Assassin's Creed III Remastered

The story of Assassin’s Creed III Remastered receives mixed praise, with several critics highlighting its historical depth and thematic ambition. Areajugones appreciates the exploration of pacifism and Connor Kenway’s character development, while BaziCenter lauds the dual timeline structure for adding narrative complexity, though it requires prior knowledge of the series. JeuxActu praises the dark, dramatic tone and rich historical references, noting themes of independence and family. Multiplayer.it commends the cinematic quality, balancing adventure with meticulous historical reconstruction, and XGN emphasizes the story’s length and depth, including the added content from Assassin’s Creed Liberation. These reviews underscore the game’s strengths in world-building and its attempt to weave personal and historical narratives, particularly through characters like Haytham Kenway and the inclusion of DLCs that expand the lore. However, critics widely criticize the story’s execution, particularly Connor Kenway’s underdeveloped character and narrative pacing issues. Areajugones and Atomix both note that Connor lacks the depth of Ezio Auditore, while Daily Star condemns the prologue as excessively long and tedious. Gaming Nexus and Push Square highlight weak writing, with Templars portrayed as comically evil and Connor’s motivations feeling obligatory. SpazioGames criticizes the abrupt ending and stretched storytelling, while The Digital Fix calls Desmond Miles’ modern-day storyline “terrible” and disjointed. Many reviewers, including IGN Spain and Vgames, point to a slow start, repetitive missions, and unresolved plot threads that undermine emotional engagement. Even positive assessments like Hobby Consolas acknowledge Connor’s lack of memorability compared to other characters, reflecting broader concerns about the narrative’s uneven execution. Overall, critics agree that Assassin’s Creed III Remastered is a flawed but historically ambitious entry in the series. While its dual timelines and historical context are praised by outlets like BaziCenter and XGN, the story’s weaknesses—particularly Connor’s unengaging character and pacing issues—are consistently highlighted. Reviews from Atomix, Gaming Nexus, and The Digital Fix emphasize that the narrative struggles to match the emotional depth of earlier games, despite efforts to expand the lore through DLCs. Though some praise its thematic richness and cinematic elements (e.g., Multiplayer.it, JeuxActu), the consensus leans toward it being a missed opportunity for deeper character exploration and cohesive storytelling. The game’s legacy remains divided, with its historical ambition overshadowed by narrative shortcomings that leave many critics disappointed.

The gameplay of Assassin’s Creed III Remastered receives praise for its foundational innovations and nostalgic charm, despite its age. Critics highlight improvements like naval battles, which are consistently noted as engaging and a standout feature (Gaming Nexus, Push Square). The remaster also introduces refined stealth mechanics, such as hiding in vegetation, double executions, and improved enemy visibility (Atomix, IGN Spain), while elements like parkour and wilderness traversal are celebrated for their creativity (Areajugones, BaziCenter). Additional features like weapon crafting, mini-map indicators, and the inclusion of Assassin’s Creed Liberation (SpazioGames) add variety. The remaster’s focus on vertical exploration and expanded content—such as hunting systems and homestead missions—enhances replayability (Push Square, Pure Nintendo), with some critics noting that these changes make the experience more tolerable than the original. However, the gameplay is frequently criticized for its outdated mechanics and repetitive design. Combat systems are repeatedly described as sluggish, reliant on reflexes, and lacking depth, with many reviewers pointing to unpolished elements like clunky AI, weak collision detection, and repetitive attack-counter-attack loops (Atomix, Vgames, The Digital Fix). Parkour controls are also criticized for feeling inconsistent, particularly on platforms like the Nintendo Switch, where motion controls and HD rumble fail to elevate the experience (Nintendo Life). Issues with mission design—such as filler content, linear progression, and unbalanced difficulty—are common complaints (Cubed3, FNintendo), while the absence of modern systems like skill trees or dynamic enemy behavior is seen as a step back (TrueAchievements, Vandal). Even positive updates, like stealth improvements, are often deemed insufficient to mask the game’s dated core mechanics. Overall, critics agree that Assassin’s Creed III Remastered is a mixed bag, balancing nostalgic charm with outdated systems. While innovations like naval combat and refined stealth mechanics (Areajugones, IGN Spain) and DLC additions (PlayStation LifeStyle) are appreciated, the gameplay feels constrained by its 2012-era design, struggling to compete with later entries in the series (BaziCenter, Screen Rant). The remaster’s improvements—such as better UI, motion controls on Switch, and expanded content—are seen as surface-level fixes rather than transformative upgrades. For fans of the original, it offers a nostalgic but imperfect experience, while newer players may find its mechanics frustratingly archaic. As IGN Italia and Vgames note, the game’s heart remains in its exploration and storytelling, but its gameplay feels like a relic of an earlier era.

The majority of reviewers praise the graphical enhancements in Assassin's Creed III Remastered, highlighting significant improvements in lighting, textures, resolution, and environmental details. Areajugones emphasizes the immersive depiction of 18th-century settings through better lighting and character models, while BaziCenter notes 4K/HDR support and improved textures that elevate the game’s world-building. Multiplayer.it and Push Square commend the physics-based lighting, seasonal changes, and atmospheric elements like dramatic landscapes, which enhance the visual spectacle. IGN Italia and MondoXbox also applaud the remaster’s ability to create a more immersive experience through enhanced reflections, ambient details, and environmental variety, particularly in cities like Boston and New York. These upgrades make the game feel fresh, even if they don’t fully modernize its aesthetic. However, several critics point out persistent flaws that undermine the visual improvements. Daily Star criticizes the character models as worse than the 2012 version, while The Digital Fix and Vgames note lifeless, unrealistic faces and glitches like "wax museum" appearances. Gaming Nexus and Hobby Consolas highlight aging animations and repetitive environments, such as snowy hills with low detail, which detract from immersion. Technical issues are also prevalent: BaziCenter mentions texture loading delays, while Cubed3 and Nintendo Life criticize the Switch version for poor resolution, object pop-in, and outdated visuals. Critics like Generación Xbox and SomosXbox point to graphical glitches, such as clipping and inconsistent lighting, which disrupt the experience. Even on higher-end platforms, issues like "invisible walls" (TheXboxHub) and "unrealistic textures" (Vgames) persist, revealing the game’s technical limitations. Overall, the consensus is that Assassin’s Creed III Remastered offers a worthwhile graphical upgrade for fans of the original, but it falls short of modern standards. While reviewers like Areajugones and MondoXbox celebrate its enhanced visuals as a "major improvement," others like Gaming Nexus and IGN Spain acknowledge that the remaster still lags behind newer titles in terms of polish and innovation. The mixed reception reflects platform-specific disparities: PS4/Xbox One versions receive more positive feedback for their 4K/HDR support and environmental details, whereas the Switch version faces harsher criticism for its technical shortcomings. Despite these flaws, many agree that the remaster successfully revitalizes the game’s aesthetic appeal, even if it cannot fully erase its age or match the visual ambition of later Assassin’s Creed entries.

The sound design and music of Assassin’s Creed III Remastered received mixed but generally positive feedback, with several critics highlighting its strengths. BaziCenter praised the soundtrack for its “revolutionary and patriotic themes,” which effectively enhance the game’s atmosphere, while Multiplayer.it noted that the music adapts well to different gameplay phases. Vandal specifically lauded Lorne Balfe’s score, calling it one of the best main themes in the series, and acknowledged the Spanish voice acting as “meritorio” (meritorious). TheXboxHub described the soundtrack as “pretty good, if not entirely original,” indicating a broadly favorable reception for the musical elements. These reviews suggest that the music successfully complements the game’s narrative and setting, even if it lacks groundbreaking innovation. However, several critics pointed to significant shortcomings in sound design, particularly on the Nintendo Switch. FNintendo and Nintendo Life criticized the audio quality for a “significant decline” due to storage limitations, citing reduced fidelity and crackling sounds during saves and transitions. NintendoWorldReport and Vooks echoed these concerns, noting persistent audio glitches during cutscenes and mission starts, with Vooks attributing this to Ubisoft’s compromises for smaller cartridge sizes. BaziCenter also mentioned that the sound design “lacks modern polish” and has inconsistencies in audio quality, while Multiplayer.it described sound effects as “average but functional.” These issues highlight technical limitations, especially on Switch, which detract from the immersive experience. The overall consensus among critics is that Assassin’s Creed III Remastered’s soundtrack remains a strong suit, with its thematic depth and composer-driven excellence standing out. However, the remaster’s sound design suffers from platform-specific flaws, particularly on the Nintendo Switch, where audio quality and stability are compromised. While BaziCenter and Vandal acknowledged the music’s strengths despite technical issues, others like FNintendo and Nintendo Life emphasized that these problems significantly impact the experience. The mixed reception reflects a balance between the game’s musical achievements and its technical shortcomings, with the latter being more pronounced on certain platforms. Ultimately, the remaster retains its auditory charm but struggles to meet modern standards in sound design across all versions.

The voice acting in Assassin’s Creed III Remastered receives mixed but notable praise, particularly for specific performances and localization efforts. Critics like Multiplayer.it highlight the Italian voice work as well-performed and emotionally resonant, while Stevivor commends John De Lancie’s charismatic portrayal of Haytham Kenway, noting his ability to elevate a flawed character. TheXboxHub praises the overall strength and entertainment value of the voice acting, emphasizing its contribution to an enjoyable experience. Additionally, Generación Xbox and Pure Nintendo celebrate the Spanish localization as a positive accessibility feature, with the latter calling the voice acting “superb” for enhancing storytelling in both main and side narratives. These positives suggest that while not universally flawless, certain aspects of the audio design were well-executed and impactful. However, several critics point to significant shortcomings in the voice acting, particularly in terms of consistency and technical quality. BaziCenter criticizes the overall performance as “subpar,” citing a failure to convey emotional intensity despite improved character rigging, while The Digital Fix describes the audio as “painful” with “laughable lip syncing.” Hobby Consolas and SomosXbox both highlight issues with Luis Tosar’s portrayal of George Washington, calling it underwhelming or inconsistent with the narrative. Vandal notes uneven quality in the Spanish voice acting, describing it as “meritorio” (meritorious) but plagued by “altibajos” (ups and downs). These critiques underscore a lack of uniformity, with some performances falling short of modern standards and detracting from immersion. The overall consensus among critics is mixed, reflecting both appreciation for standout moments and frustration with persistent flaws. While strong performances by individual actors like De Lancie and the quality of localization efforts are celebrated, the voice acting as a whole faces criticism for technical shortcomings, emotional underdelivery, and inconsistencies in character portrayal. BaziCenter and The Digital Fix represent the harshest critiques, whereas Multiplayer.it, Stevivor, and Pure Nintendo offer more balanced or positive assessments. This divergence suggests that while Assassin’s Creed III Remastered retains some voice acting strengths, its audio design fails to fully meet expectations for a remastered title, leaving room for improvement in future iterations.

The technical performance of Assassin’s Creed III Remastered varies across platforms, with some positives noted by reviewers. On PS4, Atomix praised the stable 30 FPS and improved stability compared to the original, while Push Square highlighted a polished experience without explicit technical issues. IGN Italia and We Got This Covered acknowledged smooth gameplay despite minor glitches like ragdoll errors, and Multiplayer.it emphasized enhanced optimization. For Xbox One, SomosXbox noted stable 30 FPS on Xbox One X, and TheXboxHub praised the game’s overall smoothness, though it mentioned frame rate dips during intense scenes. On Nintendo Switch, Pure Nintendo observed a stable experience without frame-rate issues, while GamePro Germany highlighted consistent 30 FPS in most scenarios. Meanwhile, PC reviewers like Wccftech acknowledged visual upgrades despite bugs, and The Games Machine noted some graphical problems but praised the remaster’s efforts. However, technical shortcomings were widespread across platforms. On PS4, BaziCenter criticized texture loading delays and physics issues, while JeuxActu highlighted unstable frame rates and poor optimization. The Digital Fix and Vgames pointed to persistent glitches like characters falling through scenery and terrain errors in snowy regions, and XGN noted choppy cutscenes and a weak frame rate. For Xbox One, Generación Xbox criticized graphical bugs and mission progression issues, while Stevivor mentioned flawed traversal mechanics. On Nintendo Switch, Cubed3 and FNintendo described subpar performance with frame-rate drops and collision problems, and Nintendo Life called out severe instability, including stuttering in docked mode. PC reviewers like Wccftech and The Games Machine cited outdated HUD elements and graphical glitches, underscoring the remaster’s failure to meet modern standards. Overall, critics agreed that Assassin’s Creed III Remastered is a mixed bag of technical improvements and lingering flaws. While PS4 and Xbox One versions saw notable stability and optimization gains—such as Atomix’s 30 FPS consistency and SomosXbox’s UI refinements—the Switch version faced significant challenges, with Pure Nintendo’s rare praise for smoothness contrasted by Nintendo Life’s harsh criticism of its technical limitations. PC performance was similarly inconsistent, with Wccftech and The Games Machine highlighting unresolved issues despite visual upgrades. Despite some positives, the consensus is that the remaster fails to fully modernize the game, with aging engine constraints and unresolved bugs—such as those noted by The Digital Fix and Vgames—diminishing its appeal. While it remains a nostalgic experience for fans, its technical shortcomings across platforms suggest it falls short of expectations for a modernized release.

The reviewers generally acknowledge that Assassin’s Creed III Remastered offers a substantial amount of content that enhances its replayability, particularly through the inclusion of DLCs, side missions, and the integration of Assassin’s Creed III: Liberation Remastered. Critics like Hobby Consolas highlight the game’s 20+ hours of main story plus side content, while XGN emphasizes extensive side missions, exploration, and bonus scenarios that provide engagement even on a second playthrough. The remaster also benefits from varied activities such as naval combat, hunting, and collectibles, which Gaming Nexus and Push Square note add diversity to the experience. Additionally, IGN Italia and We Got This Covered argue that the complete package of DLCs and improved visuals makes it worth revisiting for newcomers or fans seeking a nostalgic trip. The inclusion of Liberation is frequently cited as a key draw, with JeuxActu and Multiplayer.it pointing to its role in extending gameplay hours and enriching the overall experience. However, many critics express concerns about the game’s outdated mechanics and repetitive elements that limit its long-term appeal. Areajugones and BaziCenter note that the original’s combat system feels stale, while Gaming Nexus and TheXboxHub criticize weak storytelling and a lack of fresh content for returning players. The remaster’s inability to address these flaws is seen as a major drawback, with Wccftech and Vgames suggesting that aging mechanics and unresolved issues make it unappealing for veterans. TrueAchievements also highlights the tedious grind for 100% completion, despite generous rewards, while FNintendo and Screen Rant argue that technical flaws and an unengaging narrative diminish replayability. These critiques suggest that while the game has enough content to justify a single playthrough, its dated design and lack of innovation hinder sustained interest. Overall, the consensus among critics is mixed but leans toward viewing Assassin’s Creed III Remastered as a worthwhile experience for newcomers or fans of the series who missed the original, rather than a must-play for veterans. Hobby Consolas and XGN emphasize its value through extensive content and multiple playthroughs, while IGN Italia and We Got This Covered frame it as a solid revisit for those unfamiliar with the game. However, many reviewers, including Gaming Nexus, BaziCenter, and Wccftech, argue that the lack of meaningful improvements and repetitive gameplay make it less compelling for returning players. The inclusion of DLCs and Liberation is widely seen as a positive, but its impact on replayability is limited by the core game’s shortcomings. Ultimately, the remaster strikes a balance between nostalgia-driven appeal and modern expectations, with its replay value largely dependent on the player’s familiarity with the original and their tolerance for outdated mechanics.