Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door

The majority of critics lauded Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door for its vibrant storytelling, highlighting its engaging narrative, clever writing, and memorable characters. App Trigger praised the "ridiculously diverse cast" and the "masterfully told" segment with Princess Peach, while Areajugones and But Why Tho? emphasized the game’s focus on the journey and fleshed-out story, respectively. COGconnected and Gfinity commended the preserved, snappy dialogue and the addition of new context, such as Vivian’s transgender identity, which added depth. Cubed3 and Digital Trends celebrated its unique expansion of the Mario universe, blending humor with creativity, and IGN Portugal drew comparisons to One Piece for its innovative structure and intriguing plot points. The game’s whimsical tone, as noted by RPG Site and TechRadar Gaming, was complemented by moments of darkness and urgency, as seen in PC Games’ observation of its "dark and slightly more serious" elements. Critics like NME and Player 2 highlighted its "witty and irreverent" writing, calling it one of Nintendo’s funniest titles, while Twinfinite and Vooks appreciated its emotional beats and varied scenarios, from dungeon exploration to train-based mysteries. These elements collectively painted a picture of a story that was both charming and imaginative, with a strong emphasis on character development and world-building. However, some reviewers pointed out structural and pacing issues that detracted from the experience. COGconnected noted that while certain chapters were "rock solid," others like the tournament arc might be skipped, suggesting uneven engagement. Jeuxvideo.com criticized the "repetitive elements" of excessive backtracking, and Metro GameCentral described the story as "inconsequential" despite its humorous dialogue. Twinfinite echoed this, calling the narrative "mechanical and serialized" with predictable beats, though it improved in the second half. Additionally, GameOver.gr and Games.cz focused on specific plot details, such as the magical map and Rogueport setting, but these were more descriptive than critical. While the game’s humor and creativity were widely praised, the occasional reliance on familiar RPG tropes and the challenge of maintaining momentum through its eight-chapter structure were seen as minor drawbacks. These critiques, though present, were often framed as secondary to the game’s overall strengths. Despite the minor criticisms, the overall consensus among critics was overwhelmingly positive, with the story being a standout feature. The game’s ability to balance lightheartedness with unexpected depth, as noted by VG247 and GamingTrend, resonated strongly, while its unique setting and character-driven subplots, like those involving Peach and Bowser, added layers to the adventure. While some found the pacing inconsistent or the narrative formulaic, the majority agreed that the story’s charm, humor, and creativity more than compensated for these flaws. RPG Site and SpazioGames praised its "captivating RPG experience" and "motivating" structure, and Vooks highlighted the emotional and touching moments that elevated it beyond typical Mario fare. The game’s legacy as a "quintessential" entry in the series, with its "refreshing humor" and "surprising plot twists," solidified its reputation as a story that, while not perfect, was undeniably engaging and worth experiencing.

The majority of critics praised the gameplay of Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door for its engaging and strategic turn-based combat, which remains a core strength despite its age. Reviewers like Checkpoint Gaming highlighted the "tight and fast-paced" combat system, noting that the classic mechanics still hold up well with modernized additions such as optional hints and unlockable galleries. Gfinity and GGRecon emphasized the depth provided by the badge system, partner abilities, and the ability to customize Mario’s skills, which added layers of tactical decision-making. But Why Tho? and Cubed3 commended the game’s RPG mechanics, including unique character abilities, enjoyable puzzles, and the charm of Mario’s paper-based transformations. Player 2 and SpazioGames appreciated the inventive battle design, with Player 2 specifically noting the "context-sensitive actions" and the "paper aesthetic" that kept the experience fresh even after two decades. The game’s blend of exploration, platforming, and puzzle-solving was also frequently lauded, with Games.cz and RPG Site pointing to its diverse locations, enemies, and quality-of-life improvements like new shortcuts and partner recruitment. However, several critics pointed out notable flaws, particularly around repetition and pacing. Areajugones and IGN Portugal criticized the combat for being "slow and unengaging" or "shallow and monotonous," while COGconnected and Dot Esports found some puzzles and encounters "exhausting" or "tedious," especially in later chapters. GameSpew and NME noted that the combat could feel "simplistic" and "tiresome" due to repetitive mini-games and limited attack variety. Jeuxvideo.com and Vandal mentioned backtracking as a chore, with the latter pointing out that "some backtracking issues" detracted from the experience. Additionally, Twinfinite observed that the game "lacks in platform and puzzle-solving gameplay," suggesting that while the combat and exploration were strong, certain elements felt underdeveloped compared to other RPGs. These critiques often centered on the game’s reliance on its 2004-era design, which some found outdated in a modern context. Despite these criticisms, the overall consensus among reviewers was overwhelmingly positive, with the gameplay being deemed "very good" by the majority. The strategic depth of the turn-based system, combined with the creative use of the paper world’s mechanics—such as Mario’s folding abilities and partner switching—was seen as a standout feature. App Trigger and Nintendojo highlighted the quality-of-life upgrades that modernized the experience, while Vooks and TechRadar Gaming praised the "tactical scope" and "challenging and strategic" battles. While some critics acknowledged the game’s flaws, such as repetition or backtracking, these were often framed as minor drawbacks in an otherwise enjoyable and nostalgic package. The blend of RPG, platforming, and puzzle elements, along with the charm of its design, solidified Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door as a beloved title that, despite its age, continues to offer a rewarding and inventive gameplay experience.

The majority of reviewers praised the graphics and visual design of Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door on the Nintendo Switch, emphasizing the successful remastering that revitalized the game’s paper-themed aesthetic. Critics like Checkpoint Gaming highlighted the “thicker paper cut-out outlines, more detailed background objects, and improved lighting and shading effects,” while COGconnected and Comicbook.com noted “fabulous new visuals” and “vibrant character models” that breathe life into the world. Digital Trends and Games.cz lauded the “gorgeous” and “stunning” visuals, with the latter describing “beautiful environments” and “colorful characters.” The paper-craft style was consistently celebrated, with Dot Esports calling it “fantastic” for its commitment to the paper-themed concept and TechRadar Gaming comparing it to a “pop-up storybook.” Many also appreciated the attention to detail, such as GGRecon’s mention of “distinct pop-up book aesthetic” and Vooks’ observation of “enhanced visuals while capturing the original essence,” reinforcing the game’s visual appeal as a standout feature. While the positives were widespread, some critics pointed to minor drawbacks. GamingTrend and PlaySense noted the drop from 60fps to 30fps, which they felt impacted gameplay fluidity, though this was framed as a trade-off for the visual upgrades. Gfinity mentioned that areas like Rogueport “may look overly colorful,” suggesting a potential imbalance in the redesign, while Vandal observed that “reflective surfaces affect paper/craft aesthetic slightly.” Additionally, Nintendojo criticized the “inferior updated soundtrack,” though this pertains to audio rather than visuals. Metro GameCentral highlighted “long load times and issues with partner AI,” which, while not directly related to graphics, underscored some technical limitations in the remake. These critiques, however, were largely overshadowed by the consensus that the visual improvements were worth the compromises, with most acknowledging the game’s charm despite its technical imperfections. Overall, the critics overwhelmingly agreed that the remaster elevated the game’s visual design without losing its core identity. Areajugones and Cubed3 praised the “refined visuals” and “greater emphasis on the paper-styled world,” while Twinfinite called it “timeless” due to its “gorgeous visual style” and “streamlined menus.” Even with the 30fps limitation, VG247 noted that the “significantly changed and improved visuals” retained the original’s “accurate vibe” and could “compete with modern peers.” The enhancements—such as dynamic lighting, sharper textures, and creative level design—were seen as a testament to the game’s enduring appeal. While a few critics pointed to minor flaws, the collective sentiment was that the visual overhaul was a triumph, balancing nostalgia with modern polish and solidifying The Thousand-Year Door as a visually captivating experience that honors its 2004 roots while shining on the Switch.

The majority of reviewers praised the sound design and music of Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door as a standout enhancement to the remake. Critics like Areajugones highlighted the captivating soundtrack that complements the game’s charm, while But Why Tho? and Checkpoint Gaming celebrated the newly created and rearranged soundtrack, noting unique battle themes for each chapter and character-specific sound bites that add life to the narrative. Cubed3 and Eurogamer Poland emphasized the exceptional tracks and unique location-based themes, with IGN Portugal and SpazioGames pointing to the immersive atmosphere and real-time stage composition during battles. TechRadar Gaming and Vooks lauded the remixed instrumentation and catchy, memorable melodies, respectively, while GGRecon and Multiplayer.it appreciated the refreshed audio and its role in amplifying the game’s storytelling. These positive remarks collectively underscore the effort to modernize the audio while preserving the original’s essence. However, some critics expressed reservations about the updated soundtrack. Nintendojo noted that the new soundtrack is inferior to the original, though it introduced character-specific voices. GamingTrend mentioned mixed results, with certain tracks overusing overdriven guitars and RPG Site pointed out that Twilight Town’s theme lacked the impact of its predecessor. Pure Nintendo criticized the technical issues with switching between the original and new soundtracks, while Player 2 observed that the sound design remained largely unchanged despite minor updates. These critiques suggest that while the remastered music generally improves the experience, some elements failed to meet expectations, particularly in terms of nostalgia and specific track execution. Additionally, App Trigger highlighted the absence of voice acting as a missed opportunity, which indirectly affected immersion and the game’s overall appeal. Despite these criticisms, the overall consensus among reviewers leans heavily toward appreciation for the reworked audio. Most acknowledged the enhanced variety and quality of the soundtrack, with the option to toggle between new and original versions being a key highlight. While a few noted flaws in specific tracks or technical hiccups, the majority agreed that the music elevates the gameplay experience and retains the charm of the original. The inclusion of unique battle themes, character sound bites, and dynamic compositions was seen as a significant improvement, even if not universally flawless. Critics like COGconnected and Vandal emphasized how the sound design and audio cues contribute to a more polished and engaging experience, reinforcing that the soundtrack, while not perfect, remains a strong and memorable aspect of the remake.

Summary unavailable

The technical performance of Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door on the Nintendo Switch is largely praised for its stability and thoughtful enhancements. Critics like But Why Tho? highlight the game’s locked 30FPS, noting no lag, frame rate dips, or glitches, which ensures a smooth experience. Checkpoint Gaming and Comicbook.com commend the quality-of-life improvements, such as new warp pipes, streamlined saving, and faster partner swapping, which modernize the original while preserving its core mechanics. Cubed3 and Vandal acknowledge the 30FPS cap as a trade-off but emphasize that the remaster’s updated visuals and faster load times (mentioned by GameOver.gr) make it a worthwhile upgrade. Nintenduo and RPG Site also note minor technical tweaks that contribute to a more polished and efficient gameplay flow, reinforcing the perception of a well-crafted port. However, several critics point to the 30FPS downgrade as a significant drawback, particularly for purists who recall the original GameCube’s 60FPS performance. Cubed3 and GGRecon explicitly mention this as a potential disappointment, though they argue it doesn’t hinder gameplay due to the game’s turn-based nature. Digital Trends and GamingTrend report occasional frame rate drops and menu delays, respectively, which can disrupt immersion. Metro GameCentral criticizes long load times and partner AI issues, while Jeuxvideo.com and Pure Nintendo highlight the absence of modern conveniences like text acceleration, cutscene skipping, and a "save anywhere" feature, which they see as oversights. PlaySense and TechRadar Gaming note missing animations and difficulty spikes, respectively, suggesting that while the game runs smoothly, these technical shortcomings detract from its accessibility and polish. Despite these critiques, the overall consensus among reviewers is that the Switch version delivers a stable and enjoyable technical experience, with quality-of-life upgrades outweighing minor flaws. But Why Tho? and Vandal affirm the game’s smooth performance, while ComicBook and Comicbook.com praise its "well-crafted" execution. The 30FPS cap, though a point of contention, is generally seen as a manageable compromise, especially given the enhanced visuals and streamlined mechanics. While some critics like RPG Site and SpazioGames acknowledge the frame rate as a "nitpick," the majority agree that the remaster successfully modernizes the classic title without compromising its integrity. The technical issues mentioned are largely peripheral, and the game’s charm and design remain intact, making it a solid recommendation for both newcomers and fans of the original.

The overall sentiment among critics regarding the replay value of Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door on the Nintendo Switch is largely positive, with many highlighting the remaster’s enhancements and content that encourage multiple playthroughs. App Trigger emphasizes that new features and improvements in the remaster make it a worthwhile experience for both newcomers and returning players, while Checkpoint Gaming points to optional hints, advanced options, unlockable galleries, and the ability to retry from the last battle after a Game Over as additions that boost replayability. GGRecon and RPG Site also praise the depth of gameplay mechanics, such as collecting enemy records, cooking recipes, and post-game boss encounters, which provide extra challenges and content for completionists. Additionally, Cubed3 and Pure Nintendo note the presence of side-quests, collectibles, and hidden areas, offering opportunities for exploration, and Nintendojo and TechRadar Gaming highlight the strategic elements of badge and partner choices, as well as the game’s engaging story and memorable characters, which can make revisiting the adventure feel fresh. These elements collectively create a strong foundation for replay value, especially for fans of the series and RPG enthusiasts. However, several critics express concerns about the game’s limitations in terms of replayability, particularly for those who have already played the original. COGconnected criticizes the repetitive puzzles and a "terrible" chapter, which could deter players from revisiting, while IGN Portugal and Jeuxvideo.com argue that the lack of depth in gameplay mechanics and repetitive encounters reduce the incentive to play again. NME and GamingTrend point to under-served areas, excessive backtracking, and the absence of a hard mode as frustrations that might diminish the experience for veteran players. SpazioGames and Digital Trends note that the remake’s changes are minimal, and the lack of a difficulty selector or significant new content could make the game feel less substantial for those seeking more than the original. Twinfinite also mentions the limited side content outside the main quest, though it acknowledges the Pit of 100 Trials and Glitz Pit as exceptions. These critiques suggest that while the game is enjoyable, its replay value is not as robust as some might hope, especially for those already familiar with the original. Despite these criticisms, the overall consensus leans toward a balanced view, recognizing the game’s charm and accessibility as key factors in its replayability. While some critics, like Vooks and TierraGamer, note that the original’s core appeal remains intact and that quality-of-life improvements make it a must-play for fans, others, such as Checkpoint Gaming and NME, acknowledge that returning players may find the experience less compelling without substantial new content. The remaster’s ability to retain the original’s beloved elements—such as its strategic combat, whimsical writing, and nostalgic design—while modernizing visuals and mechanics, seems to strike a chord with many. However, the game’s linear structure, repetitive tasks, and lack of post-game depth for veterans create a divide in opinions. Ultimately, while Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door is praised for its engaging gameplay and accessibility, its replay value is seen as a mixed bag, with the remaster’s improvements and collectible-driven content making it a worthwhile revisit for new players, but less so for those who have already conquered its challenges.