City of Brass

The reviewers generally acknowledge the atmospheric and thematic strengths of City of Brass, particularly its richly imagined setting inspired by One Thousand and One Nights. Critics like Digitally Downloaded and GameSpot highlight the game’s evocative Arabian-inspired world, noting its potential to evoke mystery and adventure. Generación Xbox and Windows Central praise the sense of wonder in the cursed city’s lore, while PlayStation LifeStyle and Xbox Tavern appreciate the procedural generation and survival elements that create a dynamic exploration experience. The game’s focus on dungeon-crawling mechanics and environmental storytelling, even if minimal, is seen as a foundation for immersive gameplay, with some critics (like Metro GameCentral) acknowledging its engaging premise despite narrative shortcomings. However, the narrative depth of City of Brass is widely criticized as underdeveloped or superficial. Multiple reviewers, including Destructoid, IGN, and TheSixthAxis, argue that the story feels like a mere framework for gameplay, with minimal character development or plot complexity. GameSpew and Cultured Vultures describe the narrative as “incidental” or “barebones,” relying on procedural generation rather than meaningful storytelling. The lack of exploration into the city’s lore, the protagonist’s motivations, or the cultural context of its Arabian Nights-inspired setting is a recurring complaint. Worth Playing and Everyeye.it note that the game’s minimal story fails to capitalize on its thematic potential, with IGN specifically criticizing the superficial use of mythology as “clichéd aesthetics” without substantial research. Even GameOver.gr, which frames the lack of narrative as a neutral or genre-appropriate choice, contrasts with others who see it as a missed opportunity. The overall consensus among critics is that City of Brass prioritizes gameplay mechanics and procedural exploration over narrative substance, resulting in a mixed reception. While its atmospheric setting and dungeon-crawling structure are praised by outlets like GameSpot, Digitally Downloaded, and Generación Xbox, the lack of a compelling story is a consistent drawback. Some reviewers, such as GameOver.gr, view the minimal narrative as acceptable for a roguelike, but most (e.g., IGN, TheSixthAxis, Worth Playing) see it as a significant flaw that undermines the game’s potential. The divide reflects differing expectations: those who value immersive storytelling find the game lacking, while others appreciate its focus on gameplay. Ultimately, City of Brass is seen as a mechanically strong but narratively thin experience, with its strengths and weaknesses rooted in its design philosophy.

The gameplay of City of Brass is praised for its unique mechanics, strategic depth, and engaging roguelike elements. Critics highlight the core whip-and-sword combat as a standout feature, with COGconnected noting "sharp controls" and "effective combat systems," while Push Square emphasizes the satisfaction of the "core loop" and the versatility of the whip in traversal and environmental interaction. The procedural generation of levels and the inclusion of modifiers like blessings and burdens add replayability, with TheXboxHub praising the emphasis on "calculated strategies over reckless play." Additionally, the game’s focus on crowd control, trap navigation, and time-limited challenges is seen as a strength by reviewers like GameSpew, who describe the gameplay as "engaging and challenging," while Digitally Downloaded applauds its "slick mechanics" and "tactical combat." However, several critics voice concerns about repetitive structures, inconsistent controls, and design flaws. IGN criticizes the game for being "excessively difficult" with "frustrating controls" and "repetitive structure," while TheSixthAxis and Xbox Tavern note that procedural generation feels "predictable" and combat is "sloppy" or "robotic." Issues like imprecise hit detection (Metro GameCentral) and sluggish controls on the Switch (Cultured Vultures) further detract from the experience. Gaming Age and ZTGD point to a lack of depth over time, with repetitive enemy encounters and "limited variety in challenges," while GameCritics and Destructoid highlight inconsistent mechanics and "poor design choices" that undermine enjoyment. The absence of a block mechanic (Windows Central) and the frustration of permadeath without meaningful progression also surface as recurring complaints. Overall, critics agree that City of Brass offers a compelling blend of roguelike innovation and challenging gameplay, but its execution is marred by repetitive elements and technical shortcomings. While reviewers like COGconnected and Push Square celebrate its "unique mechanics" and "strategic depth," others such as IGN and Xbox Tavern find the difficulty curve unbalanced and the repetition tedious. The game’s procedural systems and modifiers provide variety, yet many feel they fail to fully mitigate the frustration of inconsistent controls or lackluster enemy design. Despite these flaws, the consensus leans toward acknowledging its potential: GameSpot and Digitally Downloaded note that while "technical issues" and "repetitive encounters" exist, the game’s "challenge and replayability" make it a worthwhile experience for fans of the genre.

The graphics and visual design of City of Brass are widely praised for their strong thematic execution and aesthetic appeal, particularly in capturing the Arabian Nights atmosphere. Critics like Digitally Downloaded highlight the "vivid Middle Eastern aesthetics" and "rich, distinctive" visuals that align with the game’s lore, while Gaming Nexus compares the environments to Bioshock, praising their detailed architecture and smooth animations. The use of Unreal Engine 4 is noted for its ability to create immersive settings, with PSX Extreme emphasizing "Persian architecture, lighting, and environmental storytelling" that evokes a "beautiful yet ominous atmosphere." Additionally, Xbox Addict and TheXboxHub commend the game’s day/night cycles, glowing enemies, and 4K HDR enhancements on Xbox One X, which elevate its visual presentation. The art style’s consistency in conveying a "nightmarish metropolis" with Arabian-inspired elements is frequently lauded, as seen in Cultured Vultures’ acknowledgment of the game’s "strong Arabian-themed aesthetic." However, several critics highlight significant drawbacks, particularly around repetition and lack of innovation. Multiple reviewers, including GameSpot and IGN, criticize the game for its "generic" visuals and reliance on familiar Persian clichés like hookah pipes and rugs, while Metro GameCentral notes that procedurally generated levels feel "monotonous" due to limited variety in environments. DarkStation and Destructoid point to repetitive textures, forgettable enemies, and indistinguishable districts, with GameSpot noting that the four themed backdrops (desert, overgrown, opulent, catacombs) fail to maintain visual distinction over time. Performance issues also arise as a concern: GameCritics mentions severe framerate drops on PS4 during intense combat, while Pocket Gamer UK describes the Switch version’s graphics as "muddy" and "lifeless." These technical and design shortcomings detract from the game’s overall visual experience despite its thematic strengths. The overall consensus among critics is that City of Brass excels in creating a cohesive, thematically rich visual identity but struggles with repetition and polish. While Digitally Downloaded and PSX Extreme celebrate the game’s "distinctive" art style and atmospheric details, others like IGN and GameSpot argue that its reliance on procedural generation and lack of originality make it feel derivative. The game’s visuals are often described as "beautiful" but "uninspired," with Worth Playing noting that the Arabian theme feels "superficial" and Multiplayer.it criticizing low-quality environmental details. Despite these critiques, many acknowledge the effort to evoke a vivid, immersive world, though the balance between artistic ambition and technical execution remains uneven. The mixed reception reflects a game that prioritizes thematic consistency over innovation, leaving its visual design as both a strength and a limitation.

The Sound Design and Music of City of Brass received mixed but generally favorable reactions, with several critics highlighting its atmospheric and thematic strengths. GameSpot (PS4) praised the Arabian Nights-inspired audio design, noting minimalist oud and flute themes that align with the game’s setting. AusGamers (XBOX ONE) emphasized the whip-cracking sound as a standout moment, evoking a classic Lucasfilm quality that enhances immersion. Cultured Vultures (NINTENDO SWITCH) acknowledged the decent sound design, particularly the whip crack, while Switch Player (NINTENDO SWITCH) appreciated the Arabian-themed soundtrack for its authenticity. These positives suggest the game’s audio effectively supports its adventurous tone and cultural motifs, with specific elements like environmental sounds and weapon effects contributing to a cohesive experience. However, several critics criticized the music as repetitive, underwhelming, or poorly implemented. GameSpot (PS4, XBOX ONE, PC) repeatedly noted the unremarkable and generic nature of the score, describing it as minimalist but lacking distinctiveness. PlayStation LifeStyle (PS4) pointed out poor mixing that made enemy sounds indistinguishable, undermining the game’s reliance on audio cues for survival. Vandal (PS4) and Xbox Tavern (XBOX ONE) criticized the lack of variety in enemy sounds and repetitive coughing, which detracted from immersion. Additionally, 3DJuegos (PC) and Everyeye.it (PC) highlighted the sparse musical score, with the latter calling it “repetitive desert-themed” and unmemorable. These critiques suggest that while sound design elements were present, the music often failed to elevate the experience or provide meaningful engagement. Overall, the consensus leans toward a balanced but critical assessment. While the game’s sound design successfully creates an immersive atmosphere through environmental cues and thematic motifs, the musical score is consistently criticized for being repetitive, generic, or underutilized. Critics like GameSpot (multiple platforms) and 3DJuegos emphasized the lack of innovation in the soundtrack, whereas others like Cultured Vultures and Switch Player acknowledged its role in reinforcing the game’s setting. The mixed reception reflects a divide between appreciation for atmospheric audio elements and frustration with the music’s shortcomings, leaving City of Brass as a title where sound design excels in subtlety but falls short in memorability or emotional impact.

Summary unavailable

The technical performance of City of Brass varies across platforms, with notable positives and negatives. On PS4, while several critics highlight issues like frame drops (GameCritics) and combat hitbox inconsistencies (GameSpot), others note that bugs are infrequent and minor (DualShockers). For Xbox One, Generación Xbox emphasizes stable performance on higher-end hardware like the Xbox One X, with no major bugs reported, while Windows Central acknowledges control issues but suggests optimizations could improve the experience. On Nintendo Switch, Switch Player praises smooth performance with no noticeable FPS drops, though Cultured Vultures and Screen Rant criticize sluggish controls and Joy-Con adaptability, respectively. Meanwhile, PC reviews (e.g., Everyeye.it) highlight fluid visuals and stability, despite procedural generation flaws, while 3DJuegos notes that PC performance is optimal compared to other platforms. These positives suggest the game’s technical foundation is solid in some contexts, even if not flawless. However, the negatives are more pronounced across platforms. On PS4, critics like IGN and Metro GameCentral stress control precision issues, with inconsistent attack ranges and poor hit detection exacerbating frustration. GameSpot and GameCritics also note frame rate drops during intense combat, which disrupt gameplay flow. For Xbox One, Windows Central criticizes input lag and frame rate inconsistencies on non-Xbox One X platforms, while Generación Xbox mentions minor frame drops during crowded battles. On Nintendo Switch, Screen Rant and Cultured Vultures highlight unresponsive controls and a stiff camera system, with the latter calling the Switch port’s technical performance a “significant drawback” compared to PC. Meanwhile, PC reviews (e.g., Multiplayer.it) point to imprecise aiming and collision detection problems, though these are framed as minor flaws rather than deal-breakers. These issues collectively suggest that technical polish remains a challenge across all platforms. Overall, the consensus among critics is that City of Brass faces consistent technical hurdles, particularly on PS4 and Switch, where control precision and frame stability are frequently criticized. While Xbox One and PC versions show more promise—especially with higher-end hardware or optimizations—the game’s procedural generation and combat mechanics often amplify existing flaws. Despite these issues, many reviewers acknowledge the game’s strengths, such as its atmospheric design and challenging gameplay, which mitigate some of the technical shortcomings. The disparity in performance across platforms underscores the importance of hardware capabilities and optimization efforts, leaving a mixed but ultimately forgiving assessment for players willing to overlook occasional hiccups.

The overall sentiment toward City of Brass’s replay value is mixed, but several critics highlight its potential for multiple playthroughs due to its roguelike mechanics and procedural generation. Reviewers like DualShockers and PSX Extreme emphasize that the randomized level layouts and persistent systems (such as Blessings & Burdens) create unique experiences each time, while GameCritics and Gaming Nexus note that progression systems—like experience points and permanent perks—encourage experimentation. Video Chums and Windows Central praise the game’s addictive challenge loop, with procedural generation and adjustable difficulty ensuring fresh challenges. The roguelike structure, combined with elements like permadeath and leaderboards, also appeals to speedrunners and mastery-oriented players, as noted by GameSpot and Xbox Tavern. These positives suggest that City of Brass offers a compelling foundation for replayability through its dynamic systems. However, many critics argue that the game’s repetitive design and lack of substantial content undermine its long-term appeal. COGconnected and Destructoid criticize the monotony of enemy types, boss encounters, and limited district variety, while Metro GameCentral and PlayStation Universe point to short playtimes (under two hours) and repetitive level designs as major drawbacks. GameCritics and Vandal note that despite procedural generation, the experience feels unrewarding or thin after a few hours, with ZTGD and Xbox Addict highlighting how repetition in enemies and mechanics can lead to burnout. Even reviewers like TheSixthAxis and Cultured Vultures acknowledge that the game’s dull mechanics and lack of post-game content make it less enticing for repeated play, despite its structural strengths. The consensus among critics is divided, with many recognizing City of Brass’s replayability potential but questioning its ability to sustain engagement. While GameSpot, Gaming Nexus, and Xbox Addict praise the game’s balance of challenge and flexibility, others like COGconnected, Destructoid, and Worth Playing argue that its repetitive nature and lack of meaningful progression limit its appeal. The game’s reliance on procedural generation and roguelike mechanics creates variability, but this is often offset by monotony in later stages or insufficient incentives to return. Ultimately, City of Brass seems to cater more to players who enjoy high difficulty and experimentation, with its replayability hinging on individual tolerance for repetition versus the thrill of mastery.