Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

Links

Amazon

Twitch

MONSTER

F1 24

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of F1 24
Item: F1 24
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2024

GenresSports, Single Player, Multiplayer, Racing

AvailableMay 31, 2024

PlatformPlayStation 5, Xbox Series X, PC, PlayStation 4, Xbox One

DeveloperCodemasters

Overview

Get ready to ignite your passion for racing and get closer to the grid like never before with EA SPORTS™ F1® 24, the official videogame of the 2024 FIA Formula One World Championship™. Unleash Your Champion in pursuit of a legacy-defining F1® Career and feel at one with the car with the latest handling and physics, powered by EA SPORTS Dynamic Handling. ● Unleash Your Champion: Discover the all-new Driver Career mode with new gameplay rooted in the sport. ● EA SPORTS™ Dynamic Handling: Get to grips with more authentic handling. The latest physics gives you more control over how your personal driving style impacts your car’s performance and race strategy.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

F1 24’s career modes are deep, customizable, and immersive, but the loss of the beloved Braking Point story mode leaves fans divided—celebrated for innovation, criticized for abandoning a key narrative pillar.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

71%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

29%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The reviewers generally praise the career modes in F1 24 as a significant step forward, emphasizing their depth and customization. GameCritics and Guardian highlight the game’s ability to let players assume the role of real-world drivers or create custom racers, offering a narrative-driven experience that immerses them in the Formula 1 world. Metro GameCentral and TechRadar Gaming commend features like joint careers and secret team meetings, which add layers of strategy and realism. But Why Tho? and Shacknews note the expanded focus on decision-making and reputation-building, allowing players to shape their in-game journey and influence team dynamics. Daily Star and SpazioGames also laud the improved career mode, framing it as a personal, high-octane single-player adventure that enhances immersion through driver-specific challenges and storylines. These elements collectively suggest a strong effort to evolve the franchise’s single-player experience beyond mere racing mechanics. However, several critics express disappointment over the absence of the Braking Point story mode, a hallmark of previous entries. CGMagazine and IGN specifically point out that this narrative-driven feature, which provided a structured and engaging storyline, is missing this year, leaving a void for fans who valued its inclusion. PlayStation Universe and PCGamesN echo this sentiment, criticizing the lack of a cohesive story mode and the underwhelming tweaks to the Driver Career. While some praise the customization options, others argue that the new systems feel less impactful or lack the emotional weight of earlier iterations. The consensus here is that the shift away from a traditional story mode, while offering more player agency, risks alienating those who preferred the franchise’s previous narrative frameworks. Overall, the critical reception of F1 24’s story elements is mixed, reflecting a divide between innovation and nostalgia. While outlets like GameCritics, Guardian, and TechRadar Gaming celebrate the expanded career modes and their focus on player-driven narratives, others, such as CGMagazine and PCGamesN, feel the game has lost a key storytelling component that defined its predecessors. The absence of Braking Point is a recurring point of contention, with some viewing it as a necessary evolution and others as a missed opportunity. Despite this, the new Driver Career mode and its mechanics—such as reputation systems and team interactions—receive positive traction, indicating that the game balances ambition with accessibility. Ultimately, the story in F1 24 is seen as a polarizing shift, favoring player choice over structured narratives, which may appeal to some but leave others longing for the franchise’s past storytelling strengths.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

F1 24: A technical tour de force with hyper-realistic physics, immersive career modes, and authentic weather, but its "overly forgiving" Dynamic Handling and AI quirks divide fans. A bold step forward, though not without flaws.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

74%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

16%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

11%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of F1 24 has received widespread acclaim for its realism and technical refinements, with multiple critics highlighting significant improvements. CGMagazine and PlayStation Universe praised the Dynamic Handling system and updated tyre models, noting they enhance authenticity and create a more immersive driving experience. The career mode also saw substantial upgrades, with GameCritics and Guardian emphasizing its depth through managerial decisions, team interactions, and role-playing elements that affect player progression. Metro GameCentral and TheSixthAxis commended the revised physics models and wet-weather mechanics, while GINX TV and SpazioGames lauded the enhanced aerodynamics control and suspension system for adding layers of realism. Additionally, the Challenge Career mode and My Team Career features were highlighted as engaging additions, offering varied gameplay options and a fresh approach to progression. IGN noted the accessible yet technical handling as a standout, balancing realism with approachability for a broader audience. However, some critics expressed concerns about the Dynamic Handling system and its impact on gameplay. COGconnected and PCGamesN criticized the system for feeling "off" and "overly forgiving," with cars wobbling and corners becoming unnecessarily challenging, while the AI was described as either "crashing into the player" or "dominating without mistakes." PlaySense and Twinfinite acknowledged mixed reactions, with the former pointing to increased grip and sensitivity as a double-edged sword, and the latter noting the game still feels "more arcade-like" than hardcore racing simulations. These critiques suggest that while the handling updates aim to modernize the experience, they may not satisfy purists or veteran sim racers. Additionally, some mechanics, like negotiating with constructors in career mode, were deemed "underwhelming" by PCGamesN, indicating areas where the game’s design fell short of expectations. Despite these criticisms, the overall consensus among reviewers leans toward positive reception, with most agreeing that F1 24 delivers a solid and realistic racing experience. The career mode revamp and physics improvements were frequently cited as major strengths, with critics like Xbox Tavern and Impulsegamer appreciating the added depth through features like driver recognition and specialists. While the Dynamic Handling system sparked debate, its balance between realism and accessibility was praised by IGN and Shacknews, who noted its potential to attract both newcomers and seasoned players. The game’s authentic weather effects and track redesigns further bolstered its reputation, as highlighted by Daily Star and TechRadar Gaming. Ultimately, F1 24 appears to be a step forward for the series, though its handling mechanics and AI behavior remain points of contention, reflecting a divide between those who value innovation and those who prioritize traditional simulation fidelity.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

F1 24 is a visual masterpiece with lifelike tracks, detailed cars, and immersive simulations—yet minor flaws like inconsistent character sizes and a weak soundtrack dampen its brilliance. A must-play for fans, despite incremental upgrades.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

67%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

33%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The majority of critics praise F1 24’s graphics and visual design as a significant step forward, highlighting its immersive and realistic presentation. GameCritics and TheSixthAxis commend the game’s “top-notch” visuals, noting detailed car models, lifelike driver likenesses, and vibrant track designs, particularly in locations like Spa Francochamps. IGN hails it as “the best-looking F1 game to date,” emphasizing improved driver accuracy and updated real-world circuits such as Spa, Silverstone, and Jeddah. Metro GameCentral and COGconnected praise the attention to detail in car behavior, environmental effects, and authentic track reconstructions, while PCGamesN and SpazioGames highlight smooth performance at 4K resolution and enhanced animations, including better rendering of hair, eyes, and skin. These reviews collectively underscore a visually stunning experience that elevates the Formula 1 simulation genre. However, some critics point to minor shortcomings that temper the overall enthusiasm. PlaySense notes that while new driver models are “noticeable,” issues like “inconsistent character sizes in cutscenes” detract from immersion. Shacknews and Twinfinite criticize the “marginal improvements” in visual details, with Shacknews pointing to “noticeable shortcuts” in driver models despite slight enhancements. Additionally, PlayStation Universe acknowledges “authentic post-race radio messages” but laments a “dire” soundtrack, which, while not a visual issue, reflects broader concerns about polish. These critiques suggest that while F1 24 excels in many areas, it falls short of revolutionary changes, with some technical and artistic compromises evident. Despite these critiques, the overall consensus among critics is overwhelmingly positive, with F1 24 being celebrated as a visually impressive and immersive entry in the series. Most reviewers agree that the game’s attention to detail, realistic track designs, and improved driver models create a compelling simulation experience. While a few critics like PlaySense and Twinfinite feel the advancements are incremental, the majority—包括 IGN, TheSixthAxis, and PCGamesN—highlight its status as a benchmark for F1 games. The minor flaws mentioned are seen as negligible compared to the game’s strengths, reinforcing its reputation as a must-play for fans of the genre.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

F1 24 nails the technical sound design with lifelike engine roars and haptic feedback, but its music and driver voices feel underwhelming, repetitive, and lacking in emotional depth—making it a strong but uneven audio experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

50%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

50%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music in F1 24 received widespread praise for their immersive and authentic qualities, with many critics highlighting the game’s ability to transport players into the heart of a real Formula 1 race. GameCritics and PlaySense both commended the "impressive" and "excellent" audio, noting the detailed engine roars and haptic feedback on the PS5’s DualSense controller, which enhanced the racing experience. COGconnected and Daily Star emphasized the "glorious detail" of the sound effects, with the latter pointing to the use of "hundreds of real-life audio driver samples" that added realism during key race moments. Additionally, GINX TV and PCGamesN appreciated the "immersive experience" and the "real-world F1 driver voices" that elevated the game’s atmosphere, while TechRadar Gaming and Twinfinite acknowledged the "thrilling" and "enhanced immersion" through improved audio effects, particularly in wet-weather scenarios. These positive reviews collectively underscore the game’s success in creating a visceral, high-fidelity soundscape that aligns with the expectations of a racing simulation. However, several critics raised concerns about the soundtrack and voice design, pointing to areas where the audio fell short. PlayStation Universe criticized the in-game music as "annoying and soft," advising players to turn it off, while IGN noted that "voice bites from real drivers are limited" and "commentary segments are basic," lacking tailored lines for major championship events. But Why Tho? and Shacknews echoed similar sentiments, pointing out that driver voice lines were "limited and repeated" or "cringe-inducing," and that the radio chatter, though "fantastic," needed more variety. GINX TV also mentioned that certain audio features, like mid-race objectives, felt like a "novelty" rather than a meaningful addition. These critiques suggest that while the game’s sound design excels in technical detail, its musical and vocal elements were seen as underdeveloped or inconsistent, particularly in terms of originality and depth. Despite the mixed feedback, the overall consensus leans toward appreciation for F1 24’s sound design as a core strength, with most critics agreeing that it significantly enhances the game’s realism and engagement. The positives—such as the authentic engine sounds, immersive effects, and real-world driver voices—were frequently highlighted as standout features, especially by outlets like COGconnected, Daily Star, and PCGamesN. However, the negatives, including the repetitive voice lines, unimpressive soundtrack, and lack of dynamic commentary, indicate that the audio elements, while technically solid, required more refinement to fully match the game’s racing mechanics. Critics like PlayStation Universe and IGN emphasized that the music and vocal content, while functional, did not consistently elevate the experience, leaving room for improvement. Ultimately, F1 24’s sound design is a strong asset, but its music and voice work remain a point of contention, reflecting a game that prioritizes technical accuracy over creative or emotional depth in its audio presentation.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Analysis Unavailable

Summary unavailable

TL;DR

voice acting

Description unavailable

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

F1 24’s technical performance is mostly solid, with PS5 and PC lauded for stability and optimization. Xbox struggles with Dynamic Handling hiccups, and PC’s VR textures are rough. Minor bugs and AI inconsistencies are present but not gamebreaking. A strong base, but platform-specific flaws need fixes for a flawless experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

40%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

60%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of F1 24 is generally well-received across all platforms, with several critics highlighting its stability and improvements. On the PlayStation 5, CGMagazine notes a resolution to a force feedback bug from the previous game, signaling a positive step forward, while GameCritics and Metro GameCentral praise the game for maintaining a smooth, immersive experience with no major technical issues, even after early beta reports of "strange car behavior" were addressed. PlaySense acknowledges minor graphical glitches and skipped name displays but emphasizes that these are non-gamebreaking and the game runs flawlessly on PS5. For the Xbox Series X, IGN commends the use of Codemasters’ proprietary engine, which ensures "reliable performance" and stability, though Xbox Tavern points out that the new Dynamic Handling model introduces performance hiccups that could detract from immersion, suggesting the need for a patch. On PC, Impulsegamer and PCGamesN laud the game’s exceptional performance across diverse systems, with Impulsegamer specifically praising the customizable graphics settings, and PCGamesN noting the VR mode’s stability, despite some texture quality issues. Shacknews also reports no significant technical problems on PC, reinforcing the platform’s strong showing. However, platform-specific technical challenges are mentioned. On PS5, TheSixthAxis reports bugs like unapplied penalties and AI inconsistencies, though they are described as "not considered disastrous." These issues, while minor, could affect the racing experience for some players. For the Xbox Series X, Xbox Tavern criticizes the Dynamic Handling model for negatively impacting performance and immersion, raising concerns about its design and potential need for a fix. On PC, PCGamesN highlights that while the game runs smoothly, the VR mode suffers from "blurry and rough" textures, which may disappoint enthusiasts. These negatives, though not universal, suggest that certain features or systems require refinement, particularly on Xbox and in VR on PC, where the technical execution isn’t as polished as on other platforms. Overall, the critics agree that F1 24 delivers a technically solid experience, with the proprietary engine and cross-platform optimization being key strengths. While IGN and GameCritics emphasize stability and reliability on Xbox and PS5, respectively, the game’s performance is not without flaws. The Dynamic Handling model on Xbox and the VR texture issues on PC are notable concerns, but most critics view these as manageable or addressable through updates. TheSixthAxis and Xbox Tavern suggest that while the game is mostly stable, specific mechanics and features need further tuning. Meanwhile, Impulsegamer and PCGamesN commend the PC version’s scalability and performance, even if VR isn’t perfect. The consensus leans toward a positive technical foundation, with room for improvement in certain areas, but no major systemic failures that would detract from the core experience.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

F1 24 delivers robust replay value via diverse career modes, social features, and structured challenges, but struggles with repetition, arbitrary mechanics, and underdeveloped customization—offering depth for fans, but flaws that could hinder long-term appeal.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

58%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

37%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The majority of critics highlight F1 24’s strong replay value through its diverse array of game modes and social features. GameCritics and Guardian emphasize deep career modes, multiplayer options, and time-sensitive challenges, while TheSixthAxis and IGN praise the new Driver Career and Challenge Career modes for their engagement beyond the initial playthrough. Metro GameCentral and PlayStation Universe note the inclusion of F1 World and Challenge Career, which provide structured goals and skill development opportunities. TheTwo-Player Driver Career mode, mentioned by TheSixthAxis and But Why Tho?, adds a unique social dimension, and the episodic nature of Challenge Career, as highlighted by Xbox Tavern, offers long-term progression. These elements collectively create a robust foundation for repeated play, catering to both single-player and competitive multiplayer audiences. However, several critics point to limitations that detract from the game’s replayability. COGconnected and PCGamesN criticize the lack of significant innovation, with F1 24 feeling too similar to its predecessor and missing features like customizable living quarters. IGN and GINX TV highlight arbitrary mechanics, such as mid-race objectives and secret meetings, which feel disconnected from the core experience, while Impulsegamer notes that microtransactions hinder customization. Additionally, Twinfinite points out that multiplayer-focused players may find limited appeal, as most updates center on career modes. The criticism of Podium Pass by PlaySense and the locked F1 Icons in GINX TV’s review further underscore issues with content accessibility and engagement. These shortcomings suggest that while the game offers variety, some elements fail to sustain long-term interest. Overall, the consensus leans positive but acknowledges room for improvement. Most critics agree that F1 24’s replay value is bolstered by its expanded career modes, multiplayer options, and structured challenges, as noted by GameCritics, Guardian, and Shacknews. However, the game’s reliance on familiar mechanics, limited customization, and uneven content distribution—criticized by COGconnected, PCGamesN, and IGN—create a mixed experience. While the majority of reviewers praise its depth and variety, the recurring complaints about repetition and underdeveloped features indicate that F1 24’s replayability is strong but not without flaws. The game succeeds in offering diverse ways to engage, but its ability to retain players long-term may depend on how these issues are addressed in future updates.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

44%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

53%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall sentiment toward F1 24 is largely positive, with many critics highlighting its strong core gameplay, immersive simulation elements, and visual/audio fidelity. GameCritics and Metro GameCentral praise the game as a "must-play" and the "most enjoyable and authentic Formula One game of the modern era," respectively, emphasizing its detailed presentation and appeal to both fans and sim racing enthusiasts. The Guardian and TheSixthAxis commend the career mode for its depth and real-world driver integration, while IGN and Shacknews note improvements in the Driver Career mode, dynamic handling, and track updates. These reviews consistently frame F1 24 as a refined and stable experience, with enhanced graphics, physics, and sound design that elevate its realism. For instance, TechRadar Gaming lauds the "fantastic Career mode overhaul" and "improved sound design," while Daily Star calls it the "top Formula One game" for its engagement and authenticity. The game’s ability to deliver a compelling racing experience, particularly for newcomers and casual players, is a recurring theme. However, several critics point to notable shortcomings that temper the enthusiasm. Xbox Tavern and COGconnected express concerns about the "poorly implemented new handling model" and "rough AI behavior," which they argue undermine the game’s potential. PlayStation Universe and GINX TV criticize the lack of a "standout new gameplay mode" and the absence of features like a story-driven mode, respectively, while SpazioGames and Impulsegamer highlight issues with force feedback and microtransactions. PCGamesN and Twinfinite note that the career mode feels underwhelming and the gameplay mechanics overly forgiving, suggesting the title may not justify an upgrade for all players. Additionally, some reviewers, like TheSixthAxis and TechRadar Gaming, point to technical hiccups and AI predictability as persistent flaws, even if the game is "highly immersive" in other areas. These criticisms collectively suggest that while F1 24 is polished, it struggles to innovate beyond its established formula, leaving some players unimpressed. Despite these critiques, the overall consensus leans toward F1 24 being a solid, if not revolutionary, entry in the series. Most reviewers agree it’s a strong upgrade for existing fans, with improvements in career modes, handling, and presentation that justify its release. However, the lack of major innovations and the presence of technical or design issues—such as the divisive handling model or AI shortcomings—mean it’s not universally hailed as a must-have. Critics like IGN and PlaySense acknowledge its "good racing experience" but question its necessity for those who already own F1 23, while others, like CGMagazine and PCGamesN, feel it falls short of rekindling passion for the series. The game’s balance of accessibility and depth, combined with its focus on authenticity, positions it as a reliable choice for Formula 1 enthusiasts, but its limitations in content variety and originality leave room for improvement. Ultimately, F1 24 is seen as a step forward in execution but a step back in innovation, with a mixed reception that reflects its appeal to different segments of the audience.

TL;DR

F1 24 nails immersion with stunning visuals, refined physics, and a deep career mode—perfect for fans and newcomers—but stumbles with rigid AI, uninspired updates, and a handling system that feels clunky. A solid polish over F1 23, but lacks the innovation to thrill veterans or justify upgrades for all.

MONSTER

Reviews

87 reviews found

Metro GameCentral

PlayStation 5

May 28, 2024