Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

Amazon

Twitch

MONSTER

F1 24

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of F1 24
Item: F1 24
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2024

GenresSports, Single Player, Multiplayer, Racing

AvailableMay 31, 2024

PlatformPlayStation 5, Xbox Series X, PC, PlayStation 4, Xbox One

DeveloperCodemasters

Overview

Get ready to ignite your passion for racing and get closer to the grid like never before with EA SPORTS™ F1® 24, the official videogame of the 2024 FIA Formula One World Championship™. Unleash Your Champion in pursuit of a legacy-defining F1® Career and feel at one with the car with the latest handling and physics, powered by EA SPORTS Dynamic Handling. ● Unleash Your Champion: Discover the all-new Driver Career mode with new gameplay rooted in the sport. ● EA SPORTS™ Dynamic Handling: Get to grips with more authentic handling. The latest physics gives you more control over how your personal driving style impacts your car’s performance and race strategy.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

F1 24’s career modes shine with deeper customization and strategic layers but lose the narrative soul of Braking Point, leaving fans divided between innovation and nostalgia.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

27%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

54%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

19%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The overall reception of F1 24’s narrative elements highlights both its strengths and shortcomings. Several critics praised the game’s career modes as a significant improvement, emphasizing their depth and customization. For instance, GameCritics and Games.cz highlighted the ability to create custom racers or play as real-world drivers, with mechanics like car development, sponsor negotiations, and team dynamics adding layers of engagement. Jeuxvideo.com (PS5) and SpazioGames noted narrative elements such as secret meetings, player influence on R&D, and challenges tied to specific drivers, which provide a sense of immersion. Additionally, IGN Brasil and Eurogamer Poland acknowledged the career mode’s focus on real drivers or custom avatars, even if it lacks a traditional story structure. These aspects suggest that F1 24 prioritizes player agency and simulation over linear storytelling, offering a more skill-based and strategic experience. However, the absence of the Braking Point story mode—a hallmark of previous entries—was widely criticized as a major drawback. App Trigger, CGMagazine, and GIGA explicitly noted this omission, calling it a “disappointment” and a “significant loss for narrative-driven gameplay.” TheXboxHub and PC Gamer argued that the lack of a dedicated story mode made F1 24 feel like a step backward, with some critics (e.g., IGN and Eurogamer Poland) lamenting the removal of beloved narrative elements like team rivalries and character-driven conflicts. While GameSpew and Pure Xbox suggested the mode might return in future updates, many felt the current iteration lacked depth, with VG247 criticizing the “lack of human element in rivalries” and PCGamesN calling the career mode “predictable and repetitive.” The shift away from storytelling toward gameplay mechanics left some fans unimpressed. Despite mixed reactions, the consensus among critics leans toward a balanced but cautious assessment. While F1 24’s career modes offer improved customization and strategic depth—celebrated by GameCritics, Jeuxvideo.com, and TechRadar Gaming—the removal of Braking Point remains a contentious issue. SECTOR.sk even recommended skipping the game in favor of F1 23, underscoring the frustration over narrative stagnation. However, some critics, like But Why Tho? and Shacknews, acknowledged the new Driver Career mode’s potential for player-driven storytelling, albeit with caveats about pacing and focus. Ultimately, while F1 24 excels in simulation and career progression, its lack of a cohesive narrative risks alienating fans who valued the franchise’s story-driven roots. The game feels like an evolution rather than a revolution, leaving room for improvement in future iterations.

TL;DR

story and narrative

F1 24’s career modes shine with deeper customization and strategic layers but lose the narrative soul of Braking Point, leaving fans divided between innovation and nostalgia.

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

F1 24 splits critics: praised for realistic physics and deep career modes, yet criticized for arcadey handling, AI flaws, and lack of innovation—offering incremental upgrades over bold evolution.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

48%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

45%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of F1 24 receives mixed but nuanced praise, particularly in its career mode and physics systems. Critics like CGMagazine and GINX TV highlight the improved physics, emphasizing a more realistic driving experience with enhanced tire models, aerodynamics, and suspension mechanics. The Career Mode is frequently lauded for its depth, with Eurogamer Portugal noting revamped progression systems, while GIGA and IGN Spain praise features like dynamic team interactions, contract negotiations, and adjustable difficulty settings. Additionally, the Driver Career mode, introduced in several reviews (e.g., GameSpot and GGRecon), offers unique challenges and role-playing elements that add variety. The game’s accessibility for newcomers is also a point of contention, with But Why Tho? noting that the Dynamic Handling system makes it more approachable, though some critics argue this sacrifices realism. However, the gameplay faces significant criticism, particularly around handling mechanics and AI behavior. Multiple reviewers, including Dot Esports (XBOX SERIES X) and PCGamesN (PC), criticize the Dynamic Handling system as overly forgiving or "arcadey," with issues like cars wobbling on street circuits and unpredictable AI performance. COGconnected and App Trigger highlight problems with physics feeling artificial, while GamersRD and TheXboxHub point to repetitive gameplay and a lack of innovation compared to previous entries. The AI’s predictability and difficulty imbalance are recurring complaints, with PC Gamer noting frustrating race engineer dialogue and GameSpot criticizing arbitrary mid-race objectives. Additionally, online modes and control options (e.g., gamepad vs. wheel) face scrutiny, as noted by SECTOR.sk and Hobby Consolas, who argue they fail to fully satisfy simulation purists. Overall, the consensus is that F1 24 delivers incremental improvements rather than revolutionary changes. While CGMagazine and VG247 praise its realistic physics and career mode depth, critics like Dot Esports and PCGamesN argue the handling system undermines authenticity. The game’s accessibility for casual players is a double-edged sword, with some praising its approachability (e.g., But Why Tho?) while others, like Eurogamer Poland, feel it alienates hardcore fans. Despite mixed reactions to core mechanics, the Career Mode and new features (e.g., Challenge Career and F1 World) are seen as meaningful additions, though many agree the game feels more like an evolution than a breakthrough. The divide between simulation enthusiasts and casual audiences remains stark, with critics split on whether F1 24 successfully balances realism with accessibility.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

F1 24 splits critics: praised for realistic physics and deep career modes, yet criticized for arcadey handling, AI flaws, and lack of innovation—offering incremental upgrades over bold evolution.

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

"F1 24" impresses with polished visuals, detailed circuits, and lifelike car models but relies on an outdated engine, limiting true innovation and resulting in incremental upgrades over radical change.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

47%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

53%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of F1 24 received praise for incremental improvements and specific enhancements that elevate its realism. Multiple critics highlighted updated circuits like Silverstone, Spa-Francorchamps, and Las Vegas, noting their immersive details and accurate representations of real-world locations (IGN Adria, Shacknews). The game’s car models and driver likenesses saw notable upgrades, with photogrammetry scans creating lifelike facial features and realistic liveries (GGRecon, IGN Spain). Some reviewers celebrated the improved lighting effects, such as Dynamic Global Illumination and ray tracing, which enhanced environmental fidelity (Areajugones, PCGamesN). Additionally, tracks like Jeddah Corniche and Lusail were praised for their vivid textures and authentic ambiance (LevelUp, IGN). The game’s visual polish was also commended for its consistency across platforms, with smooth 4K performance on next-gen consoles (PCGamesN, Vandal). However, several critics pointed out that these improvements felt incremental rather than revolutionary. Many noted the continued use of the aging EGO engine, which limited significant graphical advancements despite hardware upgrades (TechRadar Gaming, SECTOR.sk). Issues like stiff animations, repetitive track designs, and underdeveloped character models in the "uncanny valley" range were frequently criticized (Gameliner, Hobby Consolas). The VR experience faced particular scrutiny, with UploadVR highlighting lower-quality visuals and technical inconsistencies compared to flatscreen modes. Additionally, some tracks remained outdated, while others received late or minimal updates (Gamer.nl, Multiplayer.it). Critics like IGN Brasil and Eurogamer Portugal emphasized that the game felt more like an enhanced version of F1 23 than a visually groundbreaking entry, with limited innovation in engine technology or artistic direction. Overall, the consensus leans toward a balanced assessment: while F1 24 delivers polished visuals and specific refinements that cater to fans of the series, it falls short of delivering a major graphical leap. The game’s strengths lie in its attention to detail for key tracks and driver authenticity, as noted by IGN and PCGamesN, but its reliance on an older engine and lack of radical changes drew criticism from outlets like TechRadar Gaming and Multiplayer.it. Despite mixed reactions, many reviewers acknowledged that F1 24 remains one of the best-looking racing games, with its visual fidelity standing out in comparison to other sports titles (GameCritics, TheXboxHub). The general sentiment suggests it’s a solid evolution rather than a revolutionary leap, satisfying core fans while leaving room for future improvements.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

F1 24’s sound design shines with realistic engine roars, immersive driver voices, and haptic feedback, yet struggles with repetitive commentary, underdeveloped music, and lifeless ambiance, splitting praise between authenticity and inconsistency.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

41%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

56%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design of F1 24 receives widespread praise for its immersive and authentic audio elements, particularly in capturing the realism of Formula 1 racing. Critics like Areajugones highlight the "immersive sound quality" enhanced by high-quality headphones, while GameCritics lauds the "roar of engines and immersive audio effects," complemented by the DualSense controller’s haptic feedback. Gameliner and Games.cz note accurate engine sounds and real driver radio voicelines, with GameSpew emphasizing the authenticity of real driver audio samples. The inclusion of in-game voice lines from actual drivers, as praised by COGconnected, Daily Star, and SECTOR.sk, adds a layer of realism, while Hobby Consolas appreciates the "realistic engine sounds and crowd ambiance." These elements collectively create a strong sense of presence on the track. However, several critics point to shortcomings in consistency and depth. Games.cz criticizes repetitive commentary and inaccurate in-game messages, while IGN Spain describes the sound design as "lifeless," lacking rich ambient noise beyond engine roars. PlayStation Universe finds the soundtrack "annoying and soft," and GamingBolt notes "cheesy" dialogue, particularly from Elena. Jeuxvideo.com (PS5) and IGN (Xbox) highlight the absence of voice acting for the player’s driver and a "subdued ambiance," while But Why Tho? points to limited and repetitive voice lines. Additionally, GamingBolt and PlayStation Universe criticize the music as underdeveloped, with some reviewers feeling that the audio lacks dynamic variation during races. Overall, critics agree that F1 24 excels in capturing the visceral realism of Formula 1 through its engine sounds, driver voices, and immersive effects, but struggles with consistency and depth in areas like commentary, music, and ambient design. While Areajugones and GameCritics celebrate the technical improvements, others like IGN Spain and Games.cz argue that the audio falls short of the polish seen in other sports games. The consensus leans toward a generally positive assessment, with many acknowledging the game’s strengths while calling for more refined audio elements to match its racing realism. Despite mixed feedback on music and commentary, the core sound design is widely regarded as a standout feature, particularly for fans seeking authenticity.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

F1 24’s voice acting dazzles with real drivers’ voices and authentic commentary, boosting immersion, but repetitive lines, cheesy dialogue, and technical flaws like unclear team radio mar its potential, leaving a mixed yet promising foundation for growth.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

19%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

81%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in F1 24 received largely positive feedback for its authenticity and immersion, with several critics highlighting the inclusion of real-world elements. Areajugones praised the introduction of official pilot voices, calling it a "major improvement" over previous entries, while Gameliner noted that board radio voicelines added "authenticity." Hobby Consolas emphasized the value of drivers like Lewis Hamilton and Carlos Leclerc contributing their actual voices during races, creating a "layer of authenticity for fans," and Generación Xbox commended real presenters such as Natalie Pinkham and regional commentators for enhancing immersion. Additionally, GamingBolt acknowledged Elena’s voice acting as "good" despite its "overly cheesy" dialogue, and GGRecon highlighted specific examples like Hamilton’s victory celebrations, which enriched the Driver Career mode. These elements collectively underscored a strong effort to mirror real Formula 1 experiences. However, several critics pointed out significant flaws in the execution of voice acting. Games.cz criticized repetitive lines and a lack of originality in commentary, arguing that it failed to reflect dynamic race situations. GamingBolt also noted that Elena’s dialogue felt "overly cheesy," while PlayStation Universe described some lines as "cringe-inducing," particularly in career mode. GameSpot and IGN both pointed out that drivers were largely silent during races, with voice lines limited to post-event reactions, which reduced their impact. Multiplayer.it raised concerns about unclear audio in team radio messages, making them inaccessible for non-English speakers, while PC Gamer criticized the AI’s "repetitive and illogical comments" as annoying. TechRadar similarly called the implementation of driver voices "underbaked," suggesting that the feature felt incomplete despite its potential. Overall, critics viewed F1 24’s voice acting as a mixed but largely commendable step forward. While the inclusion of real drivers’ voices and authentic commentary was widely praised for enhancing immersion—particularly by outlets like Areajugones, Hobby Consolas, and Generación Xbox—the execution faced criticism for repetition, limited scope, and technical shortcomings. The consensus leaned toward acknowledging its improvements over past entries but recognizing that areas like AI dialogue, variety in voicelines, and accessibility needed refinement. As VG247 noted, the feature "could be expanded in future updates," indicating a balanced perspective where authenticity was celebrated, but practicality and polish remained work-in-progress.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

F1 24 impresses with stable performance and optimization across PS5, Xbox Series X, and PC, but plagued by inconsistent physics, AI flaws, and engine limitations—post-launch patches helped, yet realism and consistency remain compromised.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

29%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

67%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of F1 24 across platforms shows a mix of strengths and shortcomings. On PS5, critics like GameOver.gr praised its stable frame rate, optimization, and technical innovations, while IGN Adria highlighted improvements in physics via patches. GamingBolt noted minor graphical issues but acknowledged the game’s smooth racing experience, and Games.cz commended its absence of crashes despite some visual glitches. For Xbox Series X, Generación Xbox emphasized near-instant load times and high frame rates even on lower-end hardware, while IGN and SomosXbox praised stable performance with features like ray tracing and DLSS 3. On PC, Impulsegamer lauded the game’s scalability across systems, and PC Gamer noted smooth performance on mid-range hardware, though Steam Deck support was lacking. Overall, all platforms received praise for stability and optimization, with some reviewers highlighting incremental improvements in physics and AI behavior. However, technical issues plagued F1 24 across platforms. On PS5, App Trigger and GIGA criticized the unstable physics system and arcade-like handling, while Digital Chumps and Jeuxvideo.com pointed to AI flaws and disjointed Challenge modes. GamingBolt noted screen-tearing and inconsistent sound effects, and IGN Italia mentioned minor stuttering during replays. For Xbox Series X, Dot Esports highlighted AI glitches and pit stop issues, while Xbox Tavern criticized the Dynamic Handling model’s impact on immersion. On PC, Eurogamer Poland and Multiplayer.it criticized the aging EGO engine, with the latter calling out outdated hardware constraints. VR-specific problems on PC, like crashes and camera shake (UploadVR), further underscored technical challenges. These issues collectively pointed to a game that, while polished in some areas, required post-launch fixes for consistency. The overall consensus among critics was that F1 24 delivered solid technical performance across platforms but faced persistent issues with physics, AI behavior, and engine limitations. While PS5 and Xbox Series X reviewers praised optimization and stability (e.g., GameOver.gr, IGN), PC users like Multiplayer.it and Vandal highlighted the EGO engine’s shortcomings and VR-specific bugs. Despite mixed feedback, many acknowledged that Codemasters addressed some issues via patches (IGN Adria, TheSixthAxis) and that the game’s core mechanics remained functional. The recurring theme was a balance between technical polish and the need for post-launch refinements, with critics like GameCritics and Games.cz noting that the game largely avoided major crashes or glitches. Ultimately, F1 24 showcased progress but left room for improvement in areas like realism and consistency across platforms.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

F1 24 delivers solid career modes and multiplayer tweaks but feels like a minor update, offering enough for fans yet lacking innovation to entice newcomers—replayability hinges on tolerance for repetition and incremental fixes.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

37%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

58%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The overall sentiment toward F1 24’s replay value highlights several positive aspects, particularly its career modes and multiplayer innovations. Critics like IGN Spain praised the Career Mode’s flexibility, noting its progression system and varied options (e.g., Formula 2, team management) as strong drivers of long-term engagement. The Driver Career and Challenge Career modes were frequently highlighted for their depth, with GameStar calling the revamped Career Mode “highly engaging” and IGN Brasil acknowledging improved mechanics that add replayability. Multiplayer elements also stood out: F1 World mode, with its seasonal leagues and daily objectives, was praised by PlayStation Universe and Eurogamer Portugal for offering structured content, while Challenge Career and co-op modes (e.g., two-player Driver Career) provided varied experiences, as noted by TheSixthAxis and Daily Star. Additionally, features like FanZone and Podium Pass were seen as incremental boosts to replayability, though their impact varied. However, the negatives surrounding F1 24’s replay value are equally significant, with many critics pointing to repetitiveness and lack of innovation. PCGamesN and GamersRD criticized the game for feeling like a “minor update” with minimal changes to career modes, while Gamersky noted that repetitive races (e.g., 50+ laps) and underdeveloped story modes made it less appealing to non-fans. The Career Mode’s complexity was acknowledged as a strength by GameOver.gr, but its lack of substantial updates compared to prior titles reduced long-term appeal. Similarly, Multiplayer.it and COGconnected highlighted that the core gameplay felt stagnant, with innovations like customizing living quarters (missing in this entry) being absent. Critics also pointed out that features like F1 World and Challenge Career were often criticized for being time-consuming or offering minimal rewards, as noted by GameSpot and Dot Esports. The game’s reliance on seasonal content over meaningful new mechanics left many feeling it lacked the “compelling new experience” described by GamersRD. The overall consensus among critics is that F1 24 offers moderate replay value, primarily appealing to existing fans of the series but falling short for those seeking substantial innovation. While the Career Mode and multiplayer options provide enough content for dedicated players—evidenced by praise from IGN Spain, GameCritics, and Generación Xbox—the repetitive structure and incremental updates (as noted by Eurogamer Poland and Multiplayer.it) limit its longevity. Critics like IGN Brasil and VG247 acknowledged that new modes like FanZone and Challenge Career add variety but questioned their depth, suggesting the game feels more like a “minor update” than a fresh entry. Ultimately, while F1 24 retains the core appeal of its predecessors, its replayability hinges on player preferences: fans may find enough content to justify repeated playthroughs, but others will likely view it as a polished but unremarkable iteration of the formula.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

44%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

53%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall verdict of F1 24 highlights several positive aspects, particularly its refined career mode and technical improvements. Critics like IGN praised the game’s stable handling, improved graphics, and the new Driver Career mode, which adds depth to single-player experiences. VG247 noted the “solid foundations” of the game, while Jeuxvideo.com and GameSpot highlighted its accessible visuals and immersive career innovations. The Career Mode received widespread acclaim for its flexibility and narrative-driven elements, with IGN Italia acknowledging its appeal to newcomers and TheSixthAxis praising its customization options. Additionally, GIGA and LevelUp emphasized the game’s authenticity and competitive simulation aspects, positioning it as a strong entry for fans of Formula 1. These positives suggest that F1 24 successfully caters to dedicated players seeking incremental refinements over its predecessor. However, the negatives surrounding F1 24 are equally prominent, with many critics criticizing its lack of innovation and reliance on annual updates. Dot Esports and PCGamesN argued that the game fails to justify its price tag due to “minimal improvements” and persistent technical flaws, while COGconnected and Eurogamer Poland called it a “placeholder” with underwhelming AI behavior and flawed handling mechanics. The Breaking Point mode, absent in this iteration, was notably missed by some reviewers, including Eurogamer Poland, which gave the game a 6/10. Others like Gamer.nl and GGRecon criticized the overreliance on live service elements and divisive gameplay shifts, while TechRadar Gaming pointed out predictable AI drivers. These critiques underscore a general frustration with the series’ incremental approach, which many feel lacks the bold changes needed to excite veteran players or attract new audiences. The overall consensus among critics is that F1 24 is a solid but unremarkable entry in the series, best suited for diehard fans rather than casual players. While VG247 and GameSpot acknowledged its “mixed bag” of improvements and technical issues, IGN Adria and MeuPlayStation noted it feels like a transitional update with limited innovation compared to F1 23. Despite this, many reviewers, including LevelUp and Metro GameCentral, praised its authenticity and immersive gameplay, suggesting it remains a strong choice for Formula 1 enthusiasts. However, the recurring theme of “annual update fatigue” and missed opportunities—highlighted by Gamer.nl, COGconnected, and Eurogamer Poland—casts doubt on its long-term appeal. Ultimately, F1 24 is seen as a competent but uninspired iteration that prioritizes consistency over creativity, leaving fans divided between appreciation for its refinements and disappointment in its lack of groundbreaking changes.

TL;DR

F1 24 delivers polished refinements but lacks innovation, offering a stable, immersive career mode and authentic simulation for fans—yet its incremental updates, technical flaws, and missed opportunities leave veterans unimpressed, cementing it as a safe but uninspired entry in the series.

MONSTER

Reviews

87 reviews found

Daily Star

May 28, 2024