Monster Energy Supercross 25 - The Official Video Game

The reviews of Monster Energy Supercross 25 highlight several positive aspects of its career mode, particularly its structured progression and player agency. GamersRD and GameSpew praise the "Trayectoria" mode, which allows players to build rivalries, manage relationships with fans and sponsors, and climb through divisions, while IGN France notes the gradual ascent from smaller bikes to top categories, emphasizing reputation and notoriety. PSX Brasil and SpazioGames acknowledge the inclusion of social interactions and character relationships, adding a layer of sophistication uncommon in racing games. Additionally, Loot Level Chill highlights the RPG-style skill trees and management elements, offering a sense of customization and growth. These features suggest an attempt to blend sports simulation with narrative-driven progression, appealing to fans seeking depth beyond pure competition. However, critics consistently point out significant shortcomings in the game’s storytelling and character development. COGconnected and Gamesurf criticize the career mode as "shallow" and "linear," lacking meaningful narrative or emotional engagement. Worth Playing and XboxAddict describe the narrative as generic, with limited character customization and minimal dialogue, while GameGrin notes that social interactions via text chains feel superficial compared to in-person dynamics. IGN France further downplays the story, calling its elements "anecdotal," and SpazioGames acknowledges a "small narrative arc" but questions its impact. These critiques suggest that while the game offers structural progression, it fails to deliver a compelling or immersive story, leaving players with a sense of detachment from the characters and their journeys. Overall, the consensus among critics is that Monster Energy Supercross 25 prioritizes gameplay mechanics and progression over narrative depth, resulting in a mixed reception. While features like the "Trayectoria" mode, RPG elements, and social interactions are praised for adding variety, the lack of character development and engaging storytelling remains a recurring criticism. Reviewers like GamingTrend and MondoXbox acknowledge the game’s focus on fan-driven content and rebooted mechanics as positives, but many agree that the career mode feels formulaic and underdeveloped. The game may satisfy fans of the racing genre looking for straightforward competition, but it falls short of delivering a memorable or emotionally resonant story.

The gameplay of Monster Energy Supercross 25 receives praise for its refined mechanics and immersive racing experience. Critics like GAMES.CH highlight improved physics that help players grasp bike control more intuitively, while GameSpew and SpazioGames commend the dynamic track evolution system and realistic terrain deformation, which add depth to races. The career mode is a standout feature, with GamersRD noting its structured progression and customization options, and Multiplayer.it praising the authentic, engaging experience enhanced by dynamic ruts. XboxEra and The Games Machine also appreciate the balanced difficulty for both newcomers and veterans, along with cross-platform online competitions. These elements collectively suggest a game that prioritizes realism and player progression, offering a satisfying challenge for fans of motocross simulations. However, several critics point to significant drawbacks that hinder accessibility and enjoyment. COGconnected and Impulsegamer criticize the steep learning curve and awkward controls, which can frustrate beginners despite the forgiving physics. Gamesurf and Eurogamer Germany note the punishing nature of the game, with AI behaviors and track conditions feeling overly harsh or unrealistic. The tutorial systems are frequently criticized: XboxAddict calls it poorly designed, while Hooked Gamers and IGN Turkey highlight insufficient guidance for newcomers. Additionally, some modes, like the career mode, risk becoming repetitive (Generación Xbox) or lack unpredictability (Vandal). These issues suggest that while the game’s ambition is clear, its execution falls short in making the experience welcoming to a broader audience. Despite mixed reception, the overall consensus leans toward acknowledging Monster Energy Supercross 25 as a technically impressive but polarizing title. The majority of critics agree on its realistic physics and dynamic systems, with GAMES.CH and GameSpew praising their impact on gameplay depth. However, the game’s demanding nature and accessibility issues create a divide: while Multiplayer.it and The Games Machine celebrate its authenticity, others like IGN France and XboxAddict express frustration over the lack of support for new players. The game seems to cater most effectively to hardcore fans who value simulation accuracy, but its challenges may alienate those seeking a more polished or user-friendly experience. Ultimately, it’s a title that rewards dedication but struggles to balance ambition with approachability.

The graphics and visual design of Monster Energy Supercross 25 - The Official Video Game received largely positive feedback, particularly for its use of Unreal Engine 5, which brought notable improvements in lighting, terrain deformation, and environmental detail. Critics like COGconnected praised the "detailed bike models," "impressive track environments," and "enhanced realism" through improved rider animations. Similarly, GameSpew highlighted the game’s "impeccable presentation" with "convincing rider animations," while IGN France noted "better modeling" and "realistic terrain deformation." The transition to current-gen consoles also allowed for sharper textures, dynamic effects like mud and dirt (as mentioned by Gamesurf), and a stronger sense of speed. GamingTrend and Movies Games and Tech emphasized the game’s "gorgeous visuals," particularly in lighting and track design, while GameGrin and Hooked Gamers lauded the intricate venue designs and immersive environments. These elements collectively showcased a significant visual upgrade over previous iterations. However, several critics pointed out persistent issues with character models, animations, and crowd details. GamersRD criticized "character models and crowd visuals [that] lack realism," comparing them to "mannequins," while PSX Brasil noted "lacking character models" and "simplistic animations." Gamesurf and The Games Machine highlighted that while environments were detailed, "character faces are less impressive" and "surrounding elements could be better." Impulsegamer described the graphics as "fine but not spectacular," and Vandal called them "decent but not impressive." Additionally, Eurogamer Germany and IGN Turkey pointed out specific flaws like unrealistic rain effects and bikes that "lack realism in appearance and behavior." These critiques suggest that while technical advancements were evident, the game struggled to achieve a cohesive visual polish across all elements. Overall, the consensus among critics was that Monster Energy Supercross 25 represents a step forward in visual fidelity but remains uneven. The use of Unreal Engine 5 undeniably elevated aspects like terrain deformation, lighting, and environmental detail, as noted by GamingTrend and ZTGD, while some reviewers, such as Loot Level Chill and Oyungezer, praised the "sublime visuals" and "realistic feel." However, recurring complaints about character models, animations, and crowd realism—highlighted by GamersRD, PSX Brasil, and XboxAddict—indicated that the game’s visual design, while improved, still fell short of industry benchmarks. The mixed reception reflects a balance between technical progress and lingering shortcomings, with many critics acknowledging the effort but emphasizing areas needing refinement for future iterations.

The sound design and music of Monster Energy Supercross 25 received mixed but generally positive feedback, with several critics highlighting its strengths. IGN France praised the authenticity and spatialization of the audio, noting how it contributed to an immersive experience, while GamingTrend and Generación Xbox commended the immersive engine roars and ambient effects that align with the game’s simulation focus. GamersRD appreciated the diverse soundtrack blending rock and metal genres, which provided an energetic atmosphere for races, and Vandal acknowledged the effective sound effects that enhanced gameplay. Additionally, Eurogamer Germany noted the deep engine sounds as a positive aspect, reinforcing the game’s realism. These reviews suggest that the audio elements largely succeeded in creating an engaging and authentic racing environment. However, several critics pointed out significant shortcomings. GAMES.CH and Gamesurf criticized the repetitive commentary and limited soundtrack, with the latter noting that engine noise often overshadowed the music, diminishing its impact. Impulsegamer described the audio as adequate but unremarkable, while Vandal and Worth Playing highlighted a lack of inspiration and memorability in the music and voice acting. XboxAddict and Hooked Gamers echoed similar concerns, calling out repetitive engine noises and generic, forgettable tracks that failed to elevate the experience. SomosXbox and Gamesurf also mentioned minimal and unremarkable voice acting, further underscoring a lack of depth in the audio presentation. These critiques suggest that while the sound design met basic expectations, it fell short of delivering a truly standout or innovative auditory experience. Overall, the consensus among critics was mixed but leaning toward adequacy. While several praised specific aspects like engine realism and immersive spatialization, others felt the audio lacked creativity and variety, with repetitive elements detracting from the overall experience. The game’s sound design seemed to fulfill its functional role in enhancing gameplay but struggled to leave a lasting impression. Critics like IGN France and GamingTrend emphasized its strengths, while GAMES.CH, XboxAddict, and Hooked Gamers highlighted its limitations. This split reflects a game that delivers a competent audio experience but fails to innovate or excite beyond basic expectations, leaving room for improvement in future iterations.

Summary unavailable

The technical performance of Monster Energy Supercross 25 across platforms shows a mix of strengths, with notable positives for each system. On PS5, several reviewers praised its stability and graphical improvements, with GAMES.CH noting "stable technical performance," Impulsegamer highlighting "a stable 60fps," and IGN France crediting the transition to UE5 for "stable framerates." For Xbox Series X, critics like Movies Games and Tech emphasized "smooth gameplay and realistic physics," while Worth Playing praised "no lag in online play" and a "locked 60fps." On PC, IGN Turkey reported "smooth runs on high settings" across various hardware, and Loot Level Chill noted "stable online races," suggesting the game adapts well to different configurations. These positives indicate that the title generally delivers solid performance, particularly in terms of frame rates and physics accuracy. However, technical issues persist across platforms. On PS5, COGconnected criticized "inconsistent online multiplayer" with connectivity problems, while Gamesurf pointed to "frame rate drops in rain and motocross tracks," and The Games Machine mentioned "sporadic frame rate drops and slow menu loading times." For Xbox Series X, XboxEra described the game as "a bit janky and cheap at times," and XboxAddict noted "weird physics during certain maneuvers," though these were minor compared to other platforms. On PC, Eurogamer Germany highlighted "menu navigation and resolution issues," while GameGrin criticized "frustrating bike control." These drawbacks, particularly on PS5 and PC, suggest areas where optimization could improve the experience. Overall, critics generally agree that Monster Energy Supercross 25 performs well technically, with PS5 and Xbox Series X versions offering stable frame rates and realistic physics despite minor flaws. The PC version, while smooth on high-end hardware, faces some interface and control issues. While no platform is flawless—PS5 struggles with online stability and performance consistency, Xbox Series X has occasional jankiness, and PC requires better optimization—the game’s core mechanics and visual fidelity are praised across the board. Critics like IGN France and Impulsegamer underscored the PS5’s strengths, while Xbox-focused reviews highlighted its responsiveness, though some technical quirks remained. The consensus leans toward a positive assessment, with room for improvement in specific areas.

The reviewers generally acknowledge several positive aspects of Monster Energy Supercross 25’s replay value, particularly its variety of modes and customization options. Critics like GAMES.CH highlight features such as difficulty levels and a rewind function, which enhance long-term engagement by allowing players to revisit challenges. GameSpew and SpazioGames praise the Track Editor, multiplayer modes, and career systems, emphasizing that these elements provide ample content for repeated play. Additionally, IGN France and The Games Machine note the game’s generous amount of content, including multiple tracks and a deeper career mode, which cater to fans seeking extended gameplay. XboxAddict and XboxEra also commend the track editor and diverse race types as key contributors to replayability, suggesting that the game offers enough variety to keep players invested for some time. However, several critics point out significant drawbacks that may limit long-term appeal. COGconnected and GamersRD criticize the repetitive nature of the career mode and lack of innovative gameplay mechanics, arguing that the core experience becomes stale over time. Gamesurf and Vandal mention limitations such as restricted customization options and generic modes, which could deter players from returning. GameGrin and IGN Turkey express concerns about the game’s repetitive racing loops and insufficient depth, with the latter noting that casual players might struggle to find motivation. Worth Playing and Eurogamer Germany also highlight a lack of sustained engagement, suggesting that while there are mechanics in place for replayability, they fail to overcome the game’s inherent monotony. These critiques underscore a disconnect between the game’s potential and its execution in maintaining player interest. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed but leans toward acknowledging Monster Energy Supercross 25’s replay value as somewhat promising yet flawed. While GAMES.CH, GameSpew, and IGN France emphasize features like track creation, multiplayer, and difficulty scaling that support repeated play, others like COGconnected, GameGrin, and IGN Turkey argue that the game’s repetitive structure and lack of innovation hinder its longevity. The divide reflects differing expectations: some see the game as a solid entry for fans of the series with enough variety to justify multiple sessions, while others feel it falls short of delivering a truly engaging or innovative experience. Ultimately, the replay value appears to depend on individual preferences, with the game offering enough tools for experimentation but struggling to maintain momentum over time.