Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

About

Navigation

Home

Games

MONSTER

DOLMEN

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of DOLMEN
Item: DOLMEN
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2022

GenresAdventure, Action, Science Fiction and Futuristic, Puzzle and Logic, RPG, Single Player

AvailableMay 20, 2022

PlatformXbox Series X, PC, Xbox One, PlayStation 4, PlayStation 5

DeveloperMassive Work Studio

Overview

Only one of many Korean games titled Goindol, this one is a Puzzle Bobble clone with a prehistoric theme and graphics ripped straight from Prehistorik 2 and Joe and Mac.

Elsewhere

3.0

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Dolmen’s story splits critics: a few praise its cosmic horror flair and atmospheric sci-fi, but most call it underdeveloped, generic, and forgettable, with fragmented lore and weak storytelling dragging down an otherwise ambitious setting.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

58%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

42%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The story of Dolmen receives mixed reactions, with some critics acknowledging its unique sci-fi elements and potential. MeuPlayStation praises its "unique approach" to sci-fi and cosmic horror, noting that the narrative structure, while unconventional, offers a sense of mystery. GamingBolt highlights the game’s "straightforward and reasonably well-realized sci-fi setting," emphasizing interdimensional themes that avoid the vagueness common in Souls-like games. Similarly, PSX Brasil appreciates the story’s relative detail compared to other similar titles, with dialogues, texts, and documents providing a foundation for exploration. These reviews suggest that while the narrative is not deeply engaging, its premise and setting have some appeal, particularly for fans of Lovecraftian horror and cosmic mysteries. However, the majority of critics panned Dolmen’s story as underdeveloped, generic, and lacking in depth. PC Games called it "uninteresting and poorly executed," criticizing the "generic sci-fi premise" and lifeless text boxes that fail to engage players. COGconnected and Eurogamer Italy both described the plot as "bland," "forgettable," and "difficult to follow," with weak character development and a lack of originality. Wccftech and IGN Italia noted that the narrative relies heavily on environmental storytelling and sparse lore, failing to create emotional investment or meaningful context for the game’s mechanics. Critics like Xbox Tavern and Games.cz also highlighted the story’s minimalism, with the latter calling it "unoriginal" and "lacking in depth." The consensus here is that Dolmen’s narrative struggles to rise above its Souls-like peers, often feeling like a backdrop rather than a compelling driving force. Overall, the critical reception of Dolmen’s story leans heavily negative, with only a few reviewers finding redeeming qualities. While some praise its sci-fi concepts and environmental storytelling (e.g., MeuPlayStation, GamingBolt), the majority criticize it as derivative, underdeveloped, and unengaging. The game’s reliance on fragmented lore, minimal character arcs, and clichéd sci-fi tropes leaves many reviewers disappointed, particularly when compared to more narrative-driven Souls-like titles. Despite its ambitious setting, Dolmen’s story fails to fully capitalize on its potential, resulting in a mixed but largely unimpressive reception. As noted by multiple critics like PC Games, COGconnected, and Eurogamer Italy, the narrative remains one of the game’s weakest aspects, overshadowing its mechanical and atmospheric strengths.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

DOLMEN blends Souls-like ambition with sci-fi twists, offering inventive combat systems and strategic depth—yet clunky mechanics, unbalanced energy management, and repetitive design sabotage its promise, leaving a frustratingly incomplete experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

12%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

59%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

29%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of DOLMEN receives mixed praise, with several critics highlighting its ambitious blend of Souls-like mechanics and sci-fi elements. The energy-based systems, such as the reactor cores and mana-dependent firearms, are noted for adding strategic depth (IGN Spain, GameSpew), while the hybrid melee/ranged combat approach is seen as a unique twist (Twinfinite, PSX Brasil). Some reviewers appreciate the challenge of boss fights and the variety of weapons, with GameOver.gr praising the "versatile combat strategies" enabled by the energy bar system. The inclusion of crafting mechanics, class customization, and zone-specific challenges also earns nods for creativity (Hobby Consolas, Multiplayer.it), and The Enemy acknowledges the game’s dynamic combat as "challenging yet rewarding." These elements suggest that DOLMEN attempts to innovate within the Souls-like framework, offering players a sense of progression through skill and strategy. However, the consensus overwhelmingly points to significant flaws in execution. Critics repeatedly cite clunky combat mechanics, including stiff animations, inconsistent hitboxes, and unresponsive controls (God is a Geek, The Games Machine, SpazioGames). The energy management system is frequently criticized for being overburdened or underdeveloped, with ZTGD noting that "key abilities feel underpowered" and Gaming Nexus calling it "artificially difficult." Repetitive level design, unclear shortcuts, and a lack of meaningful exploration (The Games Machine, PC Invasion) further detract from the experience. Issues like poor enemy AI, frustrating boss encounters, and technical problems—such as framerate drops and temperamental cameras—are also highlighted by multiple reviewers (God is a Geek, NME, XboxAddict). Even the game’s attempts at innovation, like its sci-fi twists, are seen as undermined by unbalanced mechanics and a lack of polish. Overall, DOLMEN is viewed as a flawed but intriguing entry in the Souls-like genre. While it succeeds in creating a challenging, skill-based combat system with unique elements like energy management and hybrid weapon playstyles, its technical shortcomings and repetitive design prevent it from fully realizing its potential. Critics like IGN Spain and The Enemy acknowledge the game’s ambition and strategic depth, but most agree that its issues—ranging from clunky mechanics to unbalanced difficulty—hinder enjoyment. The mixed reception reflects a game that Gamepressure describes as "incomplete and poorly optimized," with many reviewers feeling that its Souls-like aspirations are overshadowed by execution flaws. Despite some praise for its core systems, the majority of critics conclude that DOLMEN struggles to deliver a cohesive or satisfying experience.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

DOLMEN’s visuals flounder under a haze of bland, outdated aesthetics and repetitive design, despite sporadic atmospheric ambition. While its Lovecraftian vibes and functional sci-fi elements occasionally shine, technical flaws, generic alien lore, and a lack of originality drown out any charm, leaving a visually unimpressive, immersion-breaking experience.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

64%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

33%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of DOLMEN received mixed but generally lukewarm reception, with some critics acknowledging its atmospheric ambition and unique elements. Several reviewers praised the game’s Lovecraftian/Giger-inspired aesthetics, noting detailed environments like "The Dumps" and "Old Lab" that evoke a sense of dread and claustrophobia (Checkpoint Gaming). Others highlighted the sci-fi setting’s functional design, such as the mix of alien and human technology, which some found coherent and immersive (IGN France). The game’s use of Unreal Engine 4 was noted for smooth performance, even if it didn’t push next-gen visuals to their limits (PlayStation LifeStyle). Additionally, the art style occasionally showcased creative setpieces, like corridors resembling an intestinal tract or electric afterimages during dodges (NME), suggesting moments of originality despite broader shortcomings. However, the negatives dominated the critiques, with most reviewers criticizing the game’s visual polish and creativity. The graphics were frequently described as "bland," "monotonous," and "visually outdated," with comparisons to older consoles like the PS2 or Xbox 360 (SECTOR.sk, TierraGamer). Issues included low-resolution textures (PC Games), generic alien designs (PC Games), repetitive environments (GameOver.gr), and awkward color schemes that hindered immersion (IGN Spain). Many pointed to a lack of distinct visual identity, with the sci-fi setting drawing heavily from Aliens and Mass Effect without adding fresh ideas (GameOver.gr). Technical flaws like compression artifacts, texture loading delays, and frame hitching further undermined the experience (Wccftech, TierraGamer), while UI design was criticized as cluttered or hard to navigate (PSX Brasil, Gaming Nexus). Even the art style’s attempts at cosmic horror fell flat, with environments like "the Dump" deemed "ugly and lifeless" (PlayStation Country). Overall, critics agreed that DOLMEN’s visuals failed to meet expectations for a modern title, despite occasional strengths. While some praised its atmospheric elements and functional level design, the consensus was that the game’s art style lacked originality, polish, and technical refinement. The reliance on sci-fi tropes, outdated graphics, and repetitive environments overshadowed its potential, leaving many reviewers unimpressed. As IGN Spain noted, the visuals "hinder navigation and immersion," while Xbox Tavern called the sci-fi world "visually unimpressive." Though a few critics acknowledged minor positives—such as Checkpoint Gaming’s praise for Lovecraftian environments or Digital Chumps’ recognition of grotesque, horror-tinged designs—the overall sentiment was that DOLMEN’s visual design struggled to deliver a cohesive or memorable experience.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

DOLMEN’s sound design polarized critics—haunting atmosphere and minimalism impressed some, but disjointed audio, monotonous music, and poor mixing undermined its sci-fi horror vision. A bold, if uneven, attempt at tension through silence.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

18%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

50%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

32%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of DOLMEN received mixed but notable praise from several critics, particularly for their atmospheric contributions. GameGrin highlighted the effective use of quiet, haunting music and silence to build tension, while GamersRD praised the quality of sound effects, voice work, and soundtrack for aligning with the game’s tone. Jeuxvideo.com (multiple mentions) and The Enemy noted that the minimalistic approach—emphasizing eerie atmospherics, unsettling sound effects, and a deliberate absence of traditional music—enhanced the game’s oppressive mood. Additionally, CGMagazine and Everyeye.it acknowledged the soundtrack as dynamic or varied, complementing the sci-fi atmosphere despite other flaws. Digital Chumps and Gamepressure also appreciated ambient sounds that amplified tension, aligning with the game’s cosmic horror themes. These positives suggest that DOLMEN’s audio design was intentionally crafted to evoke unease and immersion, even if not universally successful. However, several critics criticized the sound design for technical shortcomings and lack of cohesion. Eurogamer Italy and IGN Spain described the audio as disjointed, with overlapping ambient noises creating a cacophony that undermined immersion. Games.cz and Generación Xbox called the music forgettable and monotonous, while MeuPlayStation and XboxEra pointed out the sparse soundtrack, which failed to support the game’s cosmic horror atmosphere. Vandal and XboxEra noted abrupt sound effects and poor mixing, with some elements—like boss battle music—standing out only in contrast to the otherwise minimal audio. Multiplayer.it and SECTOR.sk also criticized the lack of distinctiveness, calling the sound design average or cheaply produced. These critiques highlight a recurring issue: while the game’s audio aimed for atmosphere, its execution often fell short, leaving players disconnected from the intended mood. Overall, the critical reception of DOLMEN’s sound design and music leans toward mediocrity, with strong opinions on both sides. While some critics (e.g., GameGrin, Jeuxvideo.com, GamersRD) praised its atmospheric depth and intentional minimalism, others (Eurogamer Italy, IGN Spain, Games.cz) found it technically flawed or unmemorable. The divide reflects the game’s polarizing approach: a focus on tension through silence and ambient sound that resonated with some but felt underdeveloped to others. Despite this, the consensus suggests that DOLMEN’s audio design was a deliberate choice aiming to enhance its sci-fi horror tone, even if it occasionally failed to deliver a cohesive or immersive experience. The mixed feedback underscores the challenge of balancing atmosphere with technical execution in sound design.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Voice acting in DOLMEN is functional yet underwhelming—praised for adequacy and minor variety but criticized for monotony, lack of emotional depth, and failing to elevate the narrative.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

55%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

36%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in DOLMEN receives mixed but generally neutral feedback from critics, with several reviewers acknowledging its adequacy despite lacking standout qualities. IGN Adria describes it as "solid," noting that it supports the narrative without elevating the experience, while SpazioGames calls it "discreta fattura" (decent quality), emphasizing its functional nature. Gamer Escape praises the voice acting as "decent and natural," even amid localization errors in text, suggesting it contributes to a believable atmosphere. Additionally, Digital Chumps highlights that vocal performances vary by character gender, a detail they frame as a positive aspect. These critiques indicate that while the voice work is not exceptional, it meets basic expectations for immersion and storytelling. However, several critics criticize the voice acting for being underwhelming or unengaging. Games.cz harshly labels it "znuděný dabing" (bored voice acting), implying a lack of enthusiasm or quality in performances. But Why Tho? goes further, calling it "poorly executed," with lines sounding like "text-to-speech" and lacking emotional depth, particularly in character dialogues. COGconnected also points to minimal voice acting, noting that the story is told through an unseen radio voice and environmental items, while PlayStation LifeStyle observes that the performances "lack emotional impact." These critiques collectively suggest that the voice acting fails to captivate players or add significant depth to the narrative, leaving it as a passive element rather than a memorable one. Overall, the consensus among critics leans toward the voice acting being functional but unremarkable. While some praise its adequacy and minor positives—such as "solid" delivery or gender-based vocal variety—the majority highlight its shortcomings, including monotony, lack of emotional resonance, and minimal impact on immersion. The reviews suggest that DOLMEN’s voice work is neither a strength nor a major flaw but rather a neutral component that fails to leave a lasting impression. This balance of critiques reflects a game where the voice acting serves its purpose without contributing meaningfully to the player’s experience, as noted by outlets like IGN Adria and But Why Tho? who frame it as either "not sufficient" or "poorly executed."

TL;DR

voice acting

Voice acting in DOLMEN is functional yet underwhelming—praised for adequacy and minor variety but criticized for monotony, lack of emotional depth, and failing to elevate the narrative.

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

DOLMEN stumbles under technical chaos: glitch-ridden, inconsistent frame rates, clunky controls, and optimization nightmares plague most platforms, with PS5/Xbox Series X|S plagued by lag, poor camera systems, and combat flaws, while PC and PS4 face bugs, unresponsive mechanics, and uneven polish—its ambition outpaced by execution.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

35%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

57%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of DOLMEN across platforms shows a mix of positives and negatives, with some standout aspects. On the PS5, PlayStation LifeStyle praised its smooth 60fps performance in Performance Mode, while SpazioGames noted rare glitches and a clean codebase despite minor issues. IGN France highlighted adjustable frame rates, and IGN Spain acknowledged the DualSense’s functional features. For Xbox Series X|S, Generación Xbox mentioned stable 60fps in Performance Mode, and XboxEra praised its ability to handle intense graphical scenes without major hiccups. On PC, GameOver.gr and IGN Italia reported smooth performance with no severe bugs, while Shacknews noted consistent frame rates. The PS4 version, though less discussed, saw some praise for its lack of catastrophic issues, as noted by TierraGamer. These positives suggest the game’s technical foundation had potential, particularly on newer hardware. However, the negatives across platforms are more pronounced and varied. On the PS5, Eurogamer Italy criticized low resolution and pixelation, while Games.cz and Jeuxvideo.com highlighted glitches, frame rate inconsistencies, and combat flaws. GamersRD noted imprecise controls despite fast load times, and Wccftech described multiplayer as plagued by latency and server instability. For Xbox Series X|S, Everyeye.it and Xbox Tavern cited laggy animations and delayed input responses, while XboxEra pointed to AI glitches and frame rate drops. On PC, GamingBolt and COGconnected criticized hit detection bugs, unresponsive controls, and a clunky camera system, though GameOver.gr found stability. The PS4 version faced issues like poor enemy AI (GRYOnline.pl) and repetitive designs (SomosXbox). These flaws collectively paint a picture of a game struggling with optimization and polish across most platforms. The overall consensus among critics is that DOLMEN suffers from significant technical shortcomings, particularly on older hardware and next-gen consoles. While some reviewers like IGN Adria and Wccftech acknowledged the game’s ambition, they emphasized its subpar optimization, inconsistent frame rates, and frustrating mechanics. The PS5 and Xbox Series X|S versions faced widespread criticism for glitches, poor camera systems, and unbalanced combat, as highlighted by Games.cz, Jeuxvideo.com, and XboxEra. PC received mixed feedback, with some praising stability (e.g., GameOver.gr) but others criticizing clunky controls and bugs (GamingBolt). The PS4 version, though less scrutinized, also faced issues like unbalanced difficulty and save mechanics. Despite minor positives in specific areas, the game’s technical flaws overshadowed its strengths, leaving critics divided on whether its ambitions justified the execution.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

DOLMEN’s replay value is a letdown despite surface-level features like boss re-runs and co-op—repetitive gameplay, lackluster innovation, and unengaging content sink its appeal, making it a tough sell beyond the initial playthrough.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

38%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

59%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The positive aspects of DOLMEN’s replay value are highlighted by several critics who note mechanics like boss respawns, build experimentation, and exploration incentives. Checkpoint Gaming emphasizes that the ability to grind materials and revisit bosses for rare items adds depth, while GamersRD and Hobby Consolas acknowledge co-op possibilities and the challenge of mastering combat systems as factors that could encourage multiple playthroughs. Vandal and Wccftech also point to boss re-runs for resource gathering and the game’s difficulty curve as elements that might appeal to fans of the Soulsborne genre, even if they’re limited in scope. Additionally, CGMagazine and GamingTrend suggest that varied combat approaches and class diversity could theoretically support replayability, though these ideas are often framed as potential rather than fully realized. However, the negatives dominate the critical consensus, with many reviewers criticizing DOLMEN for its repetitive gameplay, lack of innovation, and unengaging content. Eurogamer Italy and Games.cz argue that the game’s linear structure and minimal rewards make it unlikely to be revisited, while Gaming Nexus and IGN Spain highlight its short length (10–20 hours) and absence of features like New Game+ or meaningful post-game content. XboxEra and ZTGD condemn the repetitive combat and frustrating mechanics as deterrents, and PC Games outright advises against purchasing the game due to its “unengaging story” and poor design. Even critics who acknowledge minor positives, such as GameGrin and Gamer Escape, stress that narrative shortcomings and tedious grinding undermine long-term appeal. Overall, the critical reception of DOLMEN’s replay value is mixed but leans heavily toward the negative. While a few reviewers like Checkpoint Gaming and Hobby Consolas see potential in its mechanics for dedicated fans, the majority argue that the game’s flaws—repetitiveness, lack of innovation, and insufficient incentives—significantly limit its appeal. IGN Spain, XboxEra, and CD-Action collectively emphasize that DOLMEN fails to deliver a compelling reason to return beyond initial playthroughs, despite some surface-level replayability features. The consensus suggests that while the game may satisfy hardcore Soulsborne enthusiasts seeking challenge or specific mechanics, its overall design and execution make it an unlikely candidate for repeated engagement.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

80%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

17%

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall verdict on DOLMEN reveals a mix of cautious optimism and significant criticism. Several reviewers acknowledged its ambitious concepts and unique sci-fi setting, highlighting elements like its energy mechanics, narrative depth, and atmospheric design. For instance, The Enemy praised the game as a milestone for Brazilian gaming, celebrating its creative design and challenging gameplay despite technical limitations. GameGrin noted the engaging atmosphere and thoughtful world-building, while Shacknews appreciated its "fascinating world" and "challenging combat." GamingTrend acknowledged its solid foundation and rewarding experience for Souls-like fans, and PSX Brasil highlighted its potential as a showcase of Brazilian indie development. These positives suggest that DOLMEN had the seeds of a compelling experience, particularly for players drawn to its sci-fi twist and creative ideas. However, the negatives dominated the critical reception, with most reviewers condemning DOLMEN for its poor execution, lack of innovation, and technical shortcomings. Games.cz and PC Games called it a "waste of time" and the "worst Souls-like ever," respectively, criticizing its unenjoyable gameplay and generic design. PC Invasion and IGN Adria highlighted its failure to deliver on ambitions, citing poor combat, uninspired mechanics, and a forgettable experience. XboxEra and Eurogamer Italy criticized outdated visuals, technical issues, and a lack of originality, while Multiplayer.it and The Games Machine described it as "mediocre" and "unfocused." Even critics like Jeuxvideo.com and WellPlayed noted its "incomplete execution" and "unpolished mechanics," with many agreeing that the game fell short of expectations despite its promising ideas. The consensus was that DOLMEN struggled to translate its concepts into a cohesive, satisfying experience. The overall sentiment among critics leans heavily toward disappointment, with only a handful of reviewers offering meaningful praise. While some saw potential in DOLMEN’s unique mechanics and narrative ambitions—The Enemy and GamingTrend being notable examples—the majority viewed it as a flawed, underwhelming entry in the Souls-like genre. The game’s technical issues, repetitive design, and lack of innovation overshadowed its occasional strengths, leading to widespread recommendations against purchasing it. Critics like Games.cz, PC Games, and XboxEra were particularly harsh, emphasizing that DOLMEN failed to meet even basic expectations. However, a few reviewers, such as PSX Brasil and Shacknews, acknowledged its potential for growth, suggesting that while it fell short of excellence, it might still appeal to niche audiences or future iterations. Ultimately, the critical consensus paints DOLMEN as a missed opportunity, with its flaws outweighing its fleeting moments of promise.

TL;DR

DOLMEN crashes under its own ambition, a flawed Souls-like drowning in technical bloat, repetitive design, and hollow promises—its sci-fi flair can’t salvage a forgettable, frustrating experience that earns only faint praise from niche corners.

MONSTER

Reviews

93 reviews found

The Enemy

PlayStation 5

May 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Dolmen is hailed as a milestone for Brazilian gaming, praised for its narrative depth, challenging gameplay, and creative design. Despite some technical and visual limitations, the game is seen as ambitious and successful, with potential for future growth. The review concludes with strong enthusiasm for the title and its developer.

Read full review

Screen Rant

PlayStation 5

May 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Dolmen is described as an exciting title with constant action, intense challenges, and a mix of horror elements, intricate upgrades, and multiplayer features. It balances daunting combat with strategic depth, offering a rewarding experience for fans of Soulslike games.

Read full review

Hey Poor Player

PlayStation 5

May 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A solid debut with a unique approach to soulslike gameplay, but hindered by narrative and technical flaws. The reviewer gives it a 4/5.

Read full review

SomosXbox

Xbox One

May 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Dolmen successfully adapts the Souls formula into a space-themed action RPG with engaging mechanics and a compelling narrative, despite notable design flaws. The review suggests it could appeal to fans of Souls-like games, though its current state may require patience for improvements.

Read full review

Hobby Consolas

PlayStation 5

May 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Dolmen is an enjoyable but unoriginal souls-like game that offers a fresh setting (space mining) but fails to innovate. It appeals to fans of the genre with its difficulty and combat, though technical flaws and lack of creativity hold it back.

Read full review

Similar Games

Games you might also enjoy

Horizon Forbidden West

2022

Horizon Zero Dawn

2017

Scarlet Nexus

2021

The Surge

2017

The Surge 2

2019

The Ascent

2021

Horizon Zero Dawn: The Frozen Wilds

2017

Hellpoint

2020

CrossCode

2018

Star Ocean: The Divine Force

2022

Divinity: Original Sin

2014

God Eater 2: Rage Burst

2016

Deus Ex: Human Revolution

2011

Dex

2014

Space Siege

2008

Fallout: New Vegas

2010

Neptunia: Sisters vs. Sisters

2023

Unepic

2011

Mars: War Logs

2013

The Riftbreaker

2021

Popular Right Now

Trending games the community is playing

Battlefield 6

2025

Ghost of Yotei

2025

Silent Hill f

2025

The Outer Worlds 2

2025

Ninja Gaiden 4

2025

Cronos: The New Dawn

2025

Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater

2025

Call of Duty: Black Ops 7

2025

Little Nightmares III

2025

Shinobi: Art of Vengeance

2025

FINAL FANTASY TACTICS - The Ivalice Chronicles

2025

EA Sports FC 26

2025

Sonic Racing: CrossWorlds

2025

MARVEL Cosmic Invasion

2025

Dispatch

2025

Recently Reviewed

Games with full Monster Scorecards

Total Chaos

2025

SkateBIRD

2021

Destiny 2: The Edge of Fate

2025

Super Robot Wars Y

2025

Strange Antiquities

2025

Terminator 2D: NO FATE

2025

A Pizza Delivery

2025

Divinity: Original Sin II - Definitive Edition

2018

Metroid Prime 4: Beyond

2025

SUPERHOT VR

2016

Project Motor Racing

2025

New Super Lucky's Tale

2019

Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag

2013

ISLANDERS: New Shores

2025

A.I.L.A

2025

Bubble Bobble 4 Friends

2020

MADO MONOGATARI: Fia and the Wondrous Academy

2025

Tails of Iron

2021

Aven Colony

2017

Sacred 2 Remaster

2025

MONSTER

DOLMEN

2022

GenresAdventure, Action, Science Fiction and Futuristic, Puzzle and Logic, RPG, Single Player

AvailableMay 20, 2022

PlatformXbox Series X, PC, Xbox One, PlayStation 4, PlayStation 5

DeveloperMassive Work Studio

Overview

Only one of many Korean games titled Goindol, this one is a Puzzle Bobble clone with a prehistoric theme and graphics ripped straight from Prehistorik 2 and Joe and Mac.

Elsewhere

3.0

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

58%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

42%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

12%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

59%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

29%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

64%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

33%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

18%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

50%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

32%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Voice acting in DOLMEN is functional yet underwhelming—praised for adequacy and minor variety but criticized for monotony, lack of emotional depth, and failing to elevate the narrative.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

55%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

36%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

TL;DR

voice acting

Voice acting in DOLMEN is functional yet underwhelming—praised for adequacy and minor variety but criticized for monotony, lack of emotional depth, and failing to elevate the narrative.

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

35%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

57%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

38%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

59%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

80%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

17%

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

TL;DR

MONSTER

Reviews

93 reviews found

The Enemy

PlayStation 5

May 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Screen Rant

PlayStation 5

May 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Hey Poor Player

PlayStation 5

May 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

A solid debut with a unique approach to soulslike gameplay, but hindered by narrative and technical flaws. The reviewer gives it a 4/5.

Read full review

SomosXbox

Xbox One

May 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Hobby Consolas

PlayStation 5

May 19, 2022

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Similar Games

Games you might also enjoy

Horizon Forbidden West

2022

Horizon Zero Dawn

2017

Scarlet Nexus

2021

The Surge

2017

The Surge 2

2019

The Ascent

2021

Horizon Zero Dawn: The Frozen Wilds

2017

Hellpoint

2020

CrossCode

2018

Star Ocean: The Divine Force

2022

Divinity: Original Sin

2014

God Eater 2: Rage Burst

2016

Deus Ex: Human Revolution

2011

Dex

2014

Space Siege

2008

Fallout: New Vegas

2010

Neptunia: Sisters vs. Sisters

2023

Unepic

2011

Mars: War Logs

2013

The Riftbreaker

2021

Popular Right Now

Trending games the community is playing

Battlefield 6

2025

Ghost of Yotei

2025

Silent Hill f

2025

The Outer Worlds 2

2025

Ninja Gaiden 4

2025

Cronos: The New Dawn

2025

Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater

2025

Call of Duty: Black Ops 7

2025

Little Nightmares III

2025

Shinobi: Art of Vengeance

2025

FINAL FANTASY TACTICS - The Ivalice Chronicles

2025

EA Sports FC 26

2025

Sonic Racing: CrossWorlds

2025

MARVEL Cosmic Invasion

2025

Dispatch

2025

Recently Reviewed

Games with full Monster Scorecards

Total Chaos

2025

SkateBIRD

2021

Destiny 2: The Edge of Fate

2025

Super Robot Wars Y

2025

Strange Antiquities

2025

Terminator 2D: NO FATE

2025

A Pizza Delivery

2025

Divinity: Original Sin II - Definitive Edition

2018

Metroid Prime 4: Beyond

2025

SUPERHOT VR

2016

Project Motor Racing

2025

New Super Lucky's Tale

2019

Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag

2013

ISLANDERS: New Shores

2025

A.I.L.A

2025

Bubble Bobble 4 Friends

2020

MADO MONOGATARI: Fia and the Wondrous Academy

2025

Tails of Iron

2021

Aven Colony

2017

Sacred 2 Remaster

2025