Search for games

Type three or more characters to start searching

About

Navigation

Home

Games

Links

Playstation

Twitch

MONSTER

ADR1FT

Name: Comprehensive Review and Analysis of ADR1FT
Item: ADR1FT
Author: MonsterCritic Editorial Team

2016

GenresVirtual Reality, Adventure, Indie, Action, Science Fiction and Futuristic, Simulation, Puzzle and Logic, Single Player, First Person Perspective

AvailableMar 28, 2016

PlatformPlayStation 4, PC

DeveloperThree One Zero

Overview

Adr1ft is an immersive First Person Experience (FPX) that tells the story of an astronaut in peril. Floating silently amongst the wreckage of a destroyed space station with no memory and a severely damaged EVA suit slowly leaking oxygen, the only survivor struggles to determine the cause of the catastrophic event that took the lives of everyone on board. The player fights to stay alive by exploring the wreckage for precious resources, and overcomes the challenges of an unforgiving environment to repair the damaged EEV and safely return home.

Elsewhere

7.1

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

ADR1FT’s atmospheric storytelling dazzles with eerie isolation and environmental depth, but its fragmented, shallow narrative leaves players adrift in unanswered mysteries, prioritizing mood over meaningful character or closure.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

15%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

65%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

21%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

The story of ADR1FT receives praise for its atmospheric storytelling and creative use of environmental narrative elements. Critics like Push Square highlight how audio logs and emails humanize the environment, exploring themes of loneliness and mental instability among the crew, while Hobby Consolas notes the strong emphasis on atmosphere and mystery. Eurogamer Italy acknowledges the game’s focus on uncovering the fate of the Northstar IV crew through fragmented messages, and Forbes commends its immersive atmosphere, describing it as a poignant experience that blends cinematic elements with player agency. The narrative’s reliance on environmental storytelling and sparse dialogue is seen as effective in creating tension and curiosity, particularly in conveying the protagonist’s isolation and the station’s tragic history. However, the story faces widespread criticism for its lack of depth, unresolved mysteries, and underdeveloped characters. Areajugones and GameCritics describe the narrative as shallow, with generic character motivations and a failure to fully explore the disaster’s causes or the crew’s backstories. Metro GameCentral and Arcade Sushi criticize the audio logs as unengaging and repetitive, while Gaming Age and PC Games point out that the story feels detached from gameplay mechanics and lacks emotional resonance. The central mystery remains ambiguous, with DarkStation noting that only one character’s motivation is compelling, and GameSpew highlighting a weak finale that fails to deliver on its potential. Many critics also argue that the fragmented narrative prioritizes atmosphere over meaningful character development, leaving players disconnected from the crew’s struggles. Overall, the consensus among critics is that ADR1FT’s story excels in creating an immersive, atmospheric experience but falls short in delivering a cohesive or emotionally engaging narrative. While Polygon and IGN acknowledge the game’s strengths in environmental storytelling and voice acting, they also note its vague execution and unresolved plot threads. The narrative’s reliance on fragmented logs and emails is seen as both a creative choice and a limitation, with some critics like Digital Chumps appreciating the urgency of oxygen management and survival mechanics, while others, such as Examiner, find it repetitive and underexplored compared to similar works. Despite mixed reactions, most agree that ADR1FT’s story is more effective as a backdrop for its gameplay than as a standalone narrative, leaving players with a sense of mystery but little closure.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

ADR1FT's innovative zero-gravity mechanics and oxygen-driven tension offer immersive thrills, but repetitive tasks, clunky controls, and underdeveloped exploration leave it feeling stale and unsatisfying.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

65%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

26%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

The gameplay of ADR1FT is praised for its unique mechanics and immersive design, particularly its zero-gravity movement and oxygen-based propulsion system. Critics like Areajugones highlight the realism of controls, noting their complexity but also their learnability through a repeatable tutorial. Eurogamer Italy and Impulsegamer commend the innovative use of oxygen as a core mechanic, which creates tension and immersion, especially in VR. The game’s emphasis on exploration and survival, such as navigating a fractured space station and managing limited resources, is seen as a strength by reviewers like Everyeye.it, who note that controls become more intuitive over time. Additionally, Destructoid acknowledges the stress of oxygen management in VR, enhancing immersion through its unique approach to movement and resource scarcity. However, the gameplay faces significant criticism for its repetition and lack of engaging mechanics. Multiple reviewers, including GameCritics and Metro GameCentral, describe the core activities—repairing modules, collecting oxygen canisters, and navigating environments—as monotonous and poorly structured. DarkStation and Multiplayer.it criticize the oxygen system as illogical, with renewable resources undermining tension, while Gaming Age and PC Games argue that the game’s reliance on fetch missions and linear progression feels drawn out. Controls are frequently called clunky or overly sensitive, with Digitally Downloaded and Arcade Sushi noting collisions and frustrating physics. The lack of meaningful puzzles or challenges, as highlighted by GameSpew and Polygon, further diminishes the experience, leaving many critics frustrated by the game’s slow pace and repetitive tasks. The overall consensus among reviewers is mixed but leans toward disappointment, with praise for ADR1FT’s ambitious mechanics overshadowed by execution flaws. While Destructoid and Impulsegamer acknowledge the potential of its VR design and survival elements, most critics agree that the game’s reliance on repetitive tasks and underdeveloped exploration systems detracts from its impact. Eurogamer Italy and Areajugones note the initial intrigue of the zero-gravity mechanics, but many, like Polygon and PC Gamer, argue that the lack of variety and engaging content makes the experience feel formulaic. Despite some positive remarks about immersion and innovation, the majority of reviews—such as those from Metro GameCentral and Riot Pixels—conclude that ADR1FT struggles to balance its unique ideas with satisfying gameplay, resulting in a polarizing but ultimately underwhelming experience.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

ADR1FT’s visuals dazzle with immersive space vistas, eerie zero-g environments, and Unreal Engine 4 brilliance, evoking a modern 2001: A Space Odyssey—but repetitive interiors, PS4 technical flaws, and generic design undermine its polish, leaving a stark contrast between VR’s awe and console’s limitations.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

69%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

31%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

The graphics and visual design of ADR1FT are widely praised for their immersive atmospheric quality and technical execution, particularly in space environments. Critics highlight the game’s stunning depictions of Earth from orbit, with glowing cities at night and dynamic zero-gravity effects creating a sense of vastness and solitude (Digitally Downloaded, Eurogamer Italy, Push Square). The use of Unreal Engine 4 is frequently lauded for its detailed textures, lighting, and environmental storytelling, such as the eerie desolation of abandoned modules or the lush greenery of the botany lab (CGMagazine, PC Gamer). Many reviewers emphasize the game’s ability to evoke a modern reinterpretation of 2001: A Space Odyssey, with sleek, sterile interiors and breathtaking space vistas that enhance immersion (GameCritics, Arcade Sushi, IGN). The VR experience is particularly celebrated for amplifying these visuals, offering a more engaging perspective on Earth’s view and the station’s architecture (Eurogamer Italy, Impulsegamer). However, several critics point to flaws in environmental variety and technical execution. Repetitive interior designs, such as uniform corridors and reused assets in HAN-IV, are criticized for reducing visual interest over time (Areajugones, Everyeye.it, ZTGD). Some note that the PS4 version suffers from low-budget aesthetics, with limited detail compared to VR, while technical issues like slowdowns and crashes further detract from the experience (Eurogamer Italy, Metro GameCentral). Additionally, the lack of practical infrastructure in the station’s design—such as clear navigation cues or varied environments—has been cited as a drawback (EGM, PC Games). While the game excels in open-space scenes, closed interiors often feel generic, with some critics noting that VR’s immersive qualities are more impactful than the console versions’ limitations (Riot Pixels, Polygon). Despite these criticisms, the overall consensus among reviewers is that ADR1FT’s visuals and art design are a major strength, particularly for their atmospheric immersion and technical achievements. While the PS4 version faces some performance and aesthetic challenges compared to VR, the game’s depiction of space—especially Earth’s view and debris fields—is universally acclaimed (DarkStation, GameSpew, Forbes). Critics like GameCritics and ActionTrip praise its ability to balance beauty with narrative tension, while others, such as PC Gamer and Polygon, acknowledge that minor flaws in repetition or technical polish do not overshadow the game’s visual appeal. Ultimately, ADR1FT is seen as a standout example of how environmental design can enhance storytelling, even if its execution occasionally falters in certain areas.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

ADR1FT’s minimalist sound design masterfully amplifies tension through ambient cues, heartbeat motifs, and eerie silence, creating an immersive, isolating experience. While critics praise its atmospheric depth, some find repetitive music, jarring beeps, and accessibility issues detract from immersion—yet the audio remains a defining, chilling strength.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

31%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

54%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

15%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

The sound design and music of ADR1FT are widely praised for their minimalist approach and atmospheric effectiveness. Critics like Digitally Download highlight the use of breathing and heartbeat sounds as a "constant reminder" of the protagonist’s vulnerability, enhancing tension and immersion. Gaming Age and PlayStation LifeStyle commend the ambient sounds and environmental cues that amplify the game’s isolation theme, while LaPS4 notes the immersive quality of sound effects and a "notable soundtrack." The sparse audio design is seen as intentional, with Forbes emphasizing how ambient sounds and environmental cues create a strong sense of loneliness. Additionally, games(TM) praises the "rhythmic beat of your heart" and "guttural and panic-inducing sound of suffocation," which evoke anxiety and deep immersion. Even the limited musical elements, such as classical pieces like Beethoven’s Moonlight Sonata cited by Riot Pixels, are seen as effective in complementing the game’s mood without overpowering it. However, some critics find flaws in the audio implementation. Arcade Sushi criticizes the "irritating music" and excessive beeping from the oxygen system, which they argue detracts from immersion. PlayStation LifeStyle and GameSpew both note that the minimalist score, while praised for its tension-building potential, can feel grating or overly ominous without justification. PlayStation Universe mentions that the piano score is "good but insufficient," with limited use of music throughout the game. Meanwhile, Impulsegamer points out that the music becomes repetitive over time, and LaPS4 raises accessibility concerns about English voice acting and Spanish text. These criticisms suggest that while the sound design excels in creating atmosphere, certain elements—particularly the musical score and environmental sounds—can feel underdeveloped or jarring for some players. Overall, critics largely agree that ADR1FT’s sound design is a core strength, with its minimalism and focus on ambient cues effectively conveying isolation and tension. While Digitally Download, Gaming Age, and Forbes celebrate the immersive qualities of the audio, there’s a split in opinions about the musical elements. Some, like Riot Pixels and LaPS4, appreciate the subtle use of music, while others, including Arcade Sushi and GameSpew, find it lacking or distracting. Despite these differences, the consensus leans toward the sound design being a critical component of the game’s atmosphere, with its strengths in creating an unsettling, immersive experience outweighing its occasional shortcomings. The mixed reactions to the music highlight a balance between artistic intent and player reception, but the overall impact of the audio remains a standout aspect of ADR1FT.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

Voice acting in ADR1FT is technically solid but divisive: praised for atmospheric immersion and emotional beats via crew backstories and haunting audio logs, yet criticized as underwhelming, unengaging, or wasted on a lackluster narrative.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

20%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

70%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

10%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

The voice acting in ADR1FT receives mixed but generally positive praise from several reviewers, with many highlighting its atmospheric contributions and emotional depth. Digitally Downloaded commends the crew members’ “spot on” voice work, noting it enhances the game’s immersive atmosphere. PlayStation Universe applauds the crewmates’ voice acting for adding personality to their backstories, while Forbes emphasizes that deceased crew members’ voice messages provide emotional depth and humanizes their struggles. IGN and PC Gamer both acknowledge strong or well-done voice acting that enriches the game’s atmosphere, even if the narrative remains vague. Additionally, PC Games notes that English voice recordings are “well-produced” and add narrative depth, though they concede their impact is limited in scope. However, several critics find the voice acting underwhelming or lacking in engagement. Gaming Age criticizes it as “basic and unimpressive,” with audio logs failing to add depth or interest to the story. Metro GameCentral describes the dialogue as competent but notes that the content itself is “uninteresting,” undermining the potential of the voice work. PC Games also points out that while the voice acting is well-produced, it doesn’t significantly elevate the experience. Meanwhile, PlayStation Universe highlights a missed opportunity in the main character’s silence, arguing that their lack of dialogue or emotional expression detracts from the narrative. These critiques suggest that while the technical quality of the voice work is solid, its creative execution and impact on storytelling fall short for some. Overall, critics are divided but largely agree that ADR1FT’s voice acting contributes to its atmospheric tone without fully compensating for its narrative shortcomings. Positive reviews emphasize its role in enhancing immersion and emotional resonance, particularly through crew members’ backstories and the haunting presence of deceased characters. However, negative assessments point to a lack of engagement, unimpressive delivery, or missed opportunities to deepen the story. While Digitally Downloaded, Forbes, and IGN celebrate the voice acting’s strengths, others like Gaming Age and Metro GameCentral find it insufficient to elevate the experience. This mixed reception underscores that while the voice work is technically proficient, its creative impact remains a point of contention among reviewers.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

ADR1FT’s tech struggles haunt its PS4 port—crashes, stuttering, and rushed polish overshadow its ambition—while PC offers smoother VR immersion but grapples with optimization and motion sickness. Both platforms face hurdles, yet the game’s vision shines through fragmented execution.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

13%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

71%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

17%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

The technical performance of ADR1FT varies across platforms, with both positive and negative aspects highlighted by critics. On PS4, several reviewers praised its stability, noting smooth gameplay without significant frame rate drops or load time penalties. Areajugones emphasized that the PS4 version runs comparably to the PC version, while Eurogamer Italy confirmed consistent performance across platforms despite minor graphical differences. Push Square also noted stable 30fps with no major bugs, and Multiplayer.it acknowledged that VR-specific issues, though problematic, were mitigated by patches. For PC, critics like CGMagazine highlighted high system requirements and frame rate dips, but others such as Forbes praised the VR experience for its lack of latency, and IGN noted minimal motion sickness despite some VR comfort concerns. Digital Chumps and Impulsegamer also commended the game’s motion sickness mitigation features, balancing immersion with usability. However, technical issues plagued both platforms. On PS4, frequent crashes and stuttering were major complaints, with Digitally Downloaded reporting over 10 crashes in four hours, Everyeye.it citing delayed texture loading and instability, and Metro GameCentral attributing problems to a rushed port. Multiplayer.it criticized the PS4’s low frame rate (30fps with stuttering) and VR-specific challenges, while PlayStation LifeStyle and Universe highlighted control mechanics and physics flaws that disrupted immersion. For PC, CGMagazine noted optimization issues forcing players to lower graphics settings, and Polygon pointed to a confusing HUD and navigation aids as frustrating drawbacks. Slant Magazine criticized the suit’s movement mechanics as unrealistic, while JeuxActu mentioned inconsistent speed and oxygen management. Despite these issues, PC reviewers generally acknowledged fewer crashes compared to PS4, with Examiner noting that developers were addressing bugs. Overall, critics agreed that ADR1FT faced significant technical challenges, particularly on PS4, where instability, crashes, and performance hiccups overshadowed its strengths. The PS4 version’s issues, as highlighted by Digitally Downloaded, Everyeye.it, and Metro GameCentral, created a fragmented experience despite the game’s ambitious design. On PC, while optimization problems and motion sickness concerns were present, the platform generally offered a smoother experience, with Forbes and IGN praising VR performance and Digital Chumps acknowledging effective comfort features. The consensus was that ADR1FT’s technical flaws—whether on PS4 or PC—were notable but not insurmountable, with some critics like Eurogamer Italy and Push Square recognizing its potential despite these issues. Ultimately, the game’s technical execution varied by platform, reflecting broader challenges in cross-platform development and optimization.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

ADR1FT’s fleeting appeal is undermined by repetitive mechanics and a short runtime, despite unique VR elements and zero-G exploration—most critics say it’s not worth revisiting beyond its initial novelty.

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

30%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

70%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

The reviewers generally acknowledge some potential for replayability in ADR1FT, particularly through its unique mechanics and immersive elements. Areajugones highlights the tutorial’s repeatable nature and exploration aspects as possible incentives, while Destructoid notes that the game’s short runtime (4 hours) could encourage revisits for nostalgia or sharing with others. Eurogamer Italy and Multiplayer.it also mention that VR support enhances the experience, suggesting that the experimental concept might retain some appeal for players seeking a one-time immersive journey. Additionally, the game’s focus on zero-G movement and environmental discovery, as noted by Hobby Consolas, could intrigue players looking for novelty, even if the structure remains linear. However, the majority of critics emphasize significant limitations in replayability due to repetitive gameplay, short duration, and lack of engaging content. Eurogamer Italy and Everyeye.it stress that the 4–5 hour runtime and linear design make it unlikely to be revisited, while Gaming Age and Push Square criticize the monotonous tasks and absence of evolving challenges. The repetitive oxygen management mechanics, as highlighted by PC Gamer, and the formulaic mission structure, noted by Examiner, further diminish the game’s appeal for multiple playthroughs. Critics like GameCritics and Metro GameCentral also point to a lack of substantive progression or narrative depth, which fails to justify revisiting the experience beyond its initial novelty. Overall, the consensus among critics is that ADR1FT suffers from limited replayability due to its repetitive mechanics, short length, and lack of meaningful variation. While some reviewers, such as Destructoid and Eurogamer Italy, suggest minor incentives for revisiting—particularly through VR or nostalgic appeal—the overwhelming sentiment is that the game’s constraints hinder long-term engagement. The balance between exploration and repetition remains a key point of contention, with most agreeing that the experience feels stretched to fill its runtime rather than offering depth. Despite its unique setting and mechanics, ADR1FT struggles to justify multiple playthroughs without significant improvements in content or structure.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

10%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

82%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

The overall verdict on ADR1FT highlights its strengths in atmosphere, visual design, and immersive storytelling, which many critics praised as standout features. Reviewers like Areajugones and Eurogamer Italy emphasized the game’s ability to evoke a sense of solitude and tension through its hauntingly beautiful space environments, while GameCritics and Digital Chumps noted its unique mechanics and atmospheric depth. The VR experience, in particular, was lauded for enhancing immersion, with Impulsegamer calling it a "groundbreaking VR experience" and Eurogamer Italy stating that the VR version significantly elevates the game. Critics such as CGMagazine and Polygon acknowledged the compelling narrative and emotional impact, describing ADR1FT as a visually striking experiment that successfully blends tension with environmental storytelling. These positives often centered on its ambitious concept and the way it captures the mystery of space, even if it fell short in other areas. However, the game faced significant criticism for its repetitive gameplay, weak narrative, and technical shortcomings. DarkStation and Metro GameCentral dismissed it as an "underwhelming walking simulator" with poor mechanics and a lack of engagement, while Multiplayer.it and PC Games highlighted issues like instability, unfulfilled potential, and a short runtime that failed to justify its price. Critics like EGM and Game Debate criticized the gameplay for being tedious and lacking innovation, with EGM calling it a "VR demo prioritizing technology over substance." The narrative was also frequently panned as detached or underdeveloped, with Everyeye.it and Hobby Consolas noting repetitive design and emotional detachment. Even the VR version, while praised by some, couldn’t fully compensate for these flaws, as IGN and PC Gamer pointed out that repetitive mechanics undermined its potential. These criticisms often revolved around a disconnect between the game’s ambitious vision and its execution. The overall consensus among critics is mixed but leans toward acknowledging ADR1FT as an ambitious, if flawed, experience. While many praised its atmospheric strengths and VR potential—particularly from reviewers like Impulsegamer and Eurogamer Italy—the game’s repetitive gameplay, weak narrative, and technical issues created a polarizing reception. Critics like Areajugones and GameSpew saw it as a promising precursor to future space survival games, while others, such as DarkStation and Metro GameCentral, found it unsatisfying despite its visual merits. The divide often hinged on platform and VR compatibility, with PC reviewers (especially those using VR) offering more favorable assessments than PS4-focused critics. Ultimately, ADR1FT is viewed as a niche experience that excels in creating an immersive space atmosphere but struggles to sustain engagement beyond its initial charm, leaving it as a bold but imperfect experiment in survival gaming.

TL;DR

ADR1FT dazzles with hauntingly beautiful space atmospheres and groundbreaking VR immersion, but its repetitive gameplay, underdeveloped narrative, and technical flaws leave it as a polarizing, flawed experiment—bold in vision yet unsustainable beyond its initial charm.

MONSTER

Reviews

73 reviews found

Digital Chumps

Jun 12, 2016

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

ADR1FT is a concise, immersive VR experience that blends intensity with relaxation. It offers a unique space exploration narrative with solid mechanics, though its short runtime and lack of replay features may limit long-term appeal.

Read full review

Forbes

Mar 28, 2016

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

ADR1FT is a special, immersive experience with strong storytelling and visuals, though it suffers from gameplay repetition. It is recommended for its emotional impact and innovative VR design, despite being slightly flawed.

Read full review

Destructoid

Mar 28, 2016

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review concludes positively

Read full review

Impulsegamer

Nov 13, 2016

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

ADR1FT is praised as a groundbreaking VR experience that effectively uses the medium to immerse players in space survival. While short and with some technical limitations, it delivers a compelling narrative and challenging gameplay, making it a worthwhile purchase for VR enthusiasts.

Read full review

GameSpew

Apr 3, 2016

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Adr1ft is praised for its unique perspective, stunning visuals, and atmospheric storytelling, despite repetitive gameplay and technical limitations. It appeals to players seeking a slower-paced, exploration-focused experience.

Read full review

Similar Games

Games you might also enjoy

Deliver Us The Moon

2019

We Happy Few

2018

Scorn

2022

Star Trek: Bridge Crew

2017

EVERSPACE

2016

The Solus Project

2016

The Forest

2018

Miner Wars 2081

2012

JANITOR BLEEDS

2022

BONEWORKS

2019

A Rogue Escape

2021

Claire de Lune

2021

Rhythm of the Universe: Ionia

2021

The Tale of Onogoro

2022

TAURONOS

2017

Grey Skies: A War of the Worlds Story

2020

Eye of the Temple

2021

Titan Chaser

2021

Volcanoids

2019

No Man's Sky

2016

Popular Right Now

Trending games the community is playing

Battlefield 6

2025

Ghost of Yotei

2025

The Outer Worlds 2

2025

Ninja Gaiden 4

2025

Cronos: The New Dawn

2025

Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater

2025

Mafia: The Old Country

2025

WUCHANG: Fallen Feathers

2025

Call of Duty: Black Ops 7

2025

Little Nightmares III

2025

Silent Hill f

2025

Shinobi: Art of Vengeance

2025

Sonic Racing: CrossWorlds

2025

EA Sports FC 26

2025

FINAL FANTASY TACTICS - The Ivalice Chronicles

2025

Recently Reviewed

Games with full Monster Scorecards

Total Chaos

2025

SkateBIRD

2021

Destiny 2: The Edge of Fate

2025

Super Robot Wars Y

2025

Strange Antiquities

2025

Terminator 2D: NO FATE

2025

A Pizza Delivery

2025

Divinity: Original Sin II - Definitive Edition

2018

Metroid Prime 4: Beyond

2025

SUPERHOT VR

2016

Project Motor Racing

2025

New Super Lucky's Tale

2019

Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag

2013

ISLANDERS: New Shores

2025

A.I.L.A

2025

Bubble Bobble 4 Friends

2020

MADO MONOGATARI: Fia and the Wondrous Academy

2025

Tails of Iron

2021

Aven Colony

2017

Sacred 2 Remaster

2025

Links

Playstation

Twitch

MONSTER

ADR1FT

2016

GenresVirtual Reality, Adventure, Indie, Action, Science Fiction and Futuristic, Simulation, Puzzle and Logic, Single Player, First Person Perspective

AvailableMar 28, 2016

PlatformPlayStation 4, PC

DeveloperThree One Zero

Overview

Elsewhere

7.1

Game analysis

Monster Scorecard

EXPAND ALL

Story and Narrative

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR STORY

Story Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

15%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

65%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

21%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the story and narrative.

TL;DR

story and narrative

Gameplay Mechanics

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR GAMEPLAY

Gameplay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

65%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

26%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the gameplay mechanics.

TL;DR

gameplay mechanics

Graphics and Visual Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VISUALS

Visual Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

69%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

31%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the graphics and visual design.

TL;DR

graphics and visual design

Music and Sound Design

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR SOUND DESIGN

Sound Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

31%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

54%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

15%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the music and sound design.

TL;DR

music and sound design

Voice Acting

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR VOICE ACTING

Acting Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

20%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

70%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

10%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the voice acting.

TL;DR

voice acting

Technical Performance

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE

Tech Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

13%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

71%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

17%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the technical performance.

TL;DR

technical performance

Replay Value

Expand for full analysis

TL;DR

SCORE DISTRIBUTION FOR REPLAY VALUE

Replay Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

30%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

70%

Based on analyzing reviews that specifically scored or critiqued the replay value.

TL;DR

replay value

Overall Verdict

MONSTER

OVERALL SCORE DISTRIBUTION

Monster Score

Positive Reviews (80-100)

10%

Mixed Reviews (50-79)

82%

Negative Reviews (0-49)

Based on analyzing all available reviews that scored and critiqued the game.

TL;DR

MONSTER

Reviews

73 reviews found

Digital Chumps

Jun 12, 2016

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Forbes

Mar 28, 2016

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Destructoid

Mar 28, 2016

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

The review concludes positively

Read full review

Impulsegamer

Nov 13, 2016

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

GameSpew

Apr 3, 2016

AI-generated summary • May contain inaccuracies • See full review for precise details

Read full review

Similar Games

Games you might also enjoy

Deliver Us The Moon

2019

We Happy Few

2018

Scorn

2022

Star Trek: Bridge Crew

2017

EVERSPACE

2016

The Solus Project

2016

The Forest

2018

Miner Wars 2081

2012

JANITOR BLEEDS

2022

BONEWORKS

2019

A Rogue Escape

2021

Claire de Lune

2021

Rhythm of the Universe: Ionia

2021

The Tale of Onogoro

2022

TAURONOS

2017

Grey Skies: A War of the Worlds Story

2020

Eye of the Temple

2021

Titan Chaser

2021

Volcanoids

2019

No Man's Sky

2016

Popular Right Now

Trending games the community is playing

Battlefield 6

2025

Ghost of Yotei

2025

The Outer Worlds 2

2025

Ninja Gaiden 4

2025

Cronos: The New Dawn

2025

Metal Gear Solid Delta: Snake Eater

2025

Mafia: The Old Country

2025

WUCHANG: Fallen Feathers

2025

Call of Duty: Black Ops 7

2025

Little Nightmares III

2025

Silent Hill f

2025

Shinobi: Art of Vengeance

2025

Sonic Racing: CrossWorlds

2025

EA Sports FC 26

2025

FINAL FANTASY TACTICS - The Ivalice Chronicles

2025

Recently Reviewed

Games with full Monster Scorecards

Total Chaos

2025

SkateBIRD

2021

Destiny 2: The Edge of Fate

2025

Super Robot Wars Y

2025

Strange Antiquities

2025

Terminator 2D: NO FATE

2025

A Pizza Delivery

2025

Divinity: Original Sin II - Definitive Edition

2018

Metroid Prime 4: Beyond

2025

SUPERHOT VR

2016

Project Motor Racing

2025

New Super Lucky's Tale

2019

Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag

2013

ISLANDERS: New Shores

2025

A.I.L.A

2025

Bubble Bobble 4 Friends

2020

MADO MONOGATARI: Fia and the Wondrous Academy

2025

Tails of Iron

2021

Aven Colony

2017

Sacred 2 Remaster

2025