Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

Twitch

MONSTER

Concord

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Concord
Item: Concord
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2024

GenresAdventure, Action, Science Fiction and Futuristic, Third Person Perspective, Shooter, Multiplayer, First Person Perspective

AvailableAug 23, 2024

PlatformPlayStation 5, PC

DeveloperFirewalk

Overview

Concord is a story rich space adventure game.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Story of Concord dazzles with lush, Guardians of the Galaxy-inspired lore and visuals but falters badly: its empty characters, incoherent storytelling, and gameplay disconnect turn a bold universe into a hollow experience. While world-building shines, underdeveloped narratives and derivative mechanics leave players stranded between ambition and disappointment. Mixed reviews: lore-rich, but story-scarce.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

17%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

67%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

17%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The reviewers who praised Story of Concord highlighted its rich world-building and immersive lore, which they compared to the narrative depth of Marvel’s Guardians of the Galaxy. Daily Star noted the game’s blend of Overwatch-style run-and-gun mechanics with visually striking Guardians of the Galaxy-inspired aesthetics, while Digital Trends and TheSixthAxis commended the weekly cinematic scenes and the Galactic Guide codex for expanding the game’s universe. Checkpoint Gaming emphasized the prose-like storytelling, describing the characters as having "deep backstories and diverse identities," which suggests a strong foundation in lore and character exploration. These elements indicate that the game’s narrative framework is ambitious, offering players a sense of a living, evolving world, even if it doesn’t always translate into a cohesive gameplay experience. However, the negatives were more pronounced, with multiple critics pointing to a disconnect between the story and gameplay. IGN Spain and PCMag criticized the lack of defined narrative and character development, calling the characters "empty" and "lacking style," which hindered emotional engagement. GamesRadar+ and God is a Geek noted that the storytelling was "more telling than showing," leaving players with unresolved questions and a sense of incoherence. Push Square and Shacknews also highlighted a lack of originality, with the game feeling overly derivative of Guardians of the Galaxy and other media. Additionally, PC Invasion and GameSkinny pointed out that while characters had unique abilities, their story vignettes were "uneventful" and failed to provide meaningful exploration, further diminishing the impact of the narrative. Overall, the consensus among critics leans toward a mixed reception, with the game’s lore and visual design being its strongest suits, but its storytelling and character development falling short. While some reviewers, like Daily Star and Checkpoint Gaming, appreciated the effort to create a detailed universe, others, such as IGN Spain and PCMag, felt the narrative lacked depth and coherence. The disconnect between the game’s rich backstory and its gameplay mechanics, as noted by Digital Trends and GamesRadar+, suggests that Story of Concord prioritizes world-building over player immersion. Despite its attempts to engage through weekly content and codex entries, the lack of originality and underdeveloped characters, as critiqued by Push Square and GameSkinny, left many reviewers unconvinced of its narrative strength. The game’s story, while ambitious, appears to be a secondary focus compared to its gameplay and visuals, resulting in a polarizing experience.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Concord nails fast-paced, hero-shooter fun with slick mechanics and diverse characters, but its derivative design, forgettable maps, and polish issues keep it stuck in the shadow of established classics. It’s enjoyable but lacks the innovation to stand out.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

67%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

25%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Concord receives widespread praise for its dynamic and engaging mechanics, with many critics highlighting its fast-paced, hero-shooter design. Reviewers like GamesRadar+ and IGN Spain commend the class-swapping system and diverse character abilities, which create strategic depth and variety in matches. Checkpoint Gaming and GameSkinny emphasize the responsive gunplay, well-balanced heroes, and rewarding team-based mechanics, drawing comparisons to Destiny’s Crucible and Overwatch. Daily Star and TheSixthAxis note the game’s energetic, "fast and furious" style, blending elements of Halo and Overwatch with unique character synergies. The inclusion of crew bonuses and tactical variants, as mentioned by Push Square, further enhances the gameplay’s flexibility, making it a compelling experience for fans of competitive multiplayer. However, several critics point to notable shortcomings, particularly in innovation and game mode design. Digital Trends and PC Invasion criticize the lack of a signature gameplay idea and "forgettable maps," while PCMag highlights long queue times in Rivalry mode as a frustration. TheSixthAxis notes that the game’s deviations from established formulas, while unique, still feel derivative of Call of Duty rather than offering a fresh identity. PC Invasion also points to "lack of polish" in game modes, and GamesRadar+ acknowledges the absence of deep strategic layers despite the character diversity. These critiques suggest that while the core mechanics are strong, the game struggles to distinguish itself in a crowded genre. Overall, the consensus leans positive but cautious, with most critics agreeing that Concord delivers solid, enjoyable gameplay but falls short in innovation and polish. The praise for its hero-shooter framework, character variety, and tactical depth—highlighted by GamesRadar+, IGN Spain, and Checkpoint Gaming—contrasts with recurring complaints about game mode repetition and balance issues. While Daily Star and TheSixthAxis celebrate its energy and uniqueness, PC Invasion and Digital Trends underscore the need for more originality. The game appears to strike a balance between familiarity and experimentation, appealing to fans of the genre while leaving room for improvement in its long-term appeal.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Concord's visuals are a technical triumph—vibrant, immersive, and Halo-esque—yet generic, bland characters and lack of originality undermine its art, creating a mixed bag of polish and missed potential.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

58%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

42%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The Graphics and Visual Design of Concord receive widespread praise for their technical polish and immersive environments. Critics like Daily Star highlight the "stunning visuals reminiscent of Halo multiplayer maps," emphasizing vibrant, colorful, and varied landscapes that evoke a sense of scale and creativity. GamesRadar+ and Checkpoint Gaming commend the game’s "visually impressive" presentation, noting its "high-fidelity graphics," "tight and varied level designs," and "seamless combat animations" that enhance the fast-paced gameplay. Push Square and TheSixthAxis laud the "impressive production values," "detailed sky boxes," and "beautifully polished gunplay," while Shacknews appreciates the "beautifully diverse character designs" and "CGI cinematics" that enrich the game’s worldbuilding. These reviews collectively paint a picture of a game that excels in creating dynamic, visually engaging spaces and animations, often drawing comparisons to established AAA titles. However, several critics point to shortcomings in character design and originality. IGN Spain and PCMag note that while the galaxy setting and art direction are strong, the "maps and visuals are not particularly impressive" and "character designs are generic" with "unappealing cosmetics." GameSkinny criticizes the lack of clarity in conveying character abilities through design, arguing that this undermines the game’s personality and lore. PC Invasion highlights "bland and uninteresting" characters, despite some "excellent" designs, and mentions color scheme issues that can be mitigated by unlocking skins. God is a Geek acknowledges the "gorgeous visuals" but laments the "lack of originality in design," suggesting that while the game looks polished, it may not stand out in terms of creativity or uniqueness. The overall consensus among critics is that Concord delivers a visually strong foundation with impressive environments, animations, and art direction, but its character design and originality face criticism. While Daily Star, GamesRadar+, and Checkpoint Gaming celebrate its technical achievements and aesthetic appeal, others like IGN Spain and PCMag argue that these elements don’t fully translate to a memorable or cohesive experience. The game’s visuals are often described as "premium" and "slick," yet the mixed feedback on character design—ranging from "distinct and inviting" to "generic" and "bland"—reveals a divide in how effectively its artistic choices serve gameplay and narrative. Ultimately, Concord appears to balance high production values with some notable flaws, making its visual design a mixed bag that impresses on a technical level but leaves room for improvement in terms of creativity and depth.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Analysis Unavailable

Summary unavailable

TL;DR

music and sound design

Description unavailable

Voice Acting

Analysis Unavailable

Summary unavailable

TL;DR

voice acting

Description unavailable

Technical Performance

Analysis Unavailable

Summary unavailable

TL;DR

technical performance

Description unavailable

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Concord has strong progression and customization systems that support replayability, but its lack of innovation, repetitive gameplay, and limited content could hurt long-term engagement — success depends on future updates and Sony's commitment to free-to-play adjustments.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

25%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

58%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

17%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The critics highlight several positive aspects of Concord’s replay value, particularly its progression systems and unlockable content. Digital Trends emphasizes the game’s daily, weekly, and seasonal objectives that provide structured incentives for continued play, while GamesRadar+ points to the Job Board as a mechanism for earning cosmetics and character variants, offering tangible rewards for long-term engagement. Checkpoint Gaming and GameSkinny praise the game’s endless experimentation with abilities, class types, and unique mechanics like Crew Bonus and Persistent Gadgets, which encourage strategic play and variety. Additionally, TheSixthAxis notes that unlocking rewards, mastering Freegunners, and customizing heroes with Combat Trait variants can sustain interest, even if cosmetics are limited at launch. These elements suggest a foundation for replayability through progression and customization. However, several critics express concerns about the game’s lack of innovation and content variety, which could limit its longevity. Daily Star and God is a Geek criticize the limited game modes and repetitive gameplay, while IGN Spain and PC Invasion highlight boring progression systems and lackluster rewards that fail to sustain engagement. Push Square and TheSixthAxis raise worries about insufficient modes and endless quests, despite the absence of microtransactions. PCMag acknowledges planned free content updates but warns that low player counts and the need for a free-to-play model might hinder success. These critiques suggest that while Concord has mechanics to encourage play, its core design may struggle to retain players without significant additions or innovations. Overall, the critics present a mixed consensus, with positives centered on progression and customization balanced against concerns about content depth and innovation. While Digital Trends, GamesRadar+, and Checkpoint Gaming see potential in the game’s systems, others like PC Invasion and IGN Spain argue that these elements are not enough to overcome its shortcomings. TheSixthAxis and Push Square acknowledge some replay value but stress that it hinges on player willingness to engage with limited mechanics. The game’s success in maintaining replayability likely depends on future updates and Sony’s ability to address its current gaps, as noted by PCMag’s call for free-to-play adjustments. Ultimately, Concord offers a modest foundation for replayability but risks falling short without meaningful expansion.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

11%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

78%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

11%

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall verdict for Concord from critics highlights its solid technical foundation and engaging core mechanics, which many reviewers acknowledge as strengths. GamesRadar+ praises its "strong fundamentals" and potential to evolve into a compelling hero shooter, while TheSixthAxis commends its "unique gameplay mechanics," "fast-paced modes," and "engaging story elements." Checkpoint Gaming and GameSkinny also note the game’s "fantastic minute-to-minute gunplay," "diverse cast of heroes," and "outstanding sound design," suggesting that the experience is enjoyable in its execution. Push Square describes it as a "well-meaning first-person shooter" with a "polished presentation," and IGN Spain acknowledges its "promising foundation," indicating that Concord has the building blocks for a satisfying multiplayer experience. These positives collectively point to a game that is technically competent and fun to play, even if it doesn’t break new ground. However, the negatives dominate the critical discourse, with many reviewers emphasizing a lack of innovation and originality. Daily Star and Digital Trends call it a "decent more-of-the-same option" and a "fairly boilerplate hero shooter," respectively, while PCMag and PC Invasion criticize its "derivative" nature and "aggressively okay" feel, especially given its $40 price tag. IGN Spain and Shacknews point to "lack of content," "thin selection of modes," and "poor character design" as significant shortcomings, and GamesRadar+ and Checkpoint Gaming note issues like "excessive lore" and "weak character impressions" that detract from immersion. Additionally, concerns about "uncertain long-term support from Sony" and the absence of features like an offline mode or better leaderboards further underscore the game’s perceived deficiencies in standing out or offering lasting value. Despite these mixed reviews, the consensus among critics leans toward Concord being a competent but unremarkable entry in the hero shooter genre. While it receives praise for its polished mechanics, visuals, and gameplay loops, the recurring critiques about its lack of originality, underdeveloped characters, and insufficient content suggest it struggles to differentiate itself in a saturated market. TheSixthAxis and Checkpoint Gaming offer more optimism, framing it as a "refreshing addition" or "great shooter" with room for growth, but most reviewers, including Daily Star, Digital Trends, and PC Invasion, view it as a safe, derivative choice that fails to justify its price or investment for players seeking something truly innovative. Ultimately, Concord is seen as a functional, if unexciting, title that may appeal to fans of the genre but lacks the defining features to become a must-buy or standout experience.

TL;DR

Concord is a technically polished hero shooter with strong gunplay and sound design, but its lack of innovation, thin content, and underdeveloped characters make it a "boilerplate" experience. Critics call it derivative, "aggressively okay," and overpriced, citing weak lore, poor design, and uncertain long-term support. A safe, functional pick for fans, but it fails to stand out in a saturated genre—just another faceless title in a sea of samey shooters.

MONSTER

Reviews

103 reviews found

TheSixthAxis

PlayStation 5

Sep 2, 2024