Search for games

Type three or more characters to search...

Links

MONSTER

Skull and Bones

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Skull and Bones
Item: Skull and Bones
Author: Critik Editorial Team

2024

GenresAdventure, Action, Third Person Perspective, Open World, Single Player, Multiplayer

AvailableFeb 16, 2024

PlatformXbox Series X, PlayStation 5, PC

DeveloperUbisoft Singapore

Overview

Enter the Golden Age of Piracy as you sail through rich merchant trade routes. Embody an insatiable pirate captain, dive into the battle for the ruling of the Indian Ocean and become the most feared pirate, alone or with your gang of up to 5 players.

Elsewhere

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Skull and Bones: Critics applaud the clear goal of becoming a pirate 'Kingpin' and practical gameplay introduction, but slam the lack of depth, uninteresting characters, and forgettable story. Overall, the consensus is that the game falls short in delivering a compelling narrative experience, with reviewers describing it as predictable, generic, and lacking intrigue.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive (80-100)

Mixed (50-79)

56%

Negative (0-49)

44%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The critics' opinions on the story of Skull and Bones highlight a mix of positives and negatives. Some positive aspects include the focus on becoming the 'Kingpin' of pirates, as mentioned by Jeuxvideo.com and PlayStation Universe, which sets a clear goal for players to strive towards. Additionally, KeenGamer appreciates how the main story serves as a practical introduction to the game's mechanics, emphasizing quests for customization and rewards. Voxel also notes the varied missions and interactions with other pirates, providing some engagement within the narrative. On the negative side, the consensus among critics is that Skull and Bones lacks depth and fails to deliver an engaging or memorable story. Pure Xbox, COGconnected, and God is a Geek all criticize the weak narrative, uninteresting plotline, and forgettable characters. Metro GameCentral goes as far as describing the story as an "empty shell" with little motivation to continue playing. Dot Esports and Hooked Gamers echo these sentiments, emphasizing the lack of character development and engaging campaign elements, with NPCs feeling like placeholders rather than fleshed-out individuals. Overall, the critics' opinions paint a picture of Skull and Bones as a game that falls short in delivering a compelling and immersive narrative experience. While some appreciate the clear goal of becoming a pirate legend and the practical introduction to gameplay mechanics, the general consensus leans towards criticism of the story's lack of depth, uninteresting characters, and repetitive nature. The game's narrative is deemed predictable, generic, and lacking in intrigue by multiple reviewers such as Jeuxvideo.com, Pure Xbox, and PCGamesN. Despite offering varied missions and interactions, the overarching sentiment is that Skull and Bones fails to provide a truly engaging and memorable storytelling experience, ultimately leaving players wanting more from its narrative elements.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Skull and Bones' gameplay is a mixed bag for critics. Some praise the thrilling ship battles and customization options, while others criticize the repetitive missions and unengaging gameplay loops. Positive aspects include engaging combat mechanics and strategic elements, but negative feedback points out issues like grindy progression and technical problems. Overall, opinions on the gameplay are split, with individual preferences for naval combat and customization playing a key role in reception.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive (80-100)

43%

Mixed (50-79)

35%

Negative (0-49)

22%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The Gameplay of Skull and Bones has received a mix of positive and negative feedback from various critics. Many critics praised the action-packed ship battles, engaging naval combat, and customization options for pirates and ships. Jeuxvideo.com on Xbox Series X and PC, Pure Xbox on Xbox Series X, and God is a Geek on PS5 highlighted the satisfying ship-to-ship combat, tense battles, and smart trading mechanics. TheSixthAxis on PS5 also commended the focus on sailing, naval combat, ship customization, and resource gathering, describing the combat as rambunctious and thrilling, blending strategy and arcade-like elements. Areajugones on PC appreciated the strategic positioning and teamwork required in naval battles, raids, boss battles, and random events in the persistent open world. On the other hand, several critics pointed out various negatives in the gameplay of Skull and Bones. GamingBolt on PS5 and GGRecon on PC criticized the repetitive gameplay loop, lackluster storytelling, and unengaging gameplay, with GGRecon mentioning a grindy progression system. Metro GameCentral on PS5 and PlayStation Universe on PS5 highlighted the endless busywork and repetitive fetch quests, limited variety in missions, and oversights in combat mechanics like boarding rival NPC boats. PCGamesN on PC mentioned frustrating and boring sailing mechanics, imbalanced PvP, tedious crafting, and extended fetch quests as major drawbacks. Overall, the consensus among critics regarding the Gameplay of Skull and Bones is divided. While some critics appreciated the intense naval battles, ship customization, and immersive sailing mechanics, others found the gameplay loop to be repetitive, lacking depth, and burdened by grindy progression systems. Positive aspects like engaging combat mechanics, strategic elements, and customization options were acknowledged by critics such as Pure Xbox, God is a Geek, and TheSixthAxis. However, negative feedback regarding repetitive missions, unengaging gameplay loops, and technical issues like bugs and problematic missions were raised by critics like GamingBolt, GGRecon, and Voxel. Ultimately, the reception of Skull and Bones' gameplay seems to depend on individual preferences for naval combat, customization, and the tolerance for repetitive gameplay loops and grindy progression.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics rave about Skull and Bones' stunning visuals, realistic ship details, and extensive customization options, creating a visually delightful experience. However, some critics criticize the game for lacking personality in missions, weak visuals on land, and technical issues like low-resolution textures and bugs. Overall, opinions are mixed on the game's graphics and visual design, with praise for its high-seas experience but criticism for inconsistencies and immersion-breaking elements.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive (80-100)

41%

Mixed (50-79)

45%

Negative (0-49)

14%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The critics unanimously praise Skull and Bones for its visually impressive world and detailed environments. Critics like Jeuxvideo.com, COGconnected, and TheSixthAxis commend the game for its sumptuous visuals, stunning realism in ship details, and gorgeous environmental effects. The game's use of Ubisoft's Anvil engine, as highlighted by Jeuxvideo.com and KeenGamer, contributes to creating a visually delightful experience with beautiful sea environments and detailed ships. Additionally, the game offers extensive customization options, as noted by Pure Xbox, Softpedia, and Try Hard Guides, allowing players to personalize their ships and characters, enhancing the overall visual appeal. Despite the positive aspects, several critics point out shortcomings in Skull and Bones' graphics and visual design. Pure Xbox criticizes the game for lacking fun, color, or personality in missions, which impacts the overall visual experience negatively. Critics like God is a Geek and GGRecon highlight weak visuals on land, barren areas, and immersion-breaking cutscenes that detract from the game's visual quality. Furthermore, issues with low-resolution textures, abrupt pop-ins, and technical bugs, as mentioned by GamingBolt and Metro GameCentral, hinder the game's visual presentation and immersion for players. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed regarding Skull and Bones' graphics and visual design. While the game excels in creating a visually immersive high-seas experience with stunning water graphics and detailed ship customization, as noted by MGG and Voxel, it falls short in delivering consistent visual quality across all aspects of the game. Some critics appreciate the game's visuals and atmospheric elements, while others criticize its lackluster graphics on land and technical issues. Despite the varying opinions, the game's use of the Anvil engine and its immersive naval combat experiences receive praise from critics, showcasing a blend of positive and negative feedback on Skull and Bones' graphics and visual design.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics have mixed feelings about the sound design and music in Skull and Bones. Some praise its immersive naval combat experience and impressive visuals, while others feel let down by the lack of catchy sea shanties and narrative depth. Overall, the sound design enhances the game for many critics, but there are areas that could use improvement to elevate the player experience further.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive (80-100)

75%

Mixed (50-79)

13%

Negative (0-49)

13%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The Sound Design and Music of Skull and Bones have received a mix of positive and negative feedback from various critics. Jeuxvideo.com praised the game for its impressive visuals and sound design, particularly highlighting its strengths in naval combat and ship progression. COGconnected also commended the phenomenal sound design, emphasizing how it adds layers of life to the overall experience. GamingBolt echoed similar sentiments, describing the sound design as commendable. The use of sound in Skull and Bones seems to have resonated positively with these critics, enhancing the immersive nature of the game. On the other hand, Dexerto expressed disappointment in the game's lack of catchy Sea Shanties and engaging sound design, which they believed could have elevated the player experience. Multiplayer.it also pointed out some drawbacks, mentioning the absence of Italian dubbing and a mute protagonist as factors that detract from the narrative experience. These criticisms suggest that while the sound design in Skull and Bones has its strengths, there are areas where it falls short of expectations, impacting the overall immersion and storytelling elements of the game. Overall, the consensus among the critics leans towards the positive aspects of Skull and Bones' Sound Design and Music. Critics like Jeuxvideo.com, COGconnected, and GamingBolt appreciated the efforts put into creating an immersive audio experience that complements the naval combat and progression mechanics of the game. However, feedback from critics such as Dexerto and Multiplayer.it highlights areas where improvements could be made, such as incorporating more engaging sound elements and addressing narrative-related audio aspects. Despite some shortcomings, the general sentiment suggests that the Sound Design and Music of Skull and Bones contribute positively to the overall gameplay experience, albeit with room for enhancement in certain areas.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics have mixed feelings about the Voice Acting in Skull and Bones. While some appreciated the depth added by certain character traits, many criticized the awkward dialogue, lack of character development, and overall immersion issues. The general consensus is that the Voice Acting falls short of expectations, impacting the game's reception negatively.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive (80-100)

Mixed (50-79)

33%

Negative (0-49)

67%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The Voice Acting in Skull and Bones has received mixed reviews from critics. COGconnected noted that the characters had difficulty maintaining dialects, which hindered immersion in the game. However, PlayStation Universe did not emphasize voice acting in their review, suggesting that it may not have been a significant aspect for them. Despite this, there were some positive aspects mentioned by critics. For example, PCGamesN highlighted a foul-mouthed leader with daddy issues, which could add depth to the characters and story. On the negative side, several critics pointed out significant issues with the Voice Acting in Skull and Bones. Dexerto described the dialogue as awkward, unnatural, and unpolished, failing to immerse players in the story or connect with the characters. Dot Esports criticized the limited character development and repetitive lines for key characters like Asnah Yatim, which detracted from the overall experience. Gaming Age also highlighted the lack of development in voice acting, suggesting that it did not justify the lengthy development time of the game. Overall, the consensus among critics is that the Voice Acting in Skull and Bones falls short of expectations. While there were some positive aspects, such as intriguing character traits mentioned by PCGamesN, the general sentiment leans towards the negative. Issues like difficulty maintaining dialects, limited dialogue choices, awkward dialogue, lack of character development, and unmemorable characters were commonly cited by reviewers. These shortcomings in the Voice Acting department seem to have impacted the overall immersion and enjoyment of the game for many critics, ultimately leading to a less favorable reception of this aspect of Skull and Bones.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Critics had mixed opinions on Skull and Bones for Xbox Series X and PlayStation 5. While some praised the smooth gaming experience on Xbox, others highlighted technical issues like bugs and crashes on PS5. The game offers solid gameplay moments but faces challenges with janky sections and lacklustre locations. Overall, critics agree that technical issues may impact the overall experience across all platforms, making it a divisive choice for players seeking the best visual and gaming performance.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive (80-100)

Mixed (50-79)

73%

Negative (0-49)

27%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

In terms of the technical performance on Xbox Series X, critics Jeuxvideo.com and Pure Xbox both noted some interface and mission bugs but overall found the game to provide a solid gaming experience. This suggests that despite minor issues, the game runs smoothly on the platform and offers enjoyable gameplay moments. However, Pure Xbox mentioned janky walking sections and lacklustre locations, which could potentially detract from the overall experience on Xbox Series X. On the other hand, when it comes to the PlayStation 5 version of Skull and Bones, critics had more mixed opinions. While Multiplayer.it praised the stunning water graphics and the availability of two graphical modes, with the performance mode being the better choice, other critics like GamingBolt, KeenGamer, and Softpedia highlighted significant technical issues such as bugs, stability issues, crashes, and unstable server connections. Voxel also criticized the lack of polish, which may impact the overall experience on PS5. Metro GameCentral added that players face a difficult choice between Quality or Performance mode, indicating a potential dilemma for players seeking the best visual experience on the platform. Overall, the consensus among critics for Skull and Bones across all platforms leans towards a game with technical issues that may hinder the overall experience. While some critics like Jeuxvideo.com found the game to offer a solid gaming experience on multiple platforms, others such as GamingBolt, KeenGamer, and Voxel highlighted significant technical issues that affect gameplay. The availability of different graphical modes on the PS5, as mentioned by Multiplayer.it, adds a layer of complexity for players seeking the best visual experience. Despite the mixed opinions, it seems that the technical performance of Skull and Bones is a point of contention among critics, with some praising certain aspects while others pointing out notable flaws.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Skull and Bones receives mixed reviews on its replay value. Critics praise the engaging endgame content and diverse activities, but highlight drawbacks like repetitive missions, lack of variety, and unbalanced gameplay. The game offers opportunities for players to manage a commercial empire through cooperative and competitive events, but may struggle to maintain long-term engagement due to these shortcomings.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive (80-100)

14%

Mixed (50-79)

55%

Negative (0-49)

32%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

In terms of positives, several critics highlighted the engaging endgame content of Skull and Bones, emphasizing the opportunities for players to manage a commercial empire through cooperative and competitive events. Jeuxvideo.com praised the game for its engaging endgame content with PvPvE encounters, while Pure Xbox noted the replay value for fans of pirate-themed gameplay, especially in the late game setup where players can build their own pirate enterprise. Multiplayer.it also commended the engaging battles, rich progression system, and varying completion times due to side missions, providing players with a diverse range of activities to prolong their experience. On the negative side, critics pointed out various drawbacks that may limit the game's replay value. GamingBolt and GGRecon criticized the end-game activities for feeling tedious and lacking excitement, with a heavy emphasis on grinding for currency. Metro GameCentral highlighted the unwarranted emphasis on long-term play with little motivation to continue, while PlayStation Universe and Gaming Age mentioned the repetitive nature of fetch quests and lack of variety in missions as limiting factors. Additionally, Dexerto and GGRecon noted overwhelming features and unbalanced PvP encounters as deterrents to replayability. Overall, the consensus among the critics leans towards mixed feelings regarding the replay value of Skull and Bones. While some critics appreciate the game's engaging endgame content, rich progression system, and diverse activities, others point out significant drawbacks such as repetitive missions, lack of variety, and unbalanced gameplay elements. The game's potential as a live service title is acknowledged by God is a Geek, but the current content is deemed by-the-numbers and lacking excitement. Despite offering opportunities for players to explore, trade, upgrade ships, and engage in naval combat, the overall sentiment suggests that Skull and Bones may struggle to maintain long-term engagement due to its shortcomings in providing a truly captivating and varied gameplay experience.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive (80-100)

Mixed (50-79)

78%

Negative (0-49)

19%

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

In analyzing the opinions of the critics regarding the overall verdict of Skull and Bones, it is evident that the game has received a mix of positive feedback. Critics such as Jeuxvideo.com, GamingBolt, and KeenGamer appreciated the captivating pirate adventure aspect of the game, highlighting stunning visuals and immersive gameplay elements. The rewarding experience and customization options were also praised by Pure Xbox and Hooked Gamers. The naval combat and exploration elements were commended for offering a compelling gameplay loop, as noted by KeenGamer, and a rich maritime experience, as pointed out by Voxel. On the downside, several critics expressed concerns about Skull and Bones. COGconnected and PlayStation Universe mentioned shortcomings in the narrative and variety of content, which could potentially lead to a lack of engagement over time. God is a Geek and Metro GameCentral highlighted issues with the story, visuals on land, and overall excitement, suggesting that the game may not fully deliver on its potential. Dexerto and GGRecon criticized the game for being underdeveloped, unpolished, and lacking in originality, ultimately resulting in a low rating and doubts about its long-term appeal. Overall, the consensus among the critics leans towards Skull and Bones having potential but falling short of expectations in various aspects. While the game offers enjoyable naval combat, customization, and a promising pirate adventure experience, it is hindered by issues such as lack of direction, bland early hours, repetitive gameplay, and technical problems. Critics like Softpedia and PCGamesN noted that the game currently falls short of being a standout title in the pirate genre, with room for improvement through patches and updates. The general sentiment suggests that Skull and Bones may appeal to players interested in naval battles and exploration but may not fully satisfy those seeking a more immersive and polished pirate gaming experience.

TL;DR

Critics have mixed feelings about Skull and Bones. Positive feedback includes praise for its captivating pirate adventure, stunning visuals, and immersive gameplay. However, concerns were raised about narrative shortcomings, lack of variety, and underdeveloped aspects, leading to doubts about its long-term appeal. While the game shows potential with enjoyable naval combat and customization, it falls short in delivering a standout pirate gaming experience due to issues like repetitive gameplay and technical problems. Overall, it may appeal to fans of naval battles but may not satisfy those seeking a more polished pirate adventure.

MONSTER

Reviews

164 reviews found

Try Hard Guides

Feb 15, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Skull and Bones offers a promising addition to the pirate gaming genre with its immersive naval combat and extensive customization options, despite some missing elements and grindy gameplay.

Read full review

KeenGamer

PlayStation 5

Feb 19, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Skull and Bones offers a compelling gameplay loop with customization and upgrading, supported by authentic pirate music and decent graphics. However, stability issues during early access may impact the overall experience.

Read full review

Voxel

PlayStation 5

Feb 16, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Skull and Bones delivers a rich maritime experience but is hindered by technical problems and lack of polish. It may polarize players due to its complexity and bugs.

Read full review

Jeuxvideo.com

Xbox Series X

Feb 16, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Skull and Bones offers a captivating pirate adventure with stunning visuals, immersive gameplay elements, rewarding experience despite some repetitive aspects, worth the investment

Read full review

Hooked Gamers

Mar 6, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Skull and Bones is praised for its basic and accessible ship combat mechanics and visually appealing open-world sailing experience. However, the lack of an engaging story and sword-fighting elements may disappoint players looking for a more immersive pirate experience.

Read full review

Areajugones

Feb 19, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Decent game that avoided potential disaster, offering a solid open-world MMO experience with room for improvement.

Read full review

TheSixthAxis

PlayStation 5

Feb 26, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Skull and Bones is described as surprisingly enjoyable despite initial skepticism, with captivating visuals, engaging gameplay, and a mix of strengths and weaknesses in its mechanics. The game may not appeal to all players, but those who enjoy naval combat and exploration may find it rewarding.

Read full review

MGG

PlayStation 5

Feb 18, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Provides a decent pirate experience with memorable battles and ship customization, but may disappoint players looking for more depth and variety.

COGconnected

PlayStation 5

Mar 5, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Skull and Bones delivers on fun combat and rewarding upgrade system, but falls short in narrative and variety of content, requiring significant effort to maintain interest over time

Read full review

Multiplayer.it

PlayStation 5

Feb 19, 2024

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Skull and Bones offers immersive navigation and combat, a rich progression system, but suffers from boredom during long journeys, missed narrative potential, and technical inconsistencies.

Read full review