Search for games

Type three or more characters to search...

Links

Twitch

MONSTER

Warriors: Abyss

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Warriors: Abyss
Item: Warriors: Abyss
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2025

GenresAction, RPG, Single Player

AvailableFeb 12, 2025

PlatformPC, PlayStation 4, Xbox Series X, PlayStation 5, Nintendo Switch

DeveloperOmega Force

Overview

Through victory and defeat, traverse the merciless trials of hell.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Warriors: Abyss offers a straightforward premise of legendary warriors battling demons in Hell, which some critics find intriguing. However, the consensus is that the story is weak and underdeveloped, serving merely as a backdrop for gameplay. Reviewers criticize its lack of depth, boring dialogue, and minimal character interactions, suggesting players skip the narrative altogether. Ultimately, the game's real strengths lie in its mechanics, not its storytelling.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

38%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

62%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The reviews for Warriors: Abyss reveal a few positive notes regarding the game's story, primarily highlighting its straightforward premise. Critics like Loot Level Chill and Gamesurf appreciate the basic narrative framework, which involves the ruler of Hell, Enma, summoning legendary warriors to combat demons. This simplicity allows players to quickly engage with the gameplay without being bogged down by overly complex storytelling. The premise of historical heroes fighting in Hell offers an intriguing backdrop that some reviewers, such as Pure Nintendo, found to be potentially interesting, even if it ultimately lacks depth. However, the overwhelming sentiment among critics is that the story is fundamentally weak and underdeveloped. Reviewers consistently point out that the narrative serves merely as a backdrop for the gameplay, lacking the depth and character development necessary to engage players meaningfully. Critics like But Why Tho? and DarkZero emphasize the forgettable nature of the story, describing it as lacking finesse and depth. This sentiment is echoed by multiple reviewers, including IGN and Critical Hits, who criticize the dialogue as boring and the character interactions as minimal, leading to a general disengagement from the narrative. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Warriors: Abyss features a story that is simplistic and uninspired, failing to elevate the gameplay experience. The narrative is seen as an excuse for action rather than a compelling tale, with many reviewers recommending players skip the dialogue altogether, as noted by GamingBolt and TheSixthAxis. While the premise has the potential for intrigue, the execution leaves much to be desired, leading to a shared conclusion that the game’s strengths lie more in its mechanics than in its storytelling.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Warriors: Abyss delivers thrilling Musou-style combat infused with roguelite mechanics, offering fast-paced action and a diverse character roster. Critics celebrate its chaotic gameplay and potential for replayability, but many note frustrations with repetitiveness and a lack of strategic depth. While it’s fun for genre fans, some players might find it too simplistic and craving more complexity.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

50%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

42%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Warriors: Abyss has garnered a range of positive remarks from critics, particularly highlighting its chaotic and engaging combat system. Many reviewers, such as COGconnected and Checkpoint Gaming, praised the game for its thrilling blend of Musou-style combat with roguelite mechanics, which encourages experimentation and strategic play. The large roster of characters, each with unique abilities, adds depth and variety to the gameplay, allowing players to engage in fast-paced action against hordes of enemies. Critics like Siliconera and GamingBolt noted the satisfying combat mechanics and the potential for extensive replayability through character progression and team dynamics, making the experience enjoyable for fans of the genre. However, the gameplay is not without its criticisms. Several reviewers pointed out that while the combat can be exhilarating, it often falls into a repetitive cycle, diminishing the overall experience. Critics such as But Why Tho? and Digital Trends highlighted issues with repetitive enemies and bosses, which can lead to a lack of meaningful choices and strategy. Others, like ElDesmarque and The Jimquisition, expressed frustration with the overemphasis on dodging attacks, which detracts from the enjoyment of combat. Additionally, the simplicity of the combat system has been noted by critics like Multiplayer.it and Vandal, who felt that it lacks the depth and complexity expected from a roguelike title. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Warriors: Abyss offers a fun and chaotic gameplay experience that successfully integrates elements from both the Musou and roguelite genres. While the game shines in providing fast-paced action and a diverse character roster, it suffers from repetitiveness and a lack of strategic depth, as noted by multiple reviewers. Critics like IGN and CGMagazine encapsulated this sentiment, acknowledging the enjoyable aspects of the gameplay while also pointing out its shortcomings. Ultimately, Warriors: Abyss appeals to fans of the genre but may leave some players craving more complexity and variety in their gameplay experience.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Warriors: Abyss offers vibrant combat effects that excite, but critics largely slam its overall graphics as outdated and uninspired. While some praise the chaotic visuals, the consensus points to generic designs, reused assets, and a lack of creativity, leading to disappointment in the game's visual presentation.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

56%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

40%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The visual design of Warriors: Abyss has garnered some praise from critics, particularly for its vibrant effects during combat. Critics like Digitally Downloaded highlight the impressive fireworks from attacks and combos, which contribute to a chaotic yet engaging battlefield experience. Similarly, Checkpoint Gaming notes that the isometric perspective enhances the excitement of combat, with colorful visuals and particle effects adding to the overall thrill. This suggests that while the graphics may not be groundbreaking, the dynamic visual presentation during gameplay can create moments of visual appeal that resonate with players. However, the majority of critics have expressed significant concerns regarding the overall quality of the graphics and visual design. Many reviews, such as those from But Why Tho? and DarkZero, describe the visuals as lacking in variety and creativity, with generic enemy designs and uninspired environments. Digital Trends and GameBlast echo these sentiments, pointing out the low-quality art and reused character models that contribute to a drab depiction of the game's setting. Critics like Siliconera and COGconnected further emphasize the dated visuals, which lack detail and distinct style, leading to a monotonous overall aesthetic. The consensus indicates that while there are moments of visual excitement, they are overshadowed by a lack of innovation and polish in the game's design. Overall, the critics' consensus on the graphics and visual design of Warriors: Abyss leans heavily towards disappointment. While some reviewers acknowledge the chaotic and colorful nature of combat effects, the overwhelming sentiment is that the game suffers from outdated visuals, reused assets, and uninspired environments. Critics like IGN and Vandal specifically mention the lack of creativity in enemy and environment designs, which detracts from the player's experience. The combination of these factors suggests that while Warriors: Abyss may deliver some engaging moments, its visual presentation ultimately falls flat against the expectations of modern gaming standards.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

"Warriors: Abyss" features strong sound effects and engaging Japanese voice acting, but critics largely deem the soundtrack unremarkable and forgettable, labeling it a low-budget effort. While there are commendable moments, the overall audio experience disappoints, falling short of contemporary gaming standards and leaving players wanting more.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

17%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

50%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

33%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of "Warriors: Abyss" have garnered a mix of opinions from various critics, with some positive aspects noted. TheXboxHub highlighted the quality of the sound design, praising the impactful attack sounds and engaging voice acting, particularly in Japanese. This suggests that the game does deliver a certain level of auditory immersion that can enhance the gameplay experience. Additionally, Gamesurf pointed out that while the soundtrack draws heavily from previous titles in the series, it includes new themes for boss battles, indicating that there is some effort to innovate within a familiar framework. Overall, these elements contribute to a solid audio experience, particularly for players who appreciate the nuances of sound in action games. However, the majority of critics expressed dissatisfaction with the soundtrack and sound design. GameBlast described the soundtrack as familiar and unremarkable, contributing to a perception of low-budget production. Similarly, ElDesmarque echoed this sentiment, calling the sound design functional but unremarkable, with a forgettable soundtrack and limited voice acting. Critical Hits also noted the forgettable nature of the soundtrack and pointed out the absence of Portuguese subtitles, which, while not a major issue due to the minimal story, still reflects a lack of attention to detail in localization. This consensus on the soundtrack being forgettable or uninspired suggests a significant shortcoming in the game's overall audio landscape. In summary, while there are some commendable aspects of the sound design and music in "Warriors: Abyss," including quality sound effects and engaging voice acting, the overall sentiment leans towards disappointment. Critics like GameBlast and ElDesmarque emphasize the unremarkable and forgettable nature of the soundtrack, which detracts from the game's overall experience. The mixed reviews indicate that while there are moments of quality, the audio elements do not rise to the level of excellence expected in contemporary gaming, leaving players wanting more from the auditory experience.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

"Warriors: Abyss" features a split in voice acting reviews; some praise the immersive quality of the Japanese performances, while others slam the localized versions as cheap and repetitive, notably criticizing King Enma's voice. This divide suggests that while certain players may enjoy the original authenticity, many will find the localization flaws detract from the overall experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

17%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

33%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

50%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The opinions regarding the voice acting in "Warriors: Abyss" present a mixed bag, with some reviewers highlighting positive aspects that contribute to the game's overall experience. For instance, TheXboxHub praises the voice acting as "top-notch," emphasizing that character-specific vocalizations enhance the immersion and engagement with the narrative. Similarly, Starbit appreciates the authenticity brought by the Japanese voice acting, suggesting that it adds a layer of cultural depth to the game, even though the quality of the performances is not explicitly detailed. Gamesurf also acknowledges the good quality of the Japanese voice acting, noting that the presentation of characters is generally well done, which indicates that there are redeeming qualities in the vocal performances. However, the critiques of the voice acting in "Warriors: Abyss" are notably more pronounced, with several reviewers expressing dissatisfaction. GamingBolt specifically criticizes the voice acting of King Enma, stating that it contributes to the frustration of the story, which could significantly impact players' enjoyment. The Jimquisition echoes this sentiment by pointing out that the localized voice acting feels "cheapened," detracting from the overall experience. Additionally, ElDesmarque mentions that the voice acting is limited and features recycled lines from previous games, indicating a lack of variety that could lead to a monotonous experience for players. Overall, the consensus among critics suggests a divide in the reception of the voice acting in "Warriors: Abyss." While some, like TheXboxHub and Starbit, appreciate the authenticity and quality of the Japanese performances, others, including GamingBolt and The Jimquisition, highlight significant shortcomings, particularly in localization and variety. This dichotomy indicates that while there are strengths in the voice acting, particularly for those who appreciate the original Japanese performances, the criticisms regarding localization and repetitiveness may overshadow these positives for many players, leading to a somewhat mixed reception overall.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

"Warriors: Abyss" has mixed technical performance across platforms. PC offers smooth gameplay with high refresh rates, while the PS5 and Nintendo Switch are praised for stability but show frame rate drops in chaos. Xbox Series X struggles with performance issues and bugs. Overall, while some versions perform well, significant flaws suggest the game needs more refinement to reach its potential.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

38%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

50%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

13%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of "Warriors: Abyss" varies across different gaming platforms, showcasing a mix of strengths. On PC, reviewers like Multiplayer.it highlight that the game runs smoothly and supports high refresh rates, suggesting a commendable performance for players seeking a fluid experience. Meanwhile, on the PS5, critics such as Critical Hits and Digitally Downloaded praise the stable frame rates and responsive controls, contributing to an overall smooth gameplay experience. The Nintendo Switch version also receives positive feedback, with Pure Nintendo and Starbit noting solid performance in both docked and handheld modes, even during intense action sequences. However, several critics point out notable weaknesses across the platforms. On PC, GameBlast mentions reduced scale and interface issues that detract from the gameplay experience, while Siliconera notes that the game can be demanding visually, hinting at potential performance limitations. The PS5 version is not without its flaws; MeuPlayStation and TheSixthAxis report frame rate drops during chaotic moments, indicating some inconsistency in technical performance. On the Xbox Series X, ElDesmarque and ZTGD express concerns about performance issues, particularly during intense scenes, and mention errors in ability descriptions that suggest a lack of polish. Overall, the consensus among critics indicates a mixed reception regarding the technical performance of "Warriors: Abyss." While the PC and Nintendo Switch versions appear to deliver a more stable experience, the PS5 and Xbox Series X versions show signs of performance issues that could affect gameplay. Critics like Digital Trends and Critical Hits provide a balanced view, acknowledging both the strengths and weaknesses present in the game across platforms. Ultimately, while there are commendable aspects of technical performance, the presence of various issues across platforms suggests that "Warriors: Abyss" may require further refinement to reach its full potential.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Warriors: Abyss offers strong replay value through character progression and unlock systems that encourage experimentation, praised by critics like DarkZero and IGN. However, concerns about its repetitive gameplay and lack of variety, noted by reviewers such as Digital Trends and The Jimquisition, could dampen long-term engagement. While completionists may thrive on its challenges, the game's static design and limited diversity may deter players seeking a fresh experience. Overall, it's a mixed bag that appeals differently based on player preferences.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

31%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

50%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

19%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions regarding the replay value of Warriors: Abyss reveal a mix of positive sentiments, particularly highlighting the game's character progression and unlock systems. Critics like DarkZero and Multiplayer.it emphasize the significant replay value stemming from the variety of characters and the depth of the enhancement system, which encourages experimentation with different combinations. Similarly, Digitally Downloaded and IGN point out that the game’s mechanics, including character unlocks and quick runs, contribute to an enjoyable experience that invites players to return for more. The presence of challenges and the potential for completionists to engage deeply with the game are also noted as strong points, with critics like Gamesurf praising the special objectives that further enhance replayability. Conversely, several reviewers express concerns about the game's repetitive nature and lack of variety, which may hinder long-term engagement. Digital Trends and The Jimquisition highlight that the static design and tedious gameplay loop can make each run feel less unique and exciting, potentially leading to player disengagement. Critics such as Loot Level Chill and ElDesmarque also mention the limited diversity in enemies and stages, which detracts from the overall replay value despite the presence of a grind and progression system. This sentiment is echoed by critics on different platforms, including ZTGD, who note the disappointing lack of randomization in levels and bosses, a crucial element for a roguelite experience. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while Warriors: Abyss offers substantial replay value through character unlocks and progression mechanics, the repetitive gameplay and lack of variety in design may limit its long-term appeal. Critics like But Why Tho? and Critical Hits reflect this duality, acknowledging the potential for replayability while also cautioning about the diminishing excitement over time. The game seems to cater well to completionists and those who enjoy character experimentation, but the repetitive elements could deter players seeking a more dynamic experience. Thus, the game presents a mixed bag of replay value that may resonate differently depending on player preferences and expectations.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

29%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

71%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall sentiment regarding Warriors: Abyss reveals a mixed reception among critics, with several acknowledging the game's strengths. Many reviewers, such as Checkpoint Gaming and Digitally Downloaded, highlight the enjoyable gameplay and engaging combat mechanics, which are described as fast-paced and action-packed. Critics like GamingBolt and Loot Level Chill appreciate the solid roguelite elements and character variety, suggesting that the game offers a fun experience, particularly for fans of the Warriors franchise. The game’s ability to blend Musou gameplay with roguelike mechanics has been noted as a promising aspect, with some critics mentioning the addictive nature of the combat and team dynamics, as seen in COGconnected's review. Despite these positives, a significant number of critics express concerns about the game's shortcomings. Many reviews, including those from Digital Trends and The Jimquisition, point out that Warriors: Abyss suffers from a lack of depth in its story and level design, often feeling repetitive and grindy. Critics like My critic name is But Why Tho? and Vandal emphasize that the game feels underdeveloped and lacks ambition, particularly in its graphics and narrative elements. The consensus is that while the game may be enjoyable for die-hard fans, it falls short in delivering a compelling experience that could attract a broader audience. The overall consensus among critics suggests that Warriors: Abyss is a title that appeals primarily to existing fans of the franchise, as indicated by reviews from CGMagazine and Multiplayer.it. While the game is recognized for its fun gameplay and engaging mechanics, it is often described as flawed and unremarkable, with many critics recommending it with caveats. The sentiment is that, despite its potential and interesting ideas, the game does not stand out in the crowded roguelike genre and may leave players wanting more in terms of innovation and depth.

TL;DR

Warriors: Abyss garners mixed reviews, praised for its fast-paced combat and engaging gameplay, appealing mainly to franchise fans. However, critics highlight its repetitive story, lack of depth, and underdeveloped graphics, making it fall short of standing out in the roguelike genre. Recommended with caveats for die-hard fans only.

MONSTER

Reviews

55 reviews found

TheXboxHub

Xbox Series X

Feb 26, 2025

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

WARRIORS: Abyss is a challenging and rewarding experience for fans of the franchise, successfully blending roguelite elements with traditional Warriors gameplay.

Read full review

Digitally Downloaded

PlayStation 5

Feb 19, 2025

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Warriors: Abyss is a fun, action-packed game that successfully combines elements of the Warriors franchise with a roguelike structure, making it worth playing.

Read full review

Checkpoint Gaming

PlayStation 5

Feb 21, 2025

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Warriors: Abyss is a thrilling and refreshing take on the Warriors series, excelling in gameplay despite its minimal story. It is recommended for fans of the genre.

Read full review

GamingBolt

Feb 18, 2025

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Overall, the game is recommended for its solid gameplay and roguelite elements, despite its story and tutorial issues.

Read full review

GAMES.CH

Xbox Series X

Feb 24, 2025

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Overall, 'Warriors: Abyss' is an enjoyable game for those who appreciate action and chaos, but it lacks a compelling story and character depth.

Read full review

Gamesurf

PlayStation 5

Feb 27, 2025

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Warriors: Abyss is a fun and well-crafted game that successfully combines Musou gameplay with roguelite elements, providing an engaging experience despite its simplicity.

Read full review

GameBlast

Apr 8, 2025

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Warriors: Abyss is a fun but unremarkable experience, appealing to fans of the genre despite its flaws in story and visuals.

Read full review

MeuPlayStation

PlayStation 5

Mar 19, 2025

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Warriors: Abyss entrega uma experiência rápida e caótica, ideal para fãs da série, mas pode não atrair novos jogadores devido à falta de inovação visual.

Read full review

Finger Guns

PlayStation 5

Feb 14, 2025

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Warriors: Abyss is a fun and engaging roguelike that captures the essence of the Warriors series, despite its narrative and visual shortcomings.

Read full review

Loot Level Chill

Feb 24, 2025

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Despite its issues, Warriors: Abyss is enjoyable for fans of the genre, offering fast-paced action and satisfying progression, though it requires acceptance of its grindy nature.

Read full review