuals are engaging, they ultimately confuse players and lack depth, leaving reviewers split on the overall impact.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

21%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

79%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of Foamstars have garnered a generally positive reception among critics, particularly for their vibrant and colorful aesthetic. Reviewers such as Atomix and GGRecon praised the game's anime-inspired art style, highlighting its energetic and bold colors that contribute to an appealing presentation. But Why Tho? noted the distinct feel of characters and unique arenas, emphasizing the fun and engaging visuals. Critics like Everyeye.it and TechRadar Gaming echoed similar sentiments, pointing out the innovative character designs and the overall attractive art that enhances the game's appeal. The bright and bubbly aesthetic, along with neon lights, creates a lively atmosphere that many found enjoyable, as mentioned by Checkpoint Gaming and IGN. However, despite the overall positive impressions, several critics pointed out significant drawbacks in the visual design. Digital Trends and Gamer Escape expressed concerns about visual clutter, with the excessive foam covering the battlefield leading to confusion during gameplay. This sentiment was echoed by multiple reviewers, including GamingBolt, who noted a lack of polish and balance in the design, which detracted from the overall experience. Critics like Siliconera and Vandal criticized the character designs as lacking personality and depth, suggesting that the game feels somewhat corporate and fails to engage players fully. Additionally, some reviewers mentioned issues with map variety and dark environments, which negatively impacted player awareness and enjoyment. The overall consensus among critics indicates that while Foamstars boasts a visually appealing and colorful aesthetic, it suffers from notable design flaws that hinder the gaming experience. Many reviewers, including Push Square and Multiplayer.it, acknowledged the stylish presentation and diverse character designs but also highlighted the confusion caused by excessive visual effects and clutter. As a result, while the game presents a vibrant and energetic visual style, it struggles to maintain clarity and depth, leaving critics divided on its overall effectiveness in delivering a satisfying visual experience.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Foamstars’ sound design is divisive; while many praise its vibrant and diverse soundtrack that enhances gameplay, critics point out flaws in dialogue and a mixed musical appeal that can alienate players. The positive vibes clash with significant drawbacks, leading to a split reception among reviewers.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

33%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

33%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

33%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The opinions on the sound design and music of Foamstars reveal a generally positive sentiment regarding the game's auditory experience. Critics like Atomix and IGN highlight the engaging music and killer songs that enhance the gameplay, suggesting a strong connection between audio elements and player immersion. Gamer Escape praises the impressive soundtrack, noting its diverse influences ranging from swing and jazz to electronica and funk, which contribute to the game's vibrant atmosphere. Additionally, Push Square echoes this sentiment by describing the music as surprisingly good, complementing the energetic and lighthearted feel of the game. These positive remarks indicate that many players find the music to be a significant asset, enriching their overall experience. However, not all reviews are favorable. Critics such as Digital Trends and Siliconera express concerns about the soundtrack's appeal, with Digital Trends mentioning that the attempt to cater to both kids and adults results in an alienating balance. Siliconera criticizes the music and album covers as generic and uninspiring, lacking the unique elements that make similar games, like Splatoon, stand out. Furthermore, both God is a Geek and TechRadar Gaming point out issues with the dialogue and voice acting, describing them as annoying and irritating, which detracts from the overall sound experience. These negative aspects suggest that while the music may shine, other audio elements can significantly undermine the game's auditory quality. In summary, the overall consensus among critics regarding Foamstars' sound design and music is mixed. While many reviewers, such as Atomix and Gamer Escape, celebrate the engaging and diverse soundtrack that enhances gameplay, others like Digital Trends and TechRadar Gaming highlight significant drawbacks, particularly concerning dialogue and the inconsistency of the music's appeal. This dichotomy indicates that while the game has strengths in its musical composition, it also faces challenges that may affect player enjoyment, leading to a divided reception in the critical landscape.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Analysis Unavailable

Summary unavailable

TL;DR

voice acting

Description unavailable

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Foamstars garners mixed reviews for its technical performance on PS5 and PS4 Pro. While the PS5 version boasts stable frame rates and strong crossplay features, critics lament matchmaking woes, lag issues, and visual clutter that mar the overall experience. Positive aspects are overshadowed by significant online connectivity problems, leaving the game in need of refinement to reach its full potential.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

15%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

54%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

31%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of Foamstars across platforms, particularly on the PS5 and PS4 Pro, presents a mixed bag of opinions from various critics. On the PS5, several reviewers, including Atomix and Push Square, commend the game for its stable frame rates and overall smooth performance. Atomix highlights the effective crossplay feature between PS4 and PS5, which enhances the multiplayer experience. Push Square also notes the technical strength of the game, emphasizing the absence of frame rate dips and the successful integration of DualSense haptics, which adds to the immersion. On the PS4 Pro, Multiplayer.it reports that the game runs smoothly, with only minor performance issues during intense cooperative gameplay, indicating a generally positive experience on this platform as well. However, the criticisms surrounding Foamstars' technical performance are significant and varied. Many reviewers, such as But Why Tho? and GamingBolt, express frustration with matchmaking issues, including long queue times and network connectivity problems, which detract from the overall enjoyment of the game. Checkpoint Gaming and Vandal point out lag and clarity issues during online matches, further complicating the gameplay experience. Additionally, Gamer Escape mentions unrefined movement and visual clutter that can confuse players, while IGN raises concerns about monetization practices that impact stability and enjoyment. These issues collectively paint a picture of a game that struggles with its online infrastructure and user experience. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while Foamstars showcases some technical strengths, particularly on the PS5, the game is hampered by significant issues that affect its multiplayer functionality and overall enjoyment. The positive aspects, such as stable performance and good aesthetics, are overshadowed by recurring problems like matchmaking delays and network instability. Critics like TheSixthAxis and LevelUp echo these sentiments, indicating that while the foundation of the game is solid, the execution in terms of technical performance leaves much to be desired. This mixed reception suggests that Foamstars may need further refinement to fully realize its potential across all platforms.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Foamstars boasts a diverse character roster and unique game modes that hint at replayability, but critics slam its lack of depth, repetitive gameplay, short matches, and long wait times. Aggressive microtransactions further damage its appeal, leading many to doubt its long-term engagement potential. Overall, while there are some positives, significant flaws threaten to undermine player retention.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

79%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

21%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions regarding the replay value of Foamstars reveal a mix of positive aspects that some critics appreciate. Notably, IGN highlights the diverse roster of characters, each possessing unique abilities and playstyles, which contributes to the game's replayability. Similarly, Digital Trends mentions that the unique modes and strategic gameplay offer some replay value, suggesting that there is potential for engaging gameplay experiences. Critics like Push Square and TheSixthAxis also acknowledge the variety of game modes available, which can provide players with different experiences. This variety, combined with the potential for unlocking new characters and abilities through the battle pass system, indicates that there are elements within Foamstars that can keep players engaged for a while. However, the negatives surrounding Foamstars are significant and often overshadow the positives. A recurring theme among critics is the game's lack of depth and variety, with many reviewers, including But Why Tho? and GamingBolt, expressing concerns about limited game modes and repetitive gameplay. Critics like Checkpoint Gaming and TRG point out that the game suffers from short match lengths and long queue times, which can detract from the overall experience. Furthermore, the aggressive microtransactions and expensive cosmetics mentioned by multiple sources, including Siliconera and LevelUp, raise concerns about the game's monetization strategies, potentially discouraging long-term engagement. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while Foamstars has some redeeming qualities, particularly in terms of character variety and gameplay mechanics, its replay value is hindered by significant shortcomings. The lack of substantial content, depth, and engaging progression systems leads many reviewers, such as Gamer Escape and Multiplayer.it, to question the game's longevity and player retention. Critics agree that without meaningful updates and improvements, Foamstars may struggle to maintain player interest in the long run, leaving many to feel that it lacks the necessary elements to keep players coming back for more.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

83%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

13%

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The reviews for Foamstars reveal a mix of appreciation for its engaging gameplay mechanics and vibrant aesthetic, alongside a recognition of its potential for growth. Critics like But Why Tho? highlight the fun party shooter aspect and the chill vibes that the game offers, suggesting that it can become a great title with the right tweaks. Push Square also praises the game's colorful and unique design, emphasizing its strategic potential and entertaining nature. Many reviewers, including IGN and Gamer Escape, see promise in the gameplay and mechanics, indicating that with further development, Foamstars could evolve into a more immersive experience. However, the criticisms of Foamstars are significant and numerous. Reviewers consistently point out issues such as gameplay depth, visual clutter, and excessive monetization. Digital Trends and TechRadar Gaming specifically mention the cluttered visuals and poor single-player content, which detract from the overall experience. Furthermore, critics like Checkpoint Gaming and LevelUp express concerns that the game prioritizes in-game economy over community building and lacks innovation, which could hinder its ability to sustain player interest. The presence of aggressive microtransactions, as noted by several critics including GGRecon and TRG, raises concerns about the game's long-term viability and player satisfaction. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Foamstars is a title with notable strengths but also significant shortcomings. While there is a shared recognition of its engaging mechanics and vibrant visuals, the game is often described as falling short in terms of content, depth, and innovation. Critics like GamingBolt and Vandal emphasize that despite its fun moments, the lack of substance and excessive monetization make it difficult to recommend for long-term engagement. Ultimately, while Foamstars has the foundation for a successful multiplayer experience, it requires substantial improvements to fully realize its potential in a competitive market.

TL;DR

Foamstars impresses with engaging gameplay and vibrant visuals, but suffers from significant flaws like gameplay depth, visual clutter, and aggressive monetization. Critics acknowledge its potential for growth but emphasize that it currently lacks content and innovation, making long-term engagement questionable. Improvements are crucial for it to compete effectively in the multiplayer market.

MONSTER

Reviews

43 reviews found

Push Square

PlayStation 5

Feb 9, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Foamstars is a colorful, unique, and entertaining shooter with potential for strategy and plenty of style.

Read full review

Multiplayer.it

PlayStation 5

Mar 6, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Foamstars has potential but needs more content and innovative ideas to thrive in the competitive gaming market.

Read full review

Siliconera

PlayStation 5

Feb 13, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Foamstars offers engaging gameplay mechanics but falls short in terms of aesthetics, monetization, and long-term sustainability in a competitive market.

Read full review

Everyeye.it

PlayStation 5

Feb 11, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Foamstars has potential with distinctive heroes and varied movesets, but needs improvement in clarity and gameplay depth to truly succeed.

Read full review

But Why Tho?

PlayStation 5

Feb 11, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Foamstars is a fun party shooter with chill vibes and vibrant expression that has the potential to be great with some tweaks and additions. Despite its current shortcomings, it is engaging and enjoyable.

Read full review

Gamer Escape

PlayStation 5

Feb 22, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Foamstars shows potential with its unique gameplay mechanics, appealing visual design, and impressive soundtrack, but is held back by issues like visual clutter, movement issues, and lack of depth in certain aspects, making it fall short of making a significant impact.

Read full review

Atomix

PlayStation 5

Feb 19, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Foamstars provides a fun and engaging multiplayer experience with potential for growth through updates and player engagement, but is held back by gameplay issues, lack of variety, and design flaws.

Read full review

IGN

PlayStation 5

Feb 16, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Foamstars presents a promising foundation for a competitive shooter with creative gameplay mechanics and engaging multiplayer experience. However, issues with monetization, voice acting, and multiplayer structure hinder its potential. With improvements in these areas, Foamstars could offer a more enjoyable and immersive gaming experience.

Read full review

Checkpoint Gaming

PlayStation 5

Feb 26, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Foamstars follows the Splatoon blueprint but prioritizes in-game economy over community building, facing challenges in proving itself in the market and sustaining player interest.

Read full review

Digital Trends

PlayStation 5

Feb 13, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Foamstars has potential with its strategic gameplay and unique modes, but is hindered by cluttered visuals, awful voice acting, and a confused presentation. The presence of jaw-dropping microtransactions may also impact player enjoyment.

Read full review