Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

Steam

Twitch

MONSTER

FBC: Firebreak

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of FBC: Firebreak
Item: FBC: Firebreak
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2025

GenresAction, Science Fiction and Futuristic, Shooter, Multiplayer, First Person Perspective

AvailableJun 17, 2025

PlatformPlayStation 5, PC, Xbox Series X

DeveloperRemedy Entertainment

Overview

FBC: Firebreak is a 3-player cooperative first-person shooter set within the enigmatic Federal Bureau of Control (FBC). As the Bureau’s headquarters faces a deadly and prolonged siege by otherworldly forces, only Firebreak—its most adaptable response unit—has the skills and courage to restore order.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

FBC: Firebreak has some charm with its quirky humor and supernatural elements, but critics largely agree the narrative is shallow and forgettable, lacking depth and coherence compared to Remedy’s previous titles. While it attempts to expand the Control universe, the focus on gameplay over story results in a disconnected experience that disappoints both new players and fans alike.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

58%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

33%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The opinions regarding the story of FBC: Firebreak reveal a few positive aspects that some critics have highlighted. Several reviewers, such as GameSpot and Shacknews, appreciate the game's unique blend of humor and supernatural elements, noting that it retains Remedy's signature tone. Critics like Gaming Nexus mention the absurdist sci-fi narrative, which, while lacking in depth, adds a quirky charm to the gameplay experience. Additionally, some reviewers, including GameGrin and Gamepressure, point out that the game features small narratives within each mission that contribute to a unique atmosphere, enhancing the overall experience despite the overarching story being thin. However, the majority of critics express significant concerns about the lack of depth and coherence in the narrative of FBC: Firebreak. TechRadar Gaming and GameMAG both describe the story as minimal and forgettable, with insufficient dialogue to engage players meaningfully. XboxEra and Digital Chumps echo this sentiment, emphasizing the absence of a compelling narrative compared to its predecessor, Control. Critics like Multiplayer.it and DBLTAP also note that the game feels abstract and disconnected from the established lore, which may alienate newcomers and disappoint fans expecting a richer story. The overall impression is that the game prioritizes gameplay over narrative depth, leading to a fragmented and less engaging experience. The overall consensus among critics is that while FBC: Firebreak attempts to expand the Control universe, it ultimately falls short in delivering a compelling narrative. Reviewers such as Slant Magazine and IGN Italia highlight the disconnection from previous titles, pointing out that the game lacks the depth and character development that fans have come to expect from Remedy. Many critics agree that the focus on multiplayer gameplay detracts from the traditional storytelling elements that defined earlier games in the franchise. In summary, while there are some enjoyable aspects to the narrative, the overwhelming sentiment is that FBC: Firebreak's story is minimal and lacks the engaging qualities that would make it a memorable experience.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

TL;DR: FBC: Firebreak shines with its cooperative gameplay and unique character classes that foster teamwork, but critics overwhelmingly slam it for repetitive missions and lackluster shooting mechanics. While it has moments of fun and strategic depth, the formulaic tasks and limited enemy variety result in a dull experience that fails to engage players long-term. The game has potential, but it falls short due to its content depth and replayability issues.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

18%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

66%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

16%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

In analyzing the gameplay of FBC: Firebreak, several critics have highlighted positive aspects that contribute to an engaging cooperative experience. Many reviewers, such as Gameliner and MeuPlayStation, praised the game for its emphasis on teamwork and the unique mechanics offered by the various character classes or "Kits." The gameplay is described as chaotic and enjoyable, with distinct roles that encourage players to collaborate effectively to tackle challenges, as noted by GameSpot and Stevivor. Critics like Shacknews and GameGrin also appreciated the customizable Jobs and the interaction between different character kits, which adds depth and strategic elements to the gameplay, making it a potentially rewarding experience for players who enjoy cooperative gameplay. However, the majority of reviews convey significant concerns regarding the gameplay's repetitiveness and lack of depth. Critics such as The Jimquisition and Slant Magazine pointed out that the missions often feel formulaic and monotonous, leading to a dull experience over time. Many reviewers echoed this sentiment, with GameMAG and Try Hard Guides describing the shooting mechanics as unsatisfying and the overall gameplay loop as tedious. The repetitive nature of tasks and limited enemy variety was a common critique, with multiple reviewers like XboxEra and DarkZero highlighting how these factors detract from long-term engagement and excitement, causing players to lose interest after a few hours. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while FBC: Firebreak offers a solid foundation for cooperative gameplay with interesting mechanics and class synergies, it is ultimately hampered by a lack of variety and depth in mission design. Critics like Digital Trends and IGN noted that despite some creative mission structures, the repetitive nature of tasks and the absence of engaging challenges diminish the overall experience. While there are moments of fun and potential for teamwork, as highlighted by Player 2 and COGconnected, the game's shortcomings in content depth and replayability leave many reviewers feeling that it does not fully realize its potential.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

TL;DR: FBC: Firebreak impresses with its artistic direction and strong visuals, praised for detailed environments and lighting thanks to Remedy's Northlight engine. However, critics point out static design and technical issues like performance drops, leading to mixed reviews. While it captures the essence of its predecessor, Control, it falls short of the visual heights set by earlier Remedy games, leaving some fans wanting more innovation and polish.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

54%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

40%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The opinions on the graphics and visual design of FBC: Firebreak reveal a range of positive sentiments, particularly regarding the game's artistic direction and technical capabilities. Critics like Gameliner and COGconnected praise the impressive graphics powered by Remedy's Northlight engine, highlighting the strong visual presentation and engaging art direction. The game is noted for its detailed environments and effective use of lighting, with Hobby Consolas emphasizing the excellent shadow work that contributes to the game's atmospheric depth. Critics such as KeenGamer and MeuPlayStation also appreciate how the visuals maintain the unique aesthetic established in Control, creating an immersive experience that resonates with fans of Remedy's previous titles. However, there are notable criticisms regarding the game's visual execution. ElDesmarque describes the visual design as static and lacking personality, which contrasts sharply with the vibrant environments noted by others. GameMAG points out technical issues, including performance drops and graphical artifacts during intense moments, suggesting that while the game runs at 60 FPS, it suffers in crowded scenarios. Additionally, some critics, such as But Why Tho? and Multiplayer.it, argue that the visuals are forgettable or less impressive compared to previous Remedy games, indicating a perceived decline in visual ambition and variety. Overall, the consensus among critics reflects a mixture of admiration and disappointment. While many reviewers commend the game's strong artistic direction and atmospheric visuals, there is a significant concern regarding technical performance and the lack of innovation in design. Critics like Atomix and Vandal acknowledge that although the game captures the essence of the Control universe, it does not reach the graphical heights of earlier titles like Alan Wake II. This divergence in opinion suggests that while FBC: Firebreak has solid visual foundations, it may not fully satisfy those seeking groundbreaking advancements in graphics and design.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

FBC: Firebreak's sound design and music receive mixed reviews. While some critics praise the energetic soundtrack and effective sound effects that enhance gameplay, others slam it for being bland and forgettable, with flat music and annoying voice clips. This polarized reception highlights a split between those who enjoy the audio experience and those who feel it detracts from immersion, ultimately leaving many players unsatisfied.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

26%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

47%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

26%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The opinions regarding the sound design and music of FBC: Firebreak present a mixed bag of sentiments, with several critics highlighting notable strengths. Gameliner praises the energetic soundtrack, noting that it complements the gameplay and enhances the overall audiovisual experience. Similarly, CGMagazine appreciates the intense guitar riffs that align with the game's punk-rock sensibilities, contributing to the atmosphere. Critics like Game8 and MeuPlayStation echo this sentiment, emphasizing the strong soundtrack and effective voice acting that adds personality to the characters. On the technical side, TheXboxHub and Checkpoint Gaming commend the well-executed sound design, with effective ambient noises and thematic sound effects that enhance the gameplay experience, indicating that there are elements that resonate well with players. Conversely, a significant number of critics express disappointment in various aspects of the sound design and music. Generación Xbox describes the sound design as disappointing, with flat music and unremarkable sound effects that detract from the experience. TechRadar Gaming and The Jimquisition also criticize the sound design, labeling it as bland and dismal, with some voice clips being particularly annoying. Vandal shares similar concerns, stating that the music is forgettable and environmental effects lack prominence during key moments. This negative sentiment is echoed by critics like Atomix and XboxEra, who note the absence of memorable themes and atmospheric music, which detracts from the immersive experience. Overall, the consensus among critics is polarized, with a clear divide between those who appreciate the energetic and thematic aspects of the sound design and those who find it lacking in depth and memorability. While some, like KeenGamer and GameGrin, commend the effective audio elements that enhance the gameplay, others, such as Generación Xbox and TechRadar Gaming, highlight significant shortcomings that hinder the overall experience. This dichotomy suggests that while FBC: Firebreak has the potential for an engaging audio experience, it ultimately falls short for a considerable portion of its audience, leading to a mixed reception in terms of sound design and music.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Voice acting in FBC: Firebreak garners mixed reviews—some critics praise its humor and relatability, enhancing the game's atmosphere. However, many find it lacking depth and variety, with complaints about the limited character options and the absence of crucial communication features. While there are moments of charm, overall, significant improvements are needed to boost character engagement and narrative quality.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

25%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

25%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

50%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in FBC: Firebreak has received some positive feedback from various critics, highlighting aspects that enhance the game's overall experience. Gameliner appreciates the casual and relatable dialogue, which contributes to an engaging atmosphere, while Game8 notes that the voice acting is well-executed, endowing characters with enough personality to be endearing. Similarly, Try Hard Guides points out the humor and quippy dialogue that adds a light-hearted tone, making the interactions enjoyable. TheXboxHub mentions that the minimal voice acting is effective, particularly during team revives, reinforcing the cooperative spirit of the game. Overall, these critics recognize that the voice acting serves its purpose in creating a relatable and engaging environment for players. However, several critics have raised significant concerns regarding the voice acting in FBC: Firebreak. TechRadar Gaming describes the voice acting as unremarkable, with characters lacking depth and personality, while The Jimquisition goes as far as to label it as obnoxious, negatively impacting the overall experience. KeenGamer echoes a desire for more character variety and voice options, indicating that the current offerings feel limited, primarily focusing on Hank and Jerry. Moreover, Gfinity, DarkZero, and IGN Benelux all point out the absence of voice or text chat as a major oversight, especially for a co-op game where communication is essential for teamwork. This lack of interaction options further detracts from the potential richness of the voice acting. In summary, the overall consensus among critics regarding the voice acting in FBC: Firebreak is mixed. While some appreciate the humor and relatability of the dialogue, as noted by Gameliner and Try Hard Guides, a significant number of reviewers criticize the lack of depth and variety in the characters, with TechRadar Gaming and The Jimquisition expressing dissatisfaction. The absence of communication features, highlighted by multiple critics, is seen as a critical flaw that undermines the cooperative experience. Ultimately, while there are elements of charm and effectiveness in the voice acting, the prevailing sentiment suggests that improvements are needed to elevate the game's narrative and character engagement.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

FBC: Firebreak's technical performance is a mixed bag across platforms. Xbox Series X and PS5 generally deliver smooth gameplay and good frame rates, but face issues like performance drops and matchmaking errors. PC performance varies widely, with some praising optimization while others cite major connectivity problems. Overall, the game shows potential but needs significant fixes to tackle its technical shortcomings.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

32%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

44%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

24%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of FBC: Firebreak has received a range of opinions from critics across different gaming platforms. On the Xbox Series X, several reviewers noted a generally smooth experience, with ElDesmarque highlighting that the game runs in 4K without significant bugs, and Generación Xbox confirming stable performance at 60 FPS with quick load times. Gameliner also echoed this sentiment, stating that the game runs smoothly across platforms. TheXboxHub reported no significant technical issues, reinforcing the notion of stability on this console. On the PlayStation 5, critics like Atomix and Push Square praised the game for its smooth performance and stable frame rates, while CGMagazine noted the effective use of DualSense features, enhancing the overall experience. Similarly, on PC, critics such as Combo Infinito and DarkZero reported solid performance with no major bugs, indicating that the game is well-optimized for various hardware configurations. However, the negative aspects of technical performance cannot be overlooked. On the Xbox Series X, GameMAG pointed out performance drops and glitches during large enemy encounters, while ZTGD raised concerns about frequent disconnections that hinder the online experience. On the PlayStation 5, several reviewers, including Daily Star and PlayStation Universe, highlighted matchmaking issues and connection errors that detracted from the gameplay experience. MeuPlayStation noted frame rate drops and visual bugs at higher difficulty levels, indicating that technical issues persist. On PC, the situation appears mixed; while some reviews praised the performance, others, like Gaming Nexus and Try Hard Guides, reported significant connectivity issues and desync problems that led to frustrating gameplay experiences. Overall, the consensus among critics suggests a divided experience regarding the technical performance of FBC: Firebreak across platforms. While the Xbox Series X and PS5 versions have their strengths, such as solid frame rates and smooth gameplay, they also face notable technical challenges, particularly in online play. PC performance seems to vary widely, with some critics praising its optimization while others highlight serious connectivity and stability issues. The mixed feedback indicates that while the game has the potential for a stable and enjoyable experience, significant improvements are needed to address the technical shortcomings that many players have encountered.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

FBC: Firebreak's replay value is a mixed bag, with some critics praising its co-op play, customization, and various difficulty settings. However, the consensus leans negative, highlighting repetitive missions and a grind-heavy progression that sap enjoyment. While there are glimmers of potential, most reviewers agree the game's structure leads to fatigue, making it hard to recommend for long-term play. Overall, the lack of engaging content overshadows its redeeming features, limiting its appeal after initial runs.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

12%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

45%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

43%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The opinions regarding the replay value of FBC: Firebreak present a mixed landscape, with some critics highlighting positive aspects that may appeal to players. Several reviewers, such as MeuPlayStation and GameGrin, note that the game offers good replay value through various difficulty levels, modifiers, and customization options, which can extend its lifespan significantly. Additionally, critics like CGMagazine and SECTOR.sk emphasize the engaging co-op experience and the potential for players to return once servers are populated, suggesting that the game could provide enjoyable sessions when played with friends. The deep progression system and the ability to experiment with different character builds also contribute to the notion that there is potential for replayability, as noted by GameSpot and COGconnected. However, the overwhelming sentiment among critics leans toward a negative assessment of the game's replay value. Many reviewers, including TechRadar Gaming and GamesRadar+, express concerns about the game's repetitive nature and grind-heavy progression system, which detracts from the overall enjoyment and makes it hard to recommend for extended play. Critics like The Jimquisition and Try Hard Guides echo this sentiment, pointing out that the lack of engaging content and variability in missions limits the incentive for players to return after their initial experience. The consensus from various reviews indicates that while there are some redeeming qualities, the game's structure often leads to fatigue and a sense of staleness, making it difficult to justify replaying. In summary, the overall consensus among critics is that FBC: Firebreak suffers from low replay value due to its repetitive mission structure, lack of engaging content, and limited variety. While some reviewers highlight the potential for enjoyable co-op experiences and customization options, the majority agree that the game does not provide enough compelling reasons for players to return after their initial playthroughs. Critics like Digital Trends and Gaming Nexus encapsulate this sentiment, emphasizing that despite some promising elements, the game's repetitive nature ultimately hinders its long-term appeal.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

16%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

75%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

In examining the overall sentiment towards FBC: Firebreak, it is evident that a number of critics found redeeming qualities in the game, particularly in its cooperative gameplay and unique mechanics. For instance, Stevivor described it as a "fun and engaging shooter" that balances various elements, while CGMagazine noted it as a "surprisingly enjoyable co-op shooter" that fans of Control and cooperative games might appreciate. Other reviewers, like MeuPlayStation, highlighted the game's beautiful visuals and engaging gameplay, suggesting that it could be a worthwhile experience for multiplayer enthusiasts, despite some technical issues. Critics like GameGrin and GamingBolt also praised the game for its enjoyable mechanics and potential for replayability, indicating that there are aspects of FBC: Firebreak that resonate positively with players. However, a significant number of reviews pointed out considerable shortcomings that overshadow the game's strengths. Many critics, including GameMAG and TechRadar Gaming, labeled it a "disappointment," citing a lack of engaging content, depth, and replay value. The Jimquisition echoed this sentiment, describing the game as "lifeless" and lacking enthusiasm, while GamesRadar+ criticized it for failing to capture the charm of its predecessor, Control. Furthermore, reviewers like The Games Machine and Digital Trends noted that the game suffers from repetitive missions and a grindy nature, leading to a lack of long-term engagement. Overall, the consensus among critics is that while there are enjoyable elements, the game falls short in several key areas, particularly in content and innovation. The overall consensus among critics is decidedly mixed to negative, with many expressing disappointment in FBC: Firebreak's inability to meet the high expectations set by Remedy's previous titles. Despite some positive feedback regarding its cooperative gameplay and unique ideas, the overwhelming sentiment reflects a sense of mediocrity, with many reviewers suggesting that the game feels incomplete or lacks the depth and polish necessary for a standout experience. Critics like PlayStation Universe and Gaming Age emphasized the game's potential but noted that it is hard to recommend at full price due to its current shortcomings. Ultimately, while there are enjoyable aspects to FBC: Firebreak, the majority of reviewers agree that it does not live up to the legacy of its predecessor and may struggle to maintain player interest in the long run.

TL;DR

FBC: Firebreak garners mixed reviews, praised for its cooperative gameplay and unique mechanics, but heavily criticized for lacking content, depth, and replay value. While some enjoy its visuals and engaging elements, many deem it a disappointment failing to meet expectations set by Remedy's previous titles. Critics describe it as "lifeless" and repetitive, leading to a sense of mediocrity that makes it hard to recommend at full price. Overall, the game has redeeming features but struggles with fundamental issues, leaving players questioning its long-term appeal.

MONSTER

Reviews

118 reviews found

SECTOR.sk

Jun 17, 2025