Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

About

Navigation

Home

Games

Links

Steam

Twitch

MONSTER

Total War: Three Kingdoms

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Total War: Three Kingdoms
Item: Total War: Three Kingdoms
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2019

GenresAction, Top-Down Perspective, Strategy, Single Player, Multiplayer

AvailableMay 23, 2019

PlatformPC

DeveloperCreative Assembly

Overview

Total War: Three Kingdoms is the first in the series to recreate epic conflict across ancient China. Combining a gripping turn-based campaign of empire-building & conquest with stunning real-time battles, Three Kingdoms redefines the series in an age of heroes & legends.

Elsewhere

7.7

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

A bold experiment in merging strategy and storytelling, Total War: Three Kingdoms dazzles with dual campaigns, political depth, and character-driven chaos—but falters under clunky pacing, cryptic lore, and a learning curve that alienates newcomers.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

63%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

37%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The reviews of Total War: Three Kingdoms consistently praise its narrative depth and innovative approach to storytelling within a historical framework. Critics like 3DJuegos and Cultured Vultures highlight the game’s emphasis on personal agency, where players shape their own stories through political intrigue, character interactions, and moral choices. The dual campaign modes—Romance (epic, fictionalized) and Records (historically grounded)—are frequently lauded for offering distinct experiences, as noted by CGMagazine and IGN. These modes allow players to engage with the "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" novel’s dramatic elements while maintaining historical context, a balance that PC Gamer and Destructoid commend. Additionally, the focus on character-driven narratives, such as alliances, betrayals, and leader attributes, is seen as a standout feature by critics like SpazioGames and Everyeye.it, who appreciate how relationships and diplomacy drive the campaign’s evolution. However, several critiques point to shortcomings in narrative cohesion and accessibility. Destructoid notes sparse cutscenes and limited expansion beyond the campaign, while God is a Geek and Shacknews criticize the lack of a traditional character-driven story or deep narrative structure. Jeuxvideo.com mentions that story beats often feel disconnected from player actions, and Vandal highlights challenges for Western players unfamiliar with the era’s complex cast of characters. GRYOnline.pl and IGN Italia also note gaps in historical context, with the latter pointing out that some character names may be less recognizable to non-experts. Additionally, while MGG praises the branching quests in Romance mode, they acknowledge some objectives as overly complex or unattainable, suggesting a learning curve that could alienate casual players. Despite these critiques, the overall consensus among critics is that Total War: Three Kingdoms succeeds as a unique blend of strategy and storytelling, leveraging its historical roots to create an immersive experience. While some reviewers, like IGN and PC Gamer, acknowledge trade-offs between historical accuracy and dramatic flair, most agree that the game’s focus on character dynamics, political maneuvering, and dual modes sets it apart from traditional Total War entries. The narrative’s strength lies in its adaptability—allowing players to craft their own tales within a richly detailed world—though its complexity and occasional lack of polish (as noted by Jeuxvideo.com and Vandal) mean it may not appeal to all. Ultimately, the game is seen as a bold experiment in merging historical strategy with literary storytelling, even if it occasionally falters in execution.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Praised for its innovative dual modes, deep diplomacy, and hero-driven tactics, Total War: Three Kingdoms shines with strategic depth but falters with repetitive combat and oversimplified systems.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

79%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

21%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Total War: Three Kingdoms is widely praised for its depth, complexity, and innovative mechanics that expand the series’ traditional formula. Critics highlight its dual modes—Romance and Records—which offer distinct experiences, with Romance emphasizing narrative-driven character interactions and dramatic duels, while Records provides a more conventional Total War-style strategy (AusGamers, IGN). The game’s diplomatic systems are lauded for their intricacy, featuring espionage, faction-specific archetypes, and nuanced relationships between warlords (CGMagazine, Cultured Vultures). Additionally, the integration of hero-driven mechanics, such as generals with unique abilities and retinue-based units, adds a layer of tactical depth (3DJuegos, Game Informer). Many reviewers note that the game shifts focus from brute military conquest to political maneuvering, with systems like guanxi (social connections) and faction-specific strategies enriching the experience (Jeuxvideo.com, PC GamesN). The strategic campaign mode is described as engaging, requiring players to balance resource management, diplomacy, and long-term planning (GamingTrend, Guardian). Despite its strengths, several critics point to notable flaws. Repetition in battle mechanics and a lack of innovation in real-time combat are recurring criticisms, with some noting that battles feel similar to previous Total War entries and suffer from unimpressive AI behavior (Destructoid, PC Invasion). The absence of naval battles and limited unit diversity also draw criticism, as does the simplification of certain systems like recruitment and logistics (3DJuegos, Everyeye.it). Additionally, while the game’s complexity is a strength, some reviewers argue that it can feel overwhelming or overly spammy, particularly in diplomacy and resource management (Digitally Downloaded, IGN Italia). The learning curve is steep for newcomers, with several critics mentioning that mastering the game’s mechanics requires significant time and patience (COGconnected, Vandal). Furthermore, issues like repetitive strategies and underdeveloped systems—such as ministries or assignment structures—diminish the experience for some players (IGN, PC GamesN). Overall, the consensus among critics is overwhelmingly positive, with most agreeing that Total War: Three Kingdoms delivers a richly detailed and strategically rewarding experience. While the game’s innovations in character-driven gameplay, dual modes, and diplomatic systems are celebrated by outlets like IGN, Game Informer, and PC Gamer, the criticisms—though valid—are seen as minor drawbacks rather than deal-breakers. The game’s ability to blend historical depth with narrative flexibility, alongside its emphasis on strategic decision-making, solidifies its place as a standout entry in the series. As Cultured Vultures and Vandal note, even with its imperfections, the game’s complexity and variety of playstyles ensure it remains engaging for both longtime fans and newcomers willing to invest time in mastering its systems.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Praised for its innovative dual modes, deep diplomacy, and hero-driven tactics, Total War: Three Kingdoms shines with strategic depth but falters with repetitive combat and oversimplified systems.

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Total War: Three Kingdoms dazzles with its breathtaking, culturally rich art style—think Chinese ink paintings meets cinematic warfare—but stumbles on technical glitches, repetitive design, and undercooked mechanics, proving beauty can’t fully mask flaws.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

70%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

30%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The majority of critics praised Total War: Three Kingdoms for its visually striking and culturally immersive design, highlighting its artistic ambition and attention to detail. Reviewers consistently lauded its painterly aesthetic, vibrant color palettes, and historical authenticity, with 3DJuegos noting "stunning visuals" and "polished user interface," while AusGamers compared the art style to Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon for its cultural depth. The game’s environments—ranging from cherry blossom-drenched landscapes to snow-covered battlefields—were celebrated for their variety and atmospheric richness, as noted by Game Informer and PC Games. IGN praised its "gorgeous, stylized graphics," while MGG highlighted the pastel tones reminiscent of Chinese ink paintings, reinforcing a sense of historical immersion. Critics like Cultured Vultures and GamingTrend emphasized how the art style brought the Three Kingdoms era to life, with detailed unit designs, dynamic animations, and immersive campaign maps that enhanced both strategic and combat phases. Despite these accolades, several critics pointed out technical and design shortcomings. Jeuxvideo.com criticized the graphics as "stagnant" compared to previous Total War entries, noting minimal improvements in battle detail, while PC Gamer highlighted clunky unit animations and a lack of naval battles. Everyeye.it and XGN raised concerns about repetitive unit models, "blobbing" mechanics, and unnatural animations, with XGN specifically criticizing "copied" movement styles from Warhammer. SpazioGames noted inconsistent visual fidelity between campaign and battle phases, and Shacknews warned of performance issues on lower-end hardware. Additionally, some reviewers, like PC Games, pointed out the game’s high system requirements, while Strategy Gamer mentioned flaws in the Records mode, such as "muted colors" and distracting UI elements. These critiques, though varied, collectively underscored areas where the visual design fell short of expectations. Overall, the consensus among critics was overwhelmingly positive, with the game’s artistic direction and cultural authenticity standing out as its strongest suits. While technical flaws and minor design issues were acknowledged, they were often overshadowed by praise for its immersive world-building and unique aesthetic. IGN noted that the visuals "support the game’s aesthetic" without dominating as a standout feature, while Vandal emphasized their "visually striking" nature even at medium settings. The blend of historical inspiration, dynamic environments, and cinematic flair—echoed in reviews from 3DJuegos, Destructoid, and PCGamesN—solidified Total War: Three Kingdoms as a visually compelling entry in the series. Though not without flaws, its artistic vision and attention to detail earned it widespread acclaim as one of the most visually distinctive games in the franchise.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics rave about Total War: Three Kingdoms' immersive sound design and music, praising their atmospheric depth, tactical immersion, and historical authenticity, with standout praise for atmospheric compositions, clear effects, and flawless voice work, though some critiques lack technical detail.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

75%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

25%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The critics overwhelmingly praise the sound design and music of Total War: Three Kingdoms, highlighting their immersive and atmospheric qualities. 3DJuegos commends the "variety and fitting atmosphere" of the soundtrack, noting its ability to complement gameplay, while GamingTrend emphasizes the clarity and immersion of sound effects like soldiers marching and weapon clashes, which enhance the tactical experience. Vandal describes the music as "brillante" (brilliant), with "flawless" voice acting and accurate translations, and XGN praises the "atmospheric and traditional" soundtrack that immerses players in ancient China. GRYOnline.pl explicitly calls the music "excellent," reinforcing its role in creating an engaging world. These reviews collectively underscore the sound design’s success in amplifying the game’s historical and strategic depth. While most critiques are positive, some reviewers note limitations in their analysis. AusGamers acknowledges the "excellent music" but does not elaborate on specific elements like sound effects or voice work, while The Digital Fix mentions the music contributes to the aesthetic without delving into technical details. PLAY! Zine focuses solely on ambient sounds like flowing streams and bird chirps, omitting direct commentary on musical elements or voice acting. These gaps suggest that while the soundtrack is widely appreciated, some critics did not explore its nuances in depth, leaving room for further examination of its technical execution. The overall consensus among reviewers is highly favorable, with nearly all praising the music’s ability to enhance immersion and evoke the game’s historical setting. The combination of atmospheric compositions, immersive sound effects, and high-quality voice work—particularly noted by 3DJuegos and Vandal—creates a cohesive auditory experience that aligns with the game’s romanticized depiction of ancient China. While some critiques lack specificity, the repeated emphasis on the soundtrack’s quality and atmosphere reflects a strong critical reception, positioning Total War: Three Kingdoms as a standout example of how sound design can elevate strategic gameplay.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics rave about Total War: Three Kingdoms' voice acting for its cultural authenticity, emotional depth, and flawless execution, with standout praise for Spanish, Chinese, and Japanese performances. While some critiques highlight uneven translations in French and lack of detail in certain reviews, the overall consensus celebrates its immersive storytelling and historical fidelity, cementing it as a standout feature.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

57%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

43%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The majority of reviewers praise the voice acting in Total War: Three Kingdoms for its authenticity, depth, and cultural fidelity. 3DJuegos highlights the high-quality Spanish voice work, noting that dialogues between generals maintain the authenticity of original Chinese performances, while COGconnected commends the "perfectly cast" actors who add emotional weight to battles and character interactions. Vandal describes the voice acting as "impecable" (flawless), emphasizing accurate translations and immersive delivery during combat and character scenes. Strategy Gamer appreciates the correct pronunciation of Chinese names, which enhances cultural authenticity, while Ragequit.gr acknowledges the inclusion of Chinese voice acting for heroes, even if it’s not elaborated further. These critiques collectively underscore a strong emphasis on linguistic precision and emotional engagement, with several reviewers celebrating the effort to preserve historical and cultural nuances through vocal performances. While most feedback is positive, some critics note limitations or gaps in coverage. MGG points out that French voice acting is available but criticizes "questionable translations," suggesting potential issues with localization quality. Similarly, SpazioGames mentions Chinese dubbing and Italian subtitles but provides no specific commentary on the voice work itself, leaving its quality unexplored. Ragequit.gr’s brief mention of Chinese hero voice acting lacks detail, implying that while options exist, they are not thoroughly analyzed. These critiques highlight a minor concern about translation accuracy in certain language versions and a general lack of depth in some reviews, which could signal that the voice acting, though present, is not the central focus of their evaluations. Overall, the consensus among critics leans heavily toward appreciation for Total War: Three Kingdoms’ voice acting, particularly its cultural authenticity, emotional resonance, and technical execution. Positive remarks from 3DJuegos, COGconnected, Vandal, and Strategy Gamer dominate, with praise for casting, translations, and immersion. While MGG’s critique of French translations introduces a minor negative note, the broader reception suggests that the voice acting successfully enhances the game’s historical and narrative depth. The lack of detailed analysis from some reviewers, like SpazioGames or Ragequit.gr, does not detract from the overall positive sentiment but underscores that the voice work, while commendable, is part of a larger package of features that define the game’s appeal.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Total War: Three Kingdoms shines with stellar optimization, smooth performance, and stable gameplay across mid-to-high-end systems, but its AI quirks, clunky animations, and hardware demands drag down an otherwise polished experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

50%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

50%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of Total War: Three Kingdoms on PC is largely praised for its optimization, stability, and ability to handle complex mechanics. Critics like 3DJuegos, Cultured Vultures, and IGN highlight the game’s smooth operation across various hardware configurations, with minimal slowdowns during large-scale battles and improved load times compared to earlier titles in the series. GamingTrend and PC Gamer note that the game runs efficiently even with hundreds of units on screen, while COGconnected and Daily Star emphasize its stability during campaigns. The absence of major bugs or crashes is a recurring positive, with AusGamers acknowledging a “bug-free launch state” despite minor animation quirks. These reviews collectively suggest that the game’s technical foundation is robust, particularly for players with mid-range to high-end systems. However, several critics point to persistent technical imperfections and performance hiccups. Everyeye.it and GRYOnline.pl criticize AI behavior, such as units being easily outmaneuvered or passive during sieges, while XGN highlights unrealistic animations and “cartoonish” soldier movements. God is a Geek and MGG note long load times, especially without an SSD, and occasional performance issues during extended gameplay. Shacknews warns that mid-range systems may struggle with lag during large battles, requiring high-end hardware for smooth 60fps at higher resolutions. Additionally, Jeuxvideo.com and Vandal mention minor technical drawbacks like unpredictable AI in diplomacy and launch bugs, which, while not game-breaking, detract from the experience. These issues suggest that while the game is technically sound, it still faces challenges in refining its systems. Overall, critics agree that Total War: Three Kingdoms represents a significant step forward in technical performance for the series, with IGN and Cultured Vultures praising its stability and optimization. However, lingering issues such as AI flaws, animation quirks, and hardware demands create a mixed reception. While most reviewers acknowledge that these problems are typical of the genre or manageable via patches, they highlight that the game’s technical foundation is strong but not flawless. The consensus leans toward optimism, with 3DJuegos and PC Gamer emphasizing its improved performance over predecessors, even as Everyeye.it and XGN point to specific areas needing refinement. Ultimately, the game’s technical strengths outweigh its flaws for most players, though it remains a demanding title that benefits from capable hardware.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Highly replayable with deep strategies, diverse playstyles, and 80+ hours of content, but repetitive battle mechanics, underdeveloped post-campaign content, and limited faction variety may dampen long-term appeal. A must-play for strategy fans despite flaws.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

70%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

30%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The majority of reviewers highlight strong positives regarding the replay value of Total War: Three Kingdoms, emphasizing its depth, variety, and strategic flexibility. Critics like 3DJuegos, CGMagazine, and Cultured Vultures praise the game’s ability to offer unique narratives through diverse story paths, political strategies, and multiple playstyles (e.g., Romance vs. Records modes). The inclusion of dynamic diplomacy, customizable campaigns, and distinct warlords allows players to approach objectives in varied ways, as noted by Daily Star and GamingTrend. Additionally, the game’s complex systems—such as leader attributes, faction mechanics, and open-ended strategies—encourage experimentation, with reviewers like God is a Geek and IGN Spain pointing out that improved knowledge from repeated playthroughs enhances the experience. The sheer volume of content, including 80+ hours of gameplay and planned DLCs, further supports its longevity, as highlighted by PC Gamer and MGG. However, several critics point to notable drawbacks that may limit long-term engagement. Destructoid and Jeuxvideo.com note that post-campaign content feels underdeveloped, with historical battles appearing brief and repetitive. Trusted Reviews and PC Invasion criticize the game’s reliance on familiar formulas, pointing out that repetitive battle mechanics and AI patterns can diminish appeal over time. Additionally, some reviewers, like Everyeye.it and SpazioGames, mention that faction diversity is limited despite unique mechanics, leading to a sense of repetition in later playthroughs. While the game’s strategic depth is lauded, critics such as PC Games and Riot Pixels acknowledge that mastering factions may lead to predictable tactics, reducing the novelty of repeated sessions. Overall, the consensus among critics leans toward high replayability, though with caveats. Most agree that the game’s intricate systems, multiple modes, and branching narratives create a compelling experience for strategy enthusiasts, as emphasized by Hardcore Gamer and GRYOnline.pl. However, the balance between depth and repetition remains a point of contention, with some reviewers (e.g., Jeuxvideo.com, Trusted Reviews) suggesting that its flaws—such as limited faction variety or underdeveloped post-campaign content—may temper its long-term appeal. Despite these criticisms, the majority view Total War: Three Kingdoms as a highly replayable title for players who value strategic complexity and narrative flexibility, with only minor reservations about its repetitive elements.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

86%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

14%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overwhelming consensus among reviewers highlights Total War: Three Kingdoms as a standout entry in the series, celebrated for its depth, innovation, and historical immersion. Critics consistently praised its rich strategic systems, blending intricate diplomacy, character-driven storytelling, and a compelling campaign mode. 3DJuegos called it a "must-have for strategy fans," while CGMagazine hailed it as an "early contender for best strategy game of the year." The game’s narrative focus on the Three Kingdoms era, combined with its adaptation of Romance of the Three Kingdoms, was lauded for its authenticity and emotional depth. AusGamers noted its "innovations in diplomacy and storytelling," while Cultured Vultures described it as a "return to form" that offers fresh experiences since Shogun 2. Even critics like IGN, who called it "a significant improvement in the Total War series," emphasized its technical polish and engaging mechanics. The game’s ability to balance cerebral strategy with dynamic battlefield action was frequently cited as a key strength, with Digitally Downloaded praising its "historical depth" and "strategic flexibility." Despite these accolades, several critics pointed to notable flaws that tempered their enthusiasm. Issues such as uneven combat mechanics, AI shortcomings, and over-the-top hero abilities were recurring criticisms. Everyeye.it noted the game struggled with "balancing realism, AI flaws, and over-the-top hero abilities," while SpazioGames criticized real-time battles for lacking innovation and suffering from "UI and AI issues." Game Informer acknowledged that purists might be disappointed by its blend of fantasy and historical elements, and Jeuxvideo.com pointed to a lack of visual improvements and replayability. PC Gamer described it as "another iteration of the Total War formula" without groundbreaking innovation, while PCGamesN noted that its "real-time combat depth" fell short compared to previous entries. These critiques often centered on areas where the game’s ambition clashed with execution, particularly in its tactical layer, which some felt paled in comparison to the series’ earlier titles. The overall verdict among critics is overwhelmingly positive, with most agreeing that Total War: Three Kingdoms is a strong, if imperfect, addition to the franchise. While acknowledging its technical and design flaws, reviewers emphasized its strengths as a compelling strategy experience. Daily Star awarded it a perfect 5/5, calling it "one of the best in the RTS genre," while Hardcore Gamer declared it "arguably the strongest entry to date." Even critics with reservations, like IGN Italia, acknowledged its "unique character focus" and "refined systems," placing it among the series’ top titles. The game’s ability to merge historical depth with engaging storytelling, despite its shortcomings, resonated widely. As PC Invasion noted, it is an "exceptional experience" that successfully fuses Total War mechanics with the Three Kingdoms lore. For most reviewers, the positives—particularly its strategic richness and narrative ambition—outweighed the flaws, cementing Total War: Three Kingdoms as a must-play for fans of the genre.

TL;DR

Total War: Three Kingdoms shines with rich strategy, historical immersion, and narrative brilliance, earning praise as a standout title despite uneven combat, AI flaws, and over-the-top hero mechanics.

MONSTER

Reviews

92 reviews found

100

Daily Star

May 27, 2019

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review praises the game as one of the best in the RTS genre, highlighting its variety, campaign mode, and improvements over previous entries. A 5/5 rating is given, indicating strong overall satisfaction.

Read full review

IGN

May 16, 2019

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review is overwhelmingly positive, praising the campaign design, character systems, and technical performance. While some mechanics feel underdeveloped, the game is celebrated as a significant improvement in the Total War series.

Read full review

Vandal

May 17, 2019

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The game is praised as a 'juego de estrategia sobresaliente' (outstanding strategy game) that successfully reinvents the Total War series while maintaining its core strengths. It offers deep strategic possibilities, cultural immersion, and innovative mechanics, making it a standout entry in the franchise despite its steep learning curve.

Read full review

Ragequit.gr

May 27, 2019

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review concludes with a 91% rating, calling it a bold and successful experiment. It is recommended for all players, even those initially uninterested in the theme.

Read full review

Cultured Vultures

May 30, 2019

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A highly praised entry in the Total War series, combining narrative depth, improved mechanics, and technical performance. It is described as a return to form, offering fresh experiences since Shogun 2.

Read full review

Similar Games

Games you might also enjoy

Halo Wars 2

2017

Total War: WARHAMMER II

2017

Total War: Attila

2015

Iron Harvest

2020

Total War: Rome II

2013

A Total War Saga: TROY

2020

Total War: WARHAMMER

2016

Total War: WARHAMMER III

2022

Starcraft II: Legacy of the Void

2015

Company of Heroes 2

2013

Dungeon of the Endless

2014

Total War: Shogun 2

2011

Napoleon: Total War

2010

Satellite Reign

2015

Supreme Commander

2007

Battlefleet Gothic: Armada 2

2019

Total War: Rome Remastered

2021

8-Bit Armies

2016

Men of War: Assault Squad 2

2014

SpellForce 3: Fallen God

2020

Popular Right Now

Trending games the community is playing

Battlefield 6

2025

Ghost of Yotei

2025

The Outer Worlds 2

2025

Ninja Gaiden 4

2025

Cronos: The New Dawn

2025

Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater

2025

Mafia: The Old Country

2025

WUCHANG: Fallen Feathers

2025

Call of Duty: Black Ops 7

2025

Little Nightmares III

2025

Silent Hill f

2025

Shinobi: Art of Vengeance

2025

Sonic Racing: CrossWorlds

2025

EA Sports FC 26

2025

Ninja Gaiden: Ragebound

2025

Recently Reviewed

Games with full Monster Scorecards

Total Chaos

2025

SkateBIRD

2021

Destiny 2: The Edge of Fate

2025

Super Robot Wars Y

2025

Strange Antiquities

2025

Terminator 2D: NO FATE

2025

A Pizza Delivery

2025

Divinity: Original Sin II - Definitive Edition

2018

Metroid Prime 4: Beyond

2025

SUPERHOT VR

2016

Project Motor Racing

2025

New Super Lucky's Tale

2019

Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag

2013

ISLANDERS: New Shores

2025

A.I.L.A

2025

Bubble Bobble 4 Friends

2020

MADO MONOGATARI: Fia and the Wondrous Academy

2025

Tails of Iron

2021

Aven Colony

2017

Sacred 2 Remaster

2025

Links

Steam

Twitch

MONSTER

Total War: Three Kingdoms

2019

GenresAction, Top-Down Perspective, Strategy, Single Player, Multiplayer

AvailableMay 23, 2019

PlatformPC

DeveloperCreative Assembly

Overview

Elsewhere

7.7

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

63%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

37%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Praised for its innovative dual modes, deep diplomacy, and hero-driven tactics, Total War: Three Kingdoms shines with strategic depth but falters with repetitive combat and oversimplified systems.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

79%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

21%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Praised for its innovative dual modes, deep diplomacy, and hero-driven tactics, Total War: Three Kingdoms shines with strategic depth but falters with repetitive combat and oversimplified systems.

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

70%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

30%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

75%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

25%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

57%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

43%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

50%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

50%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

70%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

30%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

86%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

14%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

TL;DR

MONSTER

Reviews

92 reviews found

100

Daily Star

May 27, 2019

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

IGN

May 16, 2019

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Vandal

May 17, 2019

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Ragequit.gr

May 27, 2019

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review concludes with a 91% rating, calling it a bold and successful experiment. It is recommended for all players, even those initially uninterested in the theme.

Read full review

Cultured Vultures

May 30, 2019

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Similar Games

Games you might also enjoy

Halo Wars 2

2017

Total War: WARHAMMER II

2017

Total War: Attila

2015

Iron Harvest

2020

Total War: Rome II

2013

A Total War Saga: TROY

2020

Total War: WARHAMMER

2016

Total War: WARHAMMER III

2022

Starcraft II: Legacy of the Void

2015

Company of Heroes 2

2013

Dungeon of the Endless

2014

Total War: Shogun 2

2011

Napoleon: Total War

2010

Satellite Reign

2015

Supreme Commander

2007

Battlefleet Gothic: Armada 2

2019

Total War: Rome Remastered

2021

8-Bit Armies

2016

Men of War: Assault Squad 2

2014

SpellForce 3: Fallen God

2020

Popular Right Now

Trending games the community is playing

Battlefield 6

2025

Ghost of Yotei

2025

The Outer Worlds 2

2025

Ninja Gaiden 4

2025

Cronos: The New Dawn

2025

Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater

2025

Mafia: The Old Country

2025

WUCHANG: Fallen Feathers

2025

Call of Duty: Black Ops 7

2025

Little Nightmares III

2025

Silent Hill f

2025

Shinobi: Art of Vengeance

2025

Sonic Racing: CrossWorlds

2025

EA Sports FC 26

2025

Ninja Gaiden: Ragebound

2025

Recently Reviewed

Games with full Monster Scorecards

Total Chaos

2025

SkateBIRD

2021

Destiny 2: The Edge of Fate

2025

Super Robot Wars Y

2025

Strange Antiquities

2025

Terminator 2D: NO FATE

2025

A Pizza Delivery

2025

Divinity: Original Sin II - Definitive Edition

2018

Metroid Prime 4: Beyond

2025

SUPERHOT VR

2016

Project Motor Racing

2025

New Super Lucky's Tale

2019

Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag

2013

ISLANDERS: New Shores

2025

A.I.L.A

2025

Bubble Bobble 4 Friends

2020

MADO MONOGATARI: Fia and the Wondrous Academy

2025

Tails of Iron

2021

Aven Colony

2017

Sacred 2 Remaster

2025