Search for games

Type three or more characters to search...

Links

Amazon

Twitch

MONSTER

Pokemon Legends: Z-A

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Pokemon Legends: Z-A
Item: Pokemon Legends: Z-A
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2025

GenresAdventure, Action, Third Person Perspective, RPG, Anime and JRPG, Single Player

AvailableOct 16, 2025

PlatformNintendo Switch

DeveloperGame Freak

Overview

A new adventure awaits within Lumiose City, where an urban redevelopment plan is underway to shape the city into a place that belongs to both people and Pokémon. Please look forward to seeing it for yourself.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Pokémon Legends: Z-A garners positive reviews for its engaging story and character development, set against the vibrant backdrop of Illumina City. Critics praise its emotional depth and exploration of themes like legacy and coexistence. However, it suffers from pacing issues, repetitive plotlines, and a lack of voice acting, which dampens emotional resonance. While it appeals to both newcomers and veterans, many feel it lacks the depth of past entries, leaving room for improvement in narrative execution.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

57%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

36%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The overall sentiment regarding the story of Pokémon Legends: Z-A is notably positive among critics, highlighting its engaging narrative and character development. Many reviewers, such as ComicBook and Shacknews, praise the story for its compelling character introductions and emotional moments that enhance the gaming experience. The setting of Illumina City, inspired by Paris, is frequently mentioned as a vibrant backdrop that reflects the coexistence of humans and Pokémon, with IGN Brasil noting the sincerity of the narrative. Critics like Inverse and RPG Site commend the game for exploring deeper themes such as legacy and coexistence, while also emphasizing the whimsical writing and engaging side quests that contribute to a rich storytelling experience. However, the narrative has its share of criticisms, particularly regarding its structure and pacing. Several reviewers, including CGMagazine and Gamereactor UK, point out that the plot can become repetitive over time, with a linear progression that may detract from the overall excitement. Critics like IGN Benelux describe the story as transparent and lacking in complexity, which may leave some players wanting more depth. Additionally, the absence of voice acting, as noted by Gamereactor UK, is seen as a significant drawback, as it detracts from the emotional intensity of the narrative. The reliance on excessive dialogues, highlighted by COGconnected, can also slow down the pacing, making the experience feel drawn out. Overall, the consensus among critics suggests that while Pokémon Legends: Z-A offers a fresh and engaging narrative with strong character development, it struggles with pacing and repetitive elements. Reviewers like VG247 and Gfinity recognize the story's cinematic qualities and its ability to intertwine with gameplay, yet many agree that it lacks the depth and complexity found in previous entries. The game successfully appeals to both newcomers and veterans, as noted by GAMINGbible and Invader, but the execution of its narrative could benefit from more variety and emotional engagement to elevate the overall experience.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Pokémon Legends: Z-A has impressed critics with its innovative real-time battle system and enhanced exploration, making for a more engaging gameplay experience. While praised for its strategic depth and dynamic mechanics, some reviewers noted repetitive gameplay and low challenge levels as drawbacks. Overall, it’s seen as a significant step forward for the franchise, blending fresh ideas with classic Pokémon elements, despite its flaws.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

76%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

24%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of Pokémon Legends: Z-A has garnered a largely positive reception from critics, with many praising the significant innovations introduced in the game. Notably, the transition to a real-time battle system has been highlighted as a refreshing change that enhances player engagement. IGN Brasil commended the introduction of free movement in battles and strategic combinations of abilities, making the experience accessible yet deep. Critics such as CGMagazine and Invader echoed this sentiment, noting that the dynamic nature of the real-time combat system allows for creative tactics and interactive battles. Furthermore, the emphasis on exploration, particularly in areas like Lumiose City, has been recognized as a rewarding aspect of gameplay, with ComicBook describing the city as larger than expected and filled with new mechanics and challenges. Despite the overall praise, some critics pointed out certain drawbacks that could detract from the experience. A recurring theme in the reviews is the repetitiveness of the gameplay loop, as noted by COGconnected and Dexerto, who mentioned that the constant combat and the rank progression structure can lead to a lack of variety. Additionally, while the real-time battle system is engaging, some critics, such as GameSpot and TechRadar Gaming, expressed concerns about the overall challenge being low and the mechanics feeling underutilized at times. The tutorial pacing was also critiqued by 4P.de, which found it slow, potentially hindering the initial engagement for new players. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Pokémon Legends: Z-A represents a significant step forward for the franchise, with its innovative gameplay mechanics being well-received. The majority of reviewers, including Gamereactor UK and GAMES.CH, found the new real-time battle system to be a strong improvement over traditional turn-based mechanics, contributing to a more dynamic and engaging experience. While some issues regarding repetitiveness and challenge levels were noted, the positive aspects of exploration, strategic gameplay, and the introduction of new mechanics have led to a favorable outlook on the game. The critics agree that, despite its flaws, Pokémon Legends: Z-A is a compelling addition to the Pokémon series that offers a fresh take on gameplay.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Pokemon Legends: Z-A boasts vibrant visuals and smooth animations, especially in Lumiose City, earning praise for its lively atmosphere and 60fps performance. However, widespread criticism highlights flat textures, blurry shadows, and a low-budget feel that undermine its potential. While the game shows promise, it ultimately falls short of the high standards expected from a major franchise, leaving critics feeling it's a missed opportunity for the Switch 2.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

24%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

59%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

17%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of Pokemon Legends: Z-A have received a mixed reception from critics, with some acknowledging notable improvements and vibrant elements. Critics like CGMagazine and Nintenduo praised the game for its engaging visuals, highlighting the lively atmosphere of Lumiose City, which draws inspiration from Paris. The game is noted for its smooth animations and better frame rates compared to previous titles, with Nintenduo specifically mentioning the impressive 60fps and dynamic resolution of 1080p. Additionally, Pocket Tactics and Nintenderos emphasized the vibrant and bustling city design, contributing to an overall appealing aesthetic experience. However, the criticisms surrounding the graphics are significant and widespread. Many reviewers, including Nintendo Life and GAMINGbible, pointed out issues such as flat textures, blurry shadows, and a lack of detail in the environment. Critics like GameSpot and Gamereactor UK described the visual presentation as bland, with a sterile feeling in the city districts that detracts from the game's potential. Furthermore, Metro GameCentral and VG247 highlighted the low-budget appearance of the graphics, noting that the game suffers from simplistic lighting and textures, which is particularly disappointing given the franchise's legacy and expectations for a Nintendo Switch 2 title. Overall, the consensus among critics suggests that while Pokemon Legends: Z-A showcases some vibrant and engaging visuals, it ultimately falls short of the high standards expected from a major franchise. Many reviewers noted that despite the improvements in performance and some appealing design elements, the game is hindered by flat textures, a lack of detail, and repetitiveness in the environment. Critics like Inverse and Shacknews echoed this sentiment, indicating that the game's visuals, while colorful and lively, do not fully capitalize on the capabilities of the Switch 2, leaving a sense of missed opportunity.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Pokemon Legends: Z-A shines with a praised, dynamic soundtrack—hailed as the series' best by some critics—enhancing its immersive experience. However, the absence of voice acting is a significant flaw that hampers emotional engagement and narrative depth, leaving many moments feeling flat. Overall, while the music is a high point, the lack of vocal performances creates a mixed reception for the game.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

33%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

60%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of Pokemon Legends: Z-A have garnered a range of opinions from various critics, with many praising the soundtrack as a significant strength of the game. Critics like Nintenderos and RPG Site highlight the music's dynamic nature, noting that it enhances immersion and features a variety of styles, including jazz reinterpretations and techno remixes. VGC goes so far as to call it the best orchestral score in the series, emphasizing the effectiveness of both new compositions and rearrangements of classic themes. TechRadar Gaming echoes this sentiment, stating that the delightful soundtrack contributes positively to the game's atmosphere, while Pocket Tactics appreciates the variety of tracks that enrich the overall gaming experience. Despite the praise for the music, a recurring criticism among reviewers is the notable absence of voice acting, which many feel detracts from the overall experience. Critics such as IGN Brasil, CGMagazine, and GameSpot express that the lack of voice work, especially during pivotal moments and cutscenes, leaves the narrative feeling incomplete and less engaging. GAMINGbible and Metro GameCentral also point out that this absence hampers emotional engagement, making the presentation feel static. While Invader acknowledges the pleasant background music, they too note that the lack of voice-overs is a significant downside, further reinforcing the sentiment shared by many critics. Overall, the consensus among critics indicates that while the soundtrack of Pokemon Legends: Z-A is widely regarded as a highlight, the absence of voice acting is a significant drawback that undermines the game's narrative depth. Many reviewers, including those from CGMagazine and GAMES.CH, agree that the lack of voice work detracts from the emotional impact of the story and leaves key moments feeling less immersive. The combination of an impressive soundtrack and a disappointing lack of voice acting creates a mixed reception, suggesting that while the game excels in its musical composition, it falls short in delivering a fully engaging auditory experience.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics largely slam "Pokemon Legends: Z-A" for its lack of voice acting, calling it a major flaw that cripples emotional depth and narrative immersion. While some praise the quality of the writing, the consensus is clear: the absence of vocal performances is a missed opportunity that leaves the game feeling incomplete and jarring. Future titles need to address this critical shortcoming.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

10%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

90%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

In analyzing the opinions of various critics regarding the voice acting in "Pokemon Legends: Z-A," it is important to note that while the majority of reviews express disappointment, there are some subtle positives that can be gleaned. Critics like IGN Brasil and Metro GameCentral acknowledge that the dialogue itself is of high quality, suggesting that the writing could have benefitted from vocal performances to enhance the overall experience. This indicates that the narrative has potential, and the absence of voice acting does not stem from a lack of content but rather from a missed opportunity to elevate the storytelling through performance. Conversely, the overwhelming sentiment among critics is one of dissatisfaction regarding the lack of voice acting. CGMagazine and GAMINGbible both highlight how this absence undermines the emotional engagement and immersion during crucial moments in the game. The critics consistently describe the lack of voice acting as a significant flaw, with phrases like "jarring" and "empty" being used to convey the impact on the narrative delivery. GameSpot and Nintenduo specifically mention that the reliance on text alone detracts from character interactions and the dynamism of scenes, reinforcing the notion that the game feels incomplete without vocal performances. Overall, the consensus among critics is clear: the absence of voice acting in "Pokemon Legends: Z-A" is viewed as a major drawback that significantly impacts the game's emotional depth and narrative immersion. Critics like Gamereactor UK and Omelete emphasize that this omission is not just a minor issue but a critical flaw that diminishes the overall experience, suggesting that Game Freak needs to address this in future titles. The repeated references to missed opportunities and the feeling of incompleteness indicate a strong desire for a more robust auditory experience that could have complemented the game's narrative strengths.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Pokémon Legends: Z-A faces mixed reviews on the Nintendo Switch due to performance issues like frame drops and visual glitches, particularly in handheld mode. Critics note a significant improvement on the upgraded Switch 2, with smoother gameplay and a solid 60fps, though minor bugs persist. While the Switch 2 version is praised for its technical execution, the original Switch struggles with stability, highlighting a clear divide in performance across platforms.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

52%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

44%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of Pokémon Legends: Z-A has garnered mixed reviews across different platforms, particularly focusing on the Nintendo Switch and its upgraded version, the Switch 2. On the Nintendo Switch, IGN Brasil noted that while there are visual issues during fast-paced battles, they do not significantly impact gameplay. Nintendo Life highlighted that the game maintains a relatively stable 30fps, with improved performance on Switch 2. Critics like CGMagazine and COGconnected praised the performance on Switch 2, noting a higher frame rate that contributes to fluid gameplay. Many reviews, including those from Shacknews and Nintenderos, emphasized the smooth operation of the game on the Switch 2, with minimal loading times and no noticeable performance issues, marking a significant improvement over its predecessors. Conversely, the negatives for the Nintendo Switch are more pronounced. Nintendo Life pointed out noticeable frame drops during cutscenes and battles, particularly in handheld mode. 4P.de mentioned that while performance is improved compared to previous titles, specific details on technical stability were lacking. GameStar delivered a stark critique, describing the technical condition of the game as "completely unacceptable." On the Switch 2, while many critics praised its performance, there were still mentions of minor technical issues. For instance, TechRadar Gaming reported bugs related to battle positioning, and VG247 noted frame rate drops and command delays during battles, which could detract from the overall experience. Overall, the consensus among critics indicates a clear distinction between the performance of the original Nintendo Switch and the Switch 2. While the original Switch version has been criticized for its stability and performance issues, the Switch 2 has received widespread acclaim for its smooth gameplay and improved technical performance. Critics like Invader and Jeuxvideo.com noted that the Switch 2 version runs at a solid 60fps with minimal bugs, showcasing a significant leap forward in technical execution. However, there remains a cautionary note regarding the limitations of the original hardware, as highlighted by TheSixthAxis and VGC, suggesting that while the game performs well on newer systems, it may still struggle on older models.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Pokemon Legends: Z-A garners mixed reviews on replay value. Critics praise its expansive side missions, multiplayer mode, and dynamic combat for encouraging exploration and return play. However, concerns about repetitive gameplay and a lack of innovation raise doubts about long-term engagement. While it appeals to completionists, the potential for fatigue suggests players should temper expectations on replayability.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

33%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

63%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions regarding the replay value of Pokemon Legends: Z-A reveal a blend of enthusiasm and caution among critics. Many reviewers, like IGN Brasil and ComicBook, highlight the game’s extensive side missions and hidden areas, which foster exploration and encourage players to return even after completing the main storyline. Critics such as Nintenduo and Shacknews also emphasize the multiplayer mode and dynamic combat system, suggesting that these features significantly enhance the game's replayability. Additionally, the presence of various challenges and a new ranking system, as noted by TechRadar Gaming, adds layers of engagement that can keep players invested over time. Conversely, several critics express concerns about the game's long-term replay value due to repetitive gameplay elements. CGMagazine and COGconnected point out that the game can become monotonous after extended play, which may deter players from returning. Similarly, Dexerto and Gfinity note that the lack of innovation and confined gameplay experience contribute to a diminished replay appeal. Critics like Inverse and VG247 mention that while the game offers side missions, the repetitive nature of battles and certain gameplay aspects could lead to fatigue, impacting the overall desire to replay. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed, with a notable divide in opinions on replay value. While many, including Gamereactor UK and TheSixthAxis, acknowledge the game’s potential for replayability through its engaging side missions and character interactions, others caution that repetitive elements and a lack of exploration variety could limit long-term engagement. The game seems to cater well to completionists and fans of the franchise, as noted by Jeuxvideo.com and VGC, but the concerns raised about gameplay repetition suggest that players may need to balance their expectations regarding replay value.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

68%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

32%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall sentiment regarding Pokémon Legends: Z-A is largely positive, with many critics praising its innovative gameplay and fresh approach to the franchise. Reviewers like IGN Brasil highlight the game as setting a new standard for the series, blending the anime's identity with engaging gameplay. Critics from CGMagazine and GAMES.CH echo this sentiment, noting the impressive visuals and the engaging story that marks a refreshing change in the Pokémon series. Additionally, several reviewers, including Nintenderos and Shacknews, describe it as one of the best entries in the franchise, emphasizing its successful reinvention of combat mechanics and the vibrant urban setting that enhances the overall experience. However, the game is not without its criticisms. Many reviewers point out persistent technical issues, such as limitations in graphics and NPC interactions, as noted by 4P.de and GameSpot. Critics like COGconnected and Dexerto mention the repetitive gameplay and limited exploration, which detracts from the overall experience. Furthermore, some reviews, such as those from Gfinity and GameStar, suggest that while the game is enjoyable, it fails to innovate significantly compared to its predecessor, Pokémon Legends: Arceus. This sentiment is echoed by critics who mention that the game feels like a missed opportunity due to its lackluster presentation and simplistic story. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Pokémon Legends: Z-A represents a significant evolution for the franchise, successfully blending nostalgia with modern gameplay elements. While the game has its flaws—particularly in technical performance and exploration—it is generally viewed as a bold and engaging entry that offers a worthwhile experience for fans. Reviewers like RPG Site and TechRadar Gaming highlight the game's experimental approach and its balance of familiarity with innovation, suggesting that it sets a solid foundation for future titles in the Pokémon series.

TL;DR

Pokémon Legends: Z-A receives mostly positive reviews for its innovative gameplay and fresh take on the franchise, with critics praising its visuals, story, and new combat mechanics. However, it faces criticism for technical issues, repetitive gameplay, and limited exploration. While some feel it doesn't significantly innovate over its predecessor, Pokémon Legends: Arceus, many agree it marks a bold evolution for the series, blending nostalgia with modern elements and setting a promising foundation for future titles.

MONSTER

Reviews

47 reviews found

100

TheSixthAxis

Oct 14, 2025