Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

Amazon

Steam

Twitch

MONSTER

Starlink: Battle for Atlas

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Starlink: Battle for Atlas
Item: Starlink: Battle for Atlas
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2018

GenresAdventure, Action, Science Fiction and Futuristic, Third Person Perspective, Shooter, Open World, Simulation, RPG, Strategy, Single Player, Multiplayer

AvailableOct 16, 2018

PlatformNintendo Switch, Xbox One, PC, PlayStation 4

DeveloperUbisoft Toronto

Overview

Starlink: Battle for Atlas is an all-new action-adventure game developed by Ubisoft Toronto. This deep, open-world space saga features Smart Building Technology empowering players to assemble and customize real-world physical starships. Each part attached to the starship appears instantly in-game and players can experiment with different pilot abilities, weapon types, and status effects and unleash devastating combos upon their enemies.

Elsewhere

7.7

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Praised for charm, humor, and nostalgia but slammed for clichés, shallow characters, and a formulaic sci-fi plot that relies on overused tropes, leaving many calling it a generic adventure more about gameplay than storytelling.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

20%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

73%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The story of Starlink: Battle for Atlas receives praise for its engaging tone, likable characters, and nostalgic appeal, particularly among younger audiences or fans of sci-fi tropes. Critics like GameCrate highlight its "deep, complex open world RPG" with a "sweeping plot," while Gaming Nexus notes the narrative’s potential to hint at a larger universe. The inclusion of iconic characters such as Fox McCloud from Star Fox adds charm, as noted by FNintendo, and some reviewers appreciate the game’s humor and personality, with Digitally Downloaded calling it "fun little story" with a "charming and innocent tone." Additionally, IGN acknowledges the well-written middle portion focusing on the Starlink crew and the star system’s history, suggesting moments of depth despite broader criticisms. The narrative’s simplicity and accessibility also appeal to some, as seen in Xbox Tavern’s observation that it is "simple yet engaging" for both younger and older players. However, the majority of critics criticize the story for its lack of originality, shallow character development, and repetitive structure. Metro GameCentral dismisses it as a "failed Saturday morning cartoon pilot," while Slant Magazine and InsideGamer.nl describe the narrative as clichéd, formulaic, and lacking creativity. Many point to underdeveloped characters and a plot that relies on overused sci-fi tropes, such as a villain seeking universal domination or a crew rescuing a kidnapped leader. Eurogamer Italy and GameSpot note shallow character arcs and reliance on stereotypes, while Wccftech calls the antagonist "unsatisfying." The story’s pacing and structure also face criticism, with Variety describing it as "rushed" and GamePro Germany pointing to a lack of surprises. Even positive reviews like IGN’s acknowledge the plot’s clichés, highlighting that the game’s strengths lie more in its gameplay than its narrative. The overall consensus among critics is mixed but leans toward disappointment, with the story being seen as a competent but unremarkable sci-fi adventure. While some praise its charm, humor, and potential for future expansion (e.g., Gaming Nexus), the majority criticize its lack of depth, originality, and emotional engagement. GameCrate’s optimistic take contrasts sharply with Metro GameCentral’s harsh dismissal, reflecting a divide between those who appreciate the game’s accessibility and those who find it derivative. Despite this, many reviewers agree that the story serves as a functional backdrop for the gameplay rather than a standout feature, with Nintendo Enthusiast noting it "serves as a backdrop for the gameplay." The narrative’s simplicity may appeal to casual players, but its failure to innovate or deepen its world-building limits its impact on more discerning audiences.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Starlink: Battle for Atlas dazzles with inventive ship customization, dynamic combat, and expansive exploration but is bogged down by repetitive missions, grinding mechanics, and a clunky pay-to-win model, leaving its creative potential mired in inconsistency.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

55%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

45%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Starlink: Battle for Atlas receives praise for its creative customization options, engaging combat mechanics, and immersive exploration. Critics highlight the game’s ability to blend physical toy elements with digital interactivity, allowing players to customize ships and weapons in unique ways. IGN emphasizes that the ship-and-weapons system is “the rewarding meat of Starlink’s design,” with modding and leveling up adding depth. The Variety of missions, including space dogfights, planetary exploration, and RPG-style progression, is noted as a strength by outlets like GameSpot and Nintendo Life, which commend the intuitive controls and strategic combat. Additionally, the game’s open-world structure across seven planets, as described by Nintendo Enthusiast and Jeuxvideo.com, offers a sense of scale and freedom, while Switch Player and Impulsegamer praise its addictive, varied gameplay loop. However, several critics point to significant drawbacks, particularly the repetitive mission structures and grind-heavy gameplay. Multiple reviewers, including PlaySense, Push Square, and New Game Network, criticize the lack of Variety in objectives, with many tasks feeling redundant over time. The game’s reliance on resource gathering, base-building, and repetitive combat scenarios is highlighted as a flaw by Cubed3 and LevelUp, while Slant Magazine and Twinfinite note clunky mechanics tied to physical toys and a confusing leveling system. Additionally, the pay-to-win model mentioned by Slant Magazine and the low difficulty curve criticized by Atomix detract from the experience. While some praise the strategic depth of combat (The Sydney Morning Herald), others argue that the repetitive nature of missions and tasks undermines the game’s potential, as noted by GameCrate and XboxAddict. Overall, critics agree that Starlink: Battle for Atlas has a strong foundation in its customization, combat, and exploration systems but is weighed down by repetition and design flaws. While outlets like IGN and GameCritics acknowledge the game’s engaging core mechanics and creative potential, they also recognize its shortcomings in pacing and Variety. The consensus leans toward a mixed reception: the game’s innovative approach to ship customization and open-world gameplay is praised, but the repetitive tasks and lack of meaningful progression systems prevent it from fully shining. As NintendoWorldReport notes, the real-time strategy elements and planetary exploration add depth, yet many critics, including GameRadar+ and Gaming Nexus, feel that the game’s later stages become monotonous. Despite these issues, the title remains a notable entry in the action-adventure genre for its creative ideas, even if it struggles to maintain consistency throughout.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Starlink's vibrant visuals and creative design dazzle, with praise for its alien color palettes, whimsical art direction, and immersive planetary worlds—though Nintendo Switch version stumbles with technical flaws like low res, pop-in, and barren landscapes, undermining its potential despite a stunning core experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

65%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

34%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of Starlink: Battle for Atlas received widespread praise for their vibrant color palettes, creative planetary environments, and distinct art direction. Critics like GameSpot highlighted the "pleasingly alien color palettes" and "beautifully rendered" space environments, while IGN (Xbox One) noted that the planets "have their own habitat and personality," creating a sense of wonder during exploration. The cartoony aesthetic was frequently lauded for its charm, with Nintendo Enthusiast praising the "solid" visuals and "creative designs," and GameSpew calling the game "visually striking." The ship and toy designs were also highlighted as standout elements, with FANDOM (PS4) and Gamer.nl noting their unique, well-crafted details. Many reviewers, including Jeuxvideo.com (Xbox One) and PlayStation LifeStyle, emphasized the game’s ability to evoke a sense of freedom through its diverse biomes and immersive planetary ecosystems. However, several critics pointed out technical limitations, particularly on the Nintendo Switch. Issues like "short draw distances," "pop-in," and "low resolution" were recurring complaints, with DualShockers describing the graphics as "muddled" and FNintendo comparing the Switch version unfavorably to Xbox One/PS4. Wccftech criticized the "barren landscapes" and lack of interactivity, while Multiplayer.it noted "lower texture quality" and "noticeable aliasing." Some reviewers, like Game Revolution, felt the game lacked originality in its environments, and InsideGamer.nl mentioned repetitive designs. Additionally, NintendoWorldReport pointed out split-screen performance issues, such as resolution drops and restricted player movement. These technical shortcomings were often attributed to the Switch’s hardware constraints, with CGMagazine acknowledging that "the Switch version offers the definitive way to play" despite its graphical trade-offs. Overall, critics generally agreed that Starlink: Battle for Atlas delivers a visually appealing experience, balancing creative art direction with some platform-specific limitations. While the Nintendo Switch version faced criticism for technical compromises, many reviewers still found it impressive, with Gaming Nexus calling it "visually stunning" and Switch Player praising its "stunning visuals." The game’s vibrant worlds and unique planetary designs were seen as its strongest assets, even if some elements like enemy repetition or environmental detail fell short. As IGN (PS4) noted, the game “looks fantastic across all three platforms,” suggesting that while the Switch version has limitations, it remains a compelling visual experience for fans of the Star Fox universe and space exploration games. The consensus leaned toward appreciation for its artistic vision, even if technical execution varied by platform.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Starlink: Battle for Atlas' sound design and music earn praise for immersive nostalgia, standout Star Fox themes, and stellar voice work—yet suffer from repetitive motifs, inconsistent acting, and technical hiccups that undercut their impact.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

51%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

47%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of Starlink: Battle for Atlas received largely positive feedback from critics, with many praising their immersive and nostalgic qualities. Reviewers like Atomix highlighted the game’s distinct weapon audio cues and impactful combat effects, while LaPS4 emphasized how the sound design enhanced the feeling of flight and combat, creating an "immersive" experience. The inclusion of recognizable Star Fox themes, such as the remixed Corneria track, was a standout element, with GameSpot (PS4) and IGN noting its nostalgic appeal for fans. Additionally, Cubed3 described the score as "sublime," and GameSpew praised the "fantastic audio design" that contributed to the game’s overall enjoyment. Voice acting was also frequently lauded, with IGN (Switch) and Nintendo Life commending the engaging cutscenes and character performances, while GamePro Germany and PlayStation LifeStyle appreciated the humor and personality added by well-voiced dialogues. However, some critics pointed out notable shortcomings. Meristation criticized the music for lacking distinctive themes across planets, while God is a Geek noted "inconsistent voice acting" that detracted from immersion. Easy Allies mentioned repetitive NPC dialogue as a flaw, and FNintendo found the sound design "unremarkable," despite the nostalgic Star Fox tracks. Others, like Gaming Age, observed that the soundtrack lacked a "continuous epic score," and New Game Network pointed to UI clutter that distracted from the audio experience. Additionally, Generación Xbox noted scripting issues with music playback, and Meristation and FNintendo both felt the music failed to leave a lasting impression. These critiques suggest that while the audio elements were generally strong, they occasionally fell short in originality or consistency. Overall, the consensus among critics was cautiously positive, with the sound design and music being praised for their nostalgic nods, immersive qualities, and contributions to gameplay. The Star Fox themes and voice acting were particularly celebrated, as seen in IGN’s praise for "characters that have never looked or sounded better" and Nintendo WorldReport’s acknowledgment of "excellent implementation" of Star Fox content. However, the lack of unique musical motifs and occasional technical issues, as highlighted by Meristation and God is a Geek, tempered some reviews. Despite these flaws, the majority of critics agreed that the audio elements enhanced the game’s atmosphere and appeal, making it a standout feature for fans of the franchise and space shooters alike.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Starlink's voice acting shines with bold, immersive performances for key characters like Fox McCloud and the Star Fox crew, injecting charm and nostalgia, but struggles with flat, repetitive lines for secondary roles and inconsistent delivery, making its impact uneven and reliant on perspective.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

38%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

54%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in Starlink: Battle for Atlas receives generally positive feedback, with many critics highlighting its ability to breathe life into characters and enhance immersion. Main characters like Judge, Mason, and the Star Fox crew (particularly Fox McCloud) are frequently praised for their distinct personalities and engaging dialogue. IGN notes that characters have unique skills and voices, while Cubed3 emphasizes the "extensive lines" from Fox McCloud, which add to the game’s charm. GamePro Germany and PlayStation LifeStyle commend the "distinct personalities" and "immersive" dialogue, with the latter calling it "incredibly well done." The Star Fox team’s inclusion is especially celebrated for its nostalgic appeal, with FNintendo noting their dialogue feels "reminiscent of the Star Fox series," and Variety highlighting the "nostalgic experience" enhanced by strong voice work. Additionally, GameSpot and Nintendo Life praise the unique scripts for pilots during missions, which add character to gameplay. However, several critics point out inconsistencies and shortcomings in the voice acting, particularly with secondary characters and repetitive dialogue. Jeuxvideo.com and GamePro Germany note that "secondary characters lack depth," while COGconnected and Easy Allies criticize the "repetitive and stale" lines for some pilots. The Star Fox crew’s limited role in the narrative is another recurring issue; Stevivor calls their inclusion an "afterthought," and NintendoWorldReport mentions Fox often being "left out of cutscenes." Other critiques include "generic and forgettable" performances from GameCritics, "irritating" voices from InsideGamer.nl, and uneven delivery from God is a Geek. Additionally, some reviewers, like Xbox Tavern, point to one character’s "erratic" tone, while Nintendo Life acknowledges that the voice work, though decent, doesn’t fully elevate the game’s narrative. Overall, the consensus leans positive but acknowledges significant variability in quality. Main characters and the Star Fox team are widely praised for their engaging performances, with many critics agreeing that the voice acting enhances immersion and character depth. However, secondary characters and repetitive dialogue often fall short, leading to mixed experiences across platforms. While outlets like IGN, GameSpot, and Cubed3 highlight strong execution, others like GameCritics and InsideGamer.nl express frustration with inconsistencies. The game’s voice acting is seen as a solid but uneven component of its broader design, with the Star Fox collaboration standing out as a notable high point despite its limited narrative impact. Critics generally agree that it contributes to the game’s charm but doesn’t fully elevate it beyond its gameplay mechanics.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Starlink: Battle for Atlas delivers solid tech performance across platforms—Switch shines with portability and co-op, Xbox One boasts 4K resolution, and PS4 offers smooth gameplay—but all face minor hiccups like texture pop-in, frame drops, or graphical compromises, which don’t derail the experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

46%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

54%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of Starlink: Battle for Atlas varies slightly across platforms, with notable positives for each. On PS4, critics like Atomix and GamePro Germany praise its smooth gameplay without significant bugs or glitches, while GameSpot highlights the Switch version’s stability despite visual trade-offs. For Nintendo Switch, Areajugones and CGMagazine commend the absence of performance issues and seamless transitions between planets, with Destructoid and Nintendo Life noting fluid controls and consistent frame rates in both docked and handheld modes. On Xbox One, reviewers such as Generación Xbox and TheXboxHub emphasize robust performance, with Windows Central highlighting 4K resolution on the Xbox One X and XboxAddict praising its resolution boost over the Switch version. Overall, all platforms receive praise for stability, with the Switch’s portability and co-op features standing out. However, technical challenges are evident across platforms. On Switch, critics like Everyeye.it and FNintendo point to inconsistent texture quality, pop-in effects, and reduced visual fidelity in handheld mode, while Nintenderos and LevelUp mention frame rate drops during intense scenes or cooperative play. For PS4, GamePro Germany notes minor performance issues on Switch but not on PS4 itself, and Jeuxvideo.com (PS4) criticizes a cluttered interface despite smooth gameplay. On Xbox One, TrueAchievements reports achievement glitches, and Windows Central mentions frame rate struggles during large-scale battles. While these issues are generally minor, they highlight the game’s technical compromises, particularly on the Switch, where graphical limitations and resolution drops in split-screen mode (as noted by Nintendo World Report) detract from the experience. The overall consensus among critics is that Starlink: Battle for Atlas delivers solid technical performance across all platforms, with each version having its strengths. The Switch version is lauded for its portability and co-op capabilities, despite graphical trade-offs (e.g., CGMagazine, Destructoid), while the Xbox One excels in resolution and stability (Windows Central, XboxAddict). The PS4 version receives balanced praise for smooth gameplay and minimal bugs (Atomix, GamePro Germany). While platform-specific issues like texture pop-in on Switch or frame rate inconsistencies on Xbox One exist, most reviewers agree that these do not overshadow the game’s technical achievements. Critics like GameSpot and GameSpace highlight the Switch as a “definitive edition,” while others, such as Trusted Reviews and Vandal, acknowledge its graphical flaws but deem them non-gamebreaking. The game’s technical performance is broadly viewed as strong, with minor compromises that vary by platform.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Starlink: Battle for Atlas offers replay value through exploration, customization, and collectibles, but repetitive missions and monotonous tasks undermine its longevity. While toys-to-life mechanics and loot systems engage some, critics cite lack of innovation, bland variety, and tiring loops as major drawbacks. A mixed experience: fans of its depth may overlook flaws, but others find it wearying.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

15%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

80%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The reviewers generally acknowledge that Starlink: Battle for Atlas offers several elements that contribute to its replay value. Many praise the game’s emphasis on exploration, customization, and side content. For instance, IGN highlights the “Pokedex-like encyclopedia” of collectibles and hidden locations, while GameSpew notes the “plenty of end-game content and exploration” that encourages long-term engagement. The ability to customize ships, weapons, and pilots (EGM, Game Informer) adds Variety, and some critics, like TheXboxHub, appreciate the mix of quests and collectibles that incentivize revisiting planets. Additionally, multiplayer modes (Hobby Consolas) and toys-to-life mechanics (PlayStation LifeStyle) are seen as potential draws for repeated playthroughs. Even reviewers who critique repetition often concede that the game’s core systems—such as resource gathering and combat—are enjoyable enough to warrant multiple sessions (The Escapist). However, a significant number of critics argue that the game’s replay value is undermined by its repetitive mission structures and lack of innovation. Slant Magazine and LevelUp explicitly state that the “repetitive tasks” and “limited incentives” make the experience feel like “work,” while Metro GameCentral and Nintenderos note that mission repetition “diminishes” engagement. Many reviewers, including Game Revolution and Post Arcade, point to a lack of diverse mission types, which can make gameplay feel monotonous over time. The repetitive nature of resource gathering (Vandal), side quests (Gamersky), and enemy encounters is frequently cited as a drawback. Even the game’s co-op mode (GamePro Germany) and exploration elements (Eurogamer Italy) are tempered by criticisms that the core loop becomes tiresome, with Destructoid and Cubed3 noting that “repetitive tasks” and “lack of unique experiences” hinder long-term appeal. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed but leans toward a moderate assessment of Starlink: Battle for Atlas’s replay value. While many recognize its potential through exploration, customization, and side content (IGN, GameSpew), the repetitive mission design and limited Variety are seen as significant drawbacks (Slant Magazine, LevelUp). Reviewers like GameSpot and The Sydney Morning Herald highlight that the game’s loot systems and collectibles can keep players engaged despite repetition, but others, such as Forbes and Jeuxvideo.com, argue that the lack of a New Game + mode or fresh challenges limits its longevity. Ultimately, the game seems to appeal more to fans of exploration and customization who can overlook its repetitive elements, while those seeking diverse gameplay may find it less satisfying over time.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

43%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

54%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall reception of Starlink: Battle for Atlas highlights its strengths in gameplay mechanics, visual design, and innovative toys-to-life integration. Many critics praised its engaging space combat, modular ship customization, and immersive exploration. For instance, IGN noted the game’s “surprisingly rich and ambitious exploration and combat-focused” experience, while Xbox Tavern lauded it as a “stunning game that successfully revitalizes the toys-to-life genre.” The visual appeal was consistently highlighted, with GameSpew praising its “fantastic audio design” and “gorgeous visual design,” and NintendoWorldReport calling it a “fascinating experiment” with “beautiful graphics.” Additionally, the inclusion of Star Fox content for Nintendo Switch players was a standout feature, as noted by Switch Player and GameInformers, who emphasized its value for fans of the franchise. The game’s accessibility and family-friendly appeal also resonated, with GameInformers describing it as “uncomplicated and wholesome” for both younger and experienced players. However, several critics pointed to recurring issues that undermined the experience. Repetition in mission design and lack of narrative depth were frequent complaints. God is a Geek noted that “repetitive missions and inconsistent voice work” made it “a decent but underwhelming experience,” while Wccftech criticized the “sloppy story and barren worlds.” GameCritics and Everyeye.it echoed similar sentiments, citing flaws in storytelling and quest design. Technical issues, such as glitches and performance hiccups on certain platforms (e.g., LaPS4), also detracted from the experience. Additionally, concerns about monetization practices, including Pay2Win elements (GamePro Germany) and high costs for additional content (CGMagazine), were highlighted as barriers to full enjoyment. Some critics, like Vandal, felt the game “lacks focus in its gameplay,” while FANDOM pointed to “graphical limitations on the Switch.” Despite these criticisms, the consensus among reviewers is that Starlink: Battle for Atlas is a solid, if imperfect, entry in the toys-to-life genre. While it faces challenges with repetition and narrative execution, its strengths in exploration, customization, and visual design earned widespread praise. IGN called it “a standout title in the toys-to-life genre,” and GameSpot noted its “enjoyable open-world game with fun exploration and combat.” Many saw it as a promising start for a potential franchise, with NintendoWorldReport expressing hope for future installments. While some critics, like DarkStation, felt it didn’t “redefine” the genre, others, such as Impulsegamer, hailed it as “a friggin good game with relatively flawless mechanics.” The overall sentiment leans positive, acknowledging its flaws but celebrating its unique contributions to space-themed gaming.

TL;DR

Starlink: Battle for Atlas dazzles with inventive toys-to-life gameplay, stunning visuals, and Star Fox content, but repetitive missions, weak storytelling, and technical issues drag it down—still a fun, customizable space adventure with franchise potential.

MONSTER

Reviews

142 reviews found

100

Gaming Age

Nintendo Switch

Oct 15, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Starlink: Battle for Atlas is highly recommended for its engaging gameplay, impressive visuals, and the enjoyable integration of Star Fox, making it a standout title.

Read full review

Impulsegamer

Nintendo Switch

Oct 18, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Starlink: Battle for Atlas is a friggin good game with relatively flawless mechanics. It trumps similar games in terms of fun and offers a satisfying gaming experience.

Read full review

Hardcore Gamer

Nintendo Switch

Oct 16, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Starlink: Battle for Atlas is the best integration of toys-to-life so far, offering an enjoyable open-world space adventure with challenge and fun for players of any age.

Forbes

Xbox One

Nov 1, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Starlink: Battle for Atlas is a fun and engaging experience that successfully combines RPG elements with toys-to-life mechanics, despite some minor drawbacks.

Areajugones

Nintendo Switch

Oct 15, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Starlink: Battle for Atlas is an entertaining exploration and adventure game with a solid foundation, appealing to both casual players and collectors of interactive toys.

Read full review

Gaming Nexus

Nintendo Switch

Oct 26, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Starlink: Battle for Atlas is a fun and engaging game that serves as a promising start to a new franchise, with beautiful graphics and a solid toys-to-life component, despite some repetitive gameplay.

Read full review

Nintendo Life

Nintendo Switch

Oct 15, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Starlink: Battle for Atlas is a solid entry in the genre, especially on Switch, with enjoyable gameplay and integration of Star Fox content, despite some repetitive elements.

Read full review

COGconnected

Nintendo Switch

Oct 22, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Starlink: Battle for Atlas is a fast-paced and gorgeous space adventure with intuitive controls, challenging combat, and satisfying tactile response. However, it is marred by repetitive dialogue and enemies, as well as occasional flat textures.

Read full review

Generación Xbox

Xbox One

Oct 20, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Overall, Starlink: Battle for Atlas is seen as a refreshing and entertaining game that prioritizes gameplay over narrative depth, appealing to fans of space adventures.

Read full review

Digital Chumps

PlayStation 4

Oct 19, 2018

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Starlink: Battle for Atlas is a unique and entertaining game with a lot of heart, despite some repetitive gameplay and narrative challenges. It successfully combines toys-to-life elements without forcing players into that model.

Read full review